yo - Clack - One might do better to market that as a Vintage Airstream with fresh air and shore front.
I do sometimes have a nack for sales.
I do sometimes have a nack for sales.
LOL.Given your business model and projected expenses to realize your dream, I would suggest that you think about Bombay Beach on the shores of the Salton Sea.
Cheap rentals (because of the shifting water levels), the saltiest water on the face of the earth (literally) and lots of warm weather.
Once you've gotten past the stench from the Salton Sea, you're home free to acquite the economic freedom that you're searching for!
HTH!
CC
EDIT: Here's a link to a photo of Bombay Beach on the shores of the Salton Sea!
Not true, and please don't give people this impression. It's this idea that makes the DEA crack down on patients. There may be some doctors that tend to be liberal with recommendation, but it's a disservice to all patients to tell people that medical need has nothing to do with getting a recommendation.Fatboy,
Any carbon based life form with a pulse can get a doc rec in CA. Actual medical need is irrelevant.
The one with the necessary skill and patience to properly grow and trim buds is probably not going to be dissuaded by a bunch of strangers on the internet. The other 9 flood the market with a bunch of "name" strains that are poorly grown and are only grown with profit in mind. I don't think that the market is necessarily flooded, but the more bad bud in the market, the harder it can be to find the good meds.Funny how Cali is 'flooded' when people want to come here to grow, but when people go to buy at the dispensaries it's complaint after complaint about low quality, high prices, quick cured unflushed stuff, etc, etc, etc.
Sure at least 9 out of 10 people that come here to grow and make a living are going to get chewed up and spit out but the ones that make it will improve the scene for everyone. Well, except for those who like high prices and less competition.
Not true, and please don't give people this impression.
http://vote96.sos.ca.gov/BP/215yesrbt.htm said:Proposition 215 requires absolutely no written documentation of any kind to grow or smoke marijuana.
http://vote96.sos.ca.gov/BP/215noarg.htm said:READ PROPOSITION 215 CAREFULLY * IT IS A CRUEL HOAX
http://vote96.sos.ca.gov/BP/215noarg.htm said:READ THE FINE PRINT. Proposition 215 legalizes marijuana use for ''any other illness for which marijuana provides relief." This could include stress, headaches, upset stomach, insomnia, a stiff neck . . . or just about anything.
NO WRITTEN PRESCRIPTION REQUIRED
* EVEN CHILDREN COULD SMOKE POT LEGALLY!
Proposition 215 does not require a written prescription. Anyone with the ''oral recommendation or approval by a physician" can grow, possess or smoke marijuana. No medical examination is required.
THERE IS NO AGE RESTRICTION. Even children can be legally permitted to grow, possess and use marijuana . . . without parental consent.NO FDA APPROVAL * NO CONSUMER PROTECTION
6 plants even 12 plants in an apartment or small indoor space is not gunna make you enough to survive in cali, nothing you can grow in for 650. you will make more money where ever you are currently, cali is no longer the money spot for marijuana, we are flooded, we need to sump pump some of your asses out of here thats how flooded we are
and one very important piece, grow a buncha plants here and the local police arent gunna just let you be on your way theyve been making people "prove" it in court, and yeah you might not spend a minute behind bars but you sure as shit will take a financial hit
The partisan "No on 215" vote literature is not exactly an impartial source . Remember the Yes on 8 literature saying that all of the sudden teachers were going to be teaching gay marriage in kindergarten, even though it had been legal for months prior without any change in curriculum? I get what you're saying, though. The "any other" clause is obviously very open to interpretation. I don't remember all of the rhetoric around it. It's not quite as simple as just breathing to get the card. I just don't really like the fact that people keep hitting on this point because it leads to things like the DEA investigating doctors, and LEO questioning whether a patient has "legitimately" obtained a rec. People with "hidden" disabilities are often questioned about the legitimacy of their condition when asking for things that will help them that are slightly non-standard and may have the appearance of being personal preference, so I guess this is a sore spot for me. Lots of people who gain significant benefit from MMJ are affected if one of these doctors gets into trouble.Except for the fact that it is indeed true. Prop 215 was voted by the voters with this in mind. Infact they were warned in official ballot materials.
Some of us California natives remember the 1996 election. They said everything in the book to get people to vote against 215 when infact it only provided more fuel to the legalization fire. It's the fault of the prosecutors and the attorney general for making these statements to begin with and helping frame 215 in a such a good way albeit unintentional.
