nevermind. pisser.
That's a an awesome Lab RetroGrow
Is there anyway I can avoid this :
"Shipments of plant and soil samples originating from the state of California have to include a copy of our State diagnostic permit 2762. "
I'm mostly silent in this thread because I have nothing NEW to contribute....and it only serves so much purpose to re-state and re-word the same old thing over and over - my thoughts on the matter were documented on this site back in 2012 or so...maybe sooner, don't know exactly...
BUT...
I think it is a wrong direction to use the terminology [dud] in the plural sense. In my most honest of opinions, if the test results don't come off a Sour Dubb clone - one in which most of the plant was perfectly fine and only a couple branches failed to perform - we will get a million different test results to correlate with a million different environmental factors all of which will be just as inconclusive as this thread...
------
I truly think, what we need is a few people (scientists, if you will allow the use of such a term) to take on the Sour Dubb cut - and to continue to flower it out until they see the occurrence of a TRUE dud - and not just the random under performing grow room in which the not so humble can't fess up to the fact they don't have a perfect rig...
I'm sick and tired of the calling wolf routine...if this isn't happening with Sour Dubb or one of her direct descendents, I think anything you have to say is moot.
You don't solve any epidemic by look at zone 300 - you start at zone 1. You start at the beginning to gain relevant, specific origin data. You start at the first point of conception. In the case of the "dudd" - that was the Dubb...
So, please, let's focus on ONE thing - and progress from the same set point - rather than trying to set data points all over the Bermuda Triangle in the hopes that just maybe it'll make some kind of sense....eventually...
dank.Frank
"BM toxin", what is it? Someone must have an idea?
Frank, you are working under the assumption that this phenomena (for want of a better term) only affects Sour Dubb and it's crosses. However, there is plenty of anecdotal evidence that other strains/lines are affected also. It would be helpful if a significant number of people with Sour Dubb and crosses (GG4) would send samples of both "dudded" and "non-dudded" material, so that particular issue can be resolved. This should not exclude others who are having the same or similar issues with other strains, whether or not these issues are identical. Once we get a significant amount of data, it might be sorted out more easily.
be it one problem or several as I suspect.
-SamS
You got a dud in a room with no duds in a seed plant?on another note I have my first dud in quite some time and whats weird is its a head band x gg4, will get pics later and post them.
on another note I have my first dud in quite some time and whats weird is its a head band x gg4, will get pics later and post them.
I suspect we'll see MANY different problems when coming in from gardens all over off many different plants as well.
I think it will help those having issues - but it will do very little to pinpoint the EXACT cause of what the original context of this thread was - "dudd" phenomena, in relation to Sour Dubb and her direct descendents:
Adubb
Odubb
DT7
GG#4
My whole point is I don't want to state "dudds" are caused by __________ - if in fact it is NOT the SAME issue. It just muddies things.
It's why I stand by the starting at ground zero rationale.
dank.Frank
I saw Jeff Spicoli and myself get DUDs b4 Sour Dub.... Mine was Diablo OG and his was an OG Kush also
yes, first one I have had in over 2 yrs. it was a cut off a seed plant I ran, it preformed perfect the first run then it duded this cut run, I was pretty sure it was a dud in veg but dident want to believe it,You got a dud in a room with no duds in a seed plant?