maybe not, but i certainly think it especially pertains to big pharma as well.
-
As of today ICMag has his own Discord server. In this Discord server you can chat, talk with eachother, listen to music, share stories and pictures...and much more. Join now and let's grow together! Join ICMag Discord here! More details in this thread here: here.
Covid 19 mrna Vaccines...Yes/No?
- Thread starter gaiusmarius
- Start date
maybe not, but i certainly think it especially pertains to big pharma as well.
150k Covid-19 Deaths? – The ONS state in black and white that just 17,000 people have died of Covid-19 in the past 2 years???
150k Covid-19 Deaths? – The ONS state in black and white that just 17,000 people have died of Covid-19 in the past 2 years
By The Exposé on January 17, 2022 • ( 20 Comments )
For nearly two years the people of the UK have been repeatedly ordered to stay at home, wear masks, and get vaccinated in order to protect the NHS and save lives. Lockdown after lockdown, restriction after restriction.
Millions of lives have been put on hold, millions of others have been ruined. Millions of jobs have been lost, thousands of businesses are now closed forever.
But a huge majority of the British people think it has all been worth it, and absolutely necessary due to the fear propaganda that has played on a 24/7 loop on their television screens, and headlined every newspaper over the past two years.
Because the British public have been led to believe that over one-hundred-and-fifty-thousand people have died of Covid-19, and they’ve been told that number would have been much higher if they had not complied with the destruction of the economy and decimation of their lives.
But now we can confirm without a shadow of a doubt that the 150k number is an outright lie thanks to a recent response to a Freedom of Information Request made to the Office for National Statistics (ONS), in which the ONS confirms that just 17,371 people have died of Covid-19 over the past two years.
The UK Government claims via the Covid-19 dashboard that as of January 13th 2022, there have been 151,855 Covid-19 deaths throughout the UK since March 2020.
Source
The public have also been constantly reminded of this false claim via the mainstream media, with the most recent fear-mongering headlines coming on the 8th January in which the BBC echoed the UK Governments false claim that 150,000 had died of Covid-19 in the UK.
Source
Blink and you’ll miss it but it’s worth noting that the BBC chose to run with the headline the ‘UK records more than 150,000 deaths’. The key word here being record, because the UK Government can record whatever they like but this does not reflect the true number of Covid-19 deaths.
Source
The UK Medicine Regulator has also reminded the public of the falsely claimed number of Covid-19 deaths each week at the very beginning of its Coronavirus Vaccine – Weekly Summary of Yellow Card Reporting, where anyone can take a look at the 1 million+ adverse reactions and deaths that have been reported against the Covid-19 vaccines.
In a report published January 13th the MHRA claimed that “at the time of this report, over 149,541 people across the UK have died within 28 days of a positive test for Coronavirus (COVID-19) Vaccination is the single most effective way to reduce deaths…”.
Source
But all of these institutions are lying to you, because the Office for National Statistics have confirmed in a response to a Freedom of Information request that as of the end of quarter 3 in 2021 just 17,371 people had actually died of Covid-19.
Meaning less people have lost their lives due to Covid-19 in nearly two years than the average of around 30,000 people who lose their lives during a single bad flu year in the UK.
Source
The request for the true number of deaths was made some time prior to December 16th 2021 and the Office for National Statistics responded with the following –
Source
As you can clearly see these numbers add up to nowhere near the 150,000 Covid-19 deaths claimed by the UK Government and mainstream media, and if we add up the total number of deaths by the end of quarter 3 in 2021 we can see that the Covid-19 vaccines haven’t really had very much effect in reducing the number of deaths.
According to the ONS there were 9,400 Covid-19 deaths between March 1st and December 31st 2020. The firs Covid-19 vaccine was administered on December 8th 2020 and the elderly and most vulnerable to Covid-19 were prioritised first. So it’s strange to find that during the first three quarters of 2021 there were a further 7,971 Covid-19 deaths when the Covid-19 vaccines are allegedly 95% at reducing the risk of death due to Covid-19.
Source
The above chart demonstrates perfectly the absurdity of the 150,000 Covid-19 death lie that has been perpetuated by the UK Government and mainstream media to justify two years of Draconian restrictions.
Source
According to the Office for National Statistics between March 2020 and the end of quarter 3 2021, just 13,597 people over the age of 65 died of Covid-19, and just 3,774 people under the age of 65 died of Covid-19.
So why on earth did the UK Government demand that the entire population stay at home?
Why did school children have their education ruined?
Why did teenagers have their young lives ruined?
Why were new parents left in isolation to struggle alone without the help of their families?
