CannaZen
Well-known member
Yeah i just want to say domestication is a relativistic perspective I'll have you know humans domesticated themselves in relation to their environment. Earth is one living organism relative to the universe. Some rough estimate 98% of us still live in the jungle. Its art-i-ficial selection.
like In some places like the matanuska valley in alaska and some parts of russia, ruderalis came from russia.. where daylight hours can be some 24 hours a day in some places? i forget. The best working idea is that hemp were grown in those places and the ruderalis autoflowering genotype went feral'ly wild. some hemp brought to north america somehow "miraculously" carry the flowering triggering mechanism genes in the hemp that were brought over.
I believe before what we call cannabis today it may had been quite relative to a species that flowered in the summer before it separated (oh, do i wonder, how did THAT happen?) It suggests to me a very familiar relationship with the progenitors of the species with evolving primates. That is what i see in the plant!
umm so.. yeah ruderalis genetics in the himalayus what is the most likely conclusion, autoflowers were brought to the himalayas or the seeds arent authentic, occam's razor.
all i know is that hemp were cultivated and evolved differently and as such thus, a novel unique and separate domestication as it were intended for a different purpose as hemp AN 'SUB'species. Where is the distinction in that? Its all a relative perspective from there, each species were cultivated for growth efficiency for stems and stalks, flowers, CBD and THC Etc. leaves, chemotypes. hemp works for a separate unison in genomics terminology but its still the SAME species though, right. okay. there were crossbreeding that happened
ooooooooo
The bottom up model colliding with the top down model is when mutation happens evolving. They're still the very same species but as separate and distinct characteristics evolving from segregating to separate and environmentally distinct places the plant itself had not experienced as the present uniformal expression to change.. remember epi-genetics serves the top down model via rna encoding 'sequence' c hanges into genome environmental weathering, okay.
alright. So.. where did ruderalis originate from? Well now.26 percent
Buzzing right around, bees share about 44 percent of human DNA. We share about 26 percent of our “housekeeping” genes with these single-cell organisms. We share approximately 15 percent of our DNA with this plant.
like In some places like the matanuska valley in alaska and some parts of russia, ruderalis came from russia.. where daylight hours can be some 24 hours a day in some places? i forget. The best working idea is that hemp were grown in those places and the ruderalis autoflowering genotype went feral'ly wild. some hemp brought to north america somehow "miraculously" carry the flowering triggering mechanism genes in the hemp that were brought over.
I believe before what we call cannabis today it may had been quite relative to a species that flowered in the summer before it separated (oh, do i wonder, how did THAT happen?) It suggests to me a very familiar relationship with the progenitors of the species with evolving primates. That is what i see in the plant!
umm so.. yeah ruderalis genetics in the himalayus what is the most likely conclusion, autoflowers were brought to the himalayas or the seeds arent authentic, occam's razor.
all i know is that hemp were cultivated and evolved differently and as such thus, a novel unique and separate domestication as it were intended for a different purpose as hemp AN 'SUB'species. Where is the distinction in that? Its all a relative perspective from there, each species were cultivated for growth efficiency for stems and stalks, flowers, CBD and THC Etc. leaves, chemotypes. hemp works for a separate unison in genomics terminology but its still the SAME species though, right. okay. there were crossbreeding that happened
ooooooooo
The bottom up model colliding with the top down model is when mutation happens evolving. They're still the very same species but as separate and distinct characteristics evolving from segregating to separate and environmentally distinct places the plant itself had not experienced as the present uniformal expression to change.. remember epi-genetics serves the top down model via rna encoding 'sequence' c hanges into genome environmental weathering, okay.
Last edited: