What's new
  • As of today ICMag has his own Discord server. In this Discord server you can chat, talk with eachother, listen to music, share stories and pictures...and much more. Join now and let's grow together! Join ICMag Discord here! More details in this thread here: here.

The 2020 Presidential Election

Status
Not open for further replies.

White Beard

Active member
It occurs to me that the New World importation of Africans FOR ENSLAVEMENT may have colored the American experience in ways that Britain didn’t get. Britain have for generations depended on the *virtual* enslavement of the poor bastards dumb enough to be born on some lordling’s estate, so slavery in Britain was more “genteel” and of course, all-white.

We spent generations seeing brown people and thinking ‘slaves’, but in the New Britain, you can’t tell who’s emancipated from the old servitude just by looking, but you *can* tell who isn’t white. They’re all ‘citizens of the Empire/Commonwealth’ so by British law they have the right to be there(?)...but they’re also chickens that have come ‘home’ to roost, as we say here.

All those years of kicking the shit out of other countries, stealing their stuff and enslaving their people did a great job of wrecking those countries. So the time and effort y’all put into being imperial world-owning assholes doesn’t want to be turned to making amends of any decent sort to those who endured the kickings; instead you get Nigel Farrago, UKIP, BREXIT, and Mosley’s leftovers.

It leave significant sectors of both nations *bothered* by so many apparently not-from-here folks who insist on acting like it’s *their* free country, too.
(
The problem is not their presence, or even their ideology unless their ideology sets them against public order and the well-being of the populace), but our inability to accept them as ‘us’.

The friction, sadly, seems unavoidable so far, based on the fact of it staying at a simmer here and there. Perhaps y’all have not yet passed through the ‘respectability’ phase, but we have, and one of the hard lessons is that efforts by a dominant population to police - not the behavior but the presentation - of non-dominant groups *must fail* because of recognized principles of justice at work in society at large. Basic issues of parity in citizenship, equality before the law, and fairness in the public sphere. We have been through that, may still BE going through it -it’s just another form of exclusion to be identified, worked through, and moved beyond.

While I can’t approve of animus for its own sake, I believe I understand the fear that one’s tenuous hold on the necessities and a few pleasures of life is threatened by ‘others’ who ‘don’t belong’ and ‘don’t deserve’ - when you feel like you’re just hanging on, and all the nice accents are predicting doom and worse, it’s the easiest thing in the world to see one’s multicolored neighborhood as harboring existential threats. The process of integration here was far more violent, threatening, and racially-charged than anything I’ve seen happening in Britain - and as a white child, newly-baptized, the discrepancies between the two sides made it a real horrorshow to witness. Even with these years branded into my memory, it was many years before I was able to get past the conditioning that had been instilled in me - the black citizen as terrifying threat to peace and order.

That still remains in the USA after all these years and all that has gone down, because it’s hard for people to see room and reason for change IN THEMSELVES. It’s why the continued reassertion that black lives DO matter, that black citizens are CITIZENS and not to be gunned down in the street, not to be set on fire in their homes, not to be dragged with chains by a pickup truck, not to find nooses in their desk drawers at work....

At the risk of sounding like a joke, the struggle is real, and it continues.
 

Gypsy Nirvana

Recalcitrant Reprobate -
Administrator
Veteran
I could reply to that - 'Christians/Jews don't need to strap-on explosives and become suicide bombers when they have Reaper drones with an assortment of Hellfire missiles to choose from' -

- and yes, I will agree with you that Islamists kill more of their own than others - and if you wish to see an up-to-date tally of deaths caused by Islamic terrorism: https://thereligionofpeace.com/ - quite an eye opening site I would say -


When's the last time a Christian, or a jew strapped on a suicide vest and killed a bunch of people. By the way, Islamist kill more muslims than any other group.

Thanks for exposing yourself as a terrorist supporter.
 

Ichabod Crane

Well-known member
Veteran
Lets not forget what this Iranian did and why he was killed.


The Khobar Towers. It happened in 1996 and Soleimani killed 20 and injured around 500. He had his hands in that.

