What's new
  • As of today ICMag has his own Discord server. In this Discord server you can chat, talk with eachother, listen to music, share stories and pictures...and much more. Join now and let's grow together! Join ICMag Discord here! More details in this thread here: here.

:::::::INFOWARS News Thread:::::::

Status
Not open for further replies.

packerfan79

Active member
Veteran
Free speech doesn't mean that Youtube has to allow you to broadcast (and make money from) your speech....

I completely agree, YouTube has immunity as a platform. Similar to a phone company. When YouTube makes editorial decisions, they step out of the platform, and become a publisher. Publishers are open to lawsuits, where as platforms are not.

It's sad to see people here that don't believe in free speech. This isn't the American way.
 

beta

Active member
Veteran
I completely agree, YouTube has immunity as a platform. Similar to a phone company. When YouTube makes editorial decisions, they step out of the platform, and become a publisher. Publishers are open to lawsuits, where as platforms are not.

It's sad to see people here that don't believe in free speech. This isn't the American way.

LoL, now tell us how you feel about bakers refusing service to gay couples. :biggrin:
 

packerfan79

Active member
Veteran
The American Way needs some work because it isn't what it used to be.

I agree . You shouldn't be able to stifle debate, and silence voices you disagree with. I would never attempt to silence you or anyone else. Your political affiliation should not matter. Freedom is paramount.
 

pipeline

Cannabotanist
ICMag Donor
Veteran
Oh Free Speech, Free Speech, Free Speech. That again.

Free Speech isn't a sacrament and it certainly doesn't mean you get a free pass for saying anything you want. Someone might have the right to call me a cocksucker, but that doesn't mean I won't slap him in the mouth until he looses some teeth.

You have the right to just fuck any woman you want because you can do what you want. It's your right. But your wife will put a pile of garbage bags with your shit in them by the curb.

People use free speech as a shield when they're breaking the law. And by law I mean Christian, Natural, Moral, Civil and Common law.


Explain what all that means.
 

beta

Active member
Veteran
I agree . You shouldn't be able to stifle debate, and silence voices you disagree with. I would never attempt to silence you or anyone else. Your political affiliation should not matter. Freedom is paramount.

Now do Christian bakers. Should they be allowed to decide who they do business with? You're saying Youtube should not be allowed to choose.

Very consistent, very cool.
 

pipeline

Cannabotanist
ICMag Donor
Veteran
There has been selective censorship of facts being exposed. Its politically motivated censorship to hide the facts from the public. Exposing the truth through open discussion and debate will destroy the selfish agenda of the globalist government and corrupt elite. Exposing the corruption and discovering the truth is not hate and racism. Its election meddling when these platforms do this type of manipulation using their software products. It goes against the will of the people.



The government was created to protect our liberty. Have a good one! :smoke:


https://www.infowars.com/live-clown-world-footage-infowars-hits-the-streets-of-miami/

Live Clown World Footage: Infowars Hits the Streets of Miami

Find out what people are saying about the upcoming Democratic debates

Savanah Hernandez | Infowars.com - June 26, 2019 Comments





Infowars’ Savanah Hernandez headed to Miami, Florida to get a live look at the Democratic debates this week.
Prior to the debates, Hernandez talked with locals about who they think the front-runner is in the Democrat field & how badly they think Trump will lose.
 

armedoldhippy

Well-known member
Veteran
there is considerable confusion (obfuscation?) RE "facts" & their distribution. facts are FACTS, not someones opinions. you have a right to your opinions, but not your own "facts". wanting/wishing/believing something was a fact does not make it so, nor does it give one the right to claim censorship when a platform will not let them disperse their "alternative facts" as though they were, in fact, facts...sorry.
 

Badfishy1

Active member
LoL, now tell us how you feel about bakers refusing service to gay couples. :biggrin:

According to SC, they have the right to deny a commissioned piece. Buy one off the shelf. Big difference between a big tech company censoring while claiming to be a ‘platform’ and a mom n pops bakery not wanting to promote degeneracy. Why do the pole smokers need a Jesus cake anyhow?

Once again a homosexual unable to identify as anything other than a sexual degenerate hijacking a thread. Colour me shawk’d
 

White Beard

Active member
Who has hate and racism online? Constitutional government advocates? I see hate and racism from the Left/Liberal clown camp and that's about it.

Election meddling is a crime. Free speech is a God given right! The companies are getting legal protection for being an open public forum, but they are still censoring.

The “conservative” paper, NY Post, points to a study that shows NY next to last in patriotism. While that may be true, how they measure patriotism makes a mockery of the values of 1776 & July 4th. And, the climate war between radical cities & conservative rural communities escalates in Oregon

Eyes they have, but they do not see; ears they have, but do not hear, they are led astray by the Prince of Lies, down into perdition....

Censorship is a GOVERNMENT action which the 1st amendment prohibits: private entities may act as they like - within the law, at least theoretically.

“The “conservative” paper, NY Post...” is owned by Jared Kushner. Not so “conservative” as Breitbart or InfoWhores, but a true *radical* “conservative” outlet.
 

