NOT A LOT OF PEOPLE KNOW THIS - The Kalergi Plan.

[weedobix]

haha yes i remember seeing her on some tv show here in the uk where iirc they berated her for cultural appropriation, since they noted that being black was much more than just skin colour and was rooted in a legacy of oppression, or words to that affect.

 

[Switcher56]

- oh my giddy aunt! - what a whiney voice that lass has in that vid weedobix - drones on and on - maybe she should do what Martina Big did to get less white - and get all black with melanin injections? - Michael Jackson went white - and Martina likes to be black - so what's the big fuss about? - after all - she is saying that she would rather have black skin - rather than 'pasty white skin' - well change ya skin colour - like you change your hair-colour then -


View Image

* Martina Big - before and after pics - (she just wanted to be black - so she is) -

View Image

I can't even get a boner looking at either one LOL

 

[Switcher56]

View Image

That/this image is being used as we currently speak in a New York school questionnaire, in order to better understand where they need to go from here.

 

[Gypsy Nirvana]

- I only identify with 'whiteness' - until I get a nice sun-tan - then its 'brownness' -


- Martina Big - on her wedding day -

 

[Mike Litoris]

Looks like hybrid vigour.

Dont know for Kalergi plan but hybridization have some benefits.

 

[944s2]

Damn ,,she looks like Eddy Murphy wife in Norbit,,,,

 

[Tudo]

- Today's definition of democracy is basically: every 4 or 5 years the people get to choose which group of elitist psychopaths they want to give full dictatorial powers too! -

- The annoying thing is that in today's western world with current internet technology - we could actually have real peoples democracy -

- Each week all citizens could log into their registered and verified government account and vote on the issues - and laws put forward in that week by the elected officials -

- We would still have MP's (Members of Parliament) - but these M.P's would have no actual power - as it would be the citizens who voted on the laws and not the M.P's -

- In short, we would have a referendum on every bit of law that goes through The House of Commons -

- Of course for this to work properly we would need to do many things but among the most important would be to reintroduce civics lessons and also proper unbiased history lessons -

* WE DO HAVE THE TECHNOLOGY - TO HAVE REAL DEMOCRACY -

 

[Microbeman]

- If everybody was taught exactly what democracy is - and not told that a Monarchistic/Aristocratic Autocracy - masquerading as a Parliamentary Democracy - is 'Democracy' - and that we all had the right and civic duty to vote on any issues that affect us - with civic campaigns to educate everyone about whatever law/issue was presented to vote upon - that would be a start - a good start - and quite easily done - with transparency of vote - so every vote is checkable -

That is a beginning. My concern is with wisdom over greed and an ecologically balanced education. If it is majority rules, then that majority must have the knowledge that cutting down a forest gives one much less return (survival) than cutting down certain trees and letting the forest remain. This type of ignorance is already rampant throughout the world and lobbying from some educated factions and creation of regulations is what has minimally kept it in check.

What if the majority voted to oust all the pink people from the UK?

 

[PDX Dopesmoker]

That is a beginning. My concern is with wisdom over greed and an ecologically balanced education. If it is majority rules, then that majority must have the knowledge that cutting down a forest gives one much less return (survival) than cutting down certain trees and letting the forest remain. This type of ignorance is already rampant throughout the world and lobbying from some educated factions and creation of regulations is what has minimally kept it in check.

What if the majority voted to oust all the pink people from the UK?

Concern about lack of ethnic diversity in England is entirely irrational. England is the last place anyone should be concerned about that, England is home to one of the most diverse, cosmopolitan populations on the planet. Compare England to Swaziland, a completely monoethnic, racist and openly undemocratic monarchy where religious traditions are enforced by law. Yet here you are, irrationally freaking out about some imaginary "the sky is falling!" scenario in a nonexistent imaginary future where you're unsatisfied with the amount of ethnic diversity in England even though there are real places on this planet right now that have almost no diversity and you are completely unconcerned about them. Why all the concern about potential lack of diversity in imaginary future England, but no concern at all about the genuine lack of diversity in modern day Swaziland? Why aren't you outraged at the glaringly lack of transexual Guatemalans in contemporary Swaziland if you're upset that England might potentially decrease it's transexual Guatemalan population at some time in the future? Why aren't you concerned about native transexual population in Guatemala? Every time a transexual leaves Guatemala for to England, Guatemala becomes tragically less diverse, doesn't that upset you?

