What's new

Rapper Lil Wayne Detained In Texas Over Marijuana

kmk420kali

Freedom Fighter
Veteran
Edit: also the second amendment wasn't intended to have a bunch of American's owning guns just to own guns; it was for a specific reason. Primarily, it was to give the citizens a mean to combat a potential militant/authoritarian government.


I was going to comment, then I seen this....sounds like guns are allowed again!!:woohoo:
 

kweb1989

Member
from what i heard, lil wayne was in his tour bus in newyork and was suposivly pulled over by nypd for "smell of marijuana" and then let go because he was able to show a medical lisence from another state to account for what he had and was then released, however he supposivly ditched a handgun during his search... and charged. now police need to under stand they pulled him over for one reason, was wrong and still found a reason without thinking... if i had $250,000 in my teeth alone, not including any other jewelry, i would still prolly carry a gun too cause i aint getting my teeth jacked! lol but now this.... he gets jacked again???

Sounds like he is getting profiled intensly.... rapper or not he should be left alone like we all should... sorry for lil wayne!
 

Euphrates

Member
so.. can someone go to a med state even if not a citizen of this state, get a med card and have it be valid in the non med state that they have citizenship in.
 
I see this form going every where who cares if he has a gun charge right to bare arms get over it. Its our right if we so chose to exercise it. Guns drugs people police dealers security and much more tend to have that right. Its been a right in the us for ever and i am sorry but no one needs to take them away. You don't want them don't get them but don't judge others who do. If i was worth millions i would carry as well. But that don't make me a criminal. MJ till the late 30s was legal and now we are just about to have that right back but talking shit does not help. If you all want to bash on him that's bull shit what are you jealous. who cares if his taste of music is not the same as yours. i am sure your friends like different music than you not all but some. Just like movies not everyone like the same ones but you don't need to judge them. He got popped ok he smokes weed ok he likes guns ok whats the problem? is it that he is rich if it was anyone that one a friend of your would you be so judgmental as well. i have a friend that just got popped in Texas he likes weed and guns just not rich he got popped for weed at the border of New Mexico and Texas border patrol and k-9s so IMO we are all on here for the same reasons lets learn, communicate, share story's and be friends and quit hating on those that get busted but unite to try to stop from getting us in trouble for liking one of gods creations. and for all the haters we all have one thing in common lets have more in common.
 

zenoonez

Active member
Veteran
I agree that some people that grow marijuana would qualify and deserve the luxery of carry a firearm. I don't believe that access and ownership of guns should be a basic right applied without at least minimal legitimate restrictions. (non violent past, non psychotic, some kind of criteria).

As for marijuana encouraging violence...I don't think this need be the case at all. If you affiliate yourself with genuine people from the start, think long term instead of hunting down short term gains and exercise healthy paranoia I think you can avoid getting yourself into violent situations. If someone robs you I would say be the bigger man, realize thats part of the game and do something to rectify the situation. Rob him minus violence, do nothing, I dont know.

Edit: also the second amendment wasn't intended to have a bunch of American's owning guns just to own guns; it was for a specific reason. Primarily, it was to give the citizens a mean to combat a potential militant/authoritarian government.

Gun ownership is a right not a luxury or a privilege, a right. You do give up that right when you become a felon however I don't think that is appropriate either to be perfectly honest. Unless your crime involved undue violence I don't see why a felony conviction should strip you of such a basic right as self defense.

To think that violence is not part of the drug game is insane. You hold a valuable commodity which the police will not protect you against its theft. That means that you and your fellow man are on equal terms in the absolute sense. If he wields more force over you then either he kills you and takes your shit or you give it up. Self defense is a right. Let me tell you this. If I got jacked and I found out who it was it wouldn't be me robbing them. It would be them catching one in the face with their hand behind their backs and me tossing a throw away gun somewhere no one would find it.

As to your edit, it still does that but to think that firearms weren't thought of as self defense is crazy.

The drug game may be nice and chill where you live but people in my city will shoot you for an OZ or for 20 bucks and a cell phone like they did to some girl downtown. They shot her in the back as she was running away in her ball gown. She had just gotten out of the Christmas Ball having been introduced to society. People like that don't deserve the right to breathe. They deserve a shallow grave and a couple pieces of lead.
 

demasoni

Member
Do guns and drugs go together? . I don't hear people bitching about Willie Nelson and rifles or shotguns.