Why were people unable to say goodbye to their loved ones?
Why were the elderly and vulnerable left in total isolation in care homes?
Why has the NHS turned into the National Vaccination Service?
One-hundred-and-fifty-thousand Covid-19 deaths in two years? Pull the other one. The ONS has confirmed that there have only been just over 17,000.
150k Covid-19 Deaths? – The ONS state in black and white that just 17,000 people have died of Covid-19 in the past 2 years
By The Exposé on January 17, 2022 • ( 20 Comments )
For nearly two years the people of the UK have been repeatedly ordered to stay at home, wear masks, and get vaccinated in order to protect the NHS and save lives. Lockdown after lockdown, restriction after restriction.
Millions of lives have been put on hold, millions of others have been ruined. Millions of jobs have been lost, thousands of businesses are now closed forever.
But a huge majority of the British people think it has all been worth it, and absolutely necessary due to the fear propaganda that has played on a 24/7 loop on their television screens, and headlined every newspaper over the past two years.
Because the British public have been led to believe that over one-hundred-and-fifty-thousand people have died of Covid-19, and they’ve been told that number would have been much higher if they had not complied with the destruction of the economy and decimation of their lives.
But now we can confirm without a shadow of a doubt that the 150k number is an outright lie thanks to a recent response to a Freedom of Information Request made to the Office for National Statistics (ONS), in which the ONS confirms that just 17,371 people have died of Covid-19 over the past two years.
The UK Government claims via the Covid-19 dashboard that as of January 13th 2022, there have been 151,855 Covid-19 deaths throughout the UK since March 2020.
The public have also been constantly reminded of this false claim via the mainstream media, with the most recent fear-mongering headlines coming on the 8th January in which the BBC echoed the UK Governments false claim that 150,000 had died of Covid-19 in the UK.
Blink and you’ll miss it but it’s worth noting that the BBC chose to run with the headline the ‘UK records more than 150,000 deaths’. The key word here being record, because the UK Government can record whatever they like but this does not reflect the true number of Covid-19 deaths.
The UK Medicine Regulator has also reminded the public of the falsely claimed number of Covid-19 deaths each week at the very beginning of its Coronavirus Vaccine – Weekly Summary of Yellow Card Reporting, where anyone can take a look at the 1 million+ adverse reactions and deaths that have been reported against the Covid-19 vaccines.
In a report published January 13th the MHRA claimed that “at the time of this report, over 149,541 people across the UK have died within 28 days of a positive test for Coronavirus (COVID-19) Vaccination is the single most effective way to reduce deaths…”.
But all of these institutions are lying to you, because the Office for National Statistics have confirmed in a response to a Freedom of Information request that as of the end of quarter 3 in 2021 just 17,371 people had actually died of Covid-19.
Meaning less people have lost their lives due to Covid-19 in nearly two years than the average of around 30,000 people who lose their lives during a single bad flu year in the UK.
The request for the true number of deaths was made some time prior to December 16th 2021 and the Office for National Statistics responded with the following –
As you can clearly see these numbers add up to nowhere near the 150,000 Covid-19 deaths claimed by the UK Government and mainstream media, and if we add up the total number of deaths by the end of quarter 3 in 2021 we can see that the Covid-19 vaccines haven’t really had very much effect in reducing the number of deaths.
According to the ONS there were 9,400 Covid-19 deaths between March 1st and December 31st 2020. The firs Covid-19 vaccine was administered on December 8th 2020 and the elderly and most vulnerable to Covid-19 were prioritised first. So it’s strange to find that during the first three quarters of 2021 there were a further 7,971 Covid-19 deaths when the Covid-19 vaccines are allegedly 95% at reducing the risk of death due to Covid-19.
The above chart demonstrates perfectly the absurdity of the 150,000 Covid-19 death lie that has been perpetuated by the UK Government and mainstream media to justify two years of Draconian restrictions.
According to the Office for National Statistics between March 2020 and the end of quarter 3 2021, just 13,597 people over the age of 65 died of Covid-19, and just 3,774 people under the age of 65 died of Covid-19.
So why on earth did the UK Government demand that the entire population stay at home?
Why did school children have their education ruined?
Why did teenagers have their young lives ruined?
Why were new parents left in isolation to struggle alone without the help of their families?
Why were people unable to say goodbye to their loved ones?
Why were the elderly and vulnerable left in total isolation in care homes?
Why has the NHS turned into the National Vaccination Service?
One-hundred-and-fifty-thousand Covid-19 deaths in two years? Pull the other one. The ONS has confirmed that there have only been just over 17,000.
