what I don't get is that if 95% of the population gets their kids the vaccine, and then the 5% that choose not to vaccinate put their kids into school. then how would the unvaccinated kids get infected if all the other kids are immune cuz they got shots. and if the unvaccinated kid did get infected somehow, how would they transmit it to someone that has the vaccine? I'm no doctor but it seems like the only risk at stake is with their own kids getting sick not starting a pandemic.
-
As of today ICMag has his own Discord server. In this Discord server you can chat, talk with eachother, listen to music, share stories and pictures...and much more. Join now and let's grow together! Join ICMag Discord here! More details in this thread here: here.
Polio Vaccine?
- Thread starter trichrider
- Start date
Great question. I had the same one. So I asked a doc and here is what he said. Its about herd immuniyy. Aparently if a non vaccinated kid gets one of these diseasesit could mutate into a form that isn't covered by the vaccine and get vaccinated kids sic. Kind of like why the flue vaccine is soo ineffective. The virus mutates so quickly they don't know which strain to make the vaccine for. Also vaccines are not 100% effective so even a vaxed kid could catch something from the unvaxed kid. Also health departments and schools get xtra money for high vaccination rates.
Basically, the definition of Autism has changed, and has become much broader over the years.
Only this year, Aspergers syndrome was moved fully into the Autistic category, where previously it was just considered part of the Autistic spectrum.
Last edited:
So technically I'm just "Autistic"... Mmmkay. LOL
What a world we live in.
Keep it Clean!
HUGE-thanks for clearing that up for me, I figured it wasn't that simple. I try to live my life by the theory of, you have the right to do whatever you want, so long as it doesn't impede someone elses rights to do whatever they want. I have tried to pick holes in this theory and its really difficult[there are grey areas]. Living, breathing, being healthy is everyones right. so it seems vaccines would be a necessary, I got all of mine and I am fine. It was long long ago however. I just don't trust the government anymore so now I am all conflicted. haha given what I said above anyways. Glad I don't have any kids!
My medical insurance requires me to have a tetanus jab every five years to be covered , might want to check your small print if working in building or landscape trades.
Its easy for an adult to decide to refuse vaccines for themselves , having probably been immunised as a child and with no real further need unless travelling abroad.
But I feel choosing not to vaccinate a child is criminally stupid.
Looseing a child for any reason is traumatic , from a preventable desease would tear you apart.
How could you explain to a crippled child that you chose not to vaccinate because you thought it was a conspiracy . . .
Its easy for an adult to decide to refuse vaccines for themselves , having probably been immunised as a child and with no real further need unless travelling abroad.
But I feel choosing not to vaccinate a child is criminally stupid.
Looseing a child for any reason is traumatic , from a preventable desease would tear you apart.
How could you explain to a crippled child that you chose not to vaccinate because you thought it was a conspiracy . . .
No problem. I jusy had a kid and I have been doing a tremendous amount of research on this. I have decided to wait untill my kid is atleast 2 to start shots. I may decide to not do it at all but for now I'm just waiting till the 2 year mark. Iy seems most the damage comes from doing it too early.
Great point. Here is the dilema. I went and pulled up the stats for the rates of occurance and mortality rate for these vaccine preventable disease. If you devide the number of cases per year by the birth rate per year you get a % chance per year of an infant developing the disease. Usually these numbers are lower than the CDC stated % chance of very serius reaction. I ran the numbers for whooping cough and a few others not every vax. Pertussis is the one that the docs really warn you about. But if you look into it there were 3 deaths from pertussis in california in 2011 vs like 400, 000 births. Your kid has a better chance of being struck by lightning. But the reason your chance of getting it is low is because of herd immunity/most peiple are vaccinated.
And imagine the flip side. You take your perfectly healtjy baby in for hee 2month old dtap/hib/heb b/flu shot and she gets home, starts to develope a fever, then won't respond then starts seizing out. You call your doc and they say that's normal just give it some tylenol and go to hospital if gets worse where the proveed to do a spinal tap on your little 2 month old to figure out what's wrong. All tests come back normal then you get to try and fight witj the vers system because the shot makers have immunity from any prosicution
And imagine the flip side. You take your perfectly healtjy baby in for hee 2month old dtap/hib/heb b/flu shot and she gets home, starts to develope a fever, then won't respond then starts seizing out. You call your doc and they say that's normal just give it some tylenol and go to hospital if gets worse where the proveed to do a spinal tap on your little 2 month old to figure out what's wrong. All tests come back normal then you get to try and fight witj the vers system because the shot makers have immunity from any prosicution
Last edited:
Here is a list of personal stories. I don't know how legit it is as I didn't do the interviewing but you go read that list and tell me you don't want to vomit.
http://www.followingvaccinations.com/
http://www.followingvaccinations.com/
adults can view the evidence and decide.
cast your aspersions elsewhere.
cast your aspersions elsewhere.