No but it was part of the official ballot. And the arguments against 215 are very valid in court as they very well could have encouraged people to vote in favor. The best part is who is going to question JAMES P. FOXThe partisan "No on 215" vote literature is not exactly an impartial source .
Yes I remember it well. I have stood by my friends and protested at the Capitol the passage of prop 8. And guess what because those statements were made by the YES side it is illegal now illegal to teach gay marraige in school.Remember the Yes on 8 literature saying that all of the sudden teachers were going to be teaching gay marriage in kindergarten, even though it had been legal for months prior without any change in curriculum?
I get what you're saying, though. The "any other" clause is obviously very open to interpretation. I don't remember all of the rhetoric around it. It's not quite as simple as just breathing to get the card.
Except for the fact that the US Supreme Court has protected doctors rights to reccomend medical marijuana under the 1st ammendment. You know the whole free speech thing.I just don't really like the fact that people keep hitting on this point because it leads to things like the DEA investigating doctors,
That is why people have the option of VOLUNTARILY registering with the Calfornia State Dept of Health Services. LEO can't question SB 420 cards. And plus if you are doing things in a manner that brings LEO attention it will be the court that accepts the documents not the pigs. Do I need to dig out evidence code about authenticating documents?and LEO questioning whether a patient has "legitimately" obtained a rec.
I have a psychiatric disorder, which was originally diagnosed by a mmj doc. I blew off the diagnoses actually at the time. Later several other docs have confirmed it. Talk about a hidden disibilty. Can you read my mind? I do not fear being questioned. Infact I enjoy it! Ask away, lets make more people informed. By answering others questions (including the pigs) their fear (organized crime, other drugs, ect.) is removed too.People with "hidden" disabilities are often questioned about the legitimacy of their condition when asking for things that will help them that are slightly non-standard and may have the appearance of being personal preference,
Lots of people who gain significant benefit from MMJ are affected if one of these doctors gets into trouble.
I have a similar type of disability, I had the original sentence written as "WE" rather than they, but I decided to change it for some reason. I am not objecting to the mmj community agreeing that it's relatively easy to get a MMJ card, but I was cautioning against spreading that fact broadly because to some of the less intelligent people, it seems that a card that is easy to get then it's somehow debatable as to whether a patient is obtaining medication or just satisfying a habit under a technicality.No but it was part of the official ballot. And the arguments against 215 are very valid in court as they very well could have encouraged people to vote in favor. The best part is who is going to question JAMES P. FOX
President, California District Attorneys Association
in a California courtroom. If he says that his statements weren't true, then he is guilty of perjury, and corruption. Their vehement opposition all of a sudden worked against them.
The words of the drug warriors are coming to bite them in the ass, and now people want forget what THEY said.
Yes I remember it well. I have stood by my friends and protested at the Capitol the passage of prop 8. And guess what because those statements were made by the YES side it is illegal now illegal to teach gay marraige in school.
No I don't think you get what I am saying. Prop 215 was written so anybody that wants to legally smoke weed w/o state persecution can by simply talking to a friendly doctor. My friend was the genius behind that specific part of 215. It wasn't just about getting stoned this was to encourage possible social change, the only way to achieve positive social change is through inclusion of as many people as possible.
Except for the fact that the US Supreme Court has protected doctors rights to reccomend medical marijuana under the 1st ammendment. You know the whole free speech thing.
That is why people have the option of VOLUNTARILY registering with the Calfornia State Dept of Health Services. LEO can't question SB 420 cards. And plus if you are doing things in a manner that brings LEO attention it will be the court that accepts the documents not the pigs. Do I need to dig out evidence code about authenticating documents?
I have a psychiatric disorder, which was originally diagnosed by a mmj doc. I blew off the diagnoses actually at the time. Later several other docs have confirmed it. Talk about a hidden disibilty. Can you read my mind? I do not fear being questioned. Infact I enjoy it! Ask away, lets make more people informed. By answering others questions (including the pigs) their fear (organized crime, other drugs, ect.) is removed too.
Except that point is null and void
http://stopthedrugwar.org/chronicle-old/307/conant.shtml
And after the Micheal Jackson death the DEA is going to be nose deep into busting doc's who overly PRESCRIBE medication which is often fatal and commonly abused.