 

[moses wellfleet]

- I only identify with 'whiteness' - until I get a nice sun-tan - then its 'brownness' -


- Martina Big - on her wedding day -

View Image

What in the name of all that is holy?

 

[Microbeman]

Concern about lack of ethnic diversity in England is entirely irrational. England is the last place anyone should be concerned about that, England is home to one of the most diverse, cosmopolitan populations on the planet. Compare England to Swaziland, a completely monoethnic, racist and openly undemocratic monarchy where religious traditions are enforced by law. Yet here you are, irrationally freaking out about some imaginary "the sky is falling!" scenario in a nonexistent imaginary future where you're unsatisfied with the amount of ethnic diversity in England even though there are real places on this planet right now that have almost no diversity and you are completely unconcerned about them. Why all the concern about potential lack of diversity in imaginary future England, but no concern at all about the genuine lack of diversity in modern day Swaziland? Why aren't you outraged at the glaringly lack of transexual Guatemalans in contemporary Swaziland if you're upset that England might potentially decrease it's transexual Guatemalan population at some time in the future? Why aren't you concerned about native transexual population in Guatemala? Every time a transexual leaves Guatemala for to England, Guatemala becomes tragically less diverse, doesn't that upset you?

What? Are you addressing me? I said nothing remotely close to what you maintain. I presented 2 philosophical examples for majority rule.

 

[gaiusmarius]

it is kind of strange how many executive orders biden has signed on opening the borders back up to migration flows and caravans of refugees, in the middle of a world wide pandemic. does kind of make you wonder just how much he cares about the actual US citizens. on the one hand the pandemic rules are tightened for everyone, but some how the borders must stay open so more covid can be brought in. wtf? same shit here in Switzerland, instead of closing up to tourists and immigrants we leave the borders open so we keep getting new variants of covid coming in. but at the same time our lives must come to a stop because covid is so deadly. WT actual Fuck?

 

[Gypsy Nirvana]

That is a beginning. My concern is with wisdom over greed and an ecologically balanced education. If it is majority rules, then that majority must have the knowledge that cutting down a forest gives one much less return (survival) than cutting down certain trees and letting the forest remain. This type of ignorance is already rampant throughout the world and lobbying from some educated factions and creation of regulations is what has minimally kept it in check.

What if the majority voted to oust all the pink people from the UK?

- Educational standards have been 'adjusted'/lowered to accommodate all multi-culti's - in just one society - its a form of 'dumbing down' - just check relevant national IQ levels - and they will tell you that the so-called western 'democracies' are losing IQ points on average from one decade to the next - due to all the recent millions of imported - 'diverse, cultural enrichment' - (or is it?)

What in the name of all that is holy?

- Whatever you say - don't say Jehovah!

it is kind of strange how many executive orders biden has signed on opening the borders back up to migration flows and caravans of refugees, in the middle of a world wide pandemic. does kind of make you wonder just how much he cares about the actual US citizens. on the one hand the pandemic rules are tightened for everyone, but some how the borders must stay open so more covid can be brought in. wtf? same shit here in Switzerland, instead of closing up to tourists and immigrants we leave the borders open so we keep getting new variants of covid coming in. but at the same time our lives must come to a stop because covid is so deadly. WT actual Fuck?

