Dark Mission: NASA's dirty little secret.

[GMT]

I only read the first few pages of this thread, so sorry if this has been addressed already, but who filmed the first landing on the moon, I've seen footage of the capsule suposedly landing, the first man, (appart from the camera man) stepping foot on the moon, and the lander taking off again, along with other "moon" footage.

 

[Sheriff Bart]

why it was the aliens, of course

 

[Pops]

The Chinese would be better off mining the methane in my ass than spending all that money going to the moon to get helium. I can keep their factories running for years.

PS. For all you guys with a passion for green cheese, I will be cleaning out my fridge this weekend. I'm sure that I can find you some, as I suspect there is a lot of green ,glowing stuff in there. Some of it may be alive,though.

 

[ArcticBlast]

http://www.thebestpageintheuniverse.net/c.cgi?u=af07

this is the conspiracy that we NEED to start worrying about...

And for those that haven't heard of this site, you should get familiar with it...soon

ArcticBlast

 

[Linenoise]

http://www.thebestpageintheuniverse.net/c.cgi?u=af07

this is the conspiracy that we NEED to start worrying about...

And for those that haven't heard of this site, you should get familiar with it...soon

ArcticBlast

LoL.

Genius.

Not to mention more credible than the "facts" being offered here.

Peace.

 

[ArcticBlast]

http://www.thebestpageintheuniverse.net/c.cgi?u=911_morons

pretty much the most enlightened thing i've heard about the "Loose Change" crap.

I have no idea about the moon though, but i doubt that they're covering up big glass bubbles that used to hold life in them.

ArcticBlast

 

[Backdoor man]

I only read the first few pages of this thread, so sorry if this has been addressed already, but who filmed the first landing on the moon, I've seen footage of the capsule suposedly landing, the first man, (appart from the camera man) stepping foot on the moon, and the lander taking off again, along with other "moon" footage.

lol, im sure there is a simple explanation but its something ive always wondered about, along with....At what point did they get the moon buggy onto the moon and how did they get it there?

On a more serious note, and again this may have been mentioned already...
I recall watching a documentary about this and the investigating journalist actually spoke to a Nasa spokesperson and pretending to be working for a nuclear power company asked where he could get hold of one of the spacesuits that obviously protected the astronauts from the deadly effects of radiation, the spokesperson claimed that they didnt have any left and the company that used to make them back in the day was no more.
You would think that such suits, that can protect a person from radioactive materials, would be marketed and supplied to all nuclear power stations nowadays...wouldnt you?

 

[PhenoMenal]

Why would people at a nuclear facility need to walk around in spacesuits when there is no radiation?

 

[Backdoor man]

Why would people at a nuclear facility need to walk around in spacesuits when there is no radiation?

So the could walk around in the core reactor and do what they do without having to use robotic arms i suppose.

 

[PhenoMenal]

errrrr, ok - whatever you say Chief ICMag Nuclear Scientist

 

[Backdoor man]

errrrr, ok - whatever you say Chief ICMag Nuclear Scientist

errrr, it was a documentary i watched and i found it interesting that they had these protective suits in the 60's but not today - that is all Chief ICMag smart ass.

 

[Liam]

Occam's Razor: The principle states that the explanation of any phenomenon should make as few assumptions as possible, eliminating those that make no difference in the observable predictions of the explanatory hypothesis or theory.

In order to logically conclude that man has not landed on the moon... I have to explain HOW we can bounce lasers off mirrors on the moon. How to discredit the hundreds of thousands of people that saw the Apollo rockets launch. How to explain moon rock samples that were brought back. Explain how the photography was faked. And last but not least, explain why Nasa was able to broadcast signals from the moon to the world.

Moon rocks: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moon_rocks

We have 3 sources for moon rocks, ones we found on Earth (~100), ones brought back in the Apollo missions by humans (~2,400, 842 lb's), and then the Russian Luna mission ones brought back by robots (0.66 lb).

1959 Russia landed the Luna 2 robot on the moon, the first man made object to reach it. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luna_programme

Using Occam's razor, I have no choice but to conclude man DID goto the moon. Also, anyone believing otherwise is a frigging idiot, and I hope they choke.