Here is another good one that he was a part of. Well actually 2 but who's counting right. You might not be able to count that high. But he was part of the bombing of the embassies in Kenya and Tanzania. Yeah the ones where 224 were killed and over 4000 injured.

https://www.americanthinker.com/blo...ocities_from_the_lefts_vaunted_soleimani.html

But hey Obama didn't think he was a bad guy since he let Iran know the Israeli's were going to kill him.

https://theunionjournal.com/israel-...s-leader-soleimani-but-obama-tipped-off-iran/

At least the president that we have, Trump knows who the bad guys are. Unlike the whining dems who are complaining about offing a mass murderer.

I listed only 3 attacks Soleimani was part of and there are 244 dead and 4500 wounded. This don't include the Irainan's he killed or the us troops he killed or wounded. Or how about all the people he killed with that 5000 pound bomb he used to killed the leader of Lebanon.

The guy needed to go and Trump did it. The Dems did not and now they are made at Trump.
 

packerfan79

Active member
Veteran
I could reply to that - 'Christians/Jews don't need to strap-on explosives and become suicide bombers when they have Reaper drones with an assortment of Hellfire missiles to choose from' -

- and yes, I will agree with you that Islamists kill more of their own than others - and if you wish to see an up-to-date tally of deaths caused by Islamic terrorism: https://thereligionofpeace.com/ - quite an eye opening site I would say -

The difference is the west doesn't enforce religion on people. There are millions of free muslims, jews, Christians, Hindus, Buddhists, even Satanists who can choose their religion in the west.

Isreal is the only country in the middle east that has freedom of religion, or even freedom from religion. The left supports terrorists in the name of opposition to freedom. Quite ironic how the left supports regimes that kill any who don't follow their archaic religion. Facism at it's finest.
 

White Beard

Active member
Yes I am quite aware of the damage over the centuries the Abrahamic religions (Christianity/Judeaism/Islam) have caused - and still do to this day -

- as if we have people with white pointy hats on ICMAG - ROTFLMAO! -

- we may have the odd witch or warlock in a pointy hat - but they don't wear white generally -

- plus we are all 'mutts' methinks - Heinz 57 variety mongrels - polyhybrids begat by polyhybrids - so not much if any room for 'racial purity' around here - lol
I do know that we share a basic POV on the Abrahamics: it’s been a hard road learning to respect and accept them as people while not having them activate the programming which I still carry - or what is now my allergic response to so much of how they see the world and others. Gosh, I just can’t shut the fuck up lately....


By white pointy hats, I assume you don’t mean popes?

Being from Klan country, I feel safe in saying there’s probably several pointy hats of that variety.

Pointy hats are an oddity. Goth girls wear them shopping as Halloween approaches. They’re cute, but couldn’t witch an eyelash!

And so very true: race is the biggest hoax of them all, makes it hard for me to take the fake hoaxes seriously at all. Cultural remains of Homo sapiens have been reliably dated to as far back as 38,000 years; isolation of large gene pools could have existed for millennia, easily long enough for superficial distinctions to arise.

HOWEVER...race has been used practically within living memory to designate servant populations; after emancipation, Jim Crow kept the slave system alive in all but name for another hundred years, until the Civil Rights and Voting Rights Acts were made law, but it hasn’t been eradicated by any means. This means that “local government” in the US is frequently in at least a partial ‘ Jim Crow state’. And while we may have “stopped” most of that in some formal senses, we are still struggling to comprehend how we can include those populations now with “running the risk of destroying ourselves”. That’s the fear. The fear that actually embracing our fellow citizens will destroy us.

Whether as individuals, families, communities, whatever, we need to hash out WHY WE ARE SO AFRAID OF EACH OTHER. So afraid we do things others feel they need to stop.

Can’t do shit til then but work on it.
Happy Sunday, everybody. Sermon’s over :tiphat: :dance013:
 

Gypsy Nirvana

Recalcitrant Reprobate -
Administrator
Veteran
The first black people we saw coming into the UK as quite a substantial group was in the years after WW2 when most of the local working class white fellas had been killed/maimed in the war - so new labour was needed to keep the UK afloat and prosperous - and many thousands came from the former colonies - now called 'The British Commonwealth' -

As I grew up in the 60's - we got to know a Jamaican family who all worked for London Transport on the busses or underground trains - they were sorely needed to help get the country back on its feet - and generally much appreciated to this day -

