CFL have zero penetration, horrible light diffusion, emanate pretty much 360 degrees / 180, depends how you look at it… I guess.. it’s a terribly unfair comparisonI still cant get the hang of it, back in the day no one wanted to put 50 cfl lights and grow with them, claiming they are low powered lights, now everyone puts 300 even lower watt\par lights and claim they are superior, common sense and logic is out the window, go figure
Ill say it like this, Im reserving judgement until all the facts come out
Right now it seems that LED is the smoking gun in our quality problems
Im about to finish a HID cycle, ill let you know if i got the old buzz back
10foot plants indoors - how about a picture with a tape measure ... i call that bullshit... BUT... prove me wrong, and i'll eat a bag of dog-shitI grow 10’ tall trees indoors, lbs / plant…
This is one plant drying; cut in half to fit in the closet; anyone knows the height of a common closet top, give or take - double it…it’s more than that as a foot stem was left behind10foot plants indoors - how about a picture with a tape measure ... i call that bullshit... BUT... prove me wrong, and i'll eat a bag of dog-shit
hey i'm the one eating the bag of dog-shit... if i see a pic...This is one plant drying; cut in half to fit in the closet; anyone knows the height of a common closet top, give or take - double it…it’s more than that as a foot stem was left behind
My garage ceilings are over 11’ tall - I rarely post in here but enough people here know me and know two things…
I never fucking lie, ever….
I grow huge ass plants…
Good work offending me and loosing my respect forever; you sir are a muppet that deserves not even the time you’ve already received
Good day
View attachment 18740866
First of all what support you have for this claim "CFL have zero penetration", you think CFL photons are diff from other lamps or something ? penetration is the effect of intensity, the more you have the more the light will saturate and move on.CFL have zero penetration, horrible light diffusion, emanate pretty much 360 degrees / 180, depends how you look at it… I guess.. it’s a terribly unfair comparison
I’ve got LED hung up 6’ above canopy blasting it as bright as anything you’ve seen…. You can drive a single LED chip the size a quarter over a 100w, you think that’s weak?
I do tend to agree, a bunch of weak ass LED at low wattage isn’t ideal, maybe for a 3x3 closet grow or something but I grow 10’ tall trees indoors, lbs / plant… some rooms only LED, some combo LED & HID, often season dependent…. But the LED I make & buy, are exceptional at growing many species plants, cannabis included - I assure you of this, take it as you will.
Anyhow, IMHO there’s a terrible amount ego & ignorance in this thread (not directing at anyone specifically) it seems from either side the coin, and to me both sides making some valid points all the while talking right past one another…
Sadly a Sign of the times….
Two Ears & One Mouth…..
Read slower, comprehend more…. 400v like this one here that gets blown away by the LED next to it watt for watt? Nothing is in theory, those little quarter sized chips in the pic are driven at 64w each, I could do more but don’t - that light at 800w blows the fuck out the DE Gavita at 825w, and absolutely for PAR too, whom you kidding; I was spewing PAR decades ago, please your preaching to a choir who knows more about lighting and has more experience with it….all formsFirst of all what support you have for this claim "CFL have zero penetration", you think CFL photons are diff from other lamps or something ? penetration is the effect of intensity, the more you have the more the light will saturate and move on.
Where are those 100w driven diodes in the industry or hobby grows ? talk about reality, not what can be done in theory...
Bright is one thing, actual intensity is another, come look at my 400V lamp i dare you haha
It dosent mean a thing if your eye see it as bright, we are searching for most power in the PAR range in total, each photon count as long as its PAR range
I believe you are making and buying good product, i dont dispute you, i dispute the tech.
I do believe there are 5% of LED panels and growers that maybe do a better job (higher watt diodes)
I dont know about all led panels and their ratings, maybe some broke the barrier of 0.2-0.5w which is useless in producing what we look for.
You see better results with HID&LED because plants see the high intensity sun(the HID) and develop its defenses against it.
LED is weak, its perfect, but weak, its not theory, its the numbers the mfg post.
Lamp mfg measure light output in LM for a reason, PPFD is subjected to ones height and space,
you can put 300 diodes and saturate a whole 4x4 with photons, but the source who makes them are weak, only makes 40LM per sec, not enough to induce the glue process to max
Picture this, a waterfall falling on your head, or 300 sprinklers soaking you slowly
the first one is gonna make you want to put your strongest protection, as its a massive body of water, the 2nd one, you can put a small cap and be ok
Come on, you’re talking about something you simply don’t have experience with, and it shows…You are so smart, but so not.