A
AlterEgo860
this is just crazy reading wow. and then they wonder why so many americans don't want there kids vaccinated .. are u kidding me! Taking kids away from parents because they don want to be vaccinated ? really.
And for what its worth while my wife was in the stirrups they came in with Waiver forms for the babies flu shot and dtap shot and heb b. If you want the shot you have to sighn a liability waiver so yoi can't sue them when it fucks your kid up. If its soo safe why the waiver?
admittedly vaccines are not what they were and vaccinations had great intent...and my poll forced that direction.
but let's get back to the main thrust of the post...the cancer issue. and them allowing multiple cancer causing virus' in the vaccinations delivered late 50's to mid 60's.
seems the cia tried offing castro with cancer causing virus' that lee oswald was to deliver.
“Dr. Mary’s Monkey“, a 2007 republished production of the original book “Mary, Ferrie and the Monkey Virus” from 1995, is a story about the secret medical experiments conducted by the plotters of John F. Kennedy’s assassination in 1963 New Orleans. According to the claims of its author, Ed Haslam, who has drawn an autobiographical account of his experiences uncovering this conspiracy, a ‘super-secret’ particle accelerator which was hidden on the campus of the US Public Health Service hospital was used for a Manhattan Project-type vaccine program to counteract the cancer-causing monkey viruses in polio vaccines. The famous orthopedic surgeon Dr. Alton Ochsner, and Dr. Mary Sherman who worked beside him at Ochsner Clinic, supervised this covert operation and another headed by CIA pilot and extremist David Ferrie.
http://polioforever.wordpress.com/dr-marys-monkey/
they knew there were these dangerous virus' in the vaccinations.
this was around the same time nixon made pacts with edgar kaiser to develop he first HMO's that led to prohibition of cannabis...(couldn't let natural medicine interfere).
[youtubeif]3qpLVTbVHnU[/youtubeif]
and this is the time frame when cancer becomes a national health issue...
National Cancer Act of 1971
In 1970, the American people made clear their desire for a cure for the second-leading cause of death in the United States. President Nixon responded during his January 1971 State of the Union address: "I will also ask for an appropriation of an extra $100 million to launch an intensive campaign to find a cure for cancer, and I will ask later for whatever additional funds can effectively be used. The time has come in America when the same kind of concentrated effort that split the atom and took man to the moon should be turned toward conquering this dread disease. Let us make a total national commitment to achieve this goal."
As part of this national effort, in October 1971, the Army's Fort Detrick, Maryland, biological warfare facility was converted to a cancer research center, eventually becoming the Frederick Cancer Research and Development Center, an internationally recognized center for cancer and AIDS research.
On December 23, 1971, President Nixon followed through on his promise as he signed the National Cancer Act into law, declaring, "I hope in the years ahead we will look back on this action today as the most significant action taken during my Administration."1
The National Cancer Act (P.L. 92–218), "The War on Cancer," gave the NCI unique autonomy at NIH with special budgetary authority. The Cancer Chemotherapy National Service Center (CCNSC) increased its efforts to acquire new compounds for testing with the awarding of an acquisition and inventory contract responsible for the collection and documentation of test agents.
...
Despite the expenditure of $25 billion since the war on cancer was
declared by President Nixon in 1971, cancer rates have soared. Why?
In a recently released book, Dr. Samuel Epstein reveals evidence
implicating industrial carcinogens that permeate our environment -- in our
foods, our air, our water, our consumer products.
And he blames the National Cancer Institute (NCI) and the American Cancer
Society (ACS) -- what he calls "the cancer establishment" -- for ignoring
these causes and instead spending billions on the elusive search for a
magic bullet cure for cancer.
http://lists.essential.org/corp-focus/msg00002.html
also the proliferation of pharmacuetical formulary exceeds imagination. cancer and aids drugs are some of the most expensive to be found.
i contend that chemtrails are poisons deliberately exposing us to cause illness and generate income for HMOs and their kind.
but let's get back to the main thrust of the post...the cancer issue. and them allowing multiple cancer causing virus' in the vaccinations delivered late 50's to mid 60's.
seems the cia tried offing castro with cancer causing virus' that lee oswald was to deliver.