- People who are indoctrinated into an Abrahamic religion from birth - and are not so bright are preferred - they are easily subservient - and less likely to rebel against a ruling cabal - as long as their totalitarian religious/political laws are observed - e.g. Sharia or Catholicism - and being numbered in the billions - they are a ready force for slow invasion and conquest - especially if economically supported and encouraged to head into modern developed Western nations - by trouble and proxy-wars within their own - where they are catered for - often above and before the local people - who's ancestors built and bled and paid for the society and culture they still have today - but for how much longer? - that is the question -

- Its what the United Nations calls: 'Replacement Migration' - moving one often VERY extreme culture/people/religion - from 3rd world nations - into the nations, towns and cities of only Western (faux-democratic) Nations by the tens of millions of people - to breed and grow in some foreign land - supported by the state - as a form of slow-genocide/ethnocide - of the indigenous cultures/people - via mass immigration - to eventually dominate over the current natives - and that plan ain't gonna stop - super-virus or not - 'cos they ain't concerned about killing off particularly the older members of western society - since they are more likely to see and understand - so object against such radicle changes - without even being asked if we wanted to be replaced within our own nations - without any referendum about choosing mass-immigration or not - all of these crucial decisions were made by those that never asked or consulted the people about it - because it has always been - for the last 100 years or so been their plan - The Kalergi Plan - and its as plain as day - that it is coming to fruition -

 

[Switcher56]

it is kind of strange how many executive orders biden has signed on opening the borders back up to migration flows and caravans of refugees, in the middle of a world wide pandemic. does kind of make you wonder just how much he cares about the actual US citizens. on the one hand the pandemic rules are tightened for everyone, but some how the borders must stay open so more covid can be brought in. wtf? same shit here in Switzerland, instead of closing up to tourists and immigrants we leave the borders open so we keep getting new variants of covid coming in. but at the same time our lives must come to a stop because covid is so deadly. WT actual Fuck?

It's going to be interesting to see how that pans out, not! I stated in a thread oooh some months ago, well many months ago. From strictly a military POV, Covid was "the" perfect biological weapon, in every aspect. Think about that for a while. Who was the only country that has benefited from this virus? NIH is still funding the research in China. Imagine what a BRI loan would look like in California, with all its ports on the Pacific Ocean.

The size of China in comparison with populations (read in 4 columns (country, size, pop and density/km2)):

• China - 9.6M km2 - 1.4B - 146 ind/km2
• India - 3.9M km2 - 1.4B - 358 ind/km2
• USA - 9.8M km2 - 331M - 33.7 ind/km2
• Canada - 10M km2 (rounded from 9.98 (which includes the arctic)) - 38.4M - 3.8 ind/km2
• Russia - 17.1M km2 - 146M - 8.5 ind/km2
• Israel - 22K km2 - 9M - 409 ind/km2
• California - 442K km2 - 34.9M - 89.1 ind/km2
• BC - 945.7K km2 - 5.1M - 5.4 ind/km2
• North America - 19.8M km2 - 369M - 18.7 ind/km2

Those numbers are revealing, dontcha think? Especially the population density of Russia, that started all this mess.

Both China and India have major smog/pollution problems. We have all seen photos of pre lock downs and during lock downs. Both are now back in smog. Yup, they sure would like to expand their horizons.

 

[Switcher56]

Brexit leader Nigel Farage has warned that there is a “communist takeover” of large swaths of Britain’s private education sector, as an investigation has revealed that schools throughout the country have been bought out by firms connected to the Chinese government.

There are currently 17 private schools in the United Kingdom owned by Chinese firms, nine of which are owned by senior members of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP).

The schools are reportedly presenting a “whitewashed” view of China to their students, and one school has admitted that the goal of infiltrating the education system is to propagate China’s One Belt, One Road global initiative, an investigation from the Mail on Sunday revealed. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...rivate-institutions-bought-Chinese-firms.html

 

[Microbeman]

""Originally Posted by Microbeman View Post
That is a beginning. My concern is with wisdom over greed and an ecologically balanced education. If it is majority rules, then that majority must have the knowledge that cutting down a forest gives one much less return (survival) than cutting down certain trees and letting the forest remain. This type of ignorance is already rampant throughout the world and lobbying from some educated factions and creation of regulations is what has minimally kept it in check.

What if the majority voted to oust all the pink people from the UK?""

- Educational standards have been 'adjusted'/lowered to accommodate all multi-culti's - in just one society - its a form of 'dumbing down' - just check relevant national IQ levels - and they will tell you that the so-called western 'democracies' are losing IQ points on average from one decade to the next - due to all the recent millions of imported - 'diverse, cultural enrichment' - (or is it?)

