Until Grenell started shitting on Hussein’s administration.
https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/form...d-conspiring-violate-civil-rights-and-bribery
And people wonder why voter id is necessary...
-
As of today ICMag has his own Discord server. In this Discord server you can chat, talk with eachother, listen to music, share stories and pictures...and much more. Join now and let's grow together! Join ICMag Discord here! More details in this thread here: here.
Deep State: Exposed
- Thread starter med4u
- Start date
Until Grenell started shitting on Hussein’s administration.
https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/form...d-conspiring-violate-civil-rights-and-bribery
And people wonder why voter id is necessary...
The Cutter Incident: How America's First Polio Vaccine Led to a Growing Vaccine Crisis
In April 1955 more than 200 000 children in five Western and mid-Western USA states received a polio vaccine in which the process of inactivating the live virus proved to be defective. Within days there were reports of paralysis and within a month the first mass vaccination programme against polio had to be abandoned. Subsequent investigations revealed that the vaccine, manufactured by the California-based family firm of Cutter Laboratories, had caused 40 000 cases of polio, leaving 200 children with varying degrees of paralysis and killing 10.
Paul Offit, paediatrician and prominent advocate of vaccination, sets the `Cutter incident' in the context of the struggle of medical science against polio and other infectious diseases over the course of the 20th century. He reminds us that, within a decade of Karl Landsteiner's identification of the polio virus in 1908, an epidemic in New York killed 2400 people (mostly children) and left thousands more with a life-long disability. In the 1950s, summer outbreaks in the USA caused tens of thousands of cases, leaving hundreds paralysed or dead. `Second only to the atomic bomb', polio was `the thing that Americans feared the most'.
Offit provides a gripping account of how the `March of Dimes', inspired in part by President Franklin D Roosevelt's personal experience of polio, raised funds for research and focused national attention on the disease. He profiles leading figures, notably Jonas Salk and Albert Sabin —brilliant, egotistical and flawed characters—pioneers in vaccine development and as scientific celebrities, and notorious for their bitter personal rivalry.
Offit offers a balanced judgement on both the Cutter incident and on the Salk and Sabin vaccines. Reviewing failures in the manufacturing and inspection processes, he exonerates Salk from blame and concludes that `the federal government, through its vaccine regulatory agency... was in the best position to avoid the Cutter tragedy'. Three larger companies produced safe polio vaccines according to Salk's protocol for inactivating the virus with formaldehyde. The lack of experience and expertise at Cutter Laboratories, undetected by the inspectors, caused the disaster.
While acknowledging Salk's mean-spiritedness towards colleagues, Offit believes that in denying him a Nobel prize, history has dealt harshly with a man who was `the first to do many things' that have contributed to the virtual eradication of polio in the USA. The Cutter incident led to the replacement of Salk's formaldehyde-treated vaccine with Sabin's attenuated strain. Though Sabin's vaccine had the advantages of being administered orally and of fostering wider `contact immunity', it could also be re-activated by passage through the gut, resulting in occasional cases of polio (still causing paralysis in six to eight children every year in the 1980s and 1990s, when a modified Salk vaccine was re-introduced). As Offit observes, `ironically, the Cutter incident—by creating the perception among scientists and the public that Salk's vaccine was dangerous —led in part to the development of a polio vaccine that was more dangerous'.
The Cutter incident had an ambivalent legacy. On the one hand, it led to the effective federal regulation of vaccines, which today enjoy a record of safety `unmatched by any other medical product'. On the other hand, the court ruling that Cutter was liable to pay compensation to those damaged by its polio vaccine—even though it was not found to be negligent in its production—opened the floodgates to a wave of litigation. As a result, `vaccines were among the first medical products almost eliminated by lawsuits'. Indeed, the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program was introduced in 1986 to protect vaccine manufacturers from litigation on a scale that threatened the continuing production of vaccines. Still, many companies have opted out of this low-profit, high-risk field, leaving only a handful of firms to meet a growing demand (resulting in recent shortages of flu and other vaccines).
The contemporary climate of risk aversion and predatory litigation deters the introduction of new vaccines and discourages innovation in a field which boasts some of the most impressive achievements of modern medicine. To protect vaccine development—and ultimately public health —Offit proposes that the option of suing vaccine manufacturers should be stopped and that compensation should only be available through the official programme.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1383764/
The Cutter Incident: How America's First Polio Vaccine Led to the Growing Vaccine Crisis
“Liability without fault” was the verdict in a 1958 lawsuit in the aftermath of the paralysis of children in the United States who had received a licensed polio vaccine manufactured by Cutter Laboratories. In The Cutter Incident, Paul Offit lays out the meaning of this verdict: that pharmaceutical companies are liable for damage without negligence, even if they make a product according to industry standards using the best science available.Offit makes the convincing argument that this verdict has figured largely in the decision by many U.S. manufacturers not to develop or produce vaccines. He also provides a comprehensive history . . .
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMbkrev39127
In April 1955 more than 200 000 children in five Western and mid-Western USA states received a polio vaccine in which the process of inactivating the live virus proved to be defective. Within days there were reports of paralysis and within a month the first mass vaccination programme against polio had to be abandoned. Subsequent investigations revealed that the vaccine, manufactured by the California-based family firm of Cutter Laboratories, had caused 40 000 cases of polio, leaving 200 children with varying degrees of paralysis and killing 10.
Paul Offit, paediatrician and prominent advocate of vaccination, sets the `Cutter incident' in the context of the struggle of medical science against polio and other infectious diseases over the course of the 20th century. He reminds us that, within a decade of Karl Landsteiner's identification of the polio virus in 1908, an epidemic in New York killed 2400 people (mostly children) and left thousands more with a life-long disability. In the 1950s, summer outbreaks in the USA caused tens of thousands of cases, leaving hundreds paralysed or dead. `Second only to the atomic bomb', polio was `the thing that Americans feared the most'.
Offit provides a gripping account of how the `March of Dimes', inspired in part by President Franklin D Roosevelt's personal experience of polio, raised funds for research and focused national attention on the disease. He profiles leading figures, notably Jonas Salk and Albert Sabin —brilliant, egotistical and flawed characters—pioneers in vaccine development and as scientific celebrities, and notorious for their bitter personal rivalry.
Offit offers a balanced judgement on both the Cutter incident and on the Salk and Sabin vaccines. Reviewing failures in the manufacturing and inspection processes, he exonerates Salk from blame and concludes that `the federal government, through its vaccine regulatory agency... was in the best position to avoid the Cutter tragedy'. Three larger companies produced safe polio vaccines according to Salk's protocol for inactivating the virus with formaldehyde. The lack of experience and expertise at Cutter Laboratories, undetected by the inspectors, caused the disaster.
