[FONT="]You're referring to the "Population Profile", which is a fairly pointless grouping method Phylos uses; according to it PG13 is also related to OG Kush and "berry", whatever that means.[/FONT]phylos indicates pacific g13 has a good amount of skunk commonality i guess u would say. not that really matters.
[FONT="]It doesn't mean that there actually is any genes from Sam's Skunk1 in it. And i doubt there is any sk1 genetics in G13. I think the afghanis may just be distant relatives.[/FONT]
[FONT="]https://phylos.bio/sims/sample/genotype/2g4vv0ng[/FONT]
[FONT="]
[FONT="]Phylos seem to think it's somehow valid grouping system, but thou it seems to catch the eye of many visiting their pages, it seems it only ends up confusing things if people aren't familiar of what it actually does and take it's info as face value.[/FONT]
[FONT="]To me it would better to take the whole thing out of there. It's only confusing and isn't very informative to most people[/FONT]
[FONT="]People should rather look at the [/FONT][FONT="]"Closest Genetic Relatives"[/FONT][FONT="] when looking at genetic close relatives of a sample and pay little if any attention to the "Population Profile" which actually tells very little about the real genetics used to create the sampled plant.[/FONT]
[FONT="]If you look at the close relatives, PG13 is actually related to Strawberry Cough, but even this means it's one of the closest relatives PG13 has among the Phylos samples. --it doesn't mean PG13 was used to make Strawberry Cough, thou it is possible too, it can just mean it's one of the closest samples submitted to Phylos to date; Meaning they may find closer relatives to PG13 once more samples have been gathered.[/FONT]
[FONT="]I seriously doubt there's any SK1 in G13.[/FONT]
Peace