What's new
  • ICMag with help from Landrace Warden and The Vault is running a NEW contest in November! You can check it here. Prizes are seeds & forum premium access. Come join in!

Have you looked at the North Pole lately?

Yamaha FG-840

Active member
Former Rep. Patrick Kennedy, Democrat-R.I., who co-founded the anti-legalization group Smart Approaches to Marijuana, praised the preliminary AMA decisions.

"The American Medical Association took a bold step today, and they should be commended," Kennedy said in a released statement. "By explicitly rejecting calls to neutralize their anti-legalization position, they are sending a loud and powerful message to state and local decision makers, the Federal government, and the general public."
 

Yamaha FG-840

Active member
That's the same bunch of fake science barking Democrats who brought you illegal pot in the first place, founding a group to keep claiming ''pot's a dangerous drug and we all gotta stay on thim purgressive opioids! We don't nead us no leagul pot, our leader FDR and thim other signtsie fellurs dun tolt us abowt tha devil wead way back in 1937 whin thay removed this dangerous drug frum owur preshus childrin's hands. YaW''

"Oh look guvurmint fellurs sed it and, thay got tha critical peer review two pruv evur wurd in coart!"

It's still fraud.

So is telling you the Atmosphere reducing the temperature of the planet 29%

is a magic heater.
 

Yamaha FG-840

Active member
https://www.cashinbis.com/jeff-sessions-cannabis-ama/

Let's see what the AMA have to say about "POT being DANGEROUS" and how

"we better all stay on thim opioids, like thim signtsie Democrat fellurs figured out in 1937,

fur tha time bein,

JIST so's we kin keap EVURBODIE SAFE as POSSIBLE!"

Thim signtsie signtsie fellurs are the same ones who believe you should be told the cold light blocking nitrogen atmospheric bath is a heater: and that more and more of the gases,

making less and less energy go into the planet,

make more and more energy come out,

every time they make less go in.

Funny how you find the same groups of bought & paid for KooKs

barking KooK SH*T you as a Cannabis user KNOW to be false

are to be considered credible when they tell you the cold light blocking atmosphere's a heater. Actually they don't have the nerve, they just tell you ''Yeah, what those guys say.''

Meaning the same government guys they tell you that about,

when you say pot's not a dangerous drug and that
we don't really all need to get on opioids
because pot's a gateway to opioids.

You can see right there, ''they agree with the science'' and if you find yourself in court disputing that the AMA is prepared to send someone down there to help the DEA

''re-educate you'' in your trial about how ''tha signts is sownd, at tair pot's a dangerous gateway to opioids so we awl gotta git on thim opioids.''
 
I

Ignignokt

Dude.... you are trying so hard to find things that validate your your beliefs/wishes, there is no point for anyone to try to convince you otherwise.
 

Yamaha FG-840

Active member
When you get some evidence 29% less energy into a rock is more than 100% back out

Dude.... you are trying so hard to find things that validate your your beliefs/wishes, there is no point for anyone to try to convince you otherwise.

you won't be telling people a story about magic insulation that makes more energy come out of a rock

https://i.imgur.com/FoAlpG8.png

every time it makes less go in.

Well you will but since that's a crass, transparent and direct violation of Conservation of Energy

you're not gonna do it.

Not once,
Not ever.

For you to not instantly be in the realm of purest fiction

anything you say about that 29% less light in

had better involve you also saying 29% less out.

And that's not your story, your story is the 29% less in makes more than 100% of available energy come back out.

That's terminal fail and you'll never recover from it ever.
 

Yamaha FG-840

Active member
Numerous instances of your churches' illiterate and innumerate hordes barking that the magical gassiness has dun made the very gases,

COOLING the planet by 29% as the

very

first

step

in calculation of the planet's surface temperature,

''cause more than 100% sunlight energy come out of the Earth''

to the point the planet is

''33 degrees warmer than it would be without them there.''

https://goo.gl/RvxNGb

Endless hordes of innumerate hillbillies screeching that 29% less energy in

is making more than 100% available energy come back out.