While acknowledging Salk's mean-spiritedness towards colleagues, Offit believes that in denying him a Nobel prize, history has dealt harshly with a man who was `the first to do many things' that have contributed to the virtual eradication of polio in the USA. The Cutter incident led to the replacement of Salk's formaldehyde-treated vaccine with Sabin's attenuated strain. Though Sabin's vaccine had the advantages of being administered orally and of fostering wider `contact immunity', it could also be re-activated by passage through the gut, resulting in occasional cases of polio (still causing paralysis in six to eight children every year in the 1980s and 1990s, when a modified Salk vaccine was re-introduced). As Offit observes, `ironically, the Cutter incident—by creating the perception among scientists and the public that Salk's vaccine was dangerous —led in part to the development of a polio vaccine that was more dangerous'.
The Cutter incident had an ambivalent legacy. On the one hand, it led to the effective federal regulation of vaccines, which today enjoy a record of safety `unmatched by any other medical product'. On the other hand, the court ruling that Cutter was liable to pay compensation to those damaged by its polio vaccine—even though it was not found to be negligent in its production—opened the floodgates to a wave of litigation. As a result, `vaccines were among the first medical products almost eliminated by lawsuits'. Indeed, the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program was introduced in 1986 to protect vaccine manufacturers from litigation on a scale that threatened the continuing production of vaccines. Still, many companies have opted out of this low-profit, high-risk field, leaving only a handful of firms to meet a growing demand (resulting in recent shortages of flu and other vaccines).
The contemporary climate of risk aversion and predatory litigation deters the introduction of new vaccines and discourages innovation in a field which boasts some of the most impressive achievements of modern medicine. To protect vaccine development—and ultimately public health —Offit proposes that the option of suing vaccine manufacturers should be stopped and that compensation should only be available through the official programme.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1383764/
The Cutter Incident: How America's First Polio Vaccine Led to the Growing Vaccine Crisis
“Liability without fault” was the verdict in a 1958 lawsuit in the aftermath of the paralysis of children in the United States who had received a licensed polio vaccine manufactured by Cutter Laboratories. In The Cutter Incident, Paul Offit lays out the meaning of this verdict: that pharmaceutical companies are liable for damage without negligence, even if they make a product according to industry standards using the best science available.Offit makes the convincing argument that this verdict has figured largely in the decision by many U.S. manufacturers not to develop or produce vaccines. He also provides a comprehensive history . . .
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMbkrev39127
Schwan’s Co. sold to South Korean company for $1.8 billion
BLOOMINGTON, Minn. (AP) — Schwan’s Co, a food distributor with deep roots in Minnesota known for its gold home-delivery trucks, has been sold to South Korea’s largest food manufacturer.
Seoul-based CJ CheilJedang will pay $1.8 billion for an 80 percent stake in Schwan’s and gain control of its businesses that serve restaurants, grocery stores and other retailers, the companies said in a statement Thursday. The deal is expected to close early next year.
The Schwan family will retain 20 percent ownership in the businesses being sold to CJCJ. The family will keep 100 percent ownership of Schwan’s Home Service Inc., the home-delivery business that Marvin Schwan began in Marshall in 1952.
https://apnews.com/630bde2c1bfc4e24beec93d8c83531a2?fbclid=IwAR3e-d7cHEos7TdeUDddtZibynIEft3xi5ZLZKTfJRaxciPVcwasR7YQ6d0
[YOUTUBEIF]S-Xrlf3taEo[/YOUTUBEIF]
BLOOMINGTON, Minn. (AP) — Schwan’s Co, a food distributor with deep roots in Minnesota known for its gold home-delivery trucks, has been sold to South Korea’s largest food manufacturer.
Seoul-based CJ CheilJedang will pay $1.8 billion for an 80 percent stake in Schwan’s and gain control of its businesses that serve restaurants, grocery stores and other retailers, the companies said in a statement Thursday. The deal is expected to close early next year.
The Schwan family will retain 20 percent ownership in the businesses being sold to CJCJ. The family will keep 100 percent ownership of Schwan’s Home Service Inc., the home-delivery business that Marvin Schwan began in Marshall in 1952.
https://apnews.com/630bde2c1bfc4e24beec93d8c83531a2?fbclid=IwAR3e-d7cHEos7TdeUDddtZibynIEft3xi5ZLZKTfJRaxciPVcwasR7YQ6d0
[YOUTUBEIF]S-Xrlf3taEo[/YOUTUBEIF]
South Koreans are definitely Deep State.
Sadaam has been dead for many years.
Robert Kennedy Jr: CDC is a privately owned vaccine company
Robert F. Kennedy Jr. claims the CDC owns patents on at least 57 different vaccines, and profits $4.1 billion per year in vaccination sales. According to RFK Jr., the CDC is not an independent government agency but is actually a subsidiary of Big Pharma.
Greenmedinfo.com reports: Mr. Kennedy told EcoWatch, “The CDC is a subsidiary of the pharmaceutical industry. The agency owns more than 20 vaccine patents and purchases and sells $4.1 billion in vaccines annually.” Again, no source.
I have been around long enough to know that vaccine claims have to be checked and rechecked. And since this is a very old claim, one that I would like to be able to state (if it is true), I decided to review it.
I am fortunate to have, as one of my partners in advocacy, fellow autism parent Mark Blaxill, an Intellectual Property expert who has been employed by billion dollar corporations to manage their patents. Blaxill was the man who found out that HHS, through NIH, owns patents on all HPV vaccines, and receives a percentage of the profits for each dose of Gardasil and Cervarix administered anywhere in the world. He published the stunning revelation in a detailed three part expose entitled, “A License to Kill? Part 1: How A Public-Private Partnership Made the Government Merck’s Gardasil Partner.”
When I contacted Blaxill to ask how to run a patent search, he was kind enough to do it for me. He found 57 granted US patents with the CDC listed as an assignee. You can see the search results here.
Upon cursory review of the patents, I found that one did not seem applicable to vaccination, but merely referenced an article on vaccination. That leaves us with 56 CDC patents to scrutinize.
Here is what I found.
There are CDC patents applicable to vaccines for Flu, Rotavirus, Hepatitis A, HIV, Anthrax, Rabies, Dengue fever, West Nile virus, Group A Strep, Pneumococcal disease, Meningococcal disease, RSV, Gastroenteritis, Japanese encephalitis, SARS, Rift Valley Fever, and chlamydophila pneumoniae.
