I did not bring up the UV issue to start a fight, only to point out a possible enhancement. Is it going to make a night and day difference? Probably not. Attached are picts of several grow bulbs that do not have filters. The only way we will know for sure is if someone does a side by side.
HORTILUX 315 watt
View Image
DIGILAMP SINGLE ENDED CMH 945 Watt
View Image
DIGILAMP Double Ended CMH 945 Watt. They also make a 630 Watt DE Bulb
View Image
View Image
HERE IS A NEW ONE NOT OUT YET
View Image
Because we are currently in the process of switching from HPS to CMH I have been researching rather extensively following this thread in the process. So I have, just recently, looked into all of the options you've posted. Here's what I've found FWIW:
The Hortilux bulb only comes in 4200K and is recommended for the vegetative stage.
The Digilamp SE is a conversion bulb, requires a corresponding ballast, and the bulbs cost $200
The DE CMH bulbs are at least $145 and also require a corresponding ballast.
Both of these technologies have approximately 1/3 the lifespan of SE 315 watt bulbs, get hot, and need much more clearance.
The Digilamp and Growers Choice as well as the Nanolux and other brand DE CMH can produce a more intense, better spectrum with higher UV, but are extremely cost prohibitive (except for those 99th percentile commercial operations looking for the slightest edge) and require high ceilings.
After all research, I believe that the Philips 930 gives the best bang for the buck but am sure many other 315 cmh bulbs would work great too. Growers Choice, for example.