I do not believe that your argument addresses my point. It is not really a case of IQ depletion. IMO it is more a case of awareness of one's existence in the world or environment, in their human population and the ability to control one's greed; or the greed collective of a society.

It does seem that certain cultures around the planet have managed to perceive that their continued survival was dependent on preservational steps regarding their resources.

We can reflect that societies in various spots, like North, Central and South America and Australia among others were educated 'somewhat' in this way. Unfortunately not all were accepting of the humanity of other reachable societies, illustrated by skirmishes and enslavement.

I believe one can observe that their education was superior to the societies which came to overpower them and destroy resources and shit where they eat for some imaginary currency or god.

To bring about this sort of education for the contemporary dominant societies is a tall order. How does one teach compassion?

I believe it is learning congruent to animal instinct combined with scientific knowledge which could prepare humanity (individuals) to do the right thing when given the power of true democracy. That is to vote on every issue.

As Gaius mentioned to me 'can 2 wolves and a sheep decide upon dinner in democratic fashion? Or as I mentioned 'what about a vote to oust all pink people from the UK? (or US, Canada, Japan.....)

 

[Gypsy Nirvana]

* An interesting article - https://www.cspii.org/blog/immigration-islamic-doctrine-and-history/

- Immigration in Islamic Doctrine and History -

Hijra is the Islamic doctrine of jihad by migration.
Hijra is a political tactic Mohammed used to conquest a Kafir (non-Muslim) country.


In recent months, immigration from Islamic countries to Europe has become one of the continent’s most serious issues in decades. A variety of different people are currently coming to Europe through the Balkans and the Mediterranean, including those whose lives were destroyed by the jihad of the Islamic State. Nevertheless, various security agencies report warriors, who would like to bring jihad to Europe, are traveling among them as well.

- By far, the largest share of the new immigrants are the economic migrants driven by the prospect of a better life ensured by social systems of the European countries. It is also no secret that Muslims are the largest part of the immigrants. While most of the discussions on immigration deal chiefly with the economic and security consequences of Muslim immigration to Europe, this article aims to analyze what position immigration has in the doctrine of Political Islam. Furthermore, we will also reflect on the current situation and what lessons could be drawn from history -

- Dualism -

- The Islamic political doctrine has two contradictory approaches to immigration - as it actually does to many other issues. Such dualism is an inherent part of Islam and is best understood when the following two verses from Koran are compared.

Koran 2:256 There shall be no compulsion in [acceptance of] the religion.

Koran 9:29 Make war on those who do not believe in Allah or in the Last Day and who do not consider unlawful what Allah and His Messenger have made unlawful... Even though the message of the verses above may seem to be contradictory, both of them are part of the book that is regarded by Muslims as the exact words of Allah. Both of them are valid and Muslims can choose one or another, depending on outer circumstances.

- Hijra -

- The doctrine of immigration is handled in a similar way. It can be found particularly in the Sira – The Life of Mohammed. In 622 CE, Mohammed left Mecca for Medina because Meccans considered him to be the source of conflicts and did not want him to be their fellow-citizen anymore. This event is called Hijra and is crucial in Islamic history. Hijra is not only the beginning of Islamic calendar, but it also marks the divide between the Meccan Koran and the Medinan Koran and the transition from religious Islam to political Islam.

- During his thirteen-year career as a preacher, Mohammed converted approximately 150 people to Islam in Mecca. Within the course of ten years of jihad (following his migration to Medina), Mohammed spread Islam throughout Arabia. The fact that the Islamic calendar starts with Mohammed's immigration to Medina and not with his birth, death, or the first Koranic revelation indicates the significance of this event for the success of Islam.

- Immigration to Islamic Countries -

The first concept of Hijra originated in Mohammed's migration from Mecca to Medina. In Islam Mohammed is the perfect pattern of moral conduct for each Muslim. Therefore, if a Muslim is in a place where he cannot practice his ideology, he is supposed to do as Mohammed did and leave such a place. He should move to where Sharia law constitutes legal order and where he can follow the imperatives of the Islamic doctrine.

The Islamic State refers to this order in its propaganda videos. It reminds European Muslims of their religious obligation to leave for a country where Sharia is the governing law and to participate in jihad in Allah's cause.