Unvaccinated in Wisconsin hospitalized at 10x higher rate, died at 14x higher rate in December
https://www.wsaw.com/2022/01/17/unv...0x-higher-rate-died-14x-higher-rate-december/
The Wisconsin Department of Health Services released its side-by-side comparison of Wisconsin’s vaccinated and unvaccinated COVID-19 cases in December 2021 on Saturday. Even though fully vaccinated people were the majority of the population by mid-December (57.4%), they only accounted for one-fourth of the confirmed COVID-19 cases.
The DHS says if a person was infected with the coronavirus, they were 10 times more likely to fill a hospital bed and 14 times more likely to die if they never received a vaccine or were not fully vaccinated compared to a fully vaccinated person.
For every 100,000 fully vaccinated people in Wisconsin there were:
People ages 16 to 34 had the highest infection rates among the fully vaccinated population, with about 2.5% of their age groups testing positive.
Among 5- to 11-year-olds, who just became eligible for COVID-19 vaccines in November, the case rates were 3.0% among the unvaccinated or not fully vaccinated, and 0.8% in the fully vaccinated population.
https://www.wsaw.com/2022/01/17/unv...0x-higher-rate-died-14x-higher-rate-december/
The Wisconsin Department of Health Services released its side-by-side comparison of Wisconsin’s vaccinated and unvaccinated COVID-19 cases in December 2021 on Saturday. Even though fully vaccinated people were the majority of the population by mid-December (57.4%), they only accounted for one-fourth of the confirmed COVID-19 cases.
The DHS says if a person was infected with the coronavirus, they were 10 times more likely to fill a hospital bed and 14 times more likely to die if they never received a vaccine or were not fully vaccinated compared to a fully vaccinated person.
For every 100,000 fully vaccinated people in Wisconsin there were:
- 1,573.2 confirmed infections
- 18.5 hospitalizations
- 3.6 deaths
- 4,746.4 confirmed infections
- 176.4 hospitalizations
- 50.8 deaths
- 1.18% of fully vaccinated people who were infected were hospitalized, and 0.23% died
- 3.72% of unvaccinated, or not fully vaccinated, people who were infected were hospitalized, and 1.07% died
People ages 16 to 34 had the highest infection rates among the fully vaccinated population, with about 2.5% of their age groups testing positive.
Among 5- to 11-year-olds, who just became eligible for COVID-19 vaccines in November, the case rates were 3.0% among the unvaccinated or not fully vaccinated, and 0.8% in the fully vaccinated population.
65% Increase in Deaths Among 18-49 Year in the U.S.,during the Year of the Experimental COVID “Vaccines”
by Brian Shilhavy
Earlier this month (January, 2022), Scott Davison, the CEO of OneAmerica, a $100 billion insurance company based out of Indiana, made headline news in the Alternative Media when he announced that the death rate on life insurance claims skyrocketed an unprecedented 40% among those between the ages of 18 and 64 in 2021. See:
Crisis in America: Deaths Up 40% Among Those Aged 18-64 Based on Life Insurance Claims for 2021 After COVID-19 Vaccine Roll Outs
The usual corporate media “fact checkers” quickly published articles trying to contain the damage, and I received a few emails from gullible people who don’t bother researching things for themselves and didn’t bother to fact check the “fact checkers” to see if in fact they actually did debunk the story.
They didn’t, of course, but in typical fashion they setup a straw man to knock down in most cases, by stating that Scott Davison never blamed the excess in deaths on the roll out of the COVID-19 shots in 2021.
But that hardly debunks the numbers from the life insurance industry that was truly a major news story, clearly showing that deaths dramatically increased in 2021, the year of the COVID-19 experimental “vaccine” roll out.
I did my own investigation to corroborate what he was reporting, and examined the number of deaths the CDC was reporting through December, 2020, before they revised their website and changed the total number of people who died in 2020, the year the pandemic scam started, which clearly showed that total deaths in 2020 were about the same as the previous two years, and that all they basically did was eliminate most of the flu deaths and blame those on COVID-19.
The result of this investigation was that we saw about an additional 400,000 deaths in 2021, the year of the COVID-19 vaccine roll-out. See:
2021: COVID Deaths Increase, Flu Deaths Disappear, 400,000+ More Total Deaths than 2020
Since publishing that report, Petr Svab of the Epoch Times has also done an investigation on this issue, looking at death certificates from the CDC website of people between the age of 18 and 49 in 2021.
He examined the data by state, and he found that in some states the deaths in this age group had increased by as much as 65% compared to the same period in 2018 and 2019.
Here are the two articles he published that report this:
EXCLUSIVE: Nationwide Surge In Deaths Among People Aged 18-49: A State by State Overview
EXCLUSIVE: States Investigating Surge in Mortality Rate Among 18–49-Year-Olds, Majority Unrelated to COVID-19
If you hit a pay wall, ZeroHedge News has also published them:
Nationwide Surge In Deaths Among People Aged 18-49: A State By State Overview
States Investigating Surge In Mortality Rate Among 18–49-Year-Olds, Majority Unrelated To COVID-19
Some excerpts:
Petr Svab was careful to not link or blame the excess in deaths to the COVID-19 shots, probably to try and avoid the same “fact checkers” trying to discredit his investigation.
But the correlation to the COVID-19 shots now is irrefutable, just from using the U.S. Government’s own data from the CDC, and also from the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS).
This is a national catastrophe of the magnitude that this nation has never before faced, and the total collapse of the United States now seems inevitable.
- Editor @Investigator_50
- January 18, 2022
by Brian Shilhavy
Earlier this month (January, 2022), Scott Davison, the CEO of OneAmerica, a $100 billion insurance company based out of Indiana, made headline news in the Alternative Media when he announced that the death rate on life insurance claims skyrocketed an unprecedented 40% among those between the ages of 18 and 64 in 2021. See:
Crisis in America: Deaths Up 40% Among Those Aged 18-64 Based on Life Insurance Claims for 2021 After COVID-19 Vaccine Roll Outs
The usual corporate media “fact checkers” quickly published articles trying to contain the damage, and I received a few emails from gullible people who don’t bother researching things for themselves and didn’t bother to fact check the “fact checkers” to see if in fact they actually did debunk the story.
They didn’t, of course, but in typical fashion they setup a straw man to knock down in most cases, by stating that Scott Davison never blamed the excess in deaths on the roll out of the COVID-19 shots in 2021.
But that hardly debunks the numbers from the life insurance industry that was truly a major news story, clearly showing that deaths dramatically increased in 2021, the year of the COVID-19 experimental “vaccine” roll out.
I did my own investigation to corroborate what he was reporting, and examined the number of deaths the CDC was reporting through December, 2020, before they revised their website and changed the total number of people who died in 2020, the year the pandemic scam started, which clearly showed that total deaths in 2020 were about the same as the previous two years, and that all they basically did was eliminate most of the flu deaths and blame those on COVID-19.
The result of this investigation was that we saw about an additional 400,000 deaths in 2021, the year of the COVID-19 vaccine roll-out. See:
2021: COVID Deaths Increase, Flu Deaths Disappear, 400,000+ More Total Deaths than 2020
Since publishing that report, Petr Svab of the Epoch Times has also done an investigation on this issue, looking at death certificates from the CDC website of people between the age of 18 and 49 in 2021.
He examined the data by state, and he found that in some states the deaths in this age group had increased by as much as 65% compared to the same period in 2018 and 2019.
Here are the two articles he published that report this:
EXCLUSIVE: Nationwide Surge In Deaths Among People Aged 18-49: A State by State Overview
EXCLUSIVE: States Investigating Surge in Mortality Rate Among 18–49-Year-Olds, Majority Unrelated to COVID-19
If you hit a pay wall, ZeroHedge News has also published them:
Nationwide Surge In Deaths Among People Aged 18-49: A State By State Overview
States Investigating Surge In Mortality Rate Among 18–49-Year-Olds, Majority Unrelated To COVID-19
Some excerpts:
Deaths among people aged 18 to 49 increased more than 40 percent in the 12 months ending October 2021 compared to the same period in 2018–2019, before the COVID-19 pandemic, according to an analysis of death certificate data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) by The Epoch Times.
The increase was notable across the country and in no state was COVID reported in more than 60 percent of the excess deaths. Some states experienced much steeper hikes than others.
Nevada was the worst with a 65 percent prime-age mortality surge of which only 36 percent was attributed to COVID. Texas was second with a 61 percent jump of which 58 percent was attributed to COVID. Arizona and Tennessee recorded 57 percent increases with 37 percent and 33 percent attributed to COVID respectively. Not far behind was California at 55 percent and 42 percent attributed to COVID as well as New Mexico (52 percent, 33 percent), Florida (51 percent, 48 percent), and Louisiana (51 percent, 32 percent).
Health departments in several states confirmed to The Epoch Times that they are looking into a steep surge in the mortality rate for people aged 18 to 49 in 2021—a majority of which are not linked to COVID-19.