LoLoLoL!
 
Last edited:

Koondense

Well-known member
Veteran
Only evidence i see is idiotic spamming on a cannabis forum. No content just spam and trolling. At least grow a plant and say something about it, don't just play an asshole with drunk level monologues about a scientific topic. Boring and useless, a waste of electricity and server space.
 

trichrider

Kiss My Ring
Veteran
:laughing:look who's back trolling without offering anything but derision...

Canada: sea ice prevents crucial supply deliveries to isolated communities



Paulatuk, Kugluktuk and Cambridge Bay were unable to receive shipments of food, fuel and lumber



Leyland Cecco in Toronto
Fri 5 Oct 2018 07.30 EDT Last modified on Fri 5 Oct 2018 09.04 EDT


The government of the Northwest Territories now plans to airlift nearly 600,000 litres of diesel fuel. Authorities in Canada’s Arctic north are scrambling to transport critical supplies to three isolated communities after the early arrival of sea ice prevented delivery barges from reaching in the region.


Paulatuk, Kugluktuk and Cambridge Bay, which have a combined population of nearly 3,000 people, have been unable to receive shipments of food, fuel and lumber after ice moving from the high Arctic sealed off the Amundsen Gulf.


The government of the Northwest Territories now plans to airlift nearly 600,000 litres of diesel fuel to ensure residents have sufficient reserves to weather the bitterly cold winters. The operation is expected to involved 50 to 60 flights.


“This is absolute ridiculous,” said Joh Holland, a municipal representative from Paulatuk. “We’ve got people waiting for food. We’ve got hunters waiting for vehicles.”


Crucial water treatment supplies and municipal vehicles – including a new bus – are also among the stranded items. Residents are already making payments on vehicles that likely won’t arrive until next year while some small businesses awaiting buildings supplies expressed fears they might not survive without the deliveries.


The ice has been described by officials as “extreme” and even the Canadian coast guard’s largest icebreaker in the region – the Louis St Laurent – was unable to help break open a channel for the barges. The government has rejected attempting to move the barge without an escort ship.


“The ice can be like the pinchers of a giant pair of pliers,” assistant deputy minister John Vandenberg in the department of infrastructure, told the CBC. “You don’t survive that.”


Northern communities in the Arctic are sparsely populated and few have deep water ports, so container ships take advantage of summer months (when the Amundsen Gulf is largely ice-free), anchoring in deep water and making deliveries with barges.
ic

“The sea lift is critical for people here,” said Bill Lyall, a Cambridge Bay resident and Order of Canada recipient. “When it doesn’t come in, people can expect to pay double.”

In Paulatuk, the shelves of the grocery store are quickly becoming bare as nonperishable items like flour quickly disappear.


The stranded shipment was scheduled to be one of the last of the summer – but Holland said the territorial government, which recently took over the barge service, kept delaying the shipment.


“I just don’t understand why couldn’t bring barge in earlier in the season. They did it for other communities in the western Arctic – why not us? We want answers.”


https://www.theguardian.com/world/2...atuk-kugluktuk-cambridge-bay-sea-ice-supplies
 

Yamaha FG-840

Active member
That defines the lame name calling you do perfectly!

No content just trolling, name calling and foul language.

Only evidence i see is idiotic spamming on a cannabis forum. No content just spam and trolling. At least grow a plant and say something about it, don't just play an asshole with drunk level monologues about a scientific topic. Boring and useless, a waste of electricity and server space.

When you grow into a grown man you're gonna offer some evidence.

Till then you're just another boring troll.
 

Cannavore

Well-known member
Veteran
:laughing:look who's back trolling without offering anything but derision...