- Jihad -

Muslim migration to the countries governed by Kafirs (unbelievers) did not have great significance in the past. Instead, Islamic scholars dating back to the 9th century, considered staying in non-Islamic countries to be dangerous, since it can weaken Muslims’ belief. Until the late modern period, Islam was spread primarily through armed jihad.

Successful spreading of Islam was ensured by constant repetition of the following time-proven pattern: inhabitants of a certain country or region were given a choice - either convert to Islam or go to war. If the offer for conversion was declined, Islamic armies invaded the country. If the Muslims won on the battlefield, many of the conquered men were killed and the women and children were captured as spoils of war or sold on the slave markets.

A subjugated status, called “dhimmi,” was imposed upon those not killed or taken away. Life as a dhimmi was so difficult and degrading for unbelievers they gradually converted to Islam to become regular citizens. In some regions, this process took a couple of centuries due to the fact that dhimmis were persistent in declining conversion to Islam. Eventually, this approach was successful and transformed Christian Near East, Northern Africa and Asia Minor into Muslim lands. Buddhist areas in Afghanistan, Hindu areas in India and Pakistan, or Zoroastrian Persia encountered similar destinies as well. Muslim conquest of such areas was even more cruel because, in accordance with the doctrine of Political Islam, dhimmi status can be granted only to Jews and Christians.


- Immigration to non-Islamic Countries -

- Muslims did not come to the western lands of the Kafir in high numbers until the second half of the 20th century. The main motivating factors were economic. Many Western European countries went through a period of unusual surges in industrial production and the European workforce was insufficient to satisfy labor demand. At that time, numerous Western politicians thought a workforce from Muslim countries would stay in Europe for several years and, once Muslim workers earned some money, they would return to their families in their home countries. However, that was not the case. Instead, these workers’ families joined them and settled in the hosting countries permanently.

A large number of Muslims who migrated to the West convinced the Islamic scholars to rethink their attitude to this issue. They agreed if they had forbidden mass immigration, they would only alienate the migrants. Instead, they focused on drawing up of a legal-religious framework to enable the migrants to keep their Muslim identity as well as to make use of their immigration for the benefit of Islam. The agreement on this framework contained five main points:

Muslims are part of the Islamic nation, called the Ummah, wherever they live.
Life in non-Islamic countries is undesirable, but possible, if the migrant behaves as an exemplary Muslim.

Each migrant is obliged to constantly strengthen his religious identity and keep their distance from everything contradictory to Islam. In order to strengthen his religious identity, he should build mosques and be their benefactor, as well as set up Muslim schools, cultural centers and shops.

Each migrant is supposed to promote the objectives of the Muslim community, both in the religious and the political field and he shall not make difference between those two.
Muslims in the West are supposed to spread Islam in the declining and spiritually void Western societies.

The purpose of all these points has been to force Muslims to perceive their religious identity as more important than their national identity, to segregate them from the majority society and to make them agents for spreading Islam in the world. The substantial requirement was that they would live separate from Kafirs and would not make friends within the Kafir societies. Making friends with Muslims and segregating from non-Muslims is called Al Walaa wa al Baraa. This Arabian term could be translated as "loyalty and disownment" and stems from the Koran.

Koran 58:22 You will not find a people who believe in Allah and the Last Day having affection for those who oppose Allah and His Messenger, even if they were their fathers or their sons or their brothers or their kindred.

These ideas didn’t remain just a plain theory of the Islamic scholars, they really took root in the lives of numerous Western Muslims. A lot of factors played roles in this process. The essential one is the fact that immigrants brought their traditional values of the Islamic doctrine with them. In their host countries, they gathered in closed communities with their fellow believers, which further reinforced such values. The religious commitment of the children and grandchildren of the original immigrants was reinforced by the fact that it was getting increasingly more difficult to succeed in the labor market.

Another key factor was that Western politicians declared multiculturalism to be the official ideology, which meant giving up on promoting common values in their countries. One of the key postulates of multiculturalism is that no culture may be regarded as more valuable than another one. This opened the way for spreading very radical ideas incompatible with the constitutions, legal orders, and essential values of the Europeans. Their propagators consider themselves to be untouchable to a large extent, since attacking their opinions could be interpreted as an expression of xenophobia or hatred.