“Dr. Mary’s Monkey“, a 2007 republished production of the original book “Mary, Ferrie and the Monkey Virus” from 1995, is a story about the secret medical experiments conducted by the plotters of John F. Kennedy’s assassination in 1963 New Orleans. According to the claims of its author, Ed Haslam, who has drawn an autobiographical account of his experiences uncovering this conspiracy, a ‘super-secret’ particle accelerator which was hidden on the campus of the US Public Health Service hospital was used for a Manhattan Project-type vaccine program to counteract the cancer-causing monkey viruses in polio vaccines. The famous orthopedic surgeon Dr. Alton Ochsner, and Dr. Mary Sherman who worked beside him at Ochsner Clinic, supervised this covert operation and another headed by CIA pilot and extremist David Ferrie.
http://polioforever.wordpress.com/dr-marys-monkey/
they knew there were these dangerous virus' in the vaccinations.
this was around the same time nixon made pacts with edgar kaiser to develop he first HMO's that led to prohibition of cannabis...(couldn't let natural medicine interfere).
[youtubeif]3qpLVTbVHnU[/youtubeif]
and this is the time frame when cancer becomes a national health issue...
National Cancer Act of 1971
In 1970, the American people made clear their desire for a cure for the second-leading cause of death in the United States. President Nixon responded during his January 1971 State of the Union address: "I will also ask for an appropriation of an extra $100 million to launch an intensive campaign to find a cure for cancer, and I will ask later for whatever additional funds can effectively be used. The time has come in America when the same kind of concentrated effort that split the atom and took man to the moon should be turned toward conquering this dread disease. Let us make a total national commitment to achieve this goal."
As part of this national effort, in October 1971, the Army's Fort Detrick, Maryland, biological warfare facility was converted to a cancer research center, eventually becoming the Frederick Cancer Research and Development Center, an internationally recognized center for cancer and AIDS research.
On December 23, 1971, President Nixon followed through on his promise as he signed the National Cancer Act into law, declaring, "I hope in the years ahead we will look back on this action today as the most significant action taken during my Administration."1
The National Cancer Act (P.L. 92–218), "The War on Cancer," gave the NCI unique autonomy at NIH with special budgetary authority. The Cancer Chemotherapy National Service Center (CCNSC) increased its efforts to acquire new compounds for testing with the awarding of an acquisition and inventory contract responsible for the collection and documentation of test agents.
...
Despite the expenditure of $25 billion since the war on cancer was
declared by President Nixon in 1971, cancer rates have soared. Why?
In a recently released book, Dr. Samuel Epstein reveals evidence
implicating industrial carcinogens that permeate our environment -- in our
foods, our air, our water, our consumer products.
And he blames the National Cancer Institute (NCI) and the American Cancer
Society (ACS) -- what he calls "the cancer establishment" -- for ignoring
these causes and instead spending billions on the elusive search for a
magic bullet cure for cancer.
http://lists.essential.org/corp-focus/msg00002.html
also the proliferation of pharmacuetical formulary exceeds imagination. cancer and aids drugs are some of the most expensive to be found.
i contend that chemtrails are poisons deliberately exposing us to cause illness and generate income for HMOs and their kind.
Last edited:
nixon...the guy who started the war on drugs even though the report he requested stated:
"The Commission sincerely hopes that the tone of cautious restraint sounded in this Report will be perpetuated in the debate which will follow it. For those who feel we have not proceeded far enough, we are reminded of Thomas Jefferson's advice to George Washington that "Delay is preferable to error." For those who argue we have gone too far, we note Roscoe Pound's statement, "The law must be stable, but it must not stand still."
We have carefully analyzed the interrelationship between marihuana the drug, marihuana use as a behavior, and marihuana as a social problem. Recognizing the extensive degree of misinformation about marihuana as a drug, we have tried to demythologize it. Viewing the use of marihuana in its wider social context, we have tried to desymbolize it.
Considering the range of social concerns in contemporary America, marihuana does not, in our considered judgment, rank very high. We would deemphasize marihuana as a problem.
The existing social and legal policy is out of proportion to the individual and social harm engendered by the use of the drug. To replace it, we have attempted to design a suitable social policy, which we believe is fair, cautious and attuned to the social realities of our time."
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/Library/studies/nc/ncrec1_17.htm
Nixon Commission Report Advising Decriminalization of Marijuana Celebrates 30th Anniversary
Thursday, 21 March 2002
More Than 13.2 Million Americans Have Been Arrested on Pot Charges Since Congress Rejected 1972 Policy Recommendations
Washington, DC: Friday marks the 30-year-anniversary of a 1972 federal commission report advising Congress to remove criminal penalties on the possession and nonprofit distribution of marijuana. The National Commission on Marijuana and Drug Abuse (a.k.a. "the Shafer Commission"), appointed by then-President Richard Nixon, formally made its recommendation on March 22, 1972.
"Neither the marihuana user nor the drug itself can be said to constitute a danger to public safety," concluded the report's authors, led by then-Gov. Raymond Shafer of Pennsylvania. "Therefore, the Commission recommends ... [the] possession of marijuana for personal use no longer be an offense, [and that the] casual distribution of small amounts of marihuana for no remuneration, or insignificant remuneration no longer be an offense."