Texas saw the 18 to 49 age mortality jump 61 percent, the second-highest increase in the country. Of that, less than 58 percent was attributed to COVID-19.
“Our Center of Health Statistics is looking at the data,” said Chris Van Deusen, the head of Media Relations at the Texas Department of State Health Services, via email. “We’ll get back with you.”
Florida, which saw an increase of 51 percent, 48 percent of that attributed to COVID-19, is also probing the matter.
“I am looking into it to see if there is some sort of correlation/causation,” said Jeremy Redfern, spokesman for the Florida Department of Health via email.
The increase was notable across the country and in no state was COVID reported in more than 60 percent of the excess deaths. Some states experienced much steeper hikes than others.
Nevada was the worst with a 65 percent prime-age mortality surge of which only 36 percent was attributed to COVID. Texas was second with a 61 percent jump of which 58 percent was attributed to COVID. Arizona and Tennessee recorded 57 percent increases with 37 percent and 33 percent attributed to COVID respectively. Not far behind was California at 55 percent and 42 percent attributed to COVID as well as New Mexico (52 percent, 33 percent), Florida (51 percent, 48 percent), and Louisiana (51 percent, 32 percent).
Health departments in several states confirmed to The Epoch Times that they are looking into a steep surge in the mortality rate for people aged 18 to 49 in 2021—a majority of which are not linked to COVID-19.
Texas saw the 18 to 49 age mortality jump 61 percent, the second-highest increase in the country. Of that, less than 58 percent was attributed to COVID-19.
“Our Center of Health Statistics is looking at the data,” said Chris Van Deusen, the head of Media Relations at the Texas Department of State Health Services, via email. “We’ll get back with you.”
Florida, which saw an increase of 51 percent, 48 percent of that attributed to COVID-19, is also probing the matter.
“I am looking into it to see if there is some sort of correlation/causation,” said Jeremy Redfern, spokesman for the Florida Department of Health via email.
Petr Svab was careful to not link or blame the excess in deaths to the COVID-19 shots, probably to try and avoid the same “fact checkers” trying to discredit his investigation.
But the correlation to the COVID-19 shots now is irrefutable, just from using the U.S. Government’s own data from the CDC, and also from the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS).
This is a national catastrophe of the magnitude that this nation has never before faced, and the total collapse of the United States now seems inevitable.
https://hatchardreport.com/relationship-between-covid-19-vaccination-and-all-cause-mortality/
Relationship Between Covid-19 Vaccination and All Cause Mortality
Relationship Between Covid-19 Vaccination and All Cause Mortality
65% Increase in Deaths Among 18-49 Year in the U.S.,during the Year of the Experimental COVID “Vaccines”
- Editor @Investigator_50
- January 18, 2022
by Brian Shilhavy
Earlier this month (January, 2022), Scott Davison, the CEO of OneAmerica, a $100 billion insurance company based out of Indiana, made headline news in the Alternative Media when he announced that the death rate on life insurance claims skyrocketed an unprecedented 40% among those between the ages of 18 and 64 in 2021. See:
Crisis in America: Deaths Up 40% Among Those Aged 18-64 Based on Life Insurance Claims for 2021 After COVID-19 Vaccine Roll Outs
The usual corporate media “fact checkers” quickly published articles trying to contain the damage, and I received a few emails from gullible people who don’t bother researching things for themselves and didn’t bother to fact check the “fact checkers” to see if in fact they actually did debunk the story.
They didn’t, of course, but in typical fashion they setup a straw man to knock down in most cases, by stating that Scott Davison never blamed the excess in deaths on the roll out of the COVID-19 shots in 2021.
But that hardly debunks the numbers from the life insurance industry that was truly a major news story, clearly showing that deaths dramatically increased in 2021, the year of the COVID-19 experimental “vaccine” roll out.
I did my own investigation to corroborate what he was reporting, and examined the number of deaths the CDC was reporting through December, 2020, before they revised their website and changed the total number of people who died in 2020, the year the pandemic scam started, which clearly showed that total deaths in 2020 were about the same as the previous two years, and that all they basically did was eliminate most of the flu deaths and blame those on COVID-19.
The result of this investigation was that we saw about an additional 400,000 deaths in 2021, the year of the COVID-19 vaccine roll-out. See:
2021: COVID Deaths Increase, Flu Deaths Disappear, 400,000+ More Total Deaths than 2020
Since publishing that report, Petr Svab of the Epoch Times has also done an investigation on this issue, looking at death certificates from the CDC website of people between the age of 18 and 49 in 2021.