There is a CDC patent for “Nucleic acid vaccines for prevention of flavivirus infection,” which has applications in vaccines for Zika, West Nile virus, Dengue fever, tick-borne encephalitis virus, yellow fever, Palm Creek virus, and Parramatta River virus.
CDC also has several patents for administering various ”shots” via aerosol delivery systems for vaccines.
There’s a CDC patent on a process for vaccine quality control by “quantifying proteins in a complex preparation of uni- or multivalent commercial or research vaccine preparations.”
There’s a CDC patent on a method “for producing a model for evaluating the antiretroviral effects of drugs and vaccines.”
CDC has a patent for companies who want to test their respiratory system applicable vaccine on an artificial lung system.
If a vaccine maker is concerned that their vaccine might contain a human rhinovirus, CDC has a patent on a process for determining if such contamination exists.
CDC has a patent on an assay to assist vaccine makers in finding antigen-specific antibodies in a biological sample.
CDC holds a patent that provides vaccine makers with a method of “reducing the replicative fitness of a pathogen by deoptimizing codons.” Asserting that, “pathogens with deoptimized codons can be used to increase the phenotypic stability of attenuated vaccines.”
The agency also holds a patent on adjuvants for a vaccine used on premature infants and young babies.
There is a CDC patent to cover a vaccine for an infection induced by a tape worm found in pork.
They even have patents that cover vaccines for animal illnesses including Canarypox virus, Fowlpox virus, Sealpox virus, dog flu and monkey cancer.
Does this seem like a public health agency making “independent” vaccine recommendations, or a private company with an impressive portfolio to which one might look for investment opportunities?
The CDC is reputed to be an independent government agency making vaccine recommendations to the public, only for the public good. They are the agency charged with vaccine safety oversight, via their Immunization Safety Office.
Here is how the office describes its charge:
“CDC’s Immunization Safety Office plays a vital role in ensuring our nation’s vaccine safety.
Sound immunization policies affecting children and adults in the U.S. depend on continuous monitoring of the safety and effectiveness of vaccines. CDC uses many strategies to assess vaccine safety, to identify health problems possibly related to vaccines, and to conduct studies that help determine whether a health problem is caused by a specific vaccine. CDC also works with other federal government agencies and other stakeholders to determine the appropriate public health response to vaccine safety concerns and to communicate the benefits and risks of vaccines.
The Immunization Safety Office regularly reports on vaccine safety monitoring findings and any concerns to CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). This advisory group develops the recommended vaccine schedule for children and adults in the U.S. ACIP considers the safety and effectiveness of vaccines before making recommendations to the vaccine schedule or changing recommendations for vaccine use.”
Note that they proudly state that they report to the ACIP – the same committee on which Paul Offit infamously served, as if this reporting somehow adds legitimacy to their vaccine safety work. The same committee that Congress has excoriated for their long history of conflicts of interests.
Nowhere on the CDC’s web site can I find the disclosure that the agency is a profit partner with the vaccine makers for whom it is supposed to be providing safety oversight.
Mr. Kennedy is in very safe territory by reporting that the CDC has over 20 patents that create vast, undisclosed conflicts of interests in vaccine safety. He is understating the problem by more than half.
This brief look at current patents held by the CDC deserves an in-depth review to determine exactly what current financial relationships with vaccine makers now exist and what the current impact those revenue streams are likely having on vaccine safety positions. Furthermore, one must closely look at the financial relationships between the CDC and vaccine makers it is currently courting, to include the potential exploitation of new patents for financial gain. These are merely a few lines of inquiry, among hundreds, needing to be examined and why the potential RFK commission on vaccine safety must be impaneled.
No wonder the vaccine industry (and let’s not kid ourselves, CDC IS the vaccine industry) and their media outlets are fighting with such a fury to prevent the #RFK commission from being formed.
Fortunately, Mr. Kennedy has already said he will fight this corruption against our children until his last breath, and we seem to have a new president who doesn’t care what Pharma and the mainstream media throw at him. There is more than 20 years’ worth of documented abuse and corruption in the vaccine program that, if properly examined, would at the very least force reforms that would drastically reduce the profits of the industry.
The vaccine business is currently a $30 billion per year industry in which organizations like the World Health Organization have urged increased investment, projecting that it will become a $100 billion per year industry by 2025. Thus, it is evident that the CDC and their business partners need the public to not only be okay with the 69 doses of recommended childhood vaccines, but to begin to adhere to the additional 100 plus doses of vaccines recommended by the new adult schedule, and to be ready to inject their families with the additional 271 vaccines in the development pipeline.
That profit boom can’t happen if the corruption in the industry, and the vast, unassessed damage that it has done to the health of children (and now adults) is laid open for all to finally see. The $30 billion per year industry will become a sub $10 billion per year industry, with a cap on how much it can make. Because there is a cap on how much the human body can process.
We must continue to press the Trump administration for comprehensive vaccine safety review and reform, including the universal right to forgo any and all vaccines without coercion.
Without a White House to ignore CDC’s abuses and run interference with the American public, the corrupt vaccine industry may be turning into a paper tiger, and its media simply a powerless crowd of bullies with a megaphone, broadcasting “sound and fury signifying nothing.”
https://eraoflight.com/2018/12/08/robert-kennedy-jr-cdc-is-a-privately-owned-vaccine-company/?fbclid=IwAR2D8WfrTH0OYxIC2r7gMEJIenlHwlS7wa-AbO1fPQTizpF15_KDl3NdjLg
Robert F. Kennedy Jr. claims the CDC owns patents on at least 57 different vaccines, and profits $4.1 billion per year in vaccination sales. According to RFK Jr., the CDC is not an independent government agency but is actually a subsidiary of Big Pharma.
Greenmedinfo.com reports: Mr. Kennedy told EcoWatch, “The CDC is a subsidiary of the pharmaceutical industry. The agency owns more than 20 vaccine patents and purchases and sells $4.1 billion in vaccines annually.” Again, no source.
I have been around long enough to know that vaccine claims have to be checked and rechecked. And since this is a very old claim, one that I would like to be able to state (if it is true), I decided to review it.
