Evolution
Member
TomHill said:I have no love for them either & am still getting over the headache caused by a certain Malawi introduction into my neighborhood 20 years back. So, when folks come out strongly against I certainly understand where they're coming from. However I feel we must also be careful not to shoot ourselves in the foot as well.
Hypothetical situation:
We grow out 1000 Thai seeds & the top 10 regarding quality of smoke all have the ability to produce a few seeds on their own. What is the best course of action? Do we shitcan these individuals in favor of true females of lessor quality? Or, do we temporarily accept their imperfections & try to deal with their undesirable traits further down the road? The easy answer is to do both or plant another thousand but this may also interfere with our other responsibilities etc, & in reality may not always be an option.
The Chem & Trainwreck lines are two good examples of plants that have the ability to make seeds on their own. I believe these are fixed & prepotent in their valuable traits for this very reason. Should we not cross breed them even though a bit of progeny testing would locate males that masked this undesirable trait? Should we not grow them though we find 1 seed per ounce to be quite tolerable?
My primary goal is to have & produce the best that i can & i feel it would be a big mistake not to keep an open mind regarding intersex plants, & particularly those of exceptional quality.
great post Tom--we should grow them and smoke them...your viewpoints seem logical, humane and wise...thanks!
wally- your perspective is understandably harsh towards 'hermie' genes, but you must remain tolerant of others perspectives, which may not be large scale breeding oriented...you and Sam seem to want to eliminate any 'hermie' genes completely, so you guys can grow your huge crops w/o having to 'inspect' thousands of plants....
like h3ad was saying what about the 'miracle' of evolution that has taken place to allow the plant that survival mechanism? are you suggesting that mans need for farming should outweigh this plant species' evolutionary destiny, this cunning adaptation that increases evolutionary fitness of cannabis ? seems excessive and short sighted....but a convenient and easy answer...
raco- thanks for the clarke excerpt...how has his view changed?? >>>>"Therefore, the difference between monoecism and hermaphrodism is one of degree, determined by genetics and environment"....seems like the answer to 'what' a 'hermie' is....
but isn't the main issue the value of the 'hermie' and to whom?
i would submit:
'Herm" Value--
large scale breeders/researchers==no value, conservationists==great value, all others==varying value....lol
zam-great info. as usual....can u elucidate on the "'djshort' male herms" u have worked with...thanks in advance (btw great magazine article! loved it)
peace and best wishes to all
Last edited: