x
Last edited by a moderator:
Hi. It is really easy to explain that. In the past usually the way of growing or breeding wasn't hybridization. It was masal selection or somewhat like that.
So a farmer or grower got their seeds, grew them and chose the better ones or at least the ones he liked to grow the next season. If cross pollination happened was due to neighbouring plants which belonged to the same genepoool.
So if someone found a good psychedelic strain in Tien Shan mountains or Himlaya or wherever NLD appeared. They simply got seeds and share them so they spreaded to India. It seems later to South East Asia and Islands. Perhaps from South India to East Africa. Later from Phillippines or anywhere there to México, from Kalimantan to Colombia and so on. I think that is the reason why NLD genepool is so closely related.
When people (modern breeders) began to cross tropical NLD with Central Asian BLD about 60's and 70's, they got something with mixed genetic markers from both origins so it seems you get more diversity but in fact it was only a first step towards an homogeneus mix. Nowadays polyhybrids seem more simmilar to a synthetic or a composite variety.
https://theagricos.com/plant-breeding/synthetic-variety/
https://theagricos.com/plant-breeding/composite-variety/
Middle Eastern and North Africa BLD's seem to be mixed with rope hemp genepool.
The problem with Phylos is they did their first tests with BLD/NLD modern hybrids. So if Skunk#1 is Acapulco Gold x Colombian/Afghan, they show it as if Acapulco Gold is 50% Skunk, but in fact it is exactly the opposite.
Greetings.
Thats exactly the point I was trying to make.
They relate everything to Sam’s and chimera’s lines.
And they do so even more now after that “update”
Big money.
Thats exactly the point I was trying to make.
They relate everything to Sam’s and chimera’s lines.
And they do so even more now after that “update”
Big money.
I’m pretty sure you’re correct, but from the other end, if everything on Phylos points “back” to skunk#1 or Nevill’s haze, why *wouldn’t* they be able to patent everything that points to one of *those*, using Phylos “proof of prior art”?
You can only patent something that is new and Skunk#1 or Haze hardly qualifies.
I have submitted not a single sample to Phylos. Not even ONE.
Easter Island Sativa? Got a link?
April 1st
Not just new, but new, novel and NOT in the public domain. Plus probably a ton of more things.You can only patent something that is new and Skunk#1 or Haze hardly qualifies.