I am fortunate to have, as one of my partners in advocacy, fellow autism parent Mark Blaxill, an Intellectual Property expert who has been employed by billion dollar corporations to manage their patents. Blaxill was the man who found out that HHS, through NIH, owns patents on all HPV vaccines, and receives a percentage of the profits for each dose of Gardasil and Cervarix administered anywhere in the world. He published the stunning revelation in a detailed three part expose entitled, “A License to Kill? Part 1: How A Public-Private Partnership Made the Government Merck’s Gardasil Partner.”
When I contacted Blaxill to ask how to run a patent search, he was kind enough to do it for me. He found 57 granted US patents with the CDC listed as an assignee. You can see the search results here.
Upon cursory review of the patents, I found that one did not seem applicable to vaccination, but merely referenced an article on vaccination. That leaves us with 56 CDC patents to scrutinize.
Here is what I found.
There are CDC patents applicable to vaccines for Flu, Rotavirus, Hepatitis A, HIV, Anthrax, Rabies, Dengue fever, West Nile virus, Group A Strep, Pneumococcal disease, Meningococcal disease, RSV, Gastroenteritis, Japanese encephalitis, SARS, Rift Valley Fever, and chlamydophila pneumoniae.
There is a CDC patent for “Nucleic acid vaccines for prevention of flavivirus infection,” which has applications in vaccines for Zika, West Nile virus, Dengue fever, tick-borne encephalitis virus, yellow fever, Palm Creek virus, and Parramatta River virus.
CDC also has several patents for administering various ”shots” via aerosol delivery systems for vaccines.
There’s a CDC patent on a process for vaccine quality control by “quantifying proteins in a complex preparation of uni- or multivalent commercial or research vaccine preparations.”
There’s a CDC patent on a method “for producing a model for evaluating the antiretroviral effects of drugs and vaccines.”
CDC has a patent for companies who want to test their respiratory system applicable vaccine on an artificial lung system.
If a vaccine maker is concerned that their vaccine might contain a human rhinovirus, CDC has a patent on a process for determining if such contamination exists.
CDC has a patent on an assay to assist vaccine makers in finding antigen-specific antibodies in a biological sample.
CDC holds a patent that provides vaccine makers with a method of “reducing the replicative fitness of a pathogen by deoptimizing codons.” Asserting that, “pathogens with deoptimized codons can be used to increase the phenotypic stability of attenuated vaccines.”
The agency also holds a patent on adjuvants for a vaccine used on premature infants and young babies.
There is a CDC patent to cover a vaccine for an infection induced by a tape worm found in pork.
They even have patents that cover vaccines for animal illnesses including Canarypox virus, Fowlpox virus, Sealpox virus, dog flu and monkey cancer.
Does this seem like a public health agency making “independent” vaccine recommendations, or a private company with an impressive portfolio to which one might look for investment opportunities?
The CDC is reputed to be an independent government agency making vaccine recommendations to the public, only for the public good. They are the agency charged with vaccine safety oversight, via their Immunization Safety Office.
Here is how the office describes its charge:
“CDC’s Immunization Safety Office plays a vital role in ensuring our nation’s vaccine safety.
Sound immunization policies affecting children and adults in the U.S. depend on continuous monitoring of the safety and effectiveness of vaccines. CDC uses many strategies to assess vaccine safety, to identify health problems possibly related to vaccines, and to conduct studies that help determine whether a health problem is caused by a specific vaccine. CDC also works with other federal government agencies and other stakeholders to determine the appropriate public health response to vaccine safety concerns and to communicate the benefits and risks of vaccines.
The Immunization Safety Office regularly reports on vaccine safety monitoring findings and any concerns to CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). This advisory group develops the recommended vaccine schedule for children and adults in the U.S. ACIP considers the safety and effectiveness of vaccines before making recommendations to the vaccine schedule or changing recommendations for vaccine use.”
Note that they proudly state that they report to the ACIP – the same committee on which Paul Offit infamously served, as if this reporting somehow adds legitimacy to their vaccine safety work. The same committee that Congress has excoriated for their long history of conflicts of interests.
Nowhere on the CDC’s web site can I find the disclosure that the agency is a profit partner with the vaccine makers for whom it is supposed to be providing safety oversight.
Mr. Kennedy is in very safe territory by reporting that the CDC has over 20 patents that create vast, undisclosed conflicts of interests in vaccine safety. He is understating the problem by more than half.
This brief look at current patents held by the CDC deserves an in-depth review to determine exactly what current financial relationships with vaccine makers now exist and what the current impact those revenue streams are likely having on vaccine safety positions. Furthermore, one must closely look at the financial relationships between the CDC and vaccine makers it is currently courting, to include the potential exploitation of new patents for financial gain. These are merely a few lines of inquiry, among hundreds, needing to be examined and why the potential RFK commission on vaccine safety must be impaneled.
No wonder the vaccine industry (and let’s not kid ourselves, CDC IS the vaccine industry) and their media outlets are fighting with such a fury to prevent the #RFK commission from being formed.
Fortunately, Mr. Kennedy has already said he will fight this corruption against our children until his last breath, and we seem to have a new president who doesn’t care what Pharma and the mainstream media throw at him. There is more than 20 years’ worth of documented abuse and corruption in the vaccine program that, if properly examined, would at the very least force reforms that would drastically reduce the profits of the industry.
The vaccine business is currently a $30 billion per year industry in which organizations like the World Health Organization have urged increased investment, projecting that it will become a $100 billion per year industry by 2025. Thus, it is evident that the CDC and their business partners need the public to not only be okay with the 69 doses of recommended childhood vaccines, but to begin to adhere to the additional 100 plus doses of vaccines recommended by the new adult schedule, and to be ready to inject their families with the additional 271 vaccines in the development pipeline.
That profit boom can’t happen if the corruption in the industry, and the vast, unassessed damage that it has done to the health of children (and now adults) is laid open for all to finally see. The $30 billion per year industry will become a sub $10 billion per year industry, with a cap on how much it can make. Because there is a cap on how much the human body can process.
We must continue to press the Trump administration for comprehensive vaccine safety review and reform, including the universal right to forgo any and all vaccines without coercion.
