Free speech doesn't mean that Youtube has to allow you to broadcast (and make money from) your speech....
I completely agree, YouTube has immunity as a platform. Similar to a phone company. When YouTube makes editorial decisions, they step out of the platform, and become a publisher. Publishers are open to lawsuits, where as platforms are not.
It's sad to see people here that don't believe in free speech. This isn't the American way.
The American Way needs some work because it isn't what it used to be.
Oh Free Speech, Free Speech, Free Speech. That again.
Free Speech isn't a sacrament and it certainly doesn't mean you get a free pass for saying anything you want. Someone might have the right to call me a cocksucker, but that doesn't mean I won't slap him in the mouth until he looses some teeth.
You have the right to just fuck any woman you want because you can do what you want. It's your right. But your wife will put a pile of garbage bags with your shit in them by the curb.
People use free speech as a shield when they're breaking the law. And by law I mean Christian, Natural, Moral, Civil and Common law.
I agree . You shouldn't be able to stifle debate, and silence voices you disagree with. I would never attempt to silence you or anyone else. Your political affiliation should not matter. Freedom is paramount.
LoL, now tell us how you feel about bakers refusing service to gay couples.
Who has hate and racism online? Constitutional government advocates? I see hate and racism from the Left/Liberal clown camp and that's about it.
Election meddling is a crime. Free speech is a God given right! The companies are getting legal protection for being an open public forum, but they are still censoring.
The “conservative” paper, NY Post, points to a study that shows NY next to last in patriotism. While that may be true, how they measure patriotism makes a mockery of the values of 1776 & July 4th. And, the climate war between radical cities & conservative rural communities escalates in Oregon
- seems like the media these days attributes patriotism with nationalism - then goes straight to Nazism, as if any patriot is some sorta hard-right goose-stepping Nazi -
- so it appears that its not cool to show affection for or love your country in any way - unless you want to be regailed with the usual overused expletives etc.
Eyes they have, but they do not see; ears they have, but do not hear, they are led astray by the Prince of Lies, down into perdition....
Censorship is a GOVERNMENT action which the 1st amendment prohibits: private entities may act as they like - within the law, at least theoretically.
“The “conservative” paper, NY Post...” is owned by Jared Kushner. Not so “conservative” as Breitbart or InfoWhores, but a true *radical* “conservative” outlet.
They are private companies, yes, but they are a mondern day public forum similar to a public square, according to the legal framework they operate under which provides them legal protection from criminal material shared on their plaform. They were also started with government money in startup projects. Incutel (sp) was the seed company of google, and Facebook was also a gov. startup project called Lifebook which ended the day before Facebook went into operation. Do some research and let me know what you think.
Now do Christian bakers. Should they be allowed to decide who they do business with? You're saying Youtube should not be allowed to choose.
Very consistent, very cool.
The entire internet is the result of public funding.
It sounds to me like you're suggesting we should nationalize / socialize these platforms and even the internet itself.
Welcome to the revolution, Comrade Pipeline! I'm glad we can finally agree on something!
The entire internet is the result of public funding.
It sounds to me like you're suggesting we should nationalize / socialize these platforms and even the internet itself.
Welcome to the revolution, Comrade Pipeline! I'm glad we can finally agree on something!