Nevertheless, CSPI has focused on studying mainly the primary Islamic political doctrine, that is the doctrine of Allah and Mohammed, which can be found in the Koran, Sira and Hadith. Those are the real sources of Islam. Islamic scholars, whose conclusions were discussed in the previous sections, also referred to the prophet Mohammed, since he was the one who actually used immigration as a tool for spreading Islam.

- Mohammed as the Perfect Example -

When Mohammed went to Medina, half the population were Arabian polytheists and the other half consisted of three Jewish tribes. Mohammed came to a place where Islam had very little backing. He claimed he was the last in the line of Jewish prophets. Nevertheless, he gained very little backing from the Jews of Medina. It was the other way round. He claimed that Jews had intentionally corrupted and concealed God’s revelations sent through the previous prophets. Therefore, it is not surprising the Jews of Medina kept a distance from him and that he was not very popular among them. Mohammed's Jew-hatred, in many places in the Koran, has its origins in this period of time.

Nevertheless, Mohammed was very skilful in getting the most out of the situation. He made use of the disputes among the three Jewish tribes. Each time Mohammed and his companions attacked one tribe, Jews from the other tribes did not help that tribe. Employing this tactic, Mohammed was able to conquer two Jewish tribes whose members were exiled and whose property was confiscated. When Mohammad attacked the third tribe, the Banu Qurayza, there was no one left in Medina who could help the besieged Jews. They finally surrendered, throwing themselves at Mohammed's mercy. Their sentence was not exile, as was the case with the two previous tribes, but death. Mohammed and his wife Aisha then looked on as his companions beheaded approximately 800 male members of the tribe.

In this way, Mohammed conquered Medina and it became a base for his power. After eight years, he also seized Mecca. At the end of his life, Islam dominated Arabia. Immigration to the town of unbelievers marked, in Mohammed's case, the beginning of the path to political power. Mohammed is not only inspiration for Muslim scholars, but he is also the binding moral example for all the Muslims. This theme is repeated more than 90 times in the Koran.

Koran 33:21 You have an excellent example in Allah’s Messenger for those of you who put your hope in Allah and the Last Day and who praise Allah continually.

Koran 4:59 You who have believed, obey Allah and obey the Messenger and those in authority among you. The Koran emphasized several times that those who emigrated with Mohammed to the non-Muslim societies, and dominated them in favor of Islam, are perfect examples for Muslims, and Allah shall love them.

Koran 2:218 Indeed, those who have believed and those who have emigrated and fought in the cause of Allah - those expect the mercy of Allah. And Allah is Forgiving and Merciful.

- The House of Islam and the House of War -

The Islamic political doctrine divides world into dar al-Islam (the House of Islam) and dar al-Harb (the House of War). The former category involves countries governed by Islam and Sharia law. The latter category - the House of War - refers to Kafir countries. The ultimate goal of Political Islam is to incorporate the House of War into the House of Islam. This goal was proclaimed by Mohammed.

Sahih Muslim’s Hadith Book 1, Number 31 Mohammed: “I have been ordered to wage war against mankind until they accept that there is no god but Allah and that they believe I am His prophet..."

This concept solves the problem of reconciling two different, or even contradictory, approaches to the Islamic migration. If Islamic practitioners feel they cannot apply Islamic ideology where they live, they can use the first approach and emigrate to dar al-Islam (land of Islam). If they already are in dar al-Harb (land of war) or would like to travel to the Kafir countries, they are supposed to use the second approach and use their migration to the benefit of Ummah and Islam.

- Tactics -

Those who choose the latter option are supposed to follow the example of Mohammed in Medina and gradually weaken the position of Kafir society. They should practice jihad by means of speech, writing, or sword (depending on the conditions) and aspire to enshrine Sharia law.