Without a White House to ignore CDC’s abuses and run interference with the American public, the corrupt vaccine industry may be turning into a paper tiger, and its media simply a powerless crowd of bullies with a megaphone, broadcasting “sound and fury signifying nothing.”
https://eraoflight.com/2018/12/08/robert-kennedy-jr-cdc-is-a-privately-owned-vaccine-company/?fbclid=IwAR2D8WfrTH0OYxIC2r7gMEJIenlHwlS7wa-AbO1fPQTizpF15_KDl3NdjLg
- big money - in getting us sick - then selling us the cure - big money - in starting wars - and enslaving the poor -
Hempy McNoodle
Well-known member
Video of Bill Gates collaborating with CIA to commit crimes against humanity.
https://tomiarayomi1.disciplemedia.com/posts/7389?sh=wKeULgxf
https://tomiarayomi1.disciplemedia.com/posts/7389?sh=wKeULgxf
157 Research Papers Supporting Vaccine/Autism Causation Ginger Taylor, MS
Mainstream research has found that vaccines and their ingredients can cause the underlying medical conditions that committed physicians and researchers are commonly finding in children who have been given an autism diagnosis. These conditions include gastrointestinal damage, immune system impairment, chronic infections, mitochondrial disorders, autoimmune conditions, neurological regression, glial cell activation, interleukin-6 secretion dysregulation, brain inflammation, damage to the blood–brain barrier, seizures, synaptic dysfunction, dendritic cell dysfunction, mercury poisoning, aluminum toxicity, gene activation and alteration, glutathione depletion, impaired methylation, oxidative stress, impaired thioredoxin regulation, mineral deficiencies, impairment of the opioid system, endocrine dysfunction, cellular apoptosis, and other disorders.
1. Increased risk of developmental neurologic impairment after high exposure to
thimerosal-containing vaccine in first month of life.
Division of Epidemiology and Surveillance, Vaccine Safety and Development Branch, National Immunization Program, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 1999.
Thomas M. Verstraeten, Robert Davis, David Gu, Frank DeStefano
Background: Concern has risen on the presence of the ethylmercury containing preservative thimerosal in vaccines. We assessed the risk for neurologic and renal impairment associated with past exposure to thimerosal-containing vaccine using automated data from the Vaccine Safety Data link (VSD). VSD is a large linked database from four health maintenance organizations in Washington, Oregon and California, containing immunization, medical visit and demographic data on over 400,000 infants born between '91 and '97.
Methods: We categorized the cumulative ethylmercury exposure from Thimerosal containing vaccines after one month of life and assessed the subsequent risk of degenerative and developmental neurologic disorders and renal disorders before the age of six. We applied proportional hazard models adjusting for HMO, year of birth, and gender, excluding premature babies.
Results: We identified 286 children with degenerative and 3702 with developmental neurologic disorders, and 310 with renal disorders. The relative risk (RR) of developing a neurologic development disorder was 1.8 ( 95% confidence intervals [CI] =1.1-2.8) when comparing the highest exposure group at 1 month of age (cumulative dose> 25 ug) to the unexposed group. Within this group we also found an elevated risk for the following disorders: autism (RR 7.6, 95% Cl = 1.8-31.5), non organic sleep disorders (RR 5.0, 95% Cl = 1.6- 15.9}, and speech disorders (RR 2.1, 95% (1=1.1-4.0). For the neurologic degenerative and renal disorders group we found no significantly increased risk or a decreased risk.
Conclusion: This analysis suggests that high exposure to ethyl mercury from thimerosal-containing vaccines in the first month of life increases the risk of subsequent development of neurologic development impairment, but not of neurologic degenerative or renal impairment. Further confirmatory studies are needed.
2.
Pilot comparative study on the health of vaccinated and unvaccinated 6- to 12-
year old U.S. children
J Transl Sci 3: DOI: 10.15761/JTS.1000186, April 24, 2017
Anthony R Mawson, Azad R Bhuiyan, Brian D Ray, Binu Jacob
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Jackson
State University, Jackson, MS 39213, USA
National Home Education Research Institute, PO Box 13939, Salem, OR 97309,
USA
Abstract
Vaccinations have prevented millions of infectious illnesses, hospitalizations and
deaths among U.S. children, yet the long-term health outcomes of the
vaccination schedule remain uncertain. Studies have been recommended by the
U.S. Institute of Medicine to address this question. This study aimed 1) to
compare vaccinated and unvaccinated children on a broad range of health
outcomes, and 2) to determine whether an association found between
vaccination and neurodevelopmental disorders (NDD), if any, remained
significant after adjustment for other measured factors. A cross-sectional study of
mothers of children educated at home was carried out in collaboration with
homeschool organizations in four U.S. states: Florida, Louisiana, Mississippi and
Oregon. Mothers were asked to complete an anonymous online questionnaire on
their 6- to 12-year-old biological children with respect to pregnancy-related
factors, birth history, vaccinations, physician-diagnosed illnesses, medications
used, and health services. NDD, a derived diagnostic measure, was defined as
having one or more of the following three closely-related diagnoses: a learning
disability, Attention Deficient Hyperactivity Disorder, and Autism Spectrum
Disorder. A convenience sample of 666 children was obtained, of which 261
(39%) were unvaccinated. The vaccinated were less likely than the unvaccinated
to have been diagnosed with chickenpox and pertussis, but more likely to have
been diagnosed with pneumonia, otitis media, allergies and NDD. After
adjustment, vaccination, male gender, and preterm birth remained significantly
associated with NDD. However, in a final adjusted model with interaction,
vaccination but not preterm birth remained associated with NDD, while the
interaction of preterm birth and vaccination was associated with a 6.6-fold
increased odds of NDD (95% CI: 2.8, 15.5). In conclusion, vaccinated
homeschool children were found to have a higher rate of allergies and NDD
than unvaccinated homeschool children. While vaccination remained
significantly associated with NDD after controlling for other factors, preterm birth
coupled with vaccination was associated with an apparent synergistic increase in
the odds of NDD. Further research involving larger, independent samples and
stronger research designs is needed to verify and understand these unexpected
findings in order to optimize the impact of vaccines on children’s health.
Exerpts
"NDD, a derived diagnostic measure, was defined as having one or more of
the following three closely-related diagnoses: a learning disability,
Attention Deficient Hyperactivity Disorder, and Autism Spectrum Disorder.
"
"Chronic illness
Vaccinated children were significantly more likely than the unvaccinated to
have been diagnosed with the following: allergic rhinitis (10.4% vs. 0.4%, p
<0.001; OR 30.1, 95% CI: 4.1, 219.3), other allergies (22.2% vs. 6.9%, p <0.001;
OR 3.9, 95% CI: 2.3, 6.6), eczema/atopic dermatitis (9.5% vs. 3.6%, p = 0.035;
OR 2.9, 95% CI: 1.4, 6.1), a learning disability (5.7% vs. 1.2%, p = 0.003; OR
5.2, 95% CI: 1.6, 17.4), ADHD (4.7% vs. 1.0%, p = 0.013; OR 4.2, 95% CI: 1.2,
14.5), ASD (4.7% vs. 1.0%, p = 0.013; OR 4.2, 95% CI: 1.2, 14.5), any
neurodevelopmental disorder (i.e., learning disability, ADHD or ASD) (10.5% vs.
