-
As of today ICMag has his own Discord server. In this Discord server you can chat, talk with eachother, listen to music, share stories and pictures...and much more. Join now and let's grow together! Join ICMag Discord here! More details in this thread here: here.
Okay let's talk abt Psychics.
- Thread starter med_breeder
- Start date
in the west, this idea is tagged "epistemological solipsism" ......... that probably answers that question........
nah folks, have some empathy.. head on over to indigosociety and you can actually watch a bunch of nasty old masons telling kids the "voices" they hear aren't HSS speakers, but angels telling them they're (a) different from everyone else because their soul is from outer space (isolate the target) and (b) on a holy mission to join some fucking cult and take lots of drugs and sex.
there aren't too many horny, disaffected youth that can pass up an offer like that.. crestone colorado, white eagle lodge.
Genghis Kush
Active member
Alan Trist, lifelong friend of Jerry Garcia, director of Grateful Dead publishing company and son of Eric Trist, founding member and chairman of Tavistock Institute from 1956-1966.
Genghis Kush
Active member
nice camouflage, dr fever
you know it buddy although i got to stop walking up to them so much creating a trail lol
But truthully speaking hard to tell the difference.. between them tonight i need to enclose the front part of it then its stealthy and un seen by people even walking by
Genghis Kush
Active member
you know it buddy although i got to stop walking up to them so much creating a trail lol
But truthully speaking hard to tell the difference.. between them tonight i need to enclose the front part of it then its stealthy and un seen by people even walking by
good idea, the wire sort of attracts the eye. but otherwise looks pretty stealth. good luck
http://www.thecollegefix.com/post/22839/
California professors instructed not to say ‘America is the land of opportunity’
That’s one of several phrases deemed a ‘microaggression’ at faculty leader training sessions initiated by University of California President Janet Napolitano
“America is the land of opportunity,” “There is only one race, the human race” and “I believe the most qualified person should get the job” are among a long list of alleged microaggressions faculty leaders of the University of California system have been instructed not to say.
These so-called microaggressions – considered examples of subconscious racism – were presented at faculty leader training sessions held throughout the 2014-15 school year at nine of the 10 UC campuses. The sessions, an initiative of UC President Janet Napolitano, aim to teach how to avoid offending students and peers, as well as how to hire a more diverse faculty.
At the gatherings, deans and department chairs across the UC system have been instructed to be careful using (read: instructed not to use) phrases such as “America is the land of opportunity” or even use forms that provide only “male” and “female” check boxes, among a long litany of supposed microaggressions listed in a document underlying the “Faculty Leadership Seminars.”
The document has drawn little scrutiny until now, when a professor in the UC system pointed it out to The College Fix. The professor chose not to attend the seminars, but myriad materials on the UC Office of the President (UCOP) website give indication as to what sort of lessons were taught there.
Other sayings deemed unacceptable include:
● “Everyone can succeed in this society, if they work hard enough.”
● “Where are you from or where were you born?”
● “Affirmative action is racist.”
● “When I look at you, I don’t see color.”
These phrases in particular are targeted because they promote the “myth of meritocracy” or represent “statements which assert that race or gender does not play a role in life successes.” Others are said to be color blind, apparently a bad thing that indicates “that a white person does not want to or need to acknowledge race,” according to the handout, “Tool: Recognizing Microaggressions and the Messages They Send.”
In another handout, “Tool for Identifying Implicit Bias,” faculty are advised when dealing with a student or researcher that they are particularly impressed with not to express approval with compliments like “It’s clear he’s a rockstar.” The handout also describes “raising the bar” as “elitist.”
UCMicro
President Napolitano’s “invitation” to deans and department chairs in January describes the half-day seminars as helping them meet their “responsibility” to create “academic climates that enable all faculty to do their best work.” The seminars are intended to help faculty identify and “interrupt” microaggressions and develop “an inclusive department/school climate,” according to the seminars’ webpage.
The seminars also taught faculty how to deal with prospective hires and existing minority faculty. According to a synopsis of the theatric production “Ready to Vote?” presented at the gatherings, a group of professors consider whether to nominate an Asian American female colleague for tenure. It’s intended to illustrate several perceived microaggressions, such as holding minority professors to higher standards than white male counterparts and not supporting their research.
Another highlight among materials for the seminars is a curious choice: a Supreme Court dissent in a decision upholding Michigan voters’ right to ban race preferences in college admissions. Its inclusion suggests to faculty that publicly approving of race-neutral admissions policies is a microaggression.
