he's another schizo conspiracy theorist know it allYou have some real issues don't ya!!
-
ICMag and The Vault are running a NEW contest! You can check it here. Prizes are seeds & forum premium access. Come join in!
Have you looked at the North Pole lately?
- Thread starter igrowone
- Start date
Pretty much describes most of your speakers corner posts.
This whole thread is full of dulusionial people who mostly believe in fairytales
Anyone got a peer reviewed paper proving "man made" Co2 causes runaway "global" warming and "natural" Co2 does not.
Or a "peer" reviewed paper proving Co2 "man made" or natural is the global tempreture control knob.
I'll wait, wont be holding me breath tho
Anyone got a peer reviewed paper proving "man made" Co2 causes runaway "global" warming and "natural" Co2 does not.
Or a "peer" reviewed paper proving Co2 "man made" or natural is the global tempreture control knob.
I'll wait, wont be holding me breath tho
Sixth Assessment Report — IPCC
www.ipcc.ch
Quantifying the influence of anthropogenic surface processes and inhomogeneities on gridded global climate data
Local land surface modification and variations in data quality affect temperature trends in surface-measured data. Such effects are considered extraneous for the purpose of measuring climate change, and providers of climate data must develop adjustments to filter them out. If done correctly...
ui.adsabs.harvard.edu
Climate Change - NASA Science
NASA is a global leader in studying Earth’s changing climate.
science.nasa.gov
Global Carbon Budget 2019
Abstract. Accurate assessment of anthropogenic carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions and their redistribution among the atmosphere, ocean, and terrestrial biosphere – the “global carbon budget” – is important to better understand the global carbon cycle, support the development of climate policies, and...
this is a straw man
Non of that shit proved anythingSixth Assessment Report — IPCC
Quantifying the influence of anthropogenic surface processes and inhomogeneities on gridded global climate data
Local land surface modification and variations in data quality affect temperature trends in surface-measured data. Such effects are considered extraneous for the purpose of measuring climate change, and providers of climate data must develop adjustments to filter them out. If done correctly...
Climate Change - NASA Science
NASA is a global leader in studying Earth’s changing climate.
Global Carbon Budget 2019
Abstract. Accurate assessment of anthropogenic carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions and their redistribution among the atmosphere, ocean, and terrestrial biosphere – the “global carbon budget” – is important to better understand the global carbon cycle, support the development of climate policies, and...essd.copernicus.org
this is a straw man
Its just a rehash of previouse garbage, where is the "real" proof ?.
How about the tempreture, how low will the global climate/tempreture go when we hit net ZERO, will it change at all, will anyone notice if it does, the daily tempreture fluctuations far exceed the pissy and supposed 1c increase over 180 years, not that they have a clue what the global temps were 180 years ago.
How did we get out of the last glacial period, it must of been an increase in Co2 according to the scientific consensus of today, probably volcanoes erupting and spewing natural Co2 into the atmosphere causing runaway global warming
Wanna buy a bridge
Resorting to Potholer54 FFS
He/She is not a climate scientist, so according to the self imposed stantards of the believers on here it means nothing, but being a geoligst the flog propably worked for big OIL at some stage and is disqualified from having a opinion
"The global temperature rose by 0.2°C between the middle 1960's and 1980
Surly there must be thousands of peer reviewed papers proving "{man made" Co2 is causing global warming, can you find one
It was a predictabe reply to the Co2 proof question. same rubbish as Porky posts
Surly there must be thousands of peer reviewed papers proving "{man made" Co2 is causing global warming, can you find one
Hiddenjems
Well-known member
The man who wrote the equations for their models Edward Lorenz states they are non deterministic.
You could have data down to every cubic centimeter of atmosphere, and within hours the predictions are off.
Show me an accurate 20 year climate prediction that hasn’t been updated in 20 years. There are none.
Their models require constant updates with real data because they drift quickly.
I dare one person in here to describe the differential equations used in climate science.
Pull ya head in clown, you put nothing up that proves anything, how about you put the full artical up
This shit proves nothing
The physical effect of atmospheric carbon dioxide on Earth's energy budget—that is, its “greenhouse effect”—has been understood for more than 100 years, but its role in climate warming is still not universally accepted. Lacis et al. (p. 356) conducted a set of idealized climate model experiments in which various greenhouse gases were added to or subtracted from the atmosphere in order to illustrate their roles in controlling the temperature of the air. The findings clearly show that carbon dioxide exerts the most control on Earth's climate, and that its abundance determines how much water vapor the atmosphere contains, even though the radiative effect of the water vapor is greater than that of carbon dioxide itself.
Abstract
Ample physical evidence shows that carbon dioxide (CO2) is the single most important climate-relevant greenhouse gas in Earth’s atmosphere. This is because CO2, like ozone, N2O, CH4, and chlorofluorocarbons, does not condense and precipitate from the atmosphere at current climate temperatures, whereas water vapor can and does. Noncondensing greenhouse gases, which account for 25% of the total terrestrial greenhouse effect, thus serve to provide the stable temperature structure that sustains the current levels of atmospheric water vapor and clouds via feedback processes that account for the remaining 75% of the greenhouse effect. Without the radiative forcing supplied by CO2 and the other noncondensing greenhouse gases, the terrestrial greenhouse would collapse, plunging the global climate into an icebound Earth state.Get full access to this article
Just so I don't forget what a flog you are
Porky82
Well-known member
Your not doing ya self any favours today are ya dumb dumb!!
Proof is provided and it's fake according to you who has no knowledge of the subject.
The temperature could be 90c and you still say its cold!!
Porky82
Well-known member
!
Porky82
Well-known member
Yeah over millions of years not hundreds!!