 

[mark6699331]

Where'd they get the fuel to bring back 842lb's of rock in their tin can of a shell they called a space moduale. I have friends involved shall we say- and they said we orbited the earth and that's it. We filmed all this in the utah desert. Maybe the rocks came from antartica.

m

 

[PhenoMenal]

Where'd they get the fuel to bring back 842lb's of rock in their tin can of a shell they called a space moduale.

As somebody already previously pointed out, all you need fuel for is to escape orbit (didn't anybody here do year 8 science???) - once you're travelling in zero gravity you keep travelling at that same speed, and thus don't need to use any fuel along the way. A lot of fuel is required to get out of Earths orbit (launching a space shuttle for example), but nowhere near as much is required to escape the moons orbit. And btw, 842lb's of rock doesn't way 842lbs on the moon or in zero G.

Maybe the rocks came from antartica.

you're a funny man

 

[genkisan]

i will have to admit it...the moon rock came from the secret Zionist cave of Wonders, where we have been hiding all the super-advanced space technology brought to us by the Space-Rabbis, who landed at Area 51, right near the studio where the moon landings were faked...

Blah fookin blah blah blah

 

[Pops]

Pheno, at one time, the U.S. had the best educational system in the world. Unfortunately, that was 50 years ago. It is nice to see that you folks from the Land of Oz haven't let the Liberals destroy your system. Apparently, you still teach science and math, instead of knitting and bullshitting.

 

[Pops]

In order to break free from the earths gravity, a spaceship has to attain a speed of approximately 7 kilometers per second. To break free from the moons gravity,one only needs to go a little over 1 kmps. You have to remember that the spacecraft that the astronauts docked with, was already orbiting the moon and had some speed already. Therefore, it only took a little fuel to increase the speed and slingshot around the moon and head home. The 842 lbs. of rock only weighed 140 lb. on the moon, and nothing in the zero gravity of space. It would not have affected the acceleration of the spacecraft.

Mark, you say you have friends(involved---in what?) I have a son with 2 degrees in aerospace engineering,who worked for the largest defense contractor in the world. He designed rocket motors and warheads. He says your friends are full of shit!

 

[Guest]

See..they killed a monkey in orbit in just 9 days.

One week later we send 3 men to the moon. (supposedly)

1971, NASA sends FROGS into space to see if they can keep ANYTHING alive.

Rammstein goes to the moon: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9P7Zd-x2QXw

Pops - Your son is a rocket scientist? How does he explain a 20,000lb thrust engine not kicking up any dust and not making any noise?

 

[Pops]

1. The monkey committed suicide,by masturbating to death, due to boredom.

2. Only 2 men landed on the moon. The other was in orbit.

3. Both the Russian and Americans have sent dozens of men and women into space and none of hem died there. Some died going down, and some going up or before they got up.

4. The lunar lander was constructed in 2 parts, the descent module,weighing about 22,500 lbs. and the ascent module, weighing about 10,000 lbs. The descent module kicked up dust as the force of the thrust was against the surface of he moon. The ascent module sat on top of the descent module and the force of the thrust was against the descent module,not the surface of the moon. That is why it kicked up no dust.

5. Does noise travel in space without an atmosphere? Can you hear noise in a vacuum? Did the camera used to record the liftoff have a microphone?

 

[newbgrow]

Counter-arguments ("proof"?) against conspiracy common conspiracy theory questions:


1.
http://www.badastronomy.com/bad/tv/foxapollo.html

http://www.redzero.demon.co.uk/moonhoax/


2.
Moon rocks are openly sold and displayed in museums for public scrutiny. Anyone in the world could study these NASA rocks; anyone with a civil engineering degree, or a degree in any of the soil sciences could easily make an informed opinion on these rocks. How could NASA fool the whole world, by simply displaying rocks from Antartica? Are all of the world's sciences really that stupid? Or is the NASA director just an evil Zionist mastermind who could social engineer the whole world with just one finger?

You know what, guys? I think it just might be the latter (sarcasm...)