I like hps,because it puts out more lumens per watt than mh,thats why it yields better.But the mh spectrum is nicer to look at the plants and take pics w/ the lights on.Great job on the Blue Dream
so has anyone tried a PlantMax Dual Arc 1000 watt bulb....
110,000 lumens has both spectrums in one bulb...600 watt HPS + a 400 watt MH... emitted from one bulb.... runs on a 1000 watt ballast
Lumens have nothing to do with yield. The reason hps produces more is because it has a higher output of red than your basic MH. The newer 315w ceramic metal halides yield about the same as 600w hps, but only have 36000 lumens.
The plants are not signalled to bloom by red light...... They are signalled by the number of hours of dark.
Ilikecookies - Lumens have absolutely NOTHING to do with plant lighting or plant growth. It is about photons........ Lumens is a measure of light photons in a range that the human eye is sensitive and not what should be considered when evaluating a light source.
I am under the impression that during flowering( in the fall) the sun is lower in the horizon and hence has greater ozone to trvel through, there by changing the spectrum of the sunlight that reaches the earth and that plants over time have become sensitive to this color change so much so that without changing day length but changing spectrum can trigger flowering. However I have seen plants grown from clone to bud with nothing but MH bulbs with satisfactory end results.
IOW PAR is a good way. PAR is measure in Photosynthetic Photon Flux Density (PPFD) or umol/m2/second.Lumens is a measurement of light output at nm points in the spectrum that the human eye is sensitive to. Not the amount of energy the bulb puts out that plants are sensitive to.
It is better to examine the points of high output by a bulb (spectrum output breakdown) as it relates to what a plant uses in the many photosynthetic processes that occur within the plant tissue. Measuring photon output at all different wavelengths against the plant sensitivity curve is a very good start.
Duh yeah sorry my bad whazzup I was thinking higher frequency and realize the inverse relationship number between higher frequency and shorter wavelength. I agree the full spectrum is what plants like, just like the sun although it uses different wavelengths more efficiently (like red being more efficient eg at 660-680 nm). The ones who have it dialed for yield and quality seem to use both as in a 2-3:1 hps/mh ratio. Thanks for the heads up.Lol blue is higher frequency, so lower wave length .
Lumens are indeed for human as Azeotrope stated and have nothing to do with plant response. A high lumens lamp only indicates that it probably has lots of light around 550 nm where the human eye is most sensitive.
Spectrum doesn't change much over the seasons and one might even argue that in the summer you have more blue light, due to the blue skies (which are blue btw because of the diffuse blue light breaking on entrance of the atmosphere).
Fortunately the sun does not produce 2000 umol all day and doesn't even reach it every day in most places on earth, so 2000 umol is not a good aim. Look more for the dli.
Plants always do best under a full spectrum. Photosynthesis is driven by photon count, so a lamp with a higher photon output will produce a better yield. Quantity is one, quality is two. So while HPS still is the absolute winner when it comes to producing photons per watt, the quality of the spectrum is of influence too and will define the quality of the crop.