He examined the data by state, and he found that in some states the deaths in this age group had increased by as much as 65% compared to the same period in 2018 and 2019.
Here are the two articles he published that report this:
EXCLUSIVE: Nationwide Surge In Deaths Among People Aged 18-49: A State by State Overview
EXCLUSIVE: States Investigating Surge in Mortality Rate Among 18–49-Year-Olds, Majority Unrelated to COVID-19
If you hit a pay wall, ZeroHedge News has also published them:
Nationwide Surge In Deaths Among People Aged 18-49: A State By State Overview
States Investigating Surge In Mortality Rate Among 18–49-Year-Olds, Majority Unrelated To COVID-19
Some excerpts:Deaths among people aged 18 to 49 increased more than 40 percent in the 12 months ending October 2021 compared to the same period in 2018–2019, before the COVID-19 pandemic, according to an analysis of death certificate data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) by The Epoch Times.
The increase was notable across the country and in no state was COVID reported in more than 60 percent of the excess deaths. Some states experienced much steeper hikes than others.
Nevada was the worst with a 65 percent prime-age mortality surge of which only 36 percent was attributed to COVID. Texas was second with a 61 percent jump of which 58 percent was attributed to COVID. Arizona and Tennessee recorded 57 percent increases with 37 percent and 33 percent attributed to COVID respectively. Not far behind was California at 55 percent and 42 percent attributed to COVID as well as New Mexico (52 percent, 33 percent), Florida (51 percent, 48 percent), and Louisiana (51 percent, 32 percent).
Health departments in several states confirmed to The Epoch Times that they are looking into a steep surge in the mortality rate for people aged 18 to 49 in 2021—a majority of which are not linked to COVID-19.
Texas saw the 18 to 49 age mortality jump 61 percent, the second-highest increase in the country. Of that, less than 58 percent was attributed to COVID-19.
“Our Center of Health Statistics is looking at the data,” said Chris Van Deusen, the head of Media Relations at the Texas Department of State Health Services, via email. “We’ll get back with you.”
Florida, which saw an increase of 51 percent, 48 percent of that attributed to COVID-19, is also probing the matter.
“I am looking into it to see if there is some sort of correlation/causation,” said Jeremy Redfern, spokesman for the Florida Department of Health via email.
Petr Svab was careful to not link or blame the excess in deaths to the COVID-19 shots, probably to try and avoid the same “fact checkers” trying to discredit his investigation.
But the correlation to the COVID-19 shots now is irrefutable, just from using the U.S. Government’s own data from the CDC, and also from the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS).
This is a national catastrophe of the magnitude that this nation has never before faced, and the total collapse of the United States now seems inevitable.
Keep fucking that chicken.
that's right ... as that great socialist FDR once said: "we have nothing to fear except fear itself" and in the words of the eugenicist, George W Bush: "bring it"
Covid Scotland: Case rates lowest in unvaccinated as double-jabbed elderly drive rise in hospital admissions
DOUBLE-JABBED Scots are now more likely to be admitted to hospital with Covid than the unvaccinated amid an increase in elderly people falling ill due to waning immunity.
It comes amid "weird" data showing that case rates have been lower in unvaccinated individuals than the single, double, or even triple-jabbed since Omicron became the dominant variant in Scotland.
https://www.glasgowtimes.co.uk/news...abbed-elderly-drive-rise-hospital-admissions/
DOUBLE-JABBED Scots are now more likely to be admitted to hospital with Covid than the unvaccinated amid an increase in elderly people falling ill due to waning immunity.
It comes amid "weird" data showing that case rates have been lower in unvaccinated individuals than the single, double, or even triple-jabbed since Omicron became the dominant variant in Scotland.
https://www.glasgowtimes.co.uk/news...abbed-elderly-drive-rise-hospital-admissions/
FoxFace
Active member
Prayers sent for a speedy recovery....
So but that is a subscribe article
https://www.heraldscotland.com/news...ly-drive-rise-hospital-admissions/?ref=twtrec
They’re sourcing from themselves. It’s a closed loop. The article has no other sources.
I even searched it. There are no other sources. They all point back to the Herald.
Pete and Repeat were on a boat… Pete jumped off.
Last edited:
They are hiding the adverse effects. Censoring anyone who detects adverse effect issues. Go get a booster, just in case.
https://www.theepochtimes.com/resea...-vaccine-adverse-events-analysis_4221081.html
https://www.theepochtimes.com/resea...-vaccine-adverse-events-analysis_4221081.html
They are hiding the article in the link you posted. They will let me read the article if I give them your email address.