Despite the commission's recommendations, Nixon and Congress ignored the report. Since then, more than 13.2 million Americans have been arrested on marijuana charges, including some 735,000 in 2000 - the last year for which federal data is available.
http://norml.org/news/2002/03/21/ni...tion-of-marijuana-celebrates-30th-anniversary
Recently released transcripts of Nixon's conversations with Gov. Shafer, who chaired the 1972 pot commission, indicate that the President tried to pressure him to reject his committee's findings. "You're enough of a pro to know that for you to come out with something that would run counter to what Congress feels ... and what we're planning to do would make your commission just look bad as hell," Nixon warned in a May 26, 1971 conversation. In other conversations, Nixon linked marijuana to the downfall of civilized societies.
"The Commission sincerely hopes that the tone of cautious restraint sounded in this Report will be perpetuated in the debate which will follow it. For those who feel we have not proceeded far enough, we are reminded of Thomas Jefferson's advice to George Washington that "Delay is preferable to error." For those who argue we have gone too far, we note Roscoe Pound's statement, "The law must be stable, but it must not stand still."
We have carefully analyzed the interrelationship between marihuana the drug, marihuana use as a behavior, and marihuana as a social problem. Recognizing the extensive degree of misinformation about marihuana as a drug, we have tried to demythologize it. Viewing the use of marihuana in its wider social context, we have tried to desymbolize it.
Considering the range of social concerns in contemporary America, marihuana does not, in our considered judgment, rank very high. We would deemphasize marihuana as a problem.
The existing social and legal policy is out of proportion to the individual and social harm engendered by the use of the drug. To replace it, we have attempted to design a suitable social policy, which we believe is fair, cautious and attuned to the social realities of our time."
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/Library/studies/nc/ncrec1_17.htm
Nixon Commission Report Advising Decriminalization of Marijuana Celebrates 30th Anniversary
Thursday, 21 March 2002
More Than 13.2 Million Americans Have Been Arrested on Pot Charges Since Congress Rejected 1972 Policy Recommendations
Washington, DC: Friday marks the 30-year-anniversary of a 1972 federal commission report advising Congress to remove criminal penalties on the possession and nonprofit distribution of marijuana. The National Commission on Marijuana and Drug Abuse (a.k.a. "the Shafer Commission"), appointed by then-President Richard Nixon, formally made its recommendation on March 22, 1972.
"Neither the marihuana user nor the drug itself can be said to constitute a danger to public safety," concluded the report's authors, led by then-Gov. Raymond Shafer of Pennsylvania. "Therefore, the Commission recommends ... [the] possession of marijuana for personal use no longer be an offense, [and that the] casual distribution of small amounts of marihuana for no remuneration, or insignificant remuneration no longer be an offense."
Despite the commission's recommendations, Nixon and Congress ignored the report. Since then, more than 13.2 million Americans have been arrested on marijuana charges, including some 735,000 in 2000 - the last year for which federal data is available.
http://norml.org/news/2002/03/21/ni...tion-of-marijuana-celebrates-30th-anniversary
Recently released transcripts of Nixon's conversations with Gov. Shafer, who chaired the 1972 pot commission, indicate that the President tried to pressure him to reject his committee's findings. "You're enough of a pro to know that for you to come out with something that would run counter to what Congress feels ... and what we're planning to do would make your commission just look bad as hell," Nixon warned in a May 26, 1971 conversation. In other conversations, Nixon linked marijuana to the downfall of civilized societies.
Last edited:
the primary goal of the 13 Satanic Bloodlines is simple...500 million human-slaves working for them.
the strategy is simple...depopulation
the tactics are numerous, and can be seen if one actually stops being a zombie, and opens his eyes.
Taking into account that "they" pull the majority of the strings globally, I'm sure that their primary goal will eventually be achieved one way or another.
...it is only a question of when it happens, and not "if" it will happen.
the strategy is simple...depopulation
the tactics are numerous, and can be seen if one actually stops being a zombie, and opens his eyes.
Taking into account that "they" pull the majority of the strings globally, I'm sure that their primary goal will eventually be achieved one way or another.
...it is only a question of when it happens, and not "if" it will happen.
Geezzzz... I'm about to have my first child and this stuff is spooking the hell out of me. Of course I want to do the very best thing for her. Doctors I've talked to don't think there is a problem, but do even they really know what is in these vaccs? Just WHY does the world have to be so dishonest that EVERYTHING has to be such a damn quandry?
In what years was this 8 year span?
Ignore the FUD. If you google vaccinations, you wont get anything from a reputable source, telling you not to vaccinate. It's all new age woo like Natural news. They don't want you to get jabbed, but they will sell you colloidal silver and "magic" water which doesn't even contain one molecule of whatever it is supposed to have in it......
