What's new
  • Seeds Mafia is running a TURBO contest with great prizes! You can check it here.

Have you looked at the North Pole lately?

arsekick

Well-known member
Any as I said I changed me mind about it being a theory, its more like a con job or a scam,
you can call it a hypothesis if you want, I call it bullshit, follow the $$ and you shall see
 

arsekick

Well-known member
you believe that everyone advocating for/against something has an ulterior profit motive? there is money to be made in ANY situation. :rolleyes:
Yes in the case of net zero, notice how they never tell you what the change to the climate will be if they succeed or how much the temp will change.



Reaching a net-zero global economy by 2050 would require an average annual investment of around $9.2 trillion in physical assets, an increase of $3.5 trillion over current spending, or roughly 1/4 of global tax revenues.

Here's a more detailed breakdown:
  • Overall Cost:
    The transition to a net-zero global economy by 2050 would require about $275 trillion in cumulative spending on physical assets.

  • Annual Spending:
    This translates to an average annual spending of approximately $9.2 trillion, representing a $3.5 trillion increase above current levels.
 

nepalnt21

FRRRRRResh!
Veteran
can we start small?

we can agree that geology isn't just a hypothesis or conjecture?


"The geological record of ancient climate is excellent. Ancient temperatures can be determined very precisely, because the composition of the shells of corals and other marine organisms varies measurably with it. Furthermore, the plants and animals that lived during a given time and are now preserved as fossils indicate whether the climate was wet or dry. The overall climatic trend has been cooling, from an unusually warm period, called the Eocene Optimum, 55-45 million years ago, to an unusually cool period, colloquially called the Ice Age, which ended just 20,000 years ago. The overall range in temperature was enormous, about 35°F. The earth was so warm during the Eocene Optimum that Antarctica was ice-free; ice caps did not start to form there until about 35 million years ago. Palm trees grew at high latitudes and cold-blooded animals, such as crocodiles, lived in the Arctic."
 

arsekick

Well-known member
can we start small?

we can agree that geology isn't just a hypothesis or conjecture?


"The geological record of ancient climate is excellent. Ancient temperatures can be determined very precisely, because the composition of the shells of corals and other marine organisms varies measurably with it. Furthermore, the plants and animals that lived during a given time and are now preserved as fossils indicate whether the climate was wet or dry. The overall climatic trend has been cooling, from an unusually warm period, called the Eocene Optimum, 55-45 million years ago, to an unusually cool period, colloquially called the Ice Age, which ended just 20,000 years ago. The overall range in temperature was enormous, about 35°F. The earth was so warm during the Eocene Optimum that Antarctica was ice-free; ice caps did not start to form there until about 35 million years ago. Palm trees grew at high latitudes and cold-blooded animals, such as crocodiles, lived in the Arctic."

Geologist were the original climate "experts" till the climate "scientists" came along a few years ago and started with the man made bullshit, not many geologists agree with them, they get shit canned for their views because they may have worked for a mining company at one time or still do.

Not sure that "Ancient temperatures can be determined very precisely" there is a larger margin of error the further you go back in time.

Co2 follows tempreture according to most of them, it used to anyway till the man mafde propaganda started :ROFLMAO: and still does according to the "theory of Physics"
 

Cannavore

Well-known member
Veteran
Any as I said I changed me mind about it being a theory, its more like a con job or a scam,
you can call it a hypothesis if you want, I call it bullshit, follow the $$ and you shall see
"Follow the money…....... Of the government and, you know, not the profit seeking capitalists"


Those darn billionaire scientists and their mega corporations!!!!!
 

arsekick

Well-known member
Seeing how you fine upstanding gentlemen won't/can't put up any science to prove the man made Co2 bullshit, because there is none, I suppose I'll have to put up some to disprove it :ROFLMAO:
 

arsekick

Well-known member
U.S Surface Temperature

January ’25 | -3.08°F (-1.71°C)US Climate Reference Network (data updated 10-15th of month)


1741812141116.png

The US Climate Reference Network record from 2005 shows no obvious warming during this period. The graph above is created monthly by NOAA.
The graph shows the Average Surface Temperature Anomaly for the contiguous United States since 2005. The data comes from the U.S. Climate Reference Network (USCRN) which is a properly sited (away from human influences and infrastructure) and state-of-the-art weather network consisting of 114 stations in the USA.


These station locations were chosen to avoid warm biases from Urban Heat Islands (UHI) effects as well as microsite effects as documented in the 2022 report Corrupted Climate Stations: The Official U.S. Surface Temperature Record Remains Fatally Flawed. Unfortunately, NOAA never reports this data in their monthly or yearly “state of the climate report.” And, mainstream media either is entirely unaware of the existence of this data set or has chosen not to report on this U.S. temperature record.
 

shiva82

Well-known member
can we start small?

we can agree that geology isn't just a hypothesis or conjecture?


"The geological record of ancient climate is excellent. Ancient temperatures can be determined very precisely, because the composition of the shells of corals and other marine organisms varies measurably with it. Furthermore, the plants and animals that lived during a given time and are now preserved as fossils indicate whether the climate was wet or dry. The overall climatic trend has been cooling, from an unusually warm period, called the Eocene Optimum, 55-45 million years ago, to an unusually cool period, colloquially called the Ice Age, which ended just 20,000 years ago. The overall range in temperature was enormous, about 35°F. The earth was so warm during the Eocene Optimum that Antarctica was ice-free; ice caps did not start to form there until about 35 million years ago. Palm trees grew at high latitudes and cold-blooded animals, such as crocodiles, lived in the Arctic."
geology proves that current co2 levels are way below previous peaks and your net zero agenda is nothing more than a scam, and your idiot ideas cause more harm than good .
 

Latest posts

Latest posts

Top