W
Whatever
I generally disagree but also agree...quality is mainly based on genetics and you can spend a shitload of $ and still produce crap while someone else could spend much less and produce dank...even with the same cut. But will agree that a certain $ amount invested in the setup, spent right, will eliminate many variables which are the cause for growing crap. I mean like if you don't have adequate ventilation and temps soar then quality suffers...just an example. What about the nute program? Give 2 people the same nutes in the same setup and you can get dank or crap.C21H30O2 said:I think what should be taken away from the analysis is that quality and quantity don't come cheap.
For some reason can't quote this soooo:
"Most people(like me) don't have any reasonable way to compost and reuse soil, but even if I did, I probably wouldn't do it because relative to all of the other costs, soil is menial. Also, if you have any problems with plant diseases, bugs, pollen, mildew etc, its a lot safer to throw away old soil if not pasteurizing it."
Yeah but medium cost is part of the equation and it all adds up. I will say that with a solid organic soil program your second set of considerations are really not applicable...but just me. If you're gonna throw out your medium then don't bother with soil and go soilless.