The first migrants are not in an easy position. Until Islam has significant impact on the host society, it is sometimes necessary that Muslim immigrants participate in the activities forbidden by Sharia. That is enabled by the Islamic concept of “darura." Darura means that a Muslim can do what is generally forbidden and avoid doing what is ordered, if circumstances dictate. The concepts of kitman, tawriya, muruna and taqiyya (sometimes also referred to as "sacred deception") are similar tactics. They enable Muslims to lie, say a half-truth, not to say the full truth, or hide their real intentions if they do so for the benefit of Islam. Such tactics are, however, temporary. The ultimate goal is to establish an Islamic government, and impose Sharia law, so such practices are no longer needed. Until that time, Muslims can follow Mohammed's advice.

Sahih Bukhari’s Hadith Volume 4, Book 52, Number 268 Allah's apostle said: "War is deceit."

- Conclusion -

The industrial revolution in the 19th century, and western civilization’s technical innovations in the 20th century prevented Islam from spreading by the traditional means of armed jihad, enslaving elements of the Kafir population, and imposing dhimmitude on the rest of the population. Political Islam is, however, a practical tool of power. Facing this challenge, modern Islamic scholars found a way to utilize the economic emigration of their coreligionists heading toward Europe. They were inspired by Mohammed's life, his exile to Medina, and methods that enabled him to gradually dominate that city despite the majority of its citizens.

It would be wrong to assume that all economic immigrants to Europe in the past, or are currently coming, are active jihadists. Unfortunately, there are no reliable statistics available, perhaps because of the nature of this topic. Nevertheless, there are other statistics available. 74% of the Muslims in Northern Africa and Middle East would like Sharia law to be the law of the land, and only half of them think this legal system should apply only to Muslims. It is possible that there are only few well-trained jihad warriors among thousands of immigrants. Nevertheless, we can assume the demographic composition of immigrants coming to Europe at least approximately corresponds with the composition of population in their home countries. If it is the case, then almost three quarters of Muslim immigrants coming to Europe perceive religious Sharia law is a suitable framework for the official legislation. However, the Sharia law that is discussed more in detail here is contradictory to the law and constitutions of the European countries.

Studying history and the doctrine of Political Islam provides us with very valuable insight. Islam is not spread only by the professional terrorists who pressure Western governments by means of their violent acts to make many concessions, especially with regard to freedom of speech. A vital role in propagating Islam is played by Muslims who consider the Islamic political doctrine to have the same importance as the religious one.

We can presume that European governments will keep submitting to the political requirements of Islam in the name of multiculturalism. If this is really the case, the migration of hundreds of thousands of Muslim immigrants only accelerates the process that is already happening. The process in question includes the decline of Western secular values, such as free speech and women’s rights. They are suppressed by the violent political ideology of Islam.

https://www.cspii.org/blog/immigration-islamic-doctrine-and-history/


- References -

Pew Research Center. The World’s Muslims: Religion, Politics and Society. Available at: https://www.pewforum.org/2013/04/30/the-worlds-muslims-religion-politics-society-overview/.

Andrew Bostom. The Legacy of Jihad. Jihad Conquests and the Imposition of Dhimmitude – A Survey.

The Middle East Quarterly. Should Muslims Integrate into the West? Available at: https://www.meforum.org/1761/should-muslims-integrate-into-the-west.
Sam Solomon, Elias Al Maqdisi. Modern Day Trojan Horse: The Islamic Doctrine of Immigration.

Daniel Pipes. Taqiyya and Kitman: The Role of Deception in Islamic Terrorism Available at: https://www.danielpipes.org/comments/25320.

One of the essential resources was the primary Islamic political doctrine that can be found in the Koran, Sira and Hadith (we used the Hadith of Sahih Bukhari and Sahih Muslim, which are regarded as the most reliable resources).

Should you be interested in studying all the general facts about Mohammed's life as described by the Islamic doctrine, we highly recommend you study the book Sira by Dr. Bill Warner.

 

[PDX Dopesmoker]

What? Are you addressing me? I said nothing remotely close to what you maintain. I presented 2 philosophical examples for majority rule.

How come you're not using this opportunity to speak up in favor of diversity for Swaziland? I laid out the perfect chance for you to show off what a fantastic humanitarian you are by agreeing that Swaziland needs more diversity and you willfully ignored it. I guess you must be one of those anti-diversity types.

