arsekick
Well-known member
Settle down hippy, i'm not the one believing in fairytales
-
Seeds Mafia is running a TURBO contest with great prizes! You can check it here.
Have you looked at the North Pole lately?
- Thread starter Thread starter igrowone
- Start date Start date
No one in the thread has said that these changes aren't natural.
The argument is that the current rising levels are human induced, and that the levels likely to be reached will be a threat to human existence, at least in many areas. The potential threat to agriculture is massive (our ability to sustain a population). Not to mention mass migrations, water security, famines, etc.
arsekick
Well-known member
"No one in the thread has said that these changes aren't natural."
Cool so its all natural warming and cooling and warming and cooling and warming and here we are today.
Maybe we should stop the mass migrations, the rest of it is just normal weather for Australia.
"I love a sunburnt country,
A land of sweeping plains,
Of ragged mountain ranges,
Of droughts and flooding rains."
the question isn't weather (lol) the giant spinning rock can handle big shifts, the question is how bad will the mass extinctions get and how bad will the economic ramifications be.
insurance companies having to take it into account is just bollocks, right? just made up?
How climate change is contributing to the home insurance crisis in Florida and across the country
The home insurance market in every other state seems to be headed down the road that Florida has paved. We dove into this issue through a partnership with NPR station WWNO in New Orleans for their podcast, "Sea Change."
www.wusf.org
was the military under george w. bush being woke when they coined the term "threat multiplier" as it pertains to climate change?
BRIEFER: Climate Change as a “Threat Multiplier”: History, Uses and Future of the Concept
This briefer provides an account of the history of the “threat multiplier” term from its creation in the context of the environmental security era in 2007 to its progressive adoption by military, p…
climateandsecurity.org
arsekick
Well-known member
What climate change ?
There has been a moderate amount of warming since the little ice age ended, most of it happened well before the 20th century, the rate of glacial melting and sea level rise has been constant long before man started pumping out modest amounts of Co2, there is no proof that Co2 causes run away warming anyway, if it causes any at all that is measurable beyond the margin of error.
How does Co2 heat the surface of the planet anyway ?
arsekick
Well-known member
Obviously it can, we swing from glacial to interglacial periods and life still go's on.
THe economic ramifications are huge with the planet trying to get to "net zero" Co2 emmisions, the costs are enormous for no discernible benefit.
90% of all species gone in a mass extinction, and life still "goes on"... not sure what your point is
arsekick
Well-known member
Since life crawled out of the oceans maybe, not sure what that has to do with "man made" Co2
arsekick
Well-known member
When you get past the BS default statements made by Chatgpt and actually ask real science questions Chatgpt unknowingly gives you everything you need
As I thought its all bullshit
"Venus's atmosphere does not follow a radiative feedback model. It operates under a convective/pressure-induced collisional de-excitation (CDE) mechanism. Radiative de-excitation (RDE) is not the dominant factor in Venus’s atmosphere."
"The atmosphere of Venus is much denser than Earth's, with a surface pressure about 93 times that of Earth's."
Pressure causes heat does it not ?
As I thought its all bullshit
Yeah apparently it is, but.
"Venus's atmosphere does not follow a radiative feedback model. It operates under a convective/pressure-induced collisional de-excitation (CDE) mechanism. Radiative de-excitation (RDE) is not the dominant factor in Venus’s atmosphere."
"The atmosphere of Venus is much denser than Earth's, with a surface pressure about 93 times that of Earth's."
Pressure causes heat does it not ?
Last edited:
arsekick
Well-known member
Here ya go believers, some proof, not that any of you DC's will believeSeeing how you fine upstanding gentlemen won't/can't put up any science to prove the man made Co2 bullshit, because there is none, I suppose I'll have to put up some to disprove it
"Falsification Of The Atmospheric CO2 Greenhouse Effects Within The Frame Of Physics"
are you implying that carbon dioxide (one of a host of greenhouse gases) is supposed to be providing the heat?
venus isn't heated by its atmosphere, afaik... the sun heats venus and the atmosphere traps the heat.
maybe i'm thinking too elementary and you're doing 4D chess, it's just that it seems you are implying CO2 should be the thing causing heat... which is strange to my pea brain
venus isn't heated by its atmosphere, afaik... the sun heats venus and the atmosphere traps the heat.
maybe i'm thinking too elementary and you're doing 4D chess, it's just that it seems you are implying CO2 should be the thing causing heat... which is strange to my pea brain
arsekick
Well-known member
No it has the same pyisical propertys/characteristic's ? as earth, its hotter because its closer to the sun and the atmospere is 93 times more dense than earth, Co2 has nothing to do with it, it could be any gas as long as its denser and closer to the heat source it will be hotter
The surface of Venus has more heat because its denser and closer to the sun.