My people were travellers on my Fathers side and Irish/Welsh coal miners - and on my Mothers - they all lost their jobs in the Great Depression down in South Wales - and joined the army - just to have a job -

I've never known anyone with a slave in the UK - if there was any slaving to do in the past - then it was the poor white people doing it - most of the new black immigrants we have had into the UK over the past 60/70 years have managed to find paid work - some could be said to be 'wage-slaves' - just like their white work comrades -



It occurs to me that the New World importation of Africans FOR ENSLAVEMENT may have colored the American experience in ways that Britain didn’t get. Britain have for generations depended on the *virtual* enslavement of the poor bastards dumb enough to be born on some lordling’s estate, so slavery in Britain was more “genteel” and of course, all-white.

We spent generations seeing brown people and thinking ‘slaves’, but in the New Britain, you can’t tell who’s emancipated from the old servitude just by looking, but you *can* tell who isn’t white. They’re all ‘citizens of the Empire/Commonwealth’ so by British law they have the right to be there(?)...but they’re also chickens that have come ‘home’ to roost, as we say here.

All those years of kicking the shit out of other countries, stealing their stuff and enslaving their people did a great job of wrecking those countries. So the time and effort y’all put into being imperial world-owning assholes doesn’t want to be turned to making amends of any decent sort to those who endured the kickings; instead you get Nigel Farrago, UKIP, BREXIT, and Mosley’s leftovers.

It leave significant sectors of both nations *bothered* by so many apparently not-from-here folks who insist on acting like it’s *their* free country, too.
(
The problem is not their presence, or even their ideology unless their ideology sets them against public order and the well-being of the populace), but our inability to accept them as ‘us’.

The friction, sadly, seems unavoidable so far, based on the fact of it staying at a simmer here and there. Perhaps y’all have not yet passed through the ‘respectability’ phase, but we have, and one of the hard lessons is that efforts by a dominant population to police - not the behavior but the presentation - of non-dominant groups *must fail* because of recognized principles of justice at work in society at large. Basic issues of parity in citizenship, equality before the law, and fairness in the public sphere. We have been through that, may still BE going through it -it’s just another form of exclusion to be identified, worked through, and moved beyond.

While I can’t approve of animus for its own sake, I believe I understand the fear that one’s tenuous hold on the necessities and a few pleasures of life is threatened by ‘others’ who ‘don’t belong’ and ‘don’t deserve’ - when you feel like you’re just hanging on, and all the nice accents are predicting doom and worse, it’s the easiest thing in the world to see one’s multicolored neighborhood as harboring existential threats. The process of integration here was far more violent, threatening, and racially-charged than anything I’ve seen happening in Britain - and as a white child, newly-baptized, the discrepancies between the two sides made it a real horrorshow to witness. Even with these years branded into my memory, it was many years before I was able to get past the conditioning that had been instilled in me - the black citizen as terrifying threat to peace and order.

That still remains in the USA after all these years and all that has gone down, because it’s hard for people to see room and reason for change IN THEMSELVES. It’s why the continued reassertion that black lives DO matter, that black citizens are CITIZENS and not to be gunned down in the street, not to be set on fire in their homes, not to be dragged with chains by a pickup truck, not to find nooses in their desk drawers at work....

At the risk of sounding like a joke, the struggle is real, and it continues.
 

'Boogieman'

Well-known member
The first black people we saw coming into the UK as quite a substantial group was in the years after WW2 when most of the local working class white fellas had been killed/maimed in the war - so new labour was needed to keep the UK afloat and prosperous - and many thousands came from the former colonies - now called 'The British Commonwealth' -

As I grew up in the 60's - we got to know a Jamaican family who all worked for London Transport on the busses or underground trains - they were sorely needed to help get the country back on its feet - and generally much appreciated to this day -

My people were travellers on my Fathers side and Irish/Welsh coal miners - and on my Mothers - they all lost their jobs in the Great Depression down in South Wales - and joined the army - just to have a job -

I've never known anyone with a slave in the UK - if there was any slaving to do in the past - then it was the poor white people doing it - most of the new black immigrants we have had into the UK over the past 60/70 years have managed to find paid work - some could be said to be 'wage-slaves' - just like their white work comrades -

What do you mean by wage slaves?
 

