I get it you got suckered four years ago and you want more than "hope for change"
My own words aren't as easy to mock. You can't point to anything 100% clear so why would you reference 100% clear? Because practical application hasn't been part of Ron Paul's face time with the country.Could you point me to any presidential candidate that is 100% clear about their future plans on the stump.
If Ron Paul can't articulate details, he has no details. Books are great if they're titled, "How My Stump Translates To Practical Application - A Look To The Past In Order To Avoid The Pitfalls We Experienced In The 18th And 19th Centuries."Dr Paul has written 10 or so books. Maybe if you would pick one of those weird things up, watch for paper cuts though...
Relevant ti what?
Are you trying to say BO and MR are not owned by GS?
Like debt is "revenue"?
If my assumption is incorrect please correct me?!?!.
Who do you think we should pick for our cause?
I trust someone who is more beholden to military personnel private donations than I do people wholly owned by TBTF corporations who destroyed our economy.No more than Ron's owned by his contributors.
Looks like Newt may finally be finished.
Going to be Mittens, Rick, and Paul to the finish line.
I trust someone who is more beholden to military personnel private donations than I do people wholly owned by TBTF corporations who destroyed our economy.
Newt, Paul and Santorum are all done...
this is the way American politics works... it has nothing to do with voting, it has to do with monitory support and propaganda...
however, they're all done in the general election when they run up against the $1,000,000,000 Obama campaign fund...
how fucked are we...? revolution much? it's time...
War is good for the economy or so says Krugman......so when it comes right down to it, you don't mind a potential 3rd world war, as long as your hollow mountains of debt can be supported a bit longer?
Ron is for opening more bases at home. Less overseas. His anti-imperialism message appears to draw in money from the military and it's supporting institutions.How's he looking with big defense contractor donations?
loltake your pick - reality isn't a reflection of your silly arguments
perfect!No more than Ron's owned by his contributors.
swing and a miss...Reference one of your multiple accounting licenses.
"Your" cause or a democratic consensus?
lol
you no likey?
must be silly
perfect!
his contributors are average citizens not multinational banking conglomerates sooo
wholly owned thereby just like BO and MR are owned by theirs
swing and a miss...
the assumption was you support santorum NOT that T-bills are debt not revenue...
T-bills are managed by the bureau of debt that is fact not assumption
our cause you know like the OP and the title and topic of the thread
or did you meander so far you forgot?
so which of the goldman employees do you think best supports our cause?
the devil we know(worst president on MJ since nixon) or the devil we dont(majic underwear)?
Ron is for opening more bases at home. Less overseas. His anti-imperialism message appears to draw in money from the military and it's supporting institutions.