Microbemans political view may not align with others,but I wouldnt define him as a liar.
Microbemans political view may not align with others,but I wouldnt define him as a liar.
I wouldn’t either, I just thought it’d be funny to say because he was being a condescending dickhead
TldrSo asking for elucidation after an accusation of being known for 'logical fallacy' is being condescending?
The reason for Pipeline's reaction is not associated with a political view at all, nor is it about any form of disagreement. I fully agreed with the points he referenced regarding the endocannabinoid system and simply added that a certain portion of the population has a different metabolism [for want of a different word]; that the attributes he defined, ant-inflammatory, analgesia, etc. for them are sourced from the enkephalin system.
Because of this [potentially because hypothetical] these individuals can have adverse effects from the use of cannabis products. These can include increased pain and poor motor function.
EDIT: This type of reaction is not uncommon as different metabolisms react differently pharmaceutically to different herbs and drugs.
I have no idea why Pipeline thought I was arguing with him nor why you think I am being or was being a condescending dickhead.
Perhaps you can explain yourself.
i saw Pauls interview. for someone that was "attacked by an angry mob" he looked to be in pretty good shape. no cuts, bruises, black eyes or ANYTHING. he either recovers REALLY fast from a savage beating, or he has never seen a "angry mob" except on TV...
OK, I'll bite, as a 3rd generation, lifelong liberal Democrat, I don't visit Fox News or conspiracy sites but I did click on the Infowars/Rand Paul link to see what he had to say.
Well, sad to say but I'm sorry I did. As a matter of fact, I'm always sorry when I look into things these days, I just don't like what I see.
...... and what I see here is that I'm agreeing with Rand Paul. That mob that attacked him was not from DC, just like the BLM mob/attack in DC from 8/25 were likely outside agitators as previously documented by ME 4 days ago.
So maybe this 'plausible deniability' stuff does need to be looked at more closely.
Who are these BLM/white folks, were are they coming from and more importantly, how are they funding their 'trip'?
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]Project Veritas has undercover footage of involved people talking about it...What more could you possibly want ?[/FONT]Let me get this straight...
George Soros paid people to incite national unrest... which would ,in turn, allow martial law to be proclaimed.
In 2015.
Five years later Trump's achieved the national unrest yet has not proclaimed martial law.
Soros is still funding the martial law that is to be brought about by the unrest?
If I'm reading this correctly, Soros is paying for the Dear Leader to mandate martial law...?
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]Project Veritas has undercover footage of involved people talking about it...What more could you possibly want ?[/FONT]
He was being protected by the PoPo, you musta missed that part??