Canada: sea ice prevents crucial supply deliveries to isolated communities



Paulatuk, Kugluktuk and Cambridge Bay were unable to receive shipments of food, fuel and lumber



Leyland Cecco in Toronto
Fri 5 Oct 2018 07.30 EDT Last modified on Fri 5 Oct 2018 09.04 EDT

[URL=https://www.icmag.com/ic/]View Image
[/URL] The government of the Northwest Territories now plans to airlift nearly 600,000 litres of diesel fuel. Authorities in Canada’s Arctic north are scrambling to transport critical supplies to three isolated communities after the early arrival of sea ice prevented delivery barges from reaching in the region.


Paulatuk, Kugluktuk and Cambridge Bay, which have a combined population of nearly 3,000 people, have been unable to receive shipments of food, fuel and lumber after ice moving from the high Arctic sealed off the Amundsen Gulf.


The government of the Northwest Territories now plans to airlift nearly 600,000 litres of diesel fuel to ensure residents have sufficient reserves to weather the bitterly cold winters. The operation is expected to involved 50 to 60 flights.


“This is absolute ridiculous,” said Joh Holland, a municipal representative from Paulatuk. “We’ve got people waiting for food. We’ve got hunters waiting for vehicles.”


Crucial water treatment supplies and municipal vehicles – including a new bus – are also among the stranded items. Residents are already making payments on vehicles that likely won’t arrive until next year while some small businesses awaiting buildings supplies expressed fears they might not survive without the deliveries.


The ice has been described by officials as “extreme” and even the Canadian coast guard’s largest icebreaker in the region – the Louis St Laurent – was unable to help break open a channel for the barges. The government has rejected attempting to move the barge without an escort ship.


“The ice can be like the pinchers of a giant pair of pliers,” assistant deputy minister John Vandenberg in the department of infrastructure, told the CBC. “You don’t survive that.”


Northern communities in the Arctic are sparsely populated and few have deep water ports, so container ships take advantage of summer months (when the Amundsen Gulf is largely ice-free), anchoring in deep water and making deliveries with barges.
View Image
“The sea lift is critical for people here,” said Bill Lyall, a Cambridge Bay resident and Order of Canada recipient. “When it doesn’t come in, people can expect to pay double.”

In Paulatuk, the shelves of the grocery store are quickly becoming bare as nonperishable items like flour quickly disappear.


The stranded shipment was scheduled to be one of the last of the summer – but Holland said the territorial government, which recently took over the barge service, kept delaying the shipment.


“I just don’t understand why couldn’t bring barge in earlier in the season. They did it for other communities in the western Arctic – why not us? We want answers.”


https://www.theguardian.com/world/2...atuk-kugluktuk-cambridge-bay-sea-ice-supplies


what does this have to do with anything? sea ice isn't an issue.
 

Yamaha FG-840

Active member
Whenever you grow up we all wanna see your evidence 29% less into a rock makes more than 100% come back out like your church taught you.

Here's a link mister.
https://www.wired.co.uk/article/northern-sea-route-venta-maersk-shipping-climate-change

There are some words which you won't like. But try to get the message, please.

Cheers

Since you don't possess the adulthood to even discuss your link-don't-think,

we'll all assume it's nothing more than your admission you know warm optimums are defined by low ice.
 

Yamaha FG-840

Active member
Everyone note how these people aren't even bothered by the idea they're telling people a magical insulation makes more energy come out of a rock every time it lets less go in.

They're utterly unmoved having been caught repeatedly trying to claim it.

It's like telling believers pot's not like heroin. No amount of evidence does any good.

Such is the problem trying to educate the ineducable.

Even the concept more energy coming out of something, insulation made less energy go into is completely fine with them. As long as they're not admitting they're wrong, they don't care what they say or how many times they curse and troll and name-call.

Compare it to the war on pot and notice that scientific evidence and reality mean nothing.

''If thim guvurmint men said it, thin it must be trew.''

When one of you shows us less light into a rock making more come out by making it not go in, you'll be doing something other than frantically waving your hands in the air to try to make lies,

become the truth.

