what kind of led light did u use in that pic?
I have just set up my custom 200 watt 660nm red led array (18,000lm) )(1k in parts) with a 1kw mh in a test room after seeing a friend get a gpw with a higher quality Chinese LED array.
I'm not switching 100% over to leds I'm just trying to make my rooms more efficient ...
I will make decisions to spend $ based off this test room (will cost me 6-10k just to hybridize my main room )
Is this a good deal? http://compare.ebay.com/like/1806953...=sbar&_lwgsi=y
my space size is 3w x 3d x 4h. will this work good for flowering and keep the heat down.
im a few weeks in flowering now.
thanks Milhouse,
to me, LED's are the way to go
- no heat
- longer life
- very efficient (no unused spectrums)
- about half the wattage needed per sq ft (as compared to HID)
startup costs is the con. but prices should come down over time...
Cool thread, I love LEDs, work with them every day. I would like to point out though, that they do indeed make heat, a similar amount to an HPS. Seems to be a common misconception around LEDs. The most efficient blue LEDs are still only converting about 30% of the power going in photometric power, the rest goes to heat. Red LEDs are far less efficient.
The difference is that with LEDs the heat is conducted out the rear and with HPS it's mostly emitted as radiated heat.
Photometric power can also cause heat, just like a laser, especially blue wavelengths. Too much blue won't reflect back off a green leaf, much will absorb and turn to heat on the leaf's surface, which isn't good.
LEDs are amazing, but I think about 0.01% of people using them actually understand them.
the cheap ebay ufos suck.
Wow, kinda makes me rethink the use of HID or HO (PL-L isn't HO right?).
Did you grow before using LED? What kind of gpw were you getting before?
Cool thread, I love LEDs, work with them every day. I would like to point out though, that they do indeed make heat, a similar amount to an HPS. Seems to be a common misconception around LEDs. The most efficient blue LEDs are still only converting about 30% of the power going in photometric power, the rest goes to heat. Red LEDs are far less efficient.
The difference is that with LEDs the heat is conducted out the rear and with HPS it's mostly emitted as radiated heat.
Photometric power can also cause heat, just like a laser, especially blue wavelengths. Too much blue won't reflect back off a green leaf, much will absorb and turn to heat on the leaf's surface, which isn't good.
LEDs are amazing, but I think about 0.01% of people using them actually understand them.
Yes, I wish people knew more about LEDs, but that will never be the case.
Heat is a non-issue with LED growing provided you have decent thermal transfer and ventilation. If your heat sink is too hot to touch, you will have issues. The fact they do not radiate heat is a beneficial trait so that you can use wide lense angles closer to the plants for very effective intracanopy lighting. 1W LEDs of course for maximum efficiency and less heat.
I love LEDs and their incorporation to my garden. They provide side lighting where my HPS doesn't get to very well. Being that you can mount them to any aluminum surface, it allows for endless configurations. I have a couple DIY LED arrays in my cabinet to supplement my HPS and the buds are better all around. I get a more complete spectra as well as light hitting the plants where HPS doesn't. They can be mounted anywhere without risk of burning leaves.
Buying an overhead LED lamp as the only light source is probably not going to live up to the hype. You need a lot of LEDs to equal a 1000W HPS, about 850-900W worth. Still a big misconception with LEDs that will probably never go away is that you get the same output as HID for half the wattage. Simply false on every level.