White Beard

Active member
The difference is the west doesn't enforce religion on people. There are millions of free muslims, jews, Christians, Hindus, Buddhists, even Satanists who can choose their religion in the west.

Isreal is the only country in the middle east that has freedom of religion, or even freedom from religion. The left supports terrorists in the name of opposition to freedom. Quite ironic how the left supports regimes that kill any who don't follow their archaic religion. Facism at it's finest.

Christianity is the water you swim in, the air that you breathe: you are blind to the constant, ever-present pressure. Doesn’t matter what you think you believe, if your were born and raised here, “Christian” has meant “normal” your whole life. For practically everybody.
 

bigtacofarmer

Well-known member
Veteran
The difference is the west doesn't enforce religion on people. There are millions of free muslims, jews, Christians, Hindus, Buddhists, even Satanists who can choose their religion in the west.

Isreal is the only country in the middle east that has freedom of religion, or even freedom from religion. The left supports terrorists in the name of opposition to freedom. Quite ironic how the left supports regimes that kill any who don't follow their archaic religion. Facism at it's finest.


On npr yesterday I heard that shithead told Iran if there is any retaliation we will take out their 3 main refineries and 54 select cultural and historical sites.


Please explain how that is not religious extremism?
 

Ichabod Crane

Well-known member
Veteran
On npr yesterday I heard that shithead told Iran if there is any retaliation we will take out their 3 main refineries and 54 select cultural and historical sites.


Please explain how that is not religious extremism?
Because if someone attacks you and you retaliate it is self defense and not extremism.

They are warned not to so now it is up to them if they get attacked or not.
 

bigtacofarmer

Well-known member
Veteran
Because if someone attacks you and you retaliate it is self defense and not extremism.

They are warned not to so now it is up to them if they get attacked or not.

Why destroy historical sites?


Are you seriously more of a dumb ape instead of a decent human?


I understand disabling a country. Even if unnecessary. I have no tolerance for my tax money carrying out terrorist acts on some of the oldest religious sites in the world.


Fuck you team shithead!
 

Hempy McNoodle

Well-known member
On npr yesterday I heard that shithead told Iran if there is any retaliation we will take out their 3 main refineries and 54 select cultural and historical sites.


Please explain how that is not religious extremism?

NPR misrepresents many things. So for the sake of clarity, it was lindsay Graham who said that we would take out their 3 most significant oil refineries and take them out of the oil business. This would be absolutely devestating to Iran.

What Trump said was a little more vague. He said,
"We have targeted 52 Iranian sites (representing the 52 American hostages taken by Iran many years ago), some at a very high level & important to Iran & the Iranian culture, and those targets, and Iran itself, WILL BE HIT VERY FAST AND VERY HARD. The USA wants no more threats!"
 

packerfan79

Active member
Veteran
Christianity is the water you swim in, the air that you breathe: you are blind to the constant, ever-present pressure. Doesn’t matter what you think you believe, if your were born and raised here, “Christian” has meant “normal” your whole life. For practically everybody.

You have no clue what normal is to me. You are free to believe what you want, unlike the people of the middle east. Your bigotry is disgusting. If you are so unhappy with the freedom you are welcome to leave, no one is forcing you to be here. Live what you preach leave America.
 

Gypsy Nirvana

Recalcitrant Reprobate -
Administrator
Veteran
wage slave
[wage slave]

NOUN
wage slaves (plural noun)
a person who is wholly dependent on income from employment, typically employment of an arduous or menial nature.

synonyms:
servant · domestic servant · domestic · drudge · maid of all work · galley slave · labourer · minion · junior · slave · underling · subordinate · inferior · hireling · vassal · serf · lackey · flunkey · factotum · stooge · hewers of wood and drawers of water · dogsbody · skivvy · peon · gofer · scullion · servitor


What do you mean by wage slaves?
 

packerfan79

Active member
Veteran
On npr yesterday I heard that shithead told Iran if there is any retaliation we will take out their 3 main refineries and 54 select cultural and historical sites.


Please explain how that is not religious extremism?

No religion involved. Iran has killed thousands of muslims, justify that.
 

Cannavore

Well-known member
Veteran
What do you mean by wage slaves?

300px-Wagecuck2.jpg
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Latest posts

Top