The planet is cooled by the Atmosphere 29% as the very first step in calculating it's temperature. That's all there is to it and not one of you nor all of you together are going to change that.
 

Yamaha FG-840

Active member
The important thing is that it stays low. Obviously you're very easily confused, you thought less ice meant disaster.

isn't this contradictory? first its proof then its the opposite?

sea ice is increasing though isn't it?


As long as it stays reasonably low, everything's fine. Excessive growth = beginning of new glaciation. That is bad.
 
Last edited:

therevverend

Well-known member
Veteran
And whether glaciation is bad and warmth good isn't up for negotiation. There are no ''icy optima.'' There are warm ones.

Wait what? Science isn't done by deciding that natural events are good or bad. The climactic optimum of an interglacial isn't called that because science determined that it's the best weather the world could possibly have. It's called that because it's the warmest period the earth has during an Ice Age.

During the last climactic optimum sea levels were 8 meters higher which would be a disaster if it happened now. In fact any weather that's different then what we have right now would be a disaster. Canada covered in glaciers or hundreds of millions of refugees who's homes were flooded by rising sea levels, either would be shitty. Honestly I'd take the glaciers I can live without Canada.

What's great about glaciers, they lock up fresh water and they reflect sunlight back into space. If you're a farmer in India or California or China or France you fucking love glaciers. Without glacial melt you don't get fresh drinking water or irrigation for your crops. You end up with a massive famine. And hundreds of millions of people from India and Pakistan and Turkey desperate to immigrate to temperate climates like North America and Europe.

If you're a Scandinavian or Brit who doesn't like people with brown skin and dodgy religious beliefs you should be worried fucking sick about climate change There's going to be hundreds of millions of the horny bastards fleeing to Europe. Your grand-daughter is going to be married off to a Paki who'll expect her to wear a veil and have 20 kids..
 

Yamaha FG-840

Active member
I haven't seen such a desperate, rambling racist screed in the name of denying science in awhile.

Your desperate attempt to claim warm optima aren't named because they are optimum for life is really just ridiculous.

It's PRECISELY why they named them optima.


Wait what? Science isn't done by deciding that natural events are good or bad. The climactic optimum of an interglacial isn't called that because science determined that it's the best weather the world could possibly have. It's called that because it's the warmest period the earth has during an Ice Age.

During the last climactic optimum sea levels were 8 meters higher which would be a disaster if it happened now. In fact any weather that's different then what we have right now would be a disaster. Canada covered in glaciers or hundreds of millions of refugees who's homes were flooded by rising sea levels, either would be shitty. Honestly I'd take the glaciers I can live without Canada.

What's great about glaciers, they lock up fresh water and they reflect sunlight back into space. If you're a farmer in India or California or China or France you fucking love glaciers. Without glacial melt you don't get fresh drinking water or irrigation for your crops. You end up with a massive famine. And hundreds of millions of people from India and Pakistan and Turkey desperate to immigrate to temperate climates like North America and Europe.

If you're a Scandinavian or Brit who doesn't like people with brown skin and dodgy religious beliefs you should be worried fucking sick about climate change There's going to be hundreds of millions of the horny bastards fleeing to Europe. Your grand-daughter is going to be married off to a Paki who'll expect her to wear a veil and have 20 kids..

Fortunately for those who only process their science according to underlying racism,

you're in luck.

The Climate's not changing. We have the published records the French discovered and made public for review in 1864 and the

International Standard Atmosphere
and
American Standard Atmosphere,

the ACTUAL climate of record for the planet, are essentially unchanged since the French first published them so your fears of ''brown people'' aren't going to be inflamed by climate refugees.

I can't believe what you tried to say but it's your keyboard you type what you want. Remember though - it's very simple to check any claims about this because the real sciences haven't been swallowed by the church of more energy comes out every time less goes in.
 
Top