What's new
  • As of today ICMag has his own Discord server. In this Discord server you can chat, talk with eachother, listen to music, share stories and pictures...and much more. Join now and let's grow together! Join ICMag Discord here! More details in this thread here: here.

Covid is a accidental Lab leaked bioweapon

Amynamous. Can you help me with the math please, as youre so good with figures. Whats 5% of 1 million, is that 50,000?
So 50, 000 deaths from Covid and 950,000 deaths where it was incidental and not the cause.
50,000 in a two year period that were actually from Covid.
Is that right?
 

Three Berries

Active member
According to the links below, the CDC agrees with me.
Maybe you could find something else?

https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvss/c...ta-quality.pdf


https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/pressroom/p...7/20220107.htm

CDC Director Explains Major Factor Behind People Dying from Wuhan Coronavirus

https://townhall.com/tipsheet/katie...-people-dying-from-wuhan-coronavirus-n2601633

"The overwhelming number of deaths, over 75 percent, occurred in people who had at least four comorbidities. So really, these were people who were unwell to begin with," Walensky told "Good Morning America" Friday.

NEW - Director Walensky says CDC will provide data on "how many of the 836,000 deaths in the U.S. linked to Covid are from Covid or how many are with Covid," and adds "Omicron has just been with us for a few weeks."pic.twitter.com/Htf1hrfX0F

— Disclose.tv (@disclosetv) January 9, 2022
The data the government has used for years to justify their lockdowns, mandates and control over your life is contaminated trash. What a disgrace. https://t.co/sHutEi6NZm

— Katie Pavlich (@KatiePavlich) January 9, 2022
 

Amynamous

Active member
I'll make it easier for you - Less than 5% of the deaths listed as Covid deaths had No previous or other underlying health conditions and 95% of the number reported had at least 1 other major contributing factor, that may have killed them even had they not had Covid.

I wonder what the number is for influenza, seeing as you just brought it up as a comparison? (Weird how you're now comparing it to flu. Thats what I said. I said its weird how we're not treating it like flu, remember? Lol)

People live for decades with diabetes, hypertension, heart disease and other comorbidities.

I used influenza as an example in my explanation because both virus can can pneumonia and i believed it would be easily understood.
Obviously, i was mistaken in that last part.
 

Amynamous

Active member
😕 Er,. what?? Lol.. No it hasnt 😅 The definition and history of the telephone are still the sa,.. Wtf are you even saying right now?? Lool 😆😅😅 No-one changed the definition of Telephone in the dictionary to mean something else. But seeing as you brought it up, is saying "I dont want to have that phone because Ive not seen any reviews yet" the same as saying "anti-telecommunications"?



the responses are getting more ridiculous every time the 'nurse' posts.

The definition for “telephone” changed to include radio waves as a means of transmission after cellular phones came into existence.
 

Amynamous

Active member
Amynamous. Can you help me with the math please, as youre so good with figures. Whats 5% of 1 million, is that 50,000?
So 50, 000 deaths from Covid and 950,000 deaths where it was incidental and not the cause.
50,000 in a two year period that were actually from Covid.
Is that right?

That is an incorrect conclusion.
Obviously, there’s no point in trying to explain it again. I’m tired of beating a dead horse.:beat-dead
 

Chi13

Well-known member
ICMag Donor
Ive just listed to you BY NAME at least FOUR high level medical and scientific experts that you can go and listen to and yet you still exoect me to collate links abd post them for you. Jeez, what kind of nurse are you?? Lool 😅 You cant even do your own reserch when the sources are named for you??😅 Why dont you go and make yourself "familiar" with these people then if you now know who they are?? And I did @ you in a vid I posted earlier with Dr Malone but here it is again.
There is some important figures/data I want you to pay particular attention to at 8minutes 30seconds but I hope you'll watch it all and look for other interviews from him.
https://youtu.be/qWtwedwIbVM

Dr Mike Yeadon. (Skip to 30minutes 10seconds)
https://youtu.be/pn9SEbXdLYs

Dr John Campbell (you should subscribe to his channel and take a look at the dozens of other videos there.)
https://youtu.be/hkopHLQjtVQ


Your welcome.
Each of those you've listed have had their views heard and been widely discredited. You will always find experts who go against the consensus. Occasionally they are right, but mostly not. I have posted links but as is typical with some of you, discount this as some kind of conspiracy. At least you have found some experts which is better than a Russell Brandt clip or some other inane youtube shit. But your experts are still likely wrong. Not only that, but have so far been proven so.

Almost all the advice John Campbell gives has been unproven to have any effect on Covid; ivermectin, vitamin D, zinc, etc. Dr Yeadon predicted that Covid would die out in 2020, and also that the vaccines would kill people within 2 years for starters. I don't know why these people choose to put out this misinformation. Maybe they really believe it, but I suspect it brings fame and perhaps fortune.

Btw, what makes you think you have either the intellect or understanding to go against scientific consensus? What makes you so know what is going on with the CDC, WHO, or anything else for that matter? I suspect this just a political view.
 

Absolem

Active member
Amynamous. Can you help me with the math please, as youre so good with figures. Whats 5% of 1 million, is that 50,000?
So 50, 000 deaths from Covid and 950,000 deaths where it was incidental and not the cause.
50,000 in a two year period that were actually from Covid.
Is that right?


That's like saying a person who gets shot didn't die from the bullet but from bleeding out.