Gypsy Nirvana

Recalcitrant Reprobate -
Administrator
Veteran
- seems like the media these days attributes patriotism with nationalism - then goes straight to Nazism, as if any patriot is some sorta hard-right goose-stepping Nazi -

- so it appears that its not cool to show affection for or love your country in any way - unless you want to be regailed with the usual overused expletives etc.
 

pipeline

Cannabotanist
ICMag Donor
Veteran
- seems like the media these days attributes patriotism with nationalism - then goes straight to Nazism, as if any patriot is some sorta hard-right goose-stepping Nazi -

- so it appears that its not cool to show affection for or love your country in any way - unless you want to be regailed with the usual overused expletives etc.


I agree, then we have the real hate and racism directed at us for being nazi's all based on lies and ignorance! There is real discrimination going on right now, its against truth speakers and conservative nationalist patriots. There is only one truth. Infowars has a lot of man on the street interviews to show this widespread misbehavior based on false accusations.
 

pipeline

Cannabotanist
ICMag Donor
Veteran
Eyes they have, but they do not see; ears they have, but do not hear, they are led astray by the Prince of Lies, down into perdition....

Censorship is a GOVERNMENT action which the 1st amendment prohibits: private entities may act as they like - within the law, at least theoretically.

“The “conservative” paper, NY Post...” is owned by Jared Kushner. Not so “conservative” as Breitbart or InfoWhores, but a true *radical* “conservative” outlet.


They are private companies, yes, but they are a mondern day public forum similar to a public square, according to the legal framework they operate under which provides them legal protection from criminal material shared on their plaform. They were also started with government money in startup projects. Incutel (sp) was the seed company of google, and Facebook was also a gov. startup project called Lifebook which ended the day before Facebook went into operation. Do some research and let me know what you think.
 

pipeline

Cannabotanist
ICMag Donor
Veteran
https://www.infowars.com/secret-ser...e-into-custody-after-she-spits-on-eric-trump/


Secret Service Take Chicago Restaurant Employee into Custody After She Spits on Eric Trump

U.S. Secret Service took an employee of a Chicago restaurant into custody Tuesday evening after she spit on President Donald Trump’s son Eric Trump, the president’s son told Breitbart News

Breitbart - June 26, 2019 Comments
Image Credits: Spencer Platt/Getty Images.





“It was purely a disgusting act by somebody who clearly has emotional problems,” Eric Trump told Breitbart News when reached by phone late Tuesday evening. “For a party that preaches tolerance, this once again demonstrates they have very little civility. When somebody is sick enough to resort to spitting on someone, it just emphasizes a sickness and desperation and the fact that we’re winning.”
Eric Trump spoke to Breitbart News late Tuesday evening after local news reporters revealed what happened.
 

beta

Active member
Veteran
They are private companies, yes, but they are a mondern day public forum similar to a public square, according to the legal framework they operate under which provides them legal protection from criminal material shared on their plaform. They were also started with government money in startup projects. Incutel (sp) was the seed company of google, and Facebook was also a gov. startup project called Lifebook which ended the day before Facebook went into operation. Do some research and let me know what you think.

The entire internet is the result of public funding.

It sounds to me like you're suggesting we should nationalize / socialize these platforms and even the internet itself.

Welcome to the revolution, Comrade Pipeline! I'm glad we can finally agree on something! :biggrin:
 

packerfan79

Active member
Veteran
Now do Christian bakers. Should they be allowed to decide who they do business with? You're saying Youtube should not be allowed to choose.

Very consistent, very cool.

YouTube is free to choose what they publish. They just won't be able to be a platform immune from legal recourse like they have been. They will be no different from the Washington Post, or any other news source.

Are you implying that the ideology behind YouTube is a religion, thus protected by a right to religion. I have been saying for many years leftism is a religion.

Churches are not allowed to advocate political positions now, they lose their tax exemption if they do.

The Baker is protected from being forced to create an artistic product that violates religious beliefs. Should Google be forced to create conservative art?
I have been wholly consistant, no one should be forced to create something they disagree with. Allowing people on a platform, is much different than being forced to creating something you disagree with.


Google, and YouTube dominate more of the market, than Standard oil did, when they were broken up. Antitrust laws clearly apply here. Personally I think breaking Google up, is terrible for the economy. It could cause another bubble, like the housing bubble, or the dotcom bubble. Hopefully Google will regulate itself, but it doesn't look good.
 

White Beard

Active member
The entire internet is the result of public funding.

It sounds to me like you're suggesting we should nationalize / socialize these platforms and even the internet itself.

Welcome to the revolution, Comrade Pipeline! I'm glad we can finally agree on something! :biggrin:

But it must be under conservative, nationalist, profitable control, don’t you know, like the talk-show host in V for Vendetta...or his real-world model
 

packerfan79

Active member
Veteran
The entire internet is the result of public funding.

It sounds to me like you're suggesting we should nationalize / socialize these platforms and even the internet itself.

Welcome to the revolution, Comrade Pipeline! I'm glad we can finally agree on something! :biggrin:

Are you claiming that their is a potential revolution that gives governmental control of what is on the internet?

Aren't revolutions usually against a government.

I don't want the government deciding what YOU can say on the internet. Gypsy's stellar work here would be gone in a short time if we give the government that control.
 
W

Water-

"Patriotism vs. Nationalism. ... The patriot believes that both the system of government and the people of their country are inherently good and work together for a better quality of life. In contrast, feelings of nationalism are based on a belief that one's country is superior to all others."
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top