Have you looked at the North Pole lately?

[Porky82]

No one bothered to comment on this one, Greenland melting at 280 ppms or less of Co2 and probably warmer than todays supposed boiling weather/climate.

New Study Pins Time of Greenland’s Last Melting to Some 400,000 Years Ago

A study adds evidence that the Greenland Ice Sheet will be vulnerable to human-induced climate change in coming centuries.

news.climate.columbia.edu

How's that head injury going??

 

[arsekick]

How's that head injury going??

Boiling

 

[Porky82]

Boiling

Like the temperature from made climate change?

 

[buzzmobile]

https://www.cnn.com/2022/09/05/world/thwaites-doomsday-glacier-sea-level-climate/index.html?cid=external-feeds_iluminar_yahoo

 

[armedoldhippy]

a 963 square mile chunk of ice fell off of Antarctica, that's gonna be a very nice iceberg...

 

[arsekick]

More evidence of the "man made" global climate scam warming

1914 was the warmest year in Adelaide, 1958 the coldest

Average Temperature in Adelaide by Year

www.extremeweatherwatch.com

1961 the warmest year in Melbourne, 1986 the coldest

Average Temperature in Melbourne by Year

www.extremeweatherwatch.com

1921 for the warmest, 1949 the coldest

Average Temperature in Launceston by Year

www.extremeweatherwatch.com

1981 the warmest and 1996 the coldest

Average Temperature in Warrnambool by Year

www.extremeweatherwatch.com

1902 the warmest, 1904 the coldest

Average Temperature in Mildura by Year

www.extremeweatherwatch.com

 

[arsekick]

No one bothered to comment on this one, Greenland melting at 280 ppms or less of Co2 and probably warmer than todays supposed boiling weather/climate.

New Study Pins Time of Greenland’s Last Melting to Some 400,000 Years Ago

A study adds evidence that the Greenland Ice Sheet will be vulnerable to human-induced climate change in coming centuries.

news.climate.columbia.edu

Still waiting

 

[Chi13]

Still waiting

The article explains it, what are you waiting for? Someone to sumarise it for you?

Although the period when this happened is thought to have been only slightly warmer than today, there was far less carbon dioxide in the atmosphere then—280 parts per million or less, versus 420 parts per million today and rising. The findings confirm the fragile nature of the entire Greenland ice sheet, the scientists said.

 

[arsekick]

The article explains it, what are you waiting for? Someone to sumarise it for you?

Although the period when this happened is thought to have been only slightly warmer than today, there was far less carbon dioxide in the atmosphere then—280 parts per million or less, versus 420 parts per million today and rising. The findings confirm the fragile nature of the entire Greenland ice sheet, the scientists said.

It dosen't explain anything except that Co2 is NOT the climate driver you lot believe it is

 

[Chi13]

It dosen't explain anything except that Co2 is NOT the climate driver you lot believe it is

In previous warm periods, it was not a CO₂ spike that kickstarted the warming, but small and predictable wobbles in Earth’s rotation and orbit around the Sun. CO₂ played a big role as a natural amplifier of the small climate shifts initiated by these wobbles. As the planet began to cool, more CO₂ dissolved into the oceans, reducing the greenhouse effect and causing more cooling. Similarly, CO₂ was released from the oceans to the atmosphere when the planet warmed, driving further warming.

But things are very different this time around. Humans are responsible for adding huge quantities of extra CO₂ to the atmosphere – and fast.

The speed at which CO₂ is rising has no comparison in the recorded past. The fastest natural shifts out of ice ages saw CO₂ levels increase by around 35 parts per million (ppm) in 1,000 years. It might be hard to believe, but humans have emitted the equivalent amount in just the last 17 years.

The three-minute story of 800,000 years of climate change with a sting in the tail

The current rise in atmospheric carbon dioxide levels is unprecedented in the past 800,000 years. As our video explains, ice cores track human changes to the atmosphere that are far beyond natural.

theconversation.com

 

[igrowone]

Arctic sea ice extent levels off; 2024 minimum set​

TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 24, 2024
On September 11, Arctic sea ice likely reached its annual minimum extent of 4.28 million square kilometers (1.65 million square miles). The 2024 minimum is the seventh lowest in the nearly 46-year satellite record. The last 18 years, from 2007 to 2024, are the lowest 18 sea ice extents in the satellite record.
In the Antarctic, sea ice extent tracked at its second lowest level in the satellite record for most of the growth season. Fluctuations in extent are typical of Antarctic sea ice extent near the seasonal maximum, but a record low maximum is unlikely. The maximum for Antarctic sea ice typically occurs in late September or early October, but has been reached as early as August 30.
Note that this is a preliminary announcement. Changing winds or late-season melt could still reduce the Arctic ice extent, as happened in 2005 and 2010. NSIDC scientists will release a full analysis of the Arctic melt season, and discuss the Antarctic winter sea ice growth, in early October.

 

[igrowone]

and 1 hell of an end of season melt spike way up in northwest greenland!

 

[igrowone]

The new abnormal

Since 2007, the Arctic sea ice minimum has dropped below 5 million square kilometers (1.93 million square miles) every year, except in 2009, 2013, and 2014, when extent barely crossed the 5 million square kilometer mark. Such low extents would have been hard to imagine in the 1990s, when extent...

nsidc.org

 

[Porky82]

Arctic sea ice extent levels off; 2024 minimum set​

TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 24, 2024
On September 11, Arctic sea ice likely reached its annual minimum extent of 4.28 million square kilometers (1.65 million square miles). The 2024 minimum is the seventh lowest in the nearly 46-year satellite record. The last 18 years, from 2007 to 2024, are the lowest 18 sea ice extents in the satellite record.
In the Antarctic, sea ice extent tracked at its second lowest level in the satellite record for most of the growth season. Fluctuations in extent are typical of Antarctic sea ice extent near the seasonal maximum, but a record low maximum is unlikely. The maximum for Antarctic sea ice typically occurs in late September or early October, but has been reached as early as August 30.
Note that this is a preliminary announcement. Changing winds or late-season melt could still reduce the Arctic ice extent, as happened in 2005 and 2010. NSIDC scientists will release a full analysis of the Arctic melt season, and discuss the Antarctic winter sea ice growth, in early October. View attachment 19073114 View attachment 19073115

The new abnormal

Since 2007, the Arctic sea ice minimum has dropped below 5 million square kilometers (1.93 million square miles) every year, except in 2009, 2013, and 2014, when extent barely crossed the 5 million square kilometer mark. Such low extents would have been hard to imagine in the 1990s, when extent...

nsidc.org

 

[arsekick]

All depends what year you start

 

[arsekick]

 

[arsekick]

Co2 going up and temps going down

bugger all "man made" Co2 and temps going up till the 40s, lots of man made Co2 getting pumped out from ww2 onwards and temps going down

Its a SCAM

 

[arsekick]

 

[Porky82]

Co2 going up and temps going down

View attachment 19078609

bugger all "man made" Co2 and temps going up till the 40s, lots of man made Co2 getting pumped out from ww2 onwards and temps going down
View attachment 19078610

Its a SCAM

Where did you get this rubbish?
Getting colder my arse!

https://www.climate.gov/news-features/featured-images/2023-was-warmest-year-modern-temperature-record#:~:text=Details,decade%20(2014%E2%80%932023).

 

[arsekick]

Where did you get this rubbish?
Getting colder my arse!

https://www.climate.gov/news-features/featured-images/2023-was-warmest-year-modern-temperature-record#:~:text=Details,decade%20(2014%E2%80%932023).

Have another look at what I posted or see an optometrist, you clearly have no idea