Greens said:Really, I don't see why it is confusing in any way to consider anandamide, which is clearly an endocannabinoid, a cannabinoid. To me and to most modern scientists studying cannabinoids, it is much more confusing to say that it is not one. I mean, how many times do I have to say that endocannabinoid means a cannabinoid produced by the animal body? However, like I said before, it is really just a matter of semantics. It just depends on how you define the word "cannabinoid". After all, "cannabinoid" is just a word made up by humans to describe certain compounds.
As for CBD, doesn't it have an affect on the CB receptors. Doesn't it actually bind to the receptor, blocking out other cannabinoids such as THC?
Maybe it is because I learned about Canabinoids before any Endocannabinoids were even known, maybe it is because when all of the Cannabinoids are listed it is normally the 66 Phytocannabinoids, I never see Anadamide or any of the Endocannabinoids listed as one of the Cannabinoids. Anyway the solution is to use Phyto or Endo before the word Cannabinoid then your meaning is clear.
As for CBD, no it does not bind to the CB1 or CB2 receptors, yes CBD can modulate uptake of THC by the receptors, but CBD does not bind like THC does. For example if 100mg of CBD is smoked 30 minutes before taking 100mg THC the THC has little to no effect at all. Take 100mg CBD and 100mg THC at the same time and the effects of THC are delayed onset, lowering of peak effects, and lengthening of the effects several hours.
But this is not caused by CBD binding to the CB receptors.
All Phytocannabinoids do not bind to the CB receptors.
-SamS