LeafLady
Member
FLO-RIDAH is a 20+ year old Kush (aka S. Florida OG) that has been kept in the same circle as CP and GSC.
Last edited:
-
As of today ICMag has his own Discord server. In this Discord server you can chat, talk with eachother, listen to music, share stories and pictures...and much more. Join now and let's grow together! Join ICMag Discord here! More details in this thread here: here.
Girl Scout Cookies
- Thread starter Yes4Prop215
- Start date
- Status
FLO-RIDAH is a 20+ year old Kush (aka S. Florida OG) that has been kept in the same circle as CP and GSC.
O-yea(in macho man voice)finally got some of that neg rep goin around n i think i like it
but anyways tha GSC can take a pounding like a 1970's hooker in a room full of politicians my clones looked dead but left them in cloner n they bounced back
thanx phill
but anyways tha GSC can take a pounding like a 1970's hooker in a room full of politicians my clones looked dead but left them in cloner n they bounced back
thanx phill
flo-ridah is just a nickname given by the rap community, just a play on pronouncing florida differently...just like some people rename OG kush "KK" for khalifa kush....
its south florida OG...seen some in person a few times, its not as lemony or fuely as the SFV and louie13 cuts...more headbandy and earthy like a good fire OG. and very dense as well...
astartes, lumpstatus well said my friends...the testing centers have ZERO industry standards or oversight, they can probably just visually look at your nug, pull a number out of thin air, then smoke your nugs when they get home and NO ONE would be able to tell different. thc % is NOT the end all evaluation for weed....just because the number is high doesnt mean its better than something with a lower score.
its south florida OG...seen some in person a few times, its not as lemony or fuely as the SFV and louie13 cuts...more headbandy and earthy like a good fire OG. and very dense as well...
astartes, lumpstatus well said my friends...the testing centers have ZERO industry standards or oversight, they can probably just visually look at your nug, pull a number out of thin air, then smoke your nugs when they get home and NO ONE would be able to tell different. thc % is NOT the end all evaluation for weed....just because the number is high doesnt mean its better than something with a lower score.
headimonster
Active member
the gsc looks yummy, tried it, it was yummy unfortunetly the sample i tried wasnt flushed properly, still had great flav and lingering smoke, as for the tests - id assume that since it was an F1 and hasnt been circulated as much it would test in the 20%, anything might that was solid genetics, i made a cross of bluebery headband and sour diesel, it as well came in at 22%....i think just because it was a Seed Mum,.....
ive grown the cherry pie a few years back, wasnt impressed with it, although only did it outdoors...you could see she was special, acutally still have some 3 yr old outdoor from the different pheno that smelled more like ANIMAL funk...i called it ChemZoo...lol....
id like to know where i can get a verifiable cut of GSC in the Nor-Cal region if anyone could point me in the right direction?
ive grown the cherry pie a few years back, wasnt impressed with it, although only did it outdoors...you could see she was special, acutally still have some 3 yr old outdoor from the different pheno that smelled more like ANIMAL funk...i called it ChemZoo...lol....
id like to know where i can get a verifiable cut of GSC in the Nor-Cal region if anyone could point me in the right direction?
someone was quoted saying it is a big joke to try and see how many people will grow the lowest yielding strain around
I want to try the real deal, it looks awesome. Unfortunately the hype is sort of dying down and since it produces like next to nothing compared to others, like diesels and such, hell even OG.
but god damn, when done right it looks to be fucking insane, like
headimonster
Active member
someone was quoted saying it is a big joke to try and see how many people will grow the lowest yielding strain around
I want to try the real deal, it looks awesome. Unfortunately the hype is sort of dying down and since it produces like next to nothing compared to others, like diesels and such, hell even OG.
but god damn, when done right it looks to be fucking insane, like
lol funny you say that, most samples ive seen are small buds....and still dispensarys in the area are charging up to 65$ an 1/8th....for table scraps....pretty sad....
and honestly I almost think people are overdoing it, the durban has the potential to yield, but assumingly it is going to be a finicky low feeder....maybe GSC is likely to be happier in a coco medium with the right amount juicing her/....
I honestly think any herb can yield around the same amount, it just matters how you feed her, and how dialed she is....
sorry, NO
show me any picture of GSC with nugs the same size as a known producer like Sour D
yeah man, even if you run it dialed in to perfection gsc aint gon yield like no blue dream or silver haze. Nice, solid nuggets and dumbass quality but the yield aint there. Outdoor its finna be the smallest yielder in my garden other then some wispy louie the 13ths I threw out late n got shaded. By smallest yielder I mean less then half any other plant.
DIDM.. it has the same cash crop potential as any OG if not better than some. nugs are DENSE bro.. your comparing two completely different varieties.. it's an OG.. think about it. compared to HA or any OG I feel like it prolly yields more(especially In my indica doms case). at least compare it to an OG or don't single it out like that IMO.
GSC
GSC
....If I could hang with a ball like that.
GSC
when a snapper has you down for 3 hours....Thats the meds.
You can get about 15% variance in cannabinoid content in any batch of well grown pot- not mixing larf with tops. But that's not even the variance these reports are showing.
Very few samples test out over %25 total cannabinoids... they do exist, but they are extremely rare. Any lab that has numbers higher than 25% consistently has calibration issues. I would wager 2/3 of the labs in california are not validated in their methodologies, and well over %80 of labs are pumping out numbers that are completely inaccurate. I'd like to see an actual report from one of these labs that tested the cookies because someone is wrong here and it would be interesting to know wether it's the labs or the people repeating the results by word of mouth.
The numbers I was referring to as being strange were the claims of 26%-28% THC plus an additional 6% CBD. That's a total cannabinoid fraction of over %32 on the low estimate... probably %33 if it were including CBG as well. You simply do not see that kind of cannabinoid production in a single plant, period.
You also never see CBD levels in the %6 range when thc is present @ over %20. The total cannabinoid fraction like i said will rarely exceed %25. If CBD is present with THC, it's seen at a ratio of about 1:2 to 2:1 of the THC level- meaning a CBD enriched plant with a %21 cannabinoid profile plant will be in the range of %7 THC:14%CBD or % 14 THC:%7 THC +/- .
Otherwise, we see the predominant cannabinoid being either THC or CBD with levels like %23 THC and % 1.2 CBD or vice versa in a ratio of about 20:1 or 1:20.
Bottom line, reports of %26+ AND %6 CBD are highly suspicious and should not be trusted.
-Chimera
good info chimera
- Status