 

[Gypsy Nirvana]

""Originally Posted by Microbeman View Post
That is a beginning. My concern is with wisdom over greed and an ecologically balanced education. If it is majority rules, then that majority must have the knowledge that cutting down a forest gives one much less return (survival) than cutting down certain trees and letting the forest remain. This type of ignorance is already rampant throughout the world and lobbying from some educated factions and creation of regulations is what has minimally kept it in check.

What if the majority voted to oust all the pink people from the UK?""


I do not believe that your argument addresses my point. It is not really a case of IQ depletion. IMO it is more a case of awareness of one's existence in the world or environment, in their human population and the ability to control one's greed; or the greed collective of a society.

It does seem that certain cultures around the planet have managed to perceive that their continued survival was dependent on preservational steps regarding their resources.

We can reflect that societies in various spots, like North, Central and South America and Australia among others were educated 'somewhat' in this way. Unfortunately not all were accepting of the humanity of other reachable societies, illustrated by skirmishes and enslavement.

I believe one can observe that their education was superior to the societies which came to overpower them and destroy resources and shit where they eat for some imaginary currency or god.

To bring about this sort of education for the contemporary dominant societies is a tall order. How does one teach compassion?

I believe it is learning congruent to animal instinct combined with scientific knowledge which could prepare humanity (individuals) to do the right thing when given the power of true democracy. That is to vote on every issue.

As Gaius mentioned to me 'can 2 wolves and a sheep decide upon dinner in democratic fashion? Or as I mentioned 'what about a vote to oust all pink people from the UK? (or US, Canada, Japan.....)

- Yes I agree with your stressing for environmental education - but those type of issues get put on the back burner when you bring waring tribes together purposefully - then all it is about is division and human survival - people take sides - in tribes - regardless of the ecology - unless of course - you have a whole nation that feels unity within their own culture - ancestors - history - and people - who have also a common bond of good/sound education - that isn't laced with some political/religious invasive un-egalitarian doctrine - and respects the environment/nature - then you might get everyone to understand and believe in what 'the common good' is -

- When you have multiple cultures - several conflicting tribes - always at odds with one another - there is only terror and bloodshed to follow - happening already - and in abundance - the ecology just doesn't seem so important - any Brit will tell you - as we have imported the 3rd world - the garbage problem increases accordingly - more fly tipping - more litter in the streets - you see kids throw crap on the street - right next to a garbage bin - and if you were to tell the kid off for doing that - you are screamed at and called 'a waaaaaycis' - what a load of bollocks - lack of parental guidance and education is usually the case - but I have seen some of the nations some of these people come from - and that's just how they live - throwing trash everywhere - clogging the streams and rivers - burning it - fouling the air -

- I was brought up with the slogan 'Keep Britain Tidy' - and we did - never throwing our trash anywhere but in a bin - or went to the town dump - if we had lots of waste from building - decorating or garden work -

- a vote to put 'pink people' on reservations - or export them to some colony? - make them homeless - could be one day - but before that I'd say that they would be 'homogenised' into some global gene-pool - bred into oblivion - since pink people are a small minority - compared to other skin colours - and are already being outbred by other much larger groups - after years of contraception - so many less babies born - its only those whites/pinks that keep breeding with only their own kind and/or other whites due to religious/ethnic/cultural practices - that will survive for many more generations - all others are being encouraged to interbreed - and we are - just start watching modern commercials - its plain to see -

 

[Montuno]

(...)

74% of the Muslims in Northern Africa and Middle East would like Sharia law to be the law of the land, and only half of them think this legal system should apply only to Muslims.

Remember when you posted this meme-trash (because rubbish on the internet also pollutes, not only outside the bins)?

I told you it was a lie with sarcasm, out of pure demographic mathematics, as you yourself could prove.
Well; I also tell you that the highlighted is totally false in North Africa, at least as far as I know, at: Tunisia, Libya, Algeria, Morocco, Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic, and the Spanish Autonomy cities.
We only have Egypt, of which I do not speak out of ignorance.

Translated with www.DeepL.com/Translator (free version)