Interesting you say that. Rachael Maddow reported tonight about Ron Paul's strategy and how he plans to secure delegates regardless of whether he wins them (by stationing would-be delegates at caucus sites) - a Republican party maneuver originally intended to help Mitt Romney secure more delegates. Maddow said the Paul camp expects to get all the delegates from 3 of the last 4 caucuses.
Rachael wanted to know whether her opinion was accurate so she asked Doug Weed. He's been on the show several times. He agreed with Rachael's opinion and they had a friendly conversation. Then Rachael invited Doug to come back when he could and Doug accepted.
I didn't understand how caucus complexities play out but Rachael and Doug had me understanding it if only momentarily. Pretty informative.
lady lefty limbaugh...I kinda hate rachel maddow
Interesting you say that. Rachael Maddow reported tonight about Ron Paul's strategy and how he plans to secure delegates regardless of whether he wins them (by stationing would-be delegates at caucus sites) - a Republican party maneuver originally intended to help Mitt Romney secure more delegates. Maddow said the Paul camp expects to get all the delegates from 3 of the last 4 caucuses.
Rachael wanted to know whether her opinion was accurate so she asked Doug Weed. He's been on the show several times. He agreed with Rachael's opinion and they had a friendly conversation. Then Rachael invited Doug to come back when he could and Doug accepted.
I didn't understand how caucus complexities play out but Rachael and Doug had me understanding it if only momentarily. Pretty informative.
Interesting you say that. Rachael Maddow reported tonight about Ron Paul's strategy and how he plans to secure delegates regardless of whether he wins them (by stationing would-be delegates at caucus sites) - a Republican party maneuver originally intended to help Mitt Romney secure more delegates. Maddow said the Paul camp expects to get all the delegates from 3 of the last 4 caucuses.
Rachael wanted to know whether her opinion was accurate so she asked Doug Weed. He's been on the show several times. He agreed with Rachael's opinion and they had a friendly conversation. Then Rachael invited Doug to come back when he could and Doug accepted.
I didn't understand how caucus complexities play out but Rachael and Doug had me understanding it if only momentarily. Pretty informative.
Thanks for the post. Very imformative!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5O2zP...re=uploademail
It's funny, the video pissed me off until Doug Wead came on to set things straight.
Anyone else think the party nomination process is non-sensical?
Yee Haw...That's all I can say. We are going to cause a ruckus PEACEFULLY!its a bit confusing,im still learning myself ,but 1st on the checklist is register republican,then stay after the primaries or caucus,and either ask to be a deligate or nominate a RP deligate to go to a county convention then the proccess happens again at the state level and again at the RNC.
You don't consider they were in agreement? That's the impression I got.
IMO, the only remotely disparaging thing RM stated was that a couple counties in Nevada appeared to be the justification for aspirations of victory in three of the latest 4 caucus states. If DW agreed (and he appeared to, right there on tape) RM stated a fact.
Caucuses are a little confusing. I guess Maddow might appear to be insinuating Paul's exuberance is unfounded but then she explains why it's tactically possible.
I felt that she was insuating that RP was gaming the system against the spirit of the nomination process. The way she described it made it seem to be an underhanded way of handling things. If it wasn't for the lack of interruptions and cut-offs, I'd definitely say they had opposing opinions. As it is, I'd say it's hard to tell the reporter's opinion on the subject, which I guess is the way it should be...
the way i understand how a caucus works is the voting is, in reality, a straw poll.
then registered voters stay and elect delegates. these delegates do not have to vote according to the results of the 'straw poll'.