Lame. I want my 3 minutes back.
Although the vaporizer has been around for a long time it still feels rich or luxurious futuristic to inhale only vapor no smoke.
I hope someone didn't complain to have Egzoset's photos removed, that would be petty. We're discussing an important topic in a public forum. And it appears we may have a poor sport whose only purpose is to argue or cause argument. Not for me, not here please. It isn't "my thread," though I would remove negativity from it given the choice. Some prompts do not warrant a response. For example a choice to smoke, or vaporize, isn't the same as long winded posts against vaporizing, think about it for a bit. The man in the first post is still relevant though I admit it sounds a little bit like a click bait title.
Waving away 50 years of experience to the contrary requires careful documentation - which you are no doubt ready to provideALL bowls of cannabis flower are devoid of any cannabinoid resins after the second or third puff... period...
Totally agree.Anyone who thinks cannabis is devoid of cannabinoids after two puffs needs to pass me their bowl and I'll finish that off for them.
Then that's on you.
With respect, we need government *impediments* to honest research removed...for the last 50 years, govt has only funded research that promised to find HARM DONE - which is how we got the ‘brain damage’ myth, the ‘a-motivational syndrome’ myth, the ‘pot makes you sterile’ myth, and the ‘pot causes birth defects’ myth.It's high time to get the proper government funded research into exactly what is in this herb of life. How can something so old and popular throughout the ages be so little known? Nevermind blowing billions on missile research and the like...but I digress.
I'm just joshing, and I totally see your point, alcohol and tobacco being the obvious examples. Still, if smoking marijuana is bad, where are all the sick people?