The College Fix reached out to the UC Office of the President for comment. In response to a question about how these seminars might have a chilling effect on faculty members’ ability to engage in free speech, representative Shelly Meron said in an email Tuesday that “These seminars are not an attempt to curb open dialogue, debate or classroom discussions.”
“The seminars are part of the President’s Postdoctoral Fellowship Program,” Meron stated. “Deans and department heads who attended the seminars could choose whether they wanted to convey the information to their faculty.”
With regard to the seemingly commonplace, innocuous quotes that are labeled microaggressions in the seminar leaflets, Meron writes:
“The quotes you referenced are taken directly from research done on this topic. We present this research literature/climate survey responses as examples so that faculty leaders can be more aware of the impact their actions or words may have on their students, and to provide faculty members with potential strategies to create an inclusive learning environment for all students.”
Many UC administrators are used to talking about promoting diversity thanks to diversity initiatives and calls to “improve campus climate” that have been legion across UC campuses in recent years. UCLA’s campus in particular has been a hotbed of activity for diversity campus crusaders.
In 2013, Carlos Moreno, a retired California Supreme Court judge, authored an exhaustive report on “Acts of Bias and Discrimination Involving Faculty” at UCLA. Just this past year, after failed attempts in 2004 and 2012, UCLA passed a highly controversial diversity class requirement that was the subject of multiple faculty votes.
College Fix reporter Josh Hedtke is a student at UCLA. College Fix editor Jennifer Kabbany contributed to this report.
California professors instructed not to say ‘America is the land of opportunity’
That’s one of several phrases deemed a ‘microaggression’ at faculty leader training sessions initiated by University of California President Janet Napolitano
“America is the land of opportunity,” “There is only one race, the human race” and “I believe the most qualified person should get the job” are among a long list of alleged microaggressions faculty leaders of the University of California system have been instructed not to say.
These so-called microaggressions – considered examples of subconscious racism – were presented at faculty leader training sessions held throughout the 2014-15 school year at nine of the 10 UC campuses. The sessions, an initiative of UC President Janet Napolitano, aim to teach how to avoid offending students and peers, as well as how to hire a more diverse faculty.
At the gatherings, deans and department chairs across the UC system have been instructed to be careful using (read: instructed not to use) phrases such as “America is the land of opportunity” or even use forms that provide only “male” and “female” check boxes, among a long litany of supposed microaggressions listed in a document underlying the “Faculty Leadership Seminars.”
The document has drawn little scrutiny until now, when a professor in the UC system pointed it out to The College Fix. The professor chose not to attend the seminars, but myriad materials on the UC Office of the President (UCOP) website give indication as to what sort of lessons were taught there.
Other sayings deemed unacceptable include:
● “Everyone can succeed in this society, if they work hard enough.”
● “Where are you from or where were you born?”
● “Affirmative action is racist.”
● “When I look at you, I don’t see color.”
These phrases in particular are targeted because they promote the “myth of meritocracy” or represent “statements which assert that race or gender does not play a role in life successes.” Others are said to be color blind, apparently a bad thing that indicates “that a white person does not want to or need to acknowledge race,” according to the handout, “Tool: Recognizing Microaggressions and the Messages They Send.”
In another handout, “Tool for Identifying Implicit Bias,” faculty are advised when dealing with a student or researcher that they are particularly impressed with not to express approval with compliments like “It’s clear he’s a rockstar.” The handout also describes “raising the bar” as “elitist.”
UCMicro
President Napolitano’s “invitation” to deans and department chairs in January describes the half-day seminars as helping them meet their “responsibility” to create “academic climates that enable all faculty to do their best work.” The seminars are intended to help faculty identify and “interrupt” microaggressions and develop “an inclusive department/school climate,” according to the seminars’ webpage.
The seminars also taught faculty how to deal with prospective hires and existing minority faculty. According to a synopsis of the theatric production “Ready to Vote?” presented at the gatherings, a group of professors consider whether to nominate an Asian American female colleague for tenure. It’s intended to illustrate several perceived microaggressions, such as holding minority professors to higher standards than white male counterparts and not supporting their research.
Another highlight among materials for the seminars is a curious choice: a Supreme Court dissent in a decision upholding Michigan voters’ right to ban race preferences in college admissions. Its inclusion suggests to faculty that publicly approving of race-neutral admissions policies is a microaggression.
