Those pics aren't a great sales pitch for that light. Got any better pics, maybe some with buds in the pic would be good.
-
As of today ICMag has his own Discord server. In this Discord server you can chat, talk with eachother, listen to music, share stories and pictures...and much more. Join now and let's grow together! Join ICMag Discord here! More details in this thread here: here.
Those pics aren't a great sales pitch for that light. Got any better pics, maybe some with buds in the pic would be good.
I do not give a shit if you do not like them. I am simply pointing out that they are the BEST thing I have encountered in 50 years of growing.
That's nice, but until we some pics of plants with nice buds growing under them, no one's gonna buy what you're shilling.
Just think if you were using LEDs that were twice as efficient as those lights, like those of use growing with QBs are. Your mind might be blown.
John LOQUE
Member
For me, LED's just give harder buds with more trichomes. I've just done the experiment. HPS buds are lighter for the same size, sure. But, there is not money saving in electricity, as you need the same wattage than with HPS (or MH).
The only problem i see with Led's is that they don't give enough heat, it can be an issue in winter for instance.
In my grow i put MH for the stretching after 12/12 flip, 2 weeks, and i put the led's tonight till the harvest.
But i'm talking about good quality led's, no burple shit
The only problem i see with Led's is that they don't give enough heat, it can be an issue in winter for instance.
In my grow i put MH for the stretching after 12/12 flip, 2 weeks, and i put the led's tonight till the harvest.
But i'm talking about good quality led's, no burple shit
Yeah, I totally disagree with that. My yields are better from 480watts of quality LED than they ever were with 600watts HPS.
I'm repeating myself, but this shit is worth repeating. I didn't really get it a year ago, but it's simple:
Photons drive photosynthesis. The more photons you produce the more yield potential there is for you to realize. Micromoles (umol/ppf) is a measurement of photons. A mole is 6.02214076×10^23 photons and a micromole is a millionth of it. The most important give away here being that umol is a defined number of photons.
Photosynthesis is a chemical process in which the energy of a photon is used to remove an electron from h2o and then using than electron to produce atp (a chemical energy packet) which is used to make carbohydrates out of carbon dioxide. We can calculate the number of photons needed to produce one gram of plant matter. Let me repeat that: We can calculate the number of photons needed to produce one gram of plant matter.
There is no magic. Photons drive photosynthesis. The more (par) photons you produce the more yield potential there is.
Photons drive photosynthesis. The more photons you produce the more yield potential there is for you to realize. Micromoles (umol/ppf) is a measurement of photons. A mole is 6.02214076×10^23 photons and a micromole is a millionth of it. The most important give away here being that umol is a defined number of photons.
Photosynthesis is a chemical process in which the energy of a photon is used to remove an electron from h2o and then using than electron to produce atp (a chemical energy packet) which is used to make carbohydrates out of carbon dioxide. We can calculate the number of photons needed to produce one gram of plant matter. Let me repeat that: We can calculate the number of photons needed to produce one gram of plant matter.
There is no magic. Photons drive photosynthesis. The more (par) photons you produce the more yield potential there is.
Hello guys, welcome to join in new giveaway.
Hit here: https://www.icmag.com/ic/showthread.php?t=375874
Hit here: https://www.icmag.com/ic/showthread.php?t=375874
^oh and brightness is nothing. Brightness is something humans experience and plants don't have human vision so they don't care about how bright we think something is. Humans are very sensitive to green light and the same ammount of green photons will appear much, much brighter than say 660nm red. For the same kind of lights you can use brightness as a reference point, but for different spectrums it is not a viable way to compare growing power (comparing the brightness of a 3500k led to another is ok. Comparing it to 5000k is fairly close, but comparing it to hps is not and comparing to 660nm monos is definitely not ok).
Lumen is brightness and umol/ppf is number of photons.
Lumen is brightness and umol/ppf is number of photons.
I couldn't agree more.
cant see anything bro
Sorry, I can't get it to load......you can find the grow here:
https://www.*********.com/threads/irie-seeds-orange-gasm-under-gavita-pro-1700e-leds.113333/page-22
https://www.*********.com/threads/irie-seeds-orange-gasm-under-gavita-pro-1700e-leds.113333/page-22
Grown
Last edited:
LMFAO, I found this pic in your shared folder (https://dvdzrus49.imgbb.com/), is this your great grow?..
That is a maturing Zamaldelica. Next to it is a Malawi. The cola on the left is ABOUT 22 INCHES LONG. That is part of the great grow. I also have L. A. Amnesia and Jack Herrer.
Erm, that plant looks like it's dying. Buds are supposed to point up not curl over and point down.
LMFAO. You do not know shit, do you???
The plant is dying. It is finishing. You obviously are not a grower. Get lost.
Latest posts
-
-
-
question for sam the skunkman on the original haze
- Latest: Farmer John
-
Latest posts
-
-
-
question for sam the skunkman on the original haze
- Latest: Farmer John
-
