What's new
  • As of today ICMag has his own Discord server. In this Discord server you can chat, talk with eachother, listen to music, share stories and pictures...and much more. Join now and let's grow together! Join ICMag Discord here! More details in this thread here: here.

:::::::INFOWARS News Thread:::::::

Status
Not open for further replies.
h.h.

h.h.

Active member
Veteran
About a 42% difference between the U.S. and Norway.

Health insurance works at about a 4 to 5.25%, if this article is correct.

https://www.investopedia.com/ask/an...al-profit-margin-company-insurance-sector.asp



That still leaves around 37%.


Not a huge savings, but savings.


Looking at the drug margins.


https://www.46brooklyn.com/research...wild-world-of-prescription-drug-markups-bz556


Medicare for all won’t work if there is no check on the profiteers.


Trump has signed an order allowing states to legalize using out of country pharmacies. After all he is a globalist. It also appeals to his geriatric followers. It’s just a regulation dodge. Money will go to the same companies. Prices will still rise.


It’s the American way.
Liberal policies where money is blindly thrown with the wrong follow through.
Profiteers pounce on the loose cash while denouncing liberal ways, when it’s the profiteers that need to be kept in check.
 
pipeline

pipeline

Cannabotanist
ICMag Donor
Veteran
https://calvarychapel.com/pastorchuck/twft


https://www.infowars.com/673748-2/


Report: London Attacker was Convicted Terrorist with Jihadist Ties

He was jailed in 2012 as part of a plot to bomb the London Stock Exchange and build a terrorist training camp

Breitbart - November 30, 2019 11 Comments





UPDATE — 7:46 PM EST/00:46 GMT: The man who carried out the London Bridge terror attack has been identified as 28-year-old Usman Khan, Metropolitan Police confirm. He was jailed in 2012 as part of a plot to bomb the London Stock Exchange and build a terrorist training camp. He was also believed to have supported al-Muhijaroun, a militant jihadist network in the United Kingdom, reports The Guardian. Read the original article below.
The suspected attacker responsible for Friday’s deadly stabbing in central London was a convicted terrorist who was recently released from prison and believed to possess ties to Islamic extremist groups, according to The Times.
Earlier, a knife-wielding man stabbed several people at London Bridge, killing two and wounding three others. Police shot the suspect dead at the scene. He is said to have worn a fake explosive vest and an electronic prison tag. Prior to the attack, the knifeman threatened to blow up Fishmongers’ Hall, where he was reportedly planning to attend a conference on prisoner rehabilitation organized by the University of Cambridge, reports The Times. Authorities are treating the deadly incident as a terror attack.
​
Pedestrians and vehicular commuters described the fear they felt and the chaos at the scene. Ulig Bek of Uzbekistan told The Times: “I saw the guy lying on the ground and didn’t know what was going on.”
Bek, who video-recorded shots being fired, added: “The police were shouting at him and he was shouting, ‘Help, help, help’. Everyone was so shook up. Police were screaming, ‘Put it down.’”
Read more
 
Cannavore

Cannavore

Well-known member
Veteran
Dr. Purpur said:
If You Think Health Care Is Expensive Now, Just Wait Until It’s ‘Free’


America needs to see the tax returns of all public servants who
became millionaires while being public servants.
Click to expand...

*Free* at the point of service.

Why would our costs go up when every other country that does M4A does so at a lower cost per capita than we do?

M4A is inevitable. You're all fighting a losing battle lol.
 
beta

beta

Active member
Veteran
What do you suppose the chances are that Infowars would have run a breathless article about this if the attacker was a white Christian?

We both know that Infowars wouldn't have even covered it. Why does Infowars make it a point to spread fear about Muslims specifically? Why do they choose to highlight crimes that make their readers scared?

pipeline said:
https://calvarychapel.com/pastorchuck/twft


https://www.infowars.com/673748-2/


Report: London Attacker was Convicted Terrorist with Jihadist Ties

He was jailed in 2012 as part of a plot to bomb the London Stock Exchange and build a terrorist training camp

Breitbart - November 30, 2019 11 Comments
[URL=https://assets.infowars.com/2019/11/london-bridge-usman-khan.jpg]View Image[/URL]