The College Fix reached out to the UC Office of the President for comment. In response to a question about how these seminars might have a chilling effect on faculty members’ ability to engage in free speech, representative Shelly Meron said in an email Tuesday that “These seminars are not an attempt to curb open dialogue, debate or classroom discussions.”
“The seminars are part of the President’s Postdoctoral Fellowship Program,” Meron stated. “Deans and department heads who attended the seminars could choose whether they wanted to convey the information to their faculty.”
With regard to the seemingly commonplace, innocuous quotes that are labeled microaggressions in the seminar leaflets, Meron writes:
“The quotes you referenced are taken directly from research done on this topic. We present this research literature/climate survey responses as examples so that faculty leaders can be more aware of the impact their actions or words may have on their students, and to provide faculty members with potential strategies to create an inclusive learning environment for all students.”
Many UC administrators are used to talking about promoting diversity thanks to diversity initiatives and calls to “improve campus climate” that have been legion across UC campuses in recent years. UCLA’s campus in particular has been a hotbed of activity for diversity campus crusaders.
In 2013, Carlos Moreno, a retired California Supreme Court judge, authored an exhaustive report on “Acts of Bias and Discrimination Involving Faculty” at UCLA. Just this past year, after failed attempts in 2004 and 2012, UCLA passed a highly controversial diversity class requirement that was the subject of multiple faculty votes.
College Fix reporter Josh Hedtke is a student at UCLA. College Fix editor Jennifer Kabbany contributed to this report.
using the word race is not racist, I marginalized no one and you can only contrive by the illusion of your own perception some demonized image of me.
Why? Because I most often represent the moral aspect of humanity.
I will bet real money none of you racist xenophobes put this effort to stop racism in the world you live in online here or offline.
I don't suck you in, my confidence of knowing the true nature of reality, your inability to prove otherwise, my devotion to humanity regardless and my ability to articulate makes you question your own beliefs.
Belief is a compass not a destination or a foundation and when you use it past the intended purpose you make an easy intellectual target of yourself
Imagine I tried
Why? Because I most often represent the moral aspect of humanity.
I will bet real money none of you racist xenophobes put this effort to stop racism in the world you live in online here or offline.
I don't suck you in, my confidence of knowing the true nature of reality, your inability to prove otherwise, my devotion to humanity regardless and my ability to articulate makes you question your own beliefs.
Belief is a compass not a destination or a foundation and when you use it past the intended purpose you make an easy intellectual target of yourself
Imagine I tried
and none of you were in my dick until I questioned, ultimately the efficiencies of your beliefs in regards to humanity, which I do constantly myself, which is ultimately why I am who I am, no tavinstocks required.
nothing changes except now you are wasting your energy on me, someone who can't be brow beaten or swayed by majority in matters of principle, so please keep it coming, waste your energies here where they do no harm.
But then again no one ever proves their side of the argument, like race is racism or that I am being racist but they fervently defend their internet argument, an extension of self, an projection of ego or even a darker manipulation
Happens quite alot around here with me, fuck man expose the lies and have me ferreted out like the true wizard of OZ I must be
If my logic is hippy fancy then expose it to the ultimate truth or come up with more tavenstock conspiracy theories, talk about me and criticize me in the third person.
It proves your intellectual acumen (which in the end is a self imposed limitation and not a potential or capacity issue) and it makes me more than psychic but it gives illumination to the patterns of human behavior, the ability to proactively identify them and work within their limits.
This is how marketers control market perception, military control its human assets, cults control cult membership, it is how the big internet companies look and adapt to patterns in "big data"
it is beyond our everyday cognitive reasoning to see outside of this paradigm
people think they understand the extent of ego or that it is a deliberate, cognitive, construct while it is really the sum total of everything our biology encounters and is effected by and it happens on so many levels including the part of the nervous system that is subliminal.
Yeah some people can use yoga and meditation, some people can use drugs, some people use specific religious or philosophical mantra, to attempt ot over come the NEGATIVE aspect of this bias
Not all of it is negative, not all of it is bad and most people never really understand what it means to lose the attachment to it completely.
nothing changes except now you are wasting your energy on me, someone who can't be brow beaten or swayed by majority in matters of principle, so please keep it coming, waste your energies here where they do no harm.