3.1%, p <0.001; OR 3.7, 95% CI: 1.7, 7.9) and any chronic illness (44.0% vs.
25.0%, p <0.001; OR 2.4, 95% CI: 1.7, 3.3)."
https://mainevaxchoice.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/VaccineAutismStudies.pdf?fbclid=IwAR1Vws-Ne3PDip4U20npKPxIe9MHkVl1UeFos9JaJPI_9_gCfkRCIxPCmD4
Mainstream research has found that vaccines and their ingredients can cause the underlying medical conditions that committed physicians and researchers are commonly finding in children who have been given an autism diagnosis. These conditions include gastrointestinal damage, immune system impairment, chronic infections, mitochondrial disorders, autoimmune conditions, neurological regression, glial cell activation, interleukin-6 secretion dysregulation, brain inflammation, damage to the blood–brain barrier, seizures, synaptic dysfunction, dendritic cell dysfunction, mercury poisoning, aluminum toxicity, gene activation and alteration, glutathione depletion, impaired methylation, oxidative stress, impaired thioredoxin regulation, mineral deficiencies, impairment of the opioid system, endocrine dysfunction, cellular apoptosis, and other disorders.
1. Increased risk of developmental neurologic impairment after high exposure to
thimerosal-containing vaccine in first month of life.
Division of Epidemiology and Surveillance, Vaccine Safety and Development Branch, National Immunization Program, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 1999.
Thomas M. Verstraeten, Robert Davis, David Gu, Frank DeStefano
Background: Concern has risen on the presence of the ethylmercury containing preservative thimerosal in vaccines. We assessed the risk for neurologic and renal impairment associated with past exposure to thimerosal-containing vaccine using automated data from the Vaccine Safety Data link (VSD). VSD is a large linked database from four health maintenance organizations in Washington, Oregon and California, containing immunization, medical visit and demographic data on over 400,000 infants born between '91 and '97.
Methods: We categorized the cumulative ethylmercury exposure from Thimerosal containing vaccines after one month of life and assessed the subsequent risk of degenerative and developmental neurologic disorders and renal disorders before the age of six. We applied proportional hazard models adjusting for HMO, year of birth, and gender, excluding premature babies.
Results: We identified 286 children with degenerative and 3702 with developmental neurologic disorders, and 310 with renal disorders. The relative risk (RR) of developing a neurologic development disorder was 1.8 ( 95% confidence intervals [CI] =1.1-2.8) when comparing the highest exposure group at 1 month of age (cumulative dose> 25 ug) to the unexposed group. Within this group we also found an elevated risk for the following disorders: autism (RR 7.6, 95% Cl = 1.8-31.5), non organic sleep disorders (RR 5.0, 95% Cl = 1.6- 15.9}, and speech disorders (RR 2.1, 95% (1=1.1-4.0). For the neurologic degenerative and renal disorders group we found no significantly increased risk or a decreased risk.
Conclusion: This analysis suggests that high exposure to ethyl mercury from thimerosal-containing vaccines in the first month of life increases the risk of subsequent development of neurologic development impairment, but not of neurologic degenerative or renal impairment. Further confirmatory studies are needed.
2.
Pilot comparative study on the health of vaccinated and unvaccinated 6- to 12-
year old U.S. children
J Transl Sci 3: DOI: 10.15761/JTS.1000186, April 24, 2017
Anthony R Mawson, Azad R Bhuiyan, Brian D Ray, Binu Jacob
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Jackson
State University, Jackson, MS 39213, USA
National Home Education Research Institute, PO Box 13939, Salem, OR 97309,
USA
Abstract
Vaccinations have prevented millions of infectious illnesses, hospitalizations and
deaths among U.S. children, yet the long-term health outcomes of the
vaccination schedule remain uncertain. Studies have been recommended by the
U.S. Institute of Medicine to address this question. This study aimed 1) to
compare vaccinated and unvaccinated children on a broad range of health
outcomes, and 2) to determine whether an association found between
vaccination and neurodevelopmental disorders (NDD), if any, remained
significant after adjustment for other measured factors. A cross-sectional study of
mothers of children educated at home was carried out in collaboration with
homeschool organizations in four U.S. states: Florida, Louisiana, Mississippi and
Oregon. Mothers were asked to complete an anonymous online questionnaire on
their 6- to 12-year-old biological children with respect to pregnancy-related
factors, birth history, vaccinations, physician-diagnosed illnesses, medications
used, and health services. NDD, a derived diagnostic measure, was defined as
having one or more of the following three closely-related diagnoses: a learning
disability, Attention Deficient Hyperactivity Disorder, and Autism Spectrum
Disorder. A convenience sample of 666 children was obtained, of which 261
(39%) were unvaccinated. The vaccinated were less likely than the unvaccinated
to have been diagnosed with chickenpox and pertussis, but more likely to have
been diagnosed with pneumonia, otitis media, allergies and NDD. After
adjustment, vaccination, male gender, and preterm birth remained significantly
associated with NDD. However, in a final adjusted model with interaction,
vaccination but not preterm birth remained associated with NDD, while the
interaction of preterm birth and vaccination was associated with a 6.6-fold
increased odds of NDD (95% CI: 2.8, 15.5). In conclusion, vaccinated
homeschool children were found to have a higher rate of allergies and NDD
than unvaccinated homeschool children. While vaccination remained
significantly associated with NDD after controlling for other factors, preterm birth
coupled with vaccination was associated with an apparent synergistic increase in
the odds of NDD. Further research involving larger, independent samples and
stronger research designs is needed to verify and understand these unexpected
findings in order to optimize the impact of vaccines on children’s health.
Exerpts
"NDD, a derived diagnostic measure, was defined as having one or more of
the following three closely-related diagnoses: a learning disability,
Attention Deficient Hyperactivity Disorder, and Autism Spectrum Disorder.