UPDATE — 7:46 PM EST/00:46 GMT: The man who carried out the London Bridge terror attack has been identified as 28-year-old Usman Khan, Metropolitan Police confirm. He was jailed in 2012 as part of a plot to bomb the London Stock Exchange and build a terrorist training camp. He was also believed to have supported al-Muhijaroun, a militant jihadist network in the United Kingdom, reports The Guardian. Read the original article below.
The suspected attacker responsible for Friday’s deadly stabbing in central London was a convicted terrorist who was recently released from prison and believed to possess ties to Islamic extremist groups, according to The Times.
Earlier, a knife-wielding man stabbed several people at London Bridge, killing two and wounding three others. Police shot the suspect dead at the scene. He is said to have worn a fake explosive vest and an electronic prison tag. Prior to the attack, the knifeman threatened to blow up Fishmongers’ Hall, where he was reportedly planning to attend a conference on prisoner rehabilitation organized by the University of Cambridge, reports The Times. Authorities are treating the deadly incident as a terror attack.
​
Pedestrians and vehicular commuters described the fear they felt and the chaos at the scene. Ulig Bek of Uzbekistan told The Times: “I saw the guy lying on the ground and didn’t know what was going on.”
Bek, who video-recorded shots being fired, added: “The police were shouting at him and he was shouting, ‘Help, help, help’. Everyone was so shook up. Police were screaming, ‘Put it down.’”
Read more
Click to expand...
 
DrLongbottom

DrLongbottom

Well-known member
Veteran
beta said:
What do you suppose the chances are that Infowars would have run a breathless article about this if the attacker was a white Christian?

We both know that Infowars wouldn't have even covered it. Why does Infowars make it a point to spread fear about Muslims specifically? Why do they choose to highlight crimes that make their readers scared?
Click to expand...

they are selling what people are known to buy
Stories of Positivity do not get the clicks that stories selling fear do.
Rush is another perfect example of this.
 
pipeline

pipeline

Cannabotanist
ICMag Donor
Veteran
https://www.infowars.com/fight-another-terror-war-against-drug-cartels-theres-a-better-way/


Fight Another ‘Terror War’ Against Drug Cartels? There’s a Better Way!

Perhaps the answer to the drug cartel problem is to take away their incentives by ending the war on drugs

Ron Paul | Infowars.com - December 2, 2019 12 Comments
Image Credits: HERIKA MARTINEZ/AFP via Getty Images.





The 50-year US war on drugs has been a total failure, with hundreds of billions of dollars flushed down the drain and our civil liberties whittled away fighting a war that cannot be won. The 20 year “war on terror” has likewise been a gigantic US government disaster: hundreds of billions wasted, civil liberties scorched, and a world far more dangerous than when this war was launched after 9/11.
So what to do about two of the greatest policy failures in US history? According to President Trump and many in Washington, the answer is to combine them!
Last week Trump declared that, in light of an attack last month on US tourists in Mexico, he would be designating Mexican drug cartels as foreign terrorist organizations. Asked if he would send in drones to attack targets in Mexico, he responded, “I don’t want to say what I’m going to do, but they will be designated.” The Mexican president was quick to pour cold water on the idea of US drones taking out Mexican targets, responding to Trump’s threats saying “cooperation, yes; interventionism, no.”
​
Trump is not alone in drawing the wrong conclusions from the increasing violence coming from the drug cartels south of the border. A group of US Senators sent a letter to Secretary of State Mike Pompeo urging that the US slap sanctions on the drug cartels in response to the killing of Americans.
Do these Senators really believe that facing US sanctions these drug cartels will close down and move into legitimate activities? Sanctions don’t work against countries and they sure won’t work against drug cartels.
A recent editorial in the conservative Federalist publication urges President Trump to launch “unilateral, no-permission special forces raids” into Mexico like the US did into Pakistan to fight ISIS and al-Qaeda!
I am sure the military-industrial complex loves this idea! Another big war to keep Washington rich at the expense of the rest of us. And the 2001 Authorization for the Use of Military Force can even be trotted out to fight this brand new “terror war”!
Perhaps unintentionally, however, this sudden push to look at the Mexican drug cartels as we did ISIS and al-Qaeda does make sense. After all, the rise of the drug cartels and the rise of the terror cartels have both been due to bad US policy. It was the US invasion of Iraq based on neocon lies that led to the creation of ISIS and expansion of al-Qaeda in the Middle East and it was the US war on drugs that led to the rise of the drug cartels in Mexico.
Here’s another suggestion: maybe instead of doing the same things that do not work we might look at the actual cause of the problems. The US war on drugs makes drugs enormously profitable to Mexican suppliers eager to satisfy a ravenous US market. A study last year by the CATO Institute found that with the steady decriminalization and legalization of marijuana across the United States, the average US Border Patrol agent seized 78 percent less marijuana in fiscal year 2018 than in FY 2013.
Instead of declaring war on Mexico, perhaps the answer to the drug cartel problem is to take away their incentives by ending the war on drugs. Why not try something that actually works?
This article first appeared at RonPaulInstitute.org.
 