You can't even distinguish between a medical doctor and a person who isn't a MD. Wouldn't trust a thing you post after not being able to weed out something so simple about a person.
 

Amynamous

Active member
😕 Er,. what?? Lol.. No it hasnt 😅 The definition and history of the telephone are still the sa,.. Wtf are you even saying right now?? Lool 😆😅😅 No-one changed the definition of Telephone in the dictionary to mean something else. But seeing as you brought it up, is saying "I dont want to have that phone because Ive not seen any reviews yet" the same as saying "anti-telecommunications"?

I wonder why trump wanted to protect China so badly.
I also wonder how much money was added to his Chinese bank account after he made that decision.
Hmmmm……:chin:
 

unclefishstick

Fancy Janitor
ICMag Donor
Veteran
23134.jpg
 
Chi13 You, and You Amynamous are absolute clowns.🙈😂 At this point Anthony Faucci himself could tell you it was all lies and you'd both still find a way to keep believing what you do lol. - (You'd say "ahh yeah well, hes just bitter" or some shit, lmao 😆😂 "He doesnt really know anything he's not a real doctor. This website debunked him, look *shows website with Pfizer logo*" pmsl😆 "Dont listen to Faucci anymore he's not agreeing to the concensus!" 🙈😂) - Because you're so invested in it already You cant afford for it to not be real now. Its hilarious watching someone in denial but also a little bit sad. You need it to be real so bad, or you know you're going to look like jabbed up idiots 🙈😂
I'm not saying another word on it, I'm just going to wait until it all comes out, which it will. And soon⏳
Its not the experts - top in their field prior to speaking out - who have been debunked. Its the experts who are debunking the narrative and false data. And then being censored for it and "fact checked" for gullible morons like you two. (btw, How do you think they do a fact check, do you think the people at the website are doctors? Or are they IT guys? Do you think they are more medically or scientifically qalified than the world renowned doctors they're fact checking? No; They have to ask other people for the information to publish, is it "fact" or "false".
Who do they ask, who gives them the info to publish? The people in charge;
Who owns the fact checking websites? The parent companies are often sponsored and funded by MSM like CNN and washinton post;
Who is the MSM biggest advertiser revenue? Pfizer and the other pharma giants. xxxxxxxx. Lol.
This is the parent comoany of one of your "independent fact checking websites" 🐂💩

Click image for larger version  Name:	Screenshot_2022-01-13-00-02-34-1.png Views:	14 Size:	70.5 KB ID:	18040852

Click image for larger version  Name:	Screenshot_2022-01-13-00-02-22-1.png Views:	14 Size:	114.6 KB ID:	18040853 Click image for larger version  Name:	Screenshot_2022-01-13-00-02-34-1.png Views:	14 Size:	70.5 KB ID:	18040852
And the definition of a telephone didnt change, they just added to it 🙈 They didnt say its not what it used to be or describe it as something different than it originally was. They didnt change the definition to describe a shoe instead. xxxxxxx.
Theres no way I believe you're a nurse and if you actually are then God help anyone unfortunate enough to be treated by such an obtuse, blinkered, ignoramus. I bet you think half your patients are making it up just for attention. 🙈
Do you have a xxxxxxxxx by any chance? Because the high level mental gymnastics you both have to keep doing to make yourselves "right" (even if only in your own eyes/mind,) would certainly suggest so.. You make it look effortless btw. Bravo.
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_2022-01-13-00-02-29-1.png
    Screenshot_2022-01-13-00-02-29-1.png
    83.4 KB · Views: 29
  • Screenshot_2022-01-13-00-02-22-1.png
    Screenshot_2022-01-13-00-02-22-1.png
    114.6 KB · Views: 31
Last edited by a moderator:

Hammerhead

Disabled Farmer
ICMag Donor
Veteran
At their insult rates im gonna guess they won't be here for much longer if they continue. Don't get suckered into doing the same.
 

Absolem

Active member
It's funny how Bitchute, Gateway Pundit, and ZeroHedge have gotten their cult to believe people get their medical information from Fauci, fact checkers, or the news. Couldn't be further from the truth.

This is where I get my medical knowledge from. I'm glad these places get tax money to help improve the health of the nation. These places can provide up to date medical knowledge unlike some joker on a YouTube video telling people what to believe without any data to back up their claims.
https://hms.harvard.edu/research
https://www.uofmhealth.org/
https://www.mayoclinic.org/
https://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/som/
https://stanfordhealthcare.org/
 
That's like saying a person who gets shot didn't die from the bullet but from bleeding out.

You can't even distinguish between a medical doctor and a person who isn't a MD. Wouldn't trust a thing you post after not being able to weed out something so simple about a person.


In all my posts you still have to troll alllll the way back to me calling Dr John Campbell a GP to find anything at all that you can actually refute with fact. That says it all really. xxxxx
Here. Learn something. Whats the biggest criminal fine in US history? What was it for? Whos on this list, how many times and for what?
And you want to talk to me about who to trust??😏
xxxxxxxxxxx. Lol.😆😂
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_o...al_settlements
 
Last edited by a moderator:
That's like saying a person who gets shot didn't die from the bullet but from bleeding out.
.

No. But the death figures are like saying 100 people died from bullet wounds when in reality 5 got shot and died and the other 95 just had bullets in their pockets.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Latest posts

Latest posts

Top