Hempy McNoodle
Well-known member
Warmer temps lead to more cow farts. Cow farts don't lead to warmer temps. If CO2 warming theory was true (which, of course, it isn't) your grow tents would get warmer if you add CO2. But, they don't.
I was always wondering if u could see the outdoor bho blasting in cal or col in autum with the right satelite. Looks like u can.
U can tell the others but u can't think for them.I'm stepping out of this thread though, logic will only open so many eyes.
CO2 is good for plant growth, but try to find a graph of sunspot activity, which goes back further than the graph I have.You are welcome to shop at whatever store you please! Buy it or don't, CO2 is a well know greenhouse gas, but obviously not the only climate driver.
The "resolution" on the 800,000 yr time frame is excellent (actually went a couple 100,000 years back recently, with ice cores from Greenland est. 2,000,000 yr old), which is why it is used.
But here you go:
View attachment 18128402
Note the blue boxes in the upper portion -- these are the ice ages.
Within the Age of Mammals:
Study of ancient climate suggests future warming
Do high levels of CO2 in the past contradict the warming effect of CO2?
I almost completely agree. But, we also have one billion cows farting. That's only cows. Elephants are out there to consider, too, not to mention termites that happen to generate more CO2 from their farts than cows!To all those saying that climate change is natural, well yes absolutely it is. No one is denying this, least of all climate scientists. What is argued though, is that current rapid changes are brought about my man.
For those of you who believe this is a hoax, what is so hard to understand? We have 7.5 billion people burning various things for energy (oil, coal, gas, wood, cow dung), and at the same time cutting down forests (such as the Amazon, lungs of the world) and depleting the ocean, all with an atmosphere that effective goes up (I think I read) about 60 miles?
Verdant Green's post above is spot on. It's a culture war unfortunately. After reading about the "inconvenient truth", it took me some years to understand that it was not only the message that was a problem, but the messenger.
There are massive vested interests at play, that are only concerned with maintaining profits for shareholders. Short term profits at the expense of future generations.
your hypothesis is plain stupid because the co2 in grow tents is not co-mingled covalently and non-covalently with other gases in a holding pattern.Warmer temps lead to more cow farts. Cow farts don't lead to warmer temps. If CO2 warming theory was true (which, of course, it isn't) your grow tents would get warmer if you add CO2. But, they don't.
Sorry stepping out again.
Bbbut the bubble and cone people I ALREADY told you about, reinforced by Buzz are controlling thatSeems like no one ever wants to answer this.^
We've already hashed this one out enough times, in The Great Awakening thread.your hypothesis is plain stupid because the co2 in grow tents is not co-mingled covalently and non-covalently with other gases in a holding pattern.
i think climate change deniers spend most of their lives in climate controlled areas and not much time out in actual nature...i know i've personally seen millions of acre of forest die off from spruce bark beetles after years of unusually warm summers as well as seeing what's happening as the permafrost melts in alaska...here in the desert,the rio grande is just a sandy ditch,they won't let out water until june this year,typically irrigation season starts in march....and all the extreme weather events happening nearly constantly is hard to ignore...without serious cognitive dissonance,or just plain stupidity
#fuckyourbigasspickups
WE did not. You just evaded it as you do everything. You've already said twice that we hashed it out. In reality you only said something along the lines of 'what makes you think that?' or 'how so'?We've already hashed this one out enough times, in The Great Awakening thread.