X

xavier7995

Right on Ron Paul. I dont always, or even often, agree with him on many topics, but I always respected him. He at least seems to actually hold the beliefs he espouses.
 
pipeline

pipeline

Cannabotanist
ICMag Donor
Veteran
https://www.infowars.com/will-they-steal-the-2020-election/


Will They Steal The 2020 Election?

Manipulated voting machines and software could compromise election integrity

Millie Weaver | Infowars.com - December 1, 2019 Comments





While you wrestle with the reality that offshore companies count, manage, organize, control and operate most of our elections, realize that election software is more than just a tool to manipulate the outcomes of elections.
 
pipeline

pipeline

Cannabotanist
ICMag Donor
Veteran
https://www.infowars.com/judicial-watch-files-house-ethics-complaint-against-rep-ilhan-omar/



Judicial Watch Files House Ethics Complaint Asking For Investigation Into Rep. Ilhan Omar

Watchdog asks for probe into congresswoman’s potentially criminal wrongdoing

Adan Salazar | Infowars.com - July 25, 2019 49 Comments





Watchdog group Judicial Watch has filed a complaint asking the Office of Congressional Ethics to probe “potentially criminal” allegations concerning Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.).
In a press release Tuesday, Judicial Watch announced they’d hand delivered the complaint to House Congressional Ethics Chairman David Skaggs, highlighting “serious allegations of wrongdoing by Rep. Omar,” according to Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton.
“The evidence is overwhelming Rep. Omar may have violated the law and House rules,” Fitton said in a statement. “The House of Representatives must urgently investigate and resolve the serious allegations of wrongdoing by Rep. Omar. We encourage Americans to share their views on Rep. Omar’s apparent misconduct with their congressmen.”
​
Judicial Watch’s complaint asks the committee to investigate evidence Omar may have committed various state and federal crimes including: “perjury, immigration fraud, marriage fraud, state and federal tax fraud, and federal student loan fraud.”
The complaint quotes journalist David Steinberg describing Omar’s situation as “perhaps the most extensive spree of illegal misconduct committed by a House member in American history.”
The federal complaint comes as Rep. Omar and three other freshmen House Democrats have become the new faces of the progressive left, pushing open borders, Marxist ideology and the overthrow of America.
Meanwhile, a White House petition calling for Congress to open an immediate investigation into Omar’s background has generated over 12 thousand signatures.
Sign the petition
Read Judicial Watch’s entire complaint below:
Ethics Complaint Against Rep. Ilhan Omar Concerning Possible Violations of Federal and State Law
Dear Chairman Skaggs,
Judicial Watch is a non-profit, non-partisan educational foundation, promoting transparency, accountability and integrity in government and fidelity to the rule of law. We regularly monitor congressional ethics issues as part of our anti-corruption mission.
This letter serves as an official complaint with the Office of Congressional Ethics (OCE).
Substantial, compelling and, to date, unrefuted evidence has been uncovered that Rep. Ilhan Omar may have committed the following crimes in violation of both federal law and Minnesota state law: perjury, immigration fraud, marriage fraud, state and federal tax fraud, and federal student loan fraud.
Such violations would also breach the Code of Ethics for Government Service, to which all federal officeholders are subject, “Any person in Government service should uphold the Constitution, laws, and legal regulations of the United States and all governments therein and never be a party to their evasion.”) Rep. Omar actions in this suspected immigration fraud, marriage fraud, perjurious statements on her Minnesota divorce filings, and falsifications on her tax returns, merit your immediate investigation.
In the words of investigative reporter David Steinberg: “The facts describe perhaps the most extensive spree of illegal misconduct committed by a House member in American history.”
The evidence developed against Rep. Omar was the result of a three-year-long investigation in both the United States and the United Kingdom by Mr. Steinberg and his investigative reporter colleagues Preya Samsundar and Scott Johnson. It is supported by information gathered from public records, social media postings, genealogy databases, computer forensic analysis, unaltered digital photographs, discussions between the investigative reporters and the subjects of the investigation themselves, and information supplied by confidential sources within the Somali-American community.
