don't want to get on an argumentative level, but why do you keep talking about the gold standard in that way? it's been explained the Ron Paul is working on a law to allow for competition on the money market.
I hope several supporters in this thread read your message.
How would competition effect so-called fiat currency? I gather that competition and voluntary might have similarities but I don't gather how this would constitute a standard of any kind, unless commodities actually back our currency.
it doesn't have to be gold. people will be free to chose what ever type currency they wish. when gold is mentioned it's about defining money that has real value. dollars will not be taken out of circulation, there will just be other forms of legal tender out there. everyone knows it's not practical to go to a gold only type currency, too easy to manipulate the gold prices. but making it legal for people to use other forms of money is not the same thing.
i do believe you will hear much more details about Ron Pauls fiscal plans from him once he actually makes it to campaigning for president. at this stage he's fighting a different fight imo. none of the others in this race have come up with even half as much detail as Ron Paul has.
btw countries seem to be buying up gold as fast as they can, the ones with cash anyway, China, India, Brazil, Turkey, Iran just to name a few, are buying as much as they can. there is a certain inevitability about fiat currencies crashing sooner or later, we know it from history, we know that the further we go down this path the worse the crash will be. much better to face up to it before that day and reverse course on our own terms, rather then be forced to do so under worse conditions, on terms imposed rather than negotiated.
Thanks for the insight. Unfortunately, there's too much what we could do when I'm particularly interested in what Paul would do. Not the knocking down mountains part but how he'd plan to clean up the mess.