why are you using such weak power supplies ?
costs ?
power supplies are usually placed outside the room.
They have good products but
Typical : minimum :
1230 : 1107 + typical => Fv : power: and lm/W :
Under table :
+- 7% flux :
My point of view : =>
Without measurement data of specific pieces, I never trust anyone. a kind of lesson from life.
Maybe it's true or not, they are relatively cheap and good, but I do not trust 100%
https://cdn.samsung.com/led/file/res...0_Rev.10.1.pdf
bin:
VF and flux : b strips ?
smd2835 in b. strip => sorted somehow and selected? real parameters. I don't believe in anything. I assume it might be - but I don't believe it ... such a nature, unbeliever
Panel manufacturers often cover the LEDs with something like you
I used to do tests on similar supplies for a big project and found out they are most efficient when load is 80-90%. Yours might be the same, meaning you burn some electricity at 100% loss because you don't optimise load.
I've used good quality supplies and never had a problem from normal usage. I even have a passing light in a hallway that is run by sensor and it stays on juat for 5 seconds after detecting movement. It's over 10 m of rgb strip driven from a psu that is shut off by solenoid relay after each activation. Has 3 years already and still works. So it's probably not generally a rule they will break from too much on and offs.
Also, what I was saying is that in my tests, a psu loaded at 40-60% had about 15-20 W extra power draw compared to output. At 80 to 90% it was less than 10W (8 I think). So there you go, 10 W less and one psu instead of 2.
We had tens of psus running in that project so 10W per piece made for a hefty montly economy. For you it may not matter, but I shared this to you in case you might care.
Nico grow man you use a carbon filter?