Legalization should be our focus, not some apologetics to appease a dying generation.
-further edited-
EXACTLY

I'll add in regards to guns and weed: I'm a lifetime owner of firearms and a true marksman, my safety and responsibility in proper use of a firearm is totally independent of weed possession, use, or cultivation. Whether I'm "high" or not I find myself in an infinitely unalterable state of mind regarding use of firearms. It's self evident me and many other gun+marijuana Americans are safer than much if not 50%+ of law enforcment and even military personnel in judgment regarding appropriate use of firepower. How do I compare me and firearm owners like me to these governmental standards of firepower/engagement? Our actions and demonstration of responsibility versus theirs. its self evident. Anyone can find countless occurrences of inappropriate use of force amongst LEOs and military (regardless of commands- especially you USMC, you have the right to not carry out an order that violates law theres no excuses for some of the footage I've seen... some of these "kids" didn't even need the bullshit order to waste the ordinance they were.. litterally raining lead on a town with plenty civilians around and no visual contact with target, 8-12 soldiers blind firing from building top, declaring it "suppressive fire" (BULLSHIT) in presence of camera recording. I'm a fucking civilian I know better, and I could have handled that military "engagement" (lol) and the countless others like it appropriately with minimal firepower necessary. The specific footage I'm refering two could have been handled by a single SAS officer given only a SOG, 1940s battle scarred M1 carbine, and usp just incase..(or cheat, give him a smoke and a flash);. Instead we have a fucking rooftop full of GREEN fresh oversea marines blowing several 100K of ammo (taxpayers pay for), full auto fire into public/private property of people you don't know, again no visual contact with their 2-3 ID'd targets. what a fucking joke, it doesn't even take an SAS officer thats a waste of his time, give me 4 true american farm boys, could have silenced that situation quickly, given its nature, with under 10 rounds (plenty for # of targets if you know what your doing). Engage level with target, engage CQB/CQC given that situation, jesus thats a SWAT situation in America is all that " engagement" was. BUT WAIT, I'm some pothead civilian and can't responsibly use guns. NOT.
I will use a firearm defensively if the situation dictates, but I guarantee the factors dictating the use of my firearms (like other responsible MJ+guns citizens) in general are FAR more detailed than your average LEO who uses his firearm, an officer supposedly in a "sober state" (except for his/her adrenal rush, fear, insecurity and desire for power complex, all escalating in the moment resulting in use of unnecessary force-same in military). happens every day. Your either an true citizen clinging to YOUR true values you share with your countrymen (sometimes regardless of law), or your lost.
 
He should have watched Barry Cooper's tape. Nah but they love adding charges. Thats even longer they can have him wrapped up in that corrupt ass system. But he got plenty money his family won't starve while he sits it down. I think creatively he will come out with some of his best shit. He'll be reading more and lets face it he'll have plenty of time to think.... Hold your head to all those incarcerated for something as simple as their love of a plant.. We feel ya'll pain
 
EXACTLY

I'll add in regards to guns and weed: I'm a lifetime owner of firearms and a true marksman, my safety and responsibility in proper use of a firearm is totally independent of weed possession, use, or cultivation. Whether I'm "high" or not I find myself in an infinitely unalterable state of mind regarding use of firearms. It's self evident me and many other gun+marijuana Americans are safer than much if not 50%+ of law enforcment and even military personnel in judgment regarding appropriate use of firepower. How do I compare me and firearm owners like me to these governmental standards of firepower/engagement? Our actions and demonstration of responsibility versus theirs. its self evident. Anyone can find countless occurrences of inappropriate use of force amongst LEOs and military (regardless of commands- especially you USMC, you have the right to not carry out an order that violates law theres no excuses for some of the footage I've seen... some of these "kids" didn't even need the bullshit order to waste the ordinance they were.. litterally raining lead on a town with plenty civilians around and no visual contact with target, 8-12 soldiers blind firing from building top, declaring it "suppressive fire" (BULLSHIT) in presence of camera recording. I'm a fucking civilian I know better, and I could have handled that military "engagement" (lol) and the countless others like it appropriately with minimal firepower necessary; but wait no; I'm some pothead civilian and can't responsibly use guns. NOT. I will use a firearm defensively if the situation dictates, but I guarantee the factors dictating the use of my firearms (like other responsible MJ+guns citizens) in general are FAR more detailed than your average LEO who uses his firearm, an officer supposedly in a "sober state" (except for his/her adrenal rush, fear, insecurity and desire for power complex, all escalating in the moment resulting in use of unnecessary force-same in military). happens every day. Your either an true citizen clinging to YOUR true values you share with your countrymen (sometimes regardless of law), or your lost.

One of the best post's I've read here! K+ demasoni! :xmastree::joint::respect:
 
B

Blue Dot

EXACTLY

I'll add in regards to guns and weed: I'm a lifetime owner of firearms and a true marksman, my safety and responsibility in proper use of a firearm is totally independent of weed possession, use, or cultivation.

One of the best post's I've read here! K+ demasoni! :xmastree::joint::respect:

NOPE, if a dealer or whatever is willing to use a firearm to protect his property (from theft of said cannabis) or to use that weapon to facilitate a crime then that firearm is NOT independent of cannabis.

Nobody is talking about your "marksmanship" lol we' are talking about using a weapon (firearm) to facilitate drug transactions/possession.
 
Top