"
"Chronic illness
Vaccinated children were significantly more likely than the unvaccinated to
have been diagnosed with the following: allergic rhinitis (10.4% vs. 0.4%, p
<0.001; OR 30.1, 95% CI: 4.1, 219.3), other allergies (22.2% vs. 6.9%, p <0.001;
OR 3.9, 95% CI: 2.3, 6.6), eczema/atopic dermatitis (9.5% vs. 3.6%, p = 0.035;
OR 2.9, 95% CI: 1.4, 6.1), a learning disability (5.7% vs. 1.2%, p = 0.003; OR
5.2, 95% CI: 1.6, 17.4), ADHD (4.7% vs. 1.0%, p = 0.013; OR 4.2, 95% CI: 1.2,
14.5), ASD (4.7% vs. 1.0%, p = 0.013; OR 4.2, 95% CI: 1.2, 14.5), any
neurodevelopmental disorder (i.e., learning disability, ADHD or ASD) (10.5% vs.
3.1%, p <0.001; OR 3.7, 95% CI: 1.7, 7.9) and any chronic illness (44.0% vs.
25.0%, p <0.001; OR 2.4, 95% CI: 1.7, 3.3)."
https://mainevaxchoice.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/VaccineAutismStudies.pdf?fbclid=IwAR1Vws-Ne3PDip4U20npKPxIe9MHkVl1UeFos9JaJPI_9_gCfkRCIxPCmD4
https://mobile.twitter.com/raheemkassam/status/1263901466475081728?s=21
Ahhhh when the ‘strong woman’ identity in ‘identity’ politics blows up in the face of the ‘woke’ left. At 32 Kayleigh McEnany is taking the lügenpresse to task...
Ahhhh when the ‘strong woman’ identity in ‘identity’ politics blows up in the face of the ‘woke’ left. At 32 Kayleigh McEnany is taking the lügenpresse to task...
TychoMonolyth
Boreal Curing
That's all I needed to know to identify your post as complete bullshit........
mainevaxchoice.org
Associations of prenatal and early childhood mercury exposure with autistic behaviors at 5 years of age: The Mothers and Children's Environmental Health (MOCEH) study
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048969717316479
Protective Role of Alpha-Lipoic Acid in Impairments of Social and Stereotyped Behaviors Induced by Early Postnatal Administration of Thimerosal in Male Rat
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29481853/
Yep , total bullshit
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048969717316479
Protective Role of Alpha-Lipoic Acid in Impairments of Social and Stereotyped Behaviors Induced by Early Postnatal Administration of Thimerosal in Male Rat
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29481853/
Yep , total bullshit
157 Research Papers Supporting Vaccine/Autism Causation Ginger Taylor, MS
Mainstream research has found that vaccines and their ingredients can cause the underlying medical conditions that committed physicians and researchers are commonly finding in children who have been given an autism diagnosis. These conditions include gastrointestinal damage, immune system impairment, chronic infections, mitochondrial disorders, autoimmune conditions, neurological regression, glial cell activation, interleukin-6 secretion dysregulation, brain inflammation, damage to the blood–brain barrier, seizures, synaptic dysfunction, dendritic cell dysfunction, mercury poisoning, aluminum toxicity, gene activation and alteration, glutathione depletion, impaired methylation, oxidative stress, impaired thioredoxin regulation, mineral deficiencies, impairment of the opioid system, endocrine dysfunction, cellular apoptosis, and other disorders.
1. Increased risk of developmental neurologic impairment after high exposure to
thimerosal-containing vaccine in first month of life.
Division of Epidemiology and Surveillance, Vaccine Safety and Development Branch, National Immunization Program, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 1999.
Thomas M. Verstraeten, Robert Davis, David Gu, Frank DeStefano
Background: Concern has risen on the presence of the ethylmercury containing preservative thimerosal in vaccines. We assessed the risk for neurologic and renal impairment associated with past exposure to thimerosal-containing vaccine using automated data from the Vaccine Safety Data link (VSD). VSD is a large linked database from four health maintenance organizations in Washington, Oregon and California, containing immunization, medical visit and demographic data on over 400,000 infants born between '91 and '97.
Methods: We categorized the cumulative ethylmercury exposure from Thimerosal containing vaccines after one month of life and assessed the subsequent risk of degenerative and developmental neurologic disorders and renal disorders before the age of six. We applied proportional hazard models adjusting for HMO, year of birth, and gender, excluding premature babies.
Results: We identified 286 children with degenerative and 3702 with developmental neurologic disorders, and 310 with renal disorders. The relative risk (RR) of developing a neurologic development disorder was 1.8 ( 95% confidence intervals [CI] =1.1-2.8) when comparing the highest exposure group at 1 month of age (cumulative dose> 25 ug) to the unexposed group. Within this group we also found an elevated risk for the following disorders: autism (RR 7.6, 95% Cl = 1.8-31.5), non organic sleep disorders (RR 5.0, 95% Cl = 1.6- 15.9}, and speech disorders (RR 2.1, 95% (1=1.1-4.0). For the neurologic degenerative and renal disorders group we found no significantly increased risk or a decreased risk.
Conclusion: This analysis suggests that high exposure to ethyl mercury from thimerosal-containing vaccines in the first month of life increases the risk of subsequent development of neurologic development impairment, but not of neurologic degenerative or renal impairment. Further confirmatory studies are needed.
2.
Pilot comparative study on the health of vaccinated and unvaccinated 6- to 12-
year old U.S. children
J Transl Sci 3: DOI: 10.15761/JTS.1000186, April 24, 2017
Anthony R Mawson, Azad R Bhuiyan, Brian D Ray, Binu Jacob
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Jackson
State University, Jackson, MS 39213, USA
National Home Education Research Institute, PO Box 13939, Salem, OR 97309,
USA
Abstract
Vaccinations have prevented millions of infectious illnesses, hospitalizations and
deaths among U.S. children, yet the long-term health outcomes of the
vaccination schedule remain uncertain. Studies have been recommended by the
U.S. Institute of Medicine to address this question. This study aimed 1) to
compare vaccinated and unvaccinated children on a broad range of health
outcomes, and 2) to determine whether an association found between
vaccination and neurodevelopmental disorders (NDD), if any, remained
significant after adjustment for other measured factors. A cross-sectional study of
mothers of children educated at home was carried out in collaboration with
homeschool organizations in four U.S. states: Florida, Louisiana, Mississippi and
Oregon. Mothers were asked to complete an anonymous online questionnaire on
their 6- to 12-year-old biological children with respect to pregnancy-related
factors, birth history, vaccinations, physician-diagnosed illnesses, medications
used, and health services. NDD, a derived diagnostic measure, was defined as
having one or more of the following three closely-related diagnoses: a learning
disability, Attention Deficient Hyperactivity Disorder, and Autism Spectrum
Disorder. A convenience sample of 666 children was obtained, of which 261
(39%) were unvaccinated. The vaccinated were less likely than the unvaccinated
to have been diagnosed with chickenpox and pertussis, but more likely to have
been diagnosed with pneumonia, otitis media, allergies and NDD. After
adjustment, vaccination, male gender, and preterm birth remained significantly
associated with NDD. However, in a final adjusted model with interaction,
vaccination but not preterm birth remained associated with NDD, while the
interaction of preterm birth and vaccination was associated with a 6.6-fold
increased odds of NDD (95% CI: 2.8, 15.5). In conclusion, vaccinated
homeschool children were found to have a higher rate of allergies and NDD
than unvaccinated homeschool children. While vaccination remained
significantly associated with NDD after controlling for other factors, preterm birth
coupled with vaccination was associated with an apparent synergistic increase in
the odds of NDD. Further research involving larger, independent samples and
stronger research designs is needed to verify and understand these unexpected
findings in order to optimize the impact of vaccines on children’s health.