Documented-based reporting by Steinberg, et al. has developed the following information: Rep. Ilhan Abdullahi Omar, a citizen of the United States, married her biological brother, Ahmed Nur Said Elmi, a citizen of the United Kingdom, in 2009, presumably as part of an immigration fraud scheme. The couple legally divorced in 2017. In the course of that divorce, Ms. Omar submitted an “Application for an Order for Service by Alternate Means” to the State of Minnesota on August 2, 2017 and claimed, among other things, that she had had no contact with Ahmed Nur Said Elmi after June 2011. She also claimed that she did not know where to find him. The evidence developed by Mr. Steinberg and his colleagues demonstrates with a high degree of certainty that Ms. Omar not only had contact with Mr. Elmi, but actually met up with him in London in 2015, which is supported by photographic evidence. Ms. Omar signed the “Application for an Order for Service by Alternate Means” under penalty of perjury. The very document that Ilham Omar signed on August 2, 2017 bears the following notation directly above her signature: “I declare under penalty of perjury that everything I have stated in this document is true and correct. Minn. Stat. § 358.116.”
Of particular importance are archived photographs taken during a widely reported trip by Ilhan Omar to London in 2015, posted to her own Instagram account under her nickname “hameey”, in which she poses with her husband/presumed brother, Ahmed Elmi. These photographs from 2015 are documentary evidence that in fact she met up with Mr. Elmi after June 2011 and before the date she signed the divorce document in August 2017, thereby calling into question the veracity of her claim that she had not seen Mr. Elmi since June 2011.
Rep. Omar’s potential crimes far exceed perjurious statements made in a Minnesota court filing.
Rep. Omar’s conduct may include immigration fraud. It appears that Rep. Omar married her brother in order to assist his emigration to the United States from the United Kingdom. The same immigration fraud scheme may have aided Mr. Elmi in obtaining federally-backed student loans for his attendance at North Dakota State University. Mr. Elmi and Rep. Omar simultaneously attended North Dakota State University and may have derived illicit benefits predicated on the immigration fraud scheme.
The State of Minnesota Campaign Finance and Public Disclosure Board has already determined that Rep. Omar violated state campaign finance laws for improper use of campaign funds. She was forced to reimburse her campaign thousands of dollars. More significantly, the Board discovered that the federal tax returns submitted by Rep. Omar for 2014 and 2015 were filed as “joint” tax returns with a man who was not her husband, named Ahmed Hirsi, while she was actually married to Ahmed Elmi.
Under federal law, specifically, 26 U.S. Code & 7206.1, “Any person who willfully makes and subscribes any return, statement, or other document, which contains or is verified by a written declaration that it is made under the penalties of perjury, and which he does not believe to be true and correct as to every material matter … shall be guilty of a felony and, upon conviction thereof, shall be fined not more than $100,000 ($500,000 in the case of a corporation), or imprisoned not more than 3 years, or both, together with the costs of prosecution.”
Rep. Omar’s federal tax returns must be examined to determine whether any additional falsifications were made.
Mr. Steinberg, et al. have engaged in meticulous research and reporting over a period of years. They have demonstrated with a high degree of probability that Rep. Ilhan Omar has violated House Ethics Rules, federal and state laws.
We call upon the Office of Congressional Ethics to launch an investigation into Rep. Omar’s conduct immediately.
Sincerely,
Tom Fitton, President, Judicial Watch
Follow the author on Gab: https://gab.ai/adansalazar
On Twitter:
On Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/adan.salazar.735
On Minds: https://www.minds.com/adan_infowars
Watch: Report: Ilhan Omar And The Left’s War On White Men
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Latest posts

Top