Fuck their censorship. Bold added
Researcher Calls Out Censorship After Journal Pulls COVID-19 Vaccine Adverse Events Analysis
By Petr Svab
January 19, 2022 Updated: January 20, 2022
biggersmaller
Jessica Rose didn’t ask for any of this. She started to analyze data on adverse reactions after COVID-19 vaccines simply as an exercise to master a new piece of software. But she couldn’t ignore what she saw and decided to publish the results of her analysis. The next thing she knew, she was in a “bizzarro world,” she told The Epoch Times.
A paper she co-authored based on her analysis was withdrawn by Elsevier, the company publishing the academic journal that ran the article, under circumstances that raised eyebrows among her colleagues. The publisher declined to comment on the matter.
Rose received her PhD in computational biology from the Bar-Ilan University in Israel. After finishing her post-doctoral studies on molecular dynamics of certain proteins, she was looking for a new challenge. Switching to a new statistical computing software, she was looking for an interesting data set to sharpen her skills on. She picked the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), a database of reports of health problems that have occurred after a vaccination and may or may not have been caused by it.
She said she wasn’t looking for anything in particular in the data.
“I don’t go in with questions,” she said.
What she found, however, was disturbing to her.
VAERS has been in place since 1990 to provide an early warning signal that there might be a problem with a vaccine. Anybody can submit the reports, which are then checked for duplicates. They are largely filed by health care personnel, based on previous research. Usually, there would be around 40,000 reports a year, including several hundred deaths.
But with the introduction of the COVID-19 vaccines, VAERS reports went through the roof. By Jan. 7, there were over a million reports, including more than 21,000 deaths. Other notable issues include over 11,000 heart attacks, nearly 13,000 cases of Bell’s palsy, and over 25,000 cases of myocarditis or pericarditis.
Rose found the data alarming, only to realize authorities and even some experts were generally dismissing it.
“Clearly, there’s no concern [among these authorities and experts] for people who are suffering adverse events,” she said.
The usual arguments against the VAERS data have been that it’s unverified and unreliable.
Rose, however, sees such arguments as irrelevant—VAERS was never meant to provide definitive answers, it’s meant to give early warning and, as she sees it, it’s doing just that.
“It’s emitting so many safety signals and they’re being ignored,” she said.
She teamed up with Peter McCullough, an internist, cardiologist, and epidemiologist, to write a paper on VAERS reports of myocarditis in youth—an issue already acknowledged as a side effect of the vaccination, though usually described as rare.
As of July 9, they found 559 VAERS reports of myocarditis, 97 among children ages 12–15. Some of them may have been related to COVID itself, which can also cause heart problems, but there were too many cases to dismiss the likelihood the vaccines were involved, according to the authors.
“Within 8 weeks of the public offering of COVID-19 products to the 12–15-year-old age group, we found 19 times the expected number of myocarditis cases in the vaccination volunteers over background myocarditis rates for this age group,” the paper said.
After two weeks, on Oct. 15, the paper disappeared from the publisher’s website, replaced by a notice of “Temporary Removal.” Not only weren’t the authors told why, they weren’t informed at all, according to Rose.
“It’s unprecedented in the eyes of all of my colleagues,” she said.
When they brought up the issue with the publisher, they were first told the paper was pulled because it wasn’t “invited,” Rose said. That was shot down as irrelevant by McCullough, who threatened to sue for breach of contract. The publisher then turned to its terms of use, saying it has the right to refuse any paper for any reason.
It’s still not clear why the paper was pulled.
“I do apologise, but Elsevier cannot comment on this enquiry,” said Jonathan Davis, the publisher’s communications officer, in an email to The Epoch Times.
In late November, the paper was replaced by a notice that the “article has been withdrawn at the request of the author(s) and/or editor.”
“It just feels like weird censorship that isn’t really justified,” Rose said.
The paper’s conclusions are not necessarily controversial. A recent Danish study concluded, for example, an elevated risk of myocarditis for young people following the Moderna COVID vaccine.
It’s common, however, even for papers that examine potential issues with the vaccines to frame their results in a way that still endorses vaccination.
“That’s what you have to say to get your work published these days,” Rose said.
Her paper did no such thing.
“As part of any risk/benefit analysis which must be completed in the context of experimental products, the points herein must be considered before a decision can be made pertaining to agreeing to 2-dose injections of these experimental COVID-19 products, especially into children and by no means, should parental consent be waived under any circumstances to avoid children volunteering for injections with products that do not have proven safety or efficacy,” the paper said.
The paper also called the vaccines “injectable biological products”—a reference to the fact that they are distinct from all other traditional vaccines.