You have cobs, which are nothing more then again, 0.5w maybe 1w diodes packed together,
I dont get it... what do you think we are talking about ? you are a light expert ?
When you learn basic concepts of nature and light, not bro science light (adding lm is one of them, like you and most of LED fantaics do.) you dont drive a single diode to 64w, im sorry, again you are either dont know what you actually doing or, well, dont know what in theory your doing.
We dont need for you to tell us what lends more credible, we are doing fine sir
Im not saying your wrong, im saying the tech and the numbers are wrong, you just repeat them, its ok i didnt expect you to understand
Im sorry, your diodes are not 825w each, so no, you dont blow the Gavita away in no given scale.
In theory, if you had this kind of diode you would blow it away X 2
But please, land back in reality and stop talking unicorns.
Dinosaur Or was it a horse to water …So you wanna measure the arc tube now huh.. funny
Does it matter ? still produce 95K lm in real life.
"If you took a mm x mm cube, and measured light intensity vs the arc tube mm x mm cube, the LED would blow it away, that’s intensity apples to apples…"
Again with your theories ? you are comparing things that dont exist to things that do, are you following up on us here ?
bring me a 825w diode, i will be the first to agree with you it blows the HID, i will be the first to throw the HIDs away.
Until then stop talking about stuff that only exist in your imagination
"Your arguments for intensity are completely erroneous; rooted in ignorance - ignorance being having little or no LED experience - it simply is what it is…"
A lot of bla bla, ohh you are one of those guys that know my exp with shit and stuff damn, people here know me better then me
Heard it all before, come up with counter claims please, these high words dont make an impression on me, and dosent make you look good either
Lucky your only argument is "Being a fossil", again, no solid arguments, just slandering, The old is dead, Modern is better, same same bro, weak arguments, no understanding of science or nature.
But im still here, waiting to hear from you, some solid information, maybe try and show us how u drive a diode to 64w and stuff like that, wear a mask before huh ?
I used to help a friend trim who had all 10 foot plants in his garage.This is one plant drying; cut in half to fit in the closet; anyone knows the height of a common closet top, give or take - double it…it’s more than that as a foot stem was left behind
My garage ceilings are over 11’ tall - I rarely post in here but enough people here know me and know two things…
I never fucking lie, ever….
I grow huge ass plants…
Good work offending me and loosing my respect forever; you sir are a muppet that deserves not even the time you’ve already received
Good day
View attachment 18740866
perhaps you’ve been and continue to make the mistake… show me once where I ever said I drove a diode at 64w..? I said I drive a single chip at 64w, that one quarter sized chip by definition is comprised of MANY diodes…, maybe go back, reread and get it right this time…? I know exactly what I’m talking about fwiwBut now you claim you drive your COBs to 64w, maybe you made a mistake when u said you were driving a diode to this wattage, and meant the COBs, its ok, not gonna hold u to it just be more precise next time mr expert
perhaps you’ve been and continue to make the mistake… show me once where I ever said I drove a diode at 64w..? I said I drive a single chip at 64w, that one quarter sized chip by definition is comprised of MANY diodes…, maybe go back, reread and get it right this time…? I know exactly what I’m talking about fwiw
I didn’t read a chip is like an arc anywhere; I’m just saying they are comparatively the same thing for each respective tech (house the light emitting aspects of each), obviously they are completely different things… when trying to compare different techs it helps to find parts that serve similar functions for comparisons; can you understand this?
Anyhow I find you’re exhausting to converse with so I’m going to stop; good luck with your grows
A CFL, in the days of CFLs, might of used 26w to produce a 1500 lumen lamp. That is less than 60 lumen per watt. The last one's developed got that down to 18w giving almost 85 lumen per watt.I still cant get the hang of it, back in the day no one wanted to put 50 cfl lights and grow with them, claiming they are low powered lights, now everyone puts 300 even lower watt\par lights and claim they are superior, common sense and logic is out the window, go figure
Ill say it like this, Im reserving judgement until all the facts come out
Right now it seems that LED is the smoking gun in our quality problems
Im about to finish a HID cycle, ill let you know if i got the old buzz back