Budz Lightyear
Member
What? There is "no data", but "he is the guy that interprets that data" You're not making any sense. If there is no data, then what does he base views on?
Also many of his claims have been proven wrong such as the pandemic dying out in 2020. He also said there would be no second wave. How many waves have there been now?
The pandemic did die out in 2020. There was no second wave. That was just vaccine rollout effects. You have no evidence to say otherwise, just what youve been told. You didnt interpret data, you listened to someone else who interpreted it and told you that there was a second wave etc etc. How is that someone different to Mike Yeadon other than probably LESS experienced?
He bases his views on emerging data sets. He has been the leader in the field of this for years hence his employment history. I'd say he's good at it. We had no data previously for there to be evidence published and reasy to support his statements. Which was the reason for the fact check flagging. Just because the evidence hasnt veen collated and published, doesnt mean that its not there or that he doesnt gave it. As I keep saying, it will all come out in the end. Give him time, his findings will eventually trickle down to you.