How about some pictures of all that bud!?
Sorry you didn't meet your goal bro, but you didn't do bad by any means. I think if ya only did one or two things differently and everything else the same, you'd be much closer to your goal. Thanks for another great thread Anti :]
I will take some pics of the dried bud but I have my workspace torn apart right now while I work on the table. Plus all the buds are in 20 odd jars. I'll get to it sooner or later. I'll try to make it sooner.
I don't think cramming more plants is going to solve the problem. What I'm saying is that identical genetics under ~120w of CFL per sq. ft. yielded some dense, potent, eye-catching nugs. and that the exact same genetics yielded some fluffy, potent, much less pretty nugs under 50w of CMH per sq. ft. I went with a lot of wattage with CFL after reading about their limitations. According to theoretical math and everybody else's expecation, I should have pretty much perfect light density right now, but I have weak nugs.You could have crammed more plants in there and/or topped all of them. Just one simple change could have made all the difference.
So I think adding even more plants might up my harvest numbers, but I don't think I'll get the density I want unless I solve the underlying problem.
I've been thinking about this myself. I will definitely consider adding a middle row if I redesign the table.There were no plants in the spot where you had the most light, between the bulbs. A single row or column of plants could've been placed there.
I've read a lot about 50w/sq. ft. and DHF swears by it. But I'm at 53w per sq. ft. and I'm not getting the density I got last time.Nothing wrong with pH drop kits or your lighting. Watts are watts, but plants care not; it is more challenging to get higher GPW with smaller wattage bulbs. I don't have any hard proof to back that up, but having read thousands of threads in which many were micro, I'm pretty confident in that being true.
Of course, I think a lot of it might have to do with the medium. In my light mix (sphagnum/peat/perlite) I had to feed every two days and by the end of the grow, the plants would be a little droopy by day two. In coco, I was able to go two days without the plants EVER drooping, which led me to believe they were getting what they wanted.
Does that make sense?
I really want to get it fixed. I've always heard that HID nugs were denser than CFL nugs and I've got exactly the opposite. From identical genetics in identical containers with an identical feeding regimen.
The only things (that I am aware of) that changed were medium, light and environment. Plus, these plants got an extra week or so of veg time that my plants normally do NOT get.
So it makes sense to me to look to these things for the solution to the problem. What do you think?
Last edited: