I do agree that environmental influences can change the ratios, I have seen the same clone do this all dependent on the environment. But to see a major terpene appear or disappear is something I have not seen like this example. I am suspect to say the least. I have seen some of the major testing labs get results that was not correct, I know because the identical clone sample was sent to half a dozen labs and they were not all the same results, some identified peaks as the wrong terpene, as well some are using HPLC to test for terpenes when all the major terpene labs use GC-FID or some GC-MS. As well some labs test time for runs is much faster then we used, we wanted clear separation between peaks we wanted the best results we could get, they are driven by maximizing the amount of samples that can be run in a day. You decide what you would want.
-SamS
-SamS
That appears to be greengenes' test result. No controls, no consistency in growing, no repeat results, could be a lot of other things. On the other hand, I would not be surprised at all if environmental influences can change the ratios to a point where one is not detected. Unless you can reproduce the results it's rather meaningless.
There is plenty of research that shows certain light recipes and intensity as well as nutrient availability heavily influence secondary metabolites production.