But then again no one ever proves their side of the argument, like race is racism or that I am being racist but they fervently defend their internet argument, an extension of self, an projection of ego or even a darker manipulation
Happens quite alot around here with me, fuck man expose the lies and have me ferreted out like the true wizard of OZ I must be
If my logic is hippy fancy then expose it to the ultimate truth or come up with more tavenstock conspiracy theories, talk about me and criticize me in the third person.
It proves your intellectual acumen (which in the end is a self imposed limitation and not a potential or capacity issue) and it makes me more than psychic but it gives illumination to the patterns of human behavior, the ability to proactively identify them and work within their limits.
This is how marketers control market perception, military control its human assets, cults control cult membership, it is how the big internet companies look and adapt to patterns in "big data"
it is beyond our everyday cognitive reasoning to see outside of this paradigm
people think they understand the extent of ego or that it is a deliberate, cognitive, construct while it is really the sum total of everything our biology encounters and is effected by and it happens on so many levels including the part of the nervous system that is subliminal.
Yeah some people can use yoga and meditation, some people can use drugs, some people use specific religious or philosophical mantra, to attempt ot over come the NEGATIVE aspect of this bias
Not all of it is negative, not all of it is bad and most people never really understand what it means to lose the attachment to it completely.
lol your devotion what living in poverty, Cause you choose so , use some obviscated ailment to collect some government money , Welfare ????
Using racism to seperate people or ethnic groups TBH your like the rest of the turds on earth with no direction or cause ,, least i contribute its called a taxable benefit lol
Curious when was the last time you devoted your self ? lets say for a cause ?
Pay it forward give a unfortunate person 20 bucks or 100 to science for a cure for some disease ???? your devotion right
What makes you so different from the next person you piss differently or shit ??? no i wouldn't doubt you sit when you piss point tiny down as to not piss on your chin ...
lmao thats funny
Using racism to seperate people or ethnic groups TBH your like the rest of the turds on earth with no direction or cause ,, least i contribute its called a taxable benefit lol
Curious when was the last time you devoted your self ? lets say for a cause ?
Pay it forward give a unfortunate person 20 bucks or 100 to science for a cure for some disease ???? your devotion right
What makes you so different from the next person you piss differently or shit ??? no i wouldn't doubt you sit when you piss point tiny down as to not piss on your chin ...
lmao thats funny
seems to me that if you want the tavinstocks/rothchilds to stop marginalizing people then the social barriers made by them and the negative consequences have to be shown under the same lens and vernacular or simply it will continue under a new name and guise repeatedly
changing a word will not change the construct of these social barriers
people saying we are all the same makes people look at families like the rothchilds and resent them because they have more and yet we are all the same
Yet we are not the same, and every day have to fight for that to be recognized at some level. What were color issues in the past are gender issues now.
Bottom line humanity all has the same humanitarian value, which should be the value we put a premium on
when your beliefs facilitate that bottom line then they are serving a humanitarian purpose otherwise they are self serving regardless of how you slice it
changing a word will not change the construct of these social barriers
people saying we are all the same makes people look at families like the rothchilds and resent them because they have more and yet we are all the same
Yet we are not the same, and every day have to fight for that to be recognized at some level. What were color issues in the past are gender issues now.
Bottom line humanity all has the same humanitarian value, which should be the value we put a premium on
when your beliefs facilitate that bottom line then they are serving a humanitarian purpose otherwise they are self serving regardless of how you slice it
I don't profiteer I pay my way with hard earned cash and live simply so others can simply live
I also try to give a good percentage of what i make out forward have for decades, before the internet was here, I shoot for 10% and yes I have spent years tithing to feed the poor in the community, have you?
stop trying to manufacture me into a caricature of you
I did leave a very healthy six figure income and executive ship to raise my kids and I don't see too many IC mag men men up to their responsibilities so nfn most fo you don't have the integrity to fill my shoes
please call me out on this one so I can use my psychic ability to prove how shallow you really are
that's not how you spell "ass pecked" bro
I gave up a life of material focus to place it on my family, crazy you are so prejudice against me you can't read my words for what they really say
your delusion is self created and will continue to perpetuate as long as you aren't willing to take ownership of it
your so cute I think ill keep you! its not like you don't follow me as if your on a leash
:: cues fear of a weird plant
your delusion is self created and will continue to perpetuate as long as you aren't willing to take ownership of it
your so cute I think ill keep you! its not like you don't follow me as if your on a leash
:: cues fear of a weird plant
Genghis Kush
Active member
any response or acknowledgement of his existence only feeds his ego and deranged sense of importance