Exerpts
"NDD, a derived diagnostic measure, was defined as having one or more of
the following three closely-related diagnoses: a learning disability,
Attention Deficient Hyperactivity Disorder, and Autism Spectrum Disorder.
"
"Chronic illness
Vaccinated children were significantly more likely than the unvaccinated to
have been diagnosed with the following: allergic rhinitis (10.4% vs. 0.4%, p
<0.001; OR 30.1, 95% CI: 4.1, 219.3), other allergies (22.2% vs. 6.9%, p <0.001;
OR 3.9, 95% CI: 2.3, 6.6), eczema/atopic dermatitis (9.5% vs. 3.6%, p = 0.035;
OR 2.9, 95% CI: 1.4, 6.1), a learning disability (5.7% vs. 1.2%, p = 0.003; OR
5.2, 95% CI: 1.6, 17.4), ADHD (4.7% vs. 1.0%, p = 0.013; OR 4.2, 95% CI: 1.2,
14.5), ASD (4.7% vs. 1.0%, p = 0.013; OR 4.2, 95% CI: 1.2, 14.5), any
neurodevelopmental disorder (i.e., learning disability, ADHD or ASD) (10.5% vs.
3.1%, p <0.001; OR 3.7, 95% CI: 1.7, 7.9) and any chronic illness (44.0% vs.
25.0%, p <0.001; OR 2.4, 95% CI: 1.7, 3.3)."
https://mainevaxchoice.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/VaccineAutismStudies.pdf?fbclid=IwAR1Vws-Ne3PDip4U20npKPxIe9MHkVl1UeFos9JaJPI_9_gCfkRCIxPCmD4
View attachment 534681
Impact of environmental factors on the prevalence of autistic disorder after 1979
https://academicjournals.org/journal/JPHE/article-abstract/C98151247042
Hepatitis B triple series vaccine and developmental disability in US children aged 1–9 years
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/02772240701806501#.Ue8MEY1wqSo
California Autism Prevalence Trends from 1931 to 2014 and Comparison to National ASD Data from IDEA and ADDM
https://newswithviews.com/reference-guide-to-debunking-the-political-flu-pandemic/?fbclid=IwAR1-QtgBmo5QpQDHfwt7z9k8uNo-L-DSPG4GriHuQ3y-OlsrB4jiPRvtDCk
Pure bullshit
TychoMonolyth
Boreal Curing
Keep spinning.
I'mback
Comfortably numb!
ALTERNATIVE NEWSItalian Politician Says The “Lies & Falsification” of COVID-19 Numbers Is Used To “Terrorize Italians” (VIDEO)
IN BRIEF
The Facts:Vittorio Sgarbi, Italian politician Mayor of Sutri gave an emotional speech at a hearing on the 24th of April where he emphasized that the number of deaths in Italy due to COVID-19 are completely false and that the people are being lied to.
Reflect On:Why does mainstream media completely ignore all of the information suggesting that the number of deaths due to COVID-19 are completely inaccurate, showing that they may be much lower? Why do they claim deaths are actually higher?
https://www.collective-evolution.com/2020/05/07/italian-politician-calls-out-the-lies-falsification-of-covid-numbers-to-terrorize-italians-video/?fbclid=IwAR3Bb4uCLqFZv0204kmZaq3Ou7Ehs55-ZROikl--EJo8Ajzr7ByEYKPiBAQ
IN BRIEF
The Facts:Vittorio Sgarbi, Italian politician Mayor of Sutri gave an emotional speech at a hearing on the 24th of April where he emphasized that the number of deaths in Italy due to COVID-19 are completely false and that the people are being lied to.
Reflect On:Why does mainstream media completely ignore all of the information suggesting that the number of deaths due to COVID-19 are completely inaccurate, showing that they may be much lower? Why do they claim deaths are actually higher?
https://www.collective-evolution.com/2020/05/07/italian-politician-calls-out-the-lies-falsification-of-covid-numbers-to-terrorize-italians-video/?fbclid=IwAR3Bb4uCLqFZv0204kmZaq3Ou7Ehs55-ZROikl--EJo8Ajzr7ByEYKPiBAQ
Hello all,
Been hearing crickets over hear...buahahahaha
Hey, anybody read the flynn/kislyac transcripts? yeah? Nothing to say?
So it is true flynn was colluding with russians, ay?
Lied about it he did, ay?
So, we know he lied to spicer and pence on the 12th, 12 days before the fbi investigation....why would he lie to spicer and pence?
Then he lied to the fbi about the same thing....why?
WHy did flynn ask kislyac/putin to vote against the current administration's UN measure in violation of the logan act?
Will Jessica tell Chester he is getting fat?
Will Benson keep Jodie's secret?
Will Burt ever go fishing with Danny?
All that and more on the next episode of Soap.
minds_I
Been hearing crickets over hear...buahahahaha
Hey, anybody read the flynn/kislyac transcripts? yeah? Nothing to say?
So it is true flynn was colluding with russians, ay?
Lied about it he did, ay?
So, we know he lied to spicer and pence on the 12th, 12 days before the fbi investigation....why would he lie to spicer and pence?
Then he lied to the fbi about the same thing....why?
WHy did flynn ask kislyac/putin to vote against the current administration's UN measure in violation of the logan act?
Will Jessica tell Chester he is getting fat?
Will Benson keep Jodie's secret?
Will Burt ever go fishing with Danny?
All that and more on the next episode of Soap.
minds_I
TychoMonolyth
Boreal Curing
Doesn't matter. The king doesn't want him charged.
