Heres an old one, but interesting?
https://www.researchgate.net/public...uderalis_with_analysis_of_cannabinoid_content
Economic Botany, 32(4), 1978, pp. 387-394
CHEMOTAXONOMY OF CANNABIS I. CROSSBREEDING BETWEEN CANNABIS SATIVA AND C. RUDERALIS, WITH ANALYSIS OF CANNABINOID CONTENT
JOHN A. BEUTLER, ARA H. DER MARDEROSIAN
A controlled cross between Cannabis sativa L. and C. ruderalis Janisch. gave progeny intermediate in both cannabinoid content and morphology. The progeny fell into two distinct populations, those whose tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) content was closer to the C. sativa parent (greater than 60% of total cannabinoids) and those whose THC content was closer to the C. ruderalis parent (less than 40% of total cannabinoids). The lower THC group was twice as frequent as the other group. Earliness of flowering, number of flowers, and height characteristics were intermediate between the parents.
https://www.jstor.org/stable/4253980?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
https://www.researchgate.net/public...uderalis_with_analysis_of_cannabinoid_content
Economic Botany, 32(4), 1978, pp. 387-394
CHEMOTAXONOMY OF CANNABIS I. CROSSBREEDING BETWEEN CANNABIS SATIVA AND C. RUDERALIS, WITH ANALYSIS OF CANNABINOID CONTENT
JOHN A. BEUTLER, ARA H. DER MARDEROSIAN
A controlled cross between Cannabis sativa L. and C. ruderalis Janisch. gave progeny intermediate in both cannabinoid content and morphology. The progeny fell into two distinct populations, those whose tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) content was closer to the C. sativa parent (greater than 60% of total cannabinoids) and those whose THC content was closer to the C. ruderalis parent (less than 40% of total cannabinoids). The lower THC group was twice as frequent as the other group. Earliness of flowering, number of flowers, and height characteristics were intermediate between the parents.
https://www.jstor.org/stable/4253980?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
Last edited: