Shiva Grows

[pipeline]

Keep passing out. I think I'm hibernating. Herb must be good.

 

[shiva82]

Not necessarily, a lot of peer reviewed is against scientific consensus
Thanks!

it has to be accepted in a consensus before being published as 'peer reviewed'. thats what it means

 

[shiva82]

Keep passing out. I think I'm hibernating. Herb must be good.

me too haha. twice today. get our tinfoil hats on pipe , we being direct targeted with emf

 

[shiva82]

if i cuddle my cat i end up passing out often . she has that effect

 

[GreenestBasterd]

me too haha. twice today. get our tinfoil hats on pipe , we being direct targeted with emf

Wear blue…

 

[GreenestBasterd]

Think that’s lasers actually, my mistake haha

 

[shiva82]

 

[shiva82]

if in a group of scientists, the majority deem truth as dogshit and dogshit is voted or favoured over truth. dogshit is concluded to be the 'science' and published as 'peer reviewed '. that is exactly how it works in a simplified analytical way

 

[GreenestBasterd]

issac newton was head of the mint , as well as alchemist . he was like the irs in america , not just an inventor.

i don't trust many of these big players in history and i won't today

beleive nothing of what i hear, and less than half of what i witness

A bit like how all the major bands and musicians had parents in high ranking military roles…

May as well chuck in the “Paul is dead” debate because there’s soo much info on it that’s it’s past getting the term “conspiracy” thrown at it.

 

[shiva82]

A bit like how all the major bands and musicians had parents in high ranking military roles…

May as well chuck in the “Paul is dead” debate because there’s soo much info on it that’s it’s past getting the term “conspiracy” thrown at it.

jim morrison is one i can think of

 

[shiva82]

A bit like how all the major bands and musicians had parents in high ranking military roles…

May as well chuck in the “Paul is dead” debate because there’s soo much info on it that’s it’s past getting the term “conspiracy” thrown at it.

you have been down the same rabbit holes as me haha. good going. not for the faint hearted

 

[goingrey]

Peer reviewed just means that a couple of guys have read the paper and given their opinion on it to the editor of the journal it has been submitted to.

 

[shiva82]

U.S. Navy Admiral George Stephen Morrison, commander of U.S. forces in the Gulf of Tonkin incident that jumpstarted America's involvement in the Vietnam War​

 

[GreenestBasterd]

Mike Williams - sage of quay?

 

[shiva82]

Peer reviewed just means that a couple of guys have read the paper and given their opinion on it to the editor of the journal it has been submitted to.

its a group of thousands of selected registered scientists in certain fields. it goes through a voting process . its all a fix

 

[shiva82]

any science anyone outside this selected group ,ever comes up with would be instantly rejected too. or publicly smeared as not being peer reviewed. therefore inferior in some kind of way. and most people accept that as fair for some reason

 

[shiva82]

rolling up some paradise cheese ibl. starting to pale a touch and ready for curing now. at this point it's still nice to smoke for a different flavour and effect to the haze hybrids

 

[goingrey]

its a group of thousands of selected registered scientists in certain fields. it goes through a voting process . its all a fix

Typically the "guys" will be accomplished scientists from the field of the paper from universities and the like and if they say something is nonsense the editor is likely to believe that. Which could result in a radically different and correct but not convincingly put ideas being dismissed and not published. In that journal... But it's not really like any kind of racket. Just not totally perfect because people are involved.

 

[shiva82]

Typically the "guys" will be accomplished scientists from the field of the paper from universities and the like and if they say something is nonsense the editor is likely to believe that. Which could result in a radically different and correct but not convincingly put ideas being dismissed and not published. In that journal... But it's not really like any kind of racket. Just not totally perfect because people are involved.

and they are on payrolls of all the major brands owned by the same groups of people

 

[shiva82]

not many people are willing to throw away a cushty well paid amd bribed lifestyle to save their poor and poorly neighbour . thankfully there is still good souls out there