A traditional vaccine uses “whole live or attenuated pathogens” while the COVID vaccines use “mRNA in lipid nanoparticles,” Rose explained via email. She said the lipid nanoparticles include “cationic lipids which are highly toxic.” Pfizer, the manufacturer of the most popular COVID-19 vaccine in many countries, addressed the issue by saying the dose is sufficiently low to ensure “an acceptable safety margin,” according to the European drug authority, the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (pdf).
Rose also noted that the COVID-19 vaccines haven’t gone “through the 10-15 years of safety testing that vaccines have always had to go through … for obvious reasons.”
By this point, Rose is no longer a dispassionate observer. Reading through countless VAERS reports gave her a window into the hardships of those who believe they’ve been harmed by the vaccines.
“I speak for all of those people,” she said.
In the past, 50 reports of deaths in VAERS would prompt authorities to hit the brakes and investigate, Rose said. In her view, that should have happened with the COVID-19 vaccines a year ago.
Not only has that not happened, but it isn’t even clear what would be enough to convince the authorities to do so.
“What’s the cut-off number for the number of deaths?” Rose asked.
The counterargument is that the vaccines save more lives than they cost. But in Rose’s view, this logic is flawed since the vaccines haven’t been around long enough and studied thoroughly enough to tell how many lives they may cost.
It is known, however, that VAERS understates adverse events following vaccination—by a factor of anywhere between 5 and as much as 100, based on some estimates.
Submitting a VAERS report takes about 30 minutes and many medical practitioners simply don’t have the time, Rose said. Some may feel that filing the report may get them labeled as “anti-vaxxers.” Some may simply not associate whatever health issue they’re facing with the vaccination. Some may not even be aware VAERS exists.
It’s unlikely that any significant number of the reports would be fraudulent, she suggested, noting it’s a federal offense to submit a false report.
Rose has now joined the ranks of dissident doctors and researchers skeptical of the official line on the vaccines and the pandemic in general. She described it as something she’s compelled to do despite the disincentives involved.
“We don’t want to be doing this. But it is our duty. Doctors swore an oath to do no harm. And researchers with integrity cannot look away from this,” she said via email.
Correction: A previous version of this article incorrectly identified Elsevier as an academic journal. Elsevier is a company specializing in publishing scientific literature. The Epoch Times regrets the error.
The Herald has it's info for the article from the Public Health of Scotland.
I have not heard of any adverse effects from the ivermectin "horse paste", even though it is effective and CHEAP. And it's a liquid, not a paste. Here is the stash I give my dawg as a preventatve for heartworms. I would take 2cc orally if I thought I had a bad case of WuFlu coming on, which I haven't.
https://noqreport.com/2022/01/19/iv...ective-in-preventing-infection-uk-doctor-says
https://noqreport.com/2022/01/19/iv...ective-in-preventing-infection-uk-doctor-says
Is It Time To Short The Entire Vaccine Narrative?
by Tyler Durden
Thursday, Jan 20, 2022 - 05:00 AM
Submitted by QTR's Fringe Finance
The “Big Short” of 2008, the housing market, got its name because it looked too big to be a possible idea to short. The idea that the housing market would collapse was literally laughed off the air on financial media and there was nary a mainstream anchor or news contributor who admitted the housing market was in a precarious position.
This is what made putting the position on - shorting this market - such a bold and movie-worthy story. It defied expectations and was beyond belief.
When comes to the idea of Covid vaccines, few things look more steadfast as a certainty right now. Literally everyone is trying to convince you to get vaccinated, and the incessant campaign to remind you to do so is backed by limitless government resources and every “intellectual” that every mainstream media networks can find two minutes for to roll out onto the air and say their piece.
Those who have been reading my blog and listening to my podcast for months know that I am already immensely skeptical of the Soviet-style propaganda campaign being rolled out across our country to push vaccines.
For example, I wrote an article days ago called “Capitalism and Common Sense Will End Vaccine Mandates In 2022” that laid out my initial argument as to why vaccine mandates may wind up falling by the wayside during the upcoming year.
But there’s been little doubt the relentless vaccine campaign, for the time being, has acted like a free sales and marketing department for major pharmaceutical companies like Pfizer (PFE) and Moderna (MRNA). In fact, Pfizer announced just last week that, despite an incredible year in 2021, it would be reducing its sales staff.
The last line of the Reuters article announcing the job cuts says it all:
However, make no mistake: these companies have benefitted hugely from the rollout of their respective Covid vaccines.
Over the last year, Moderna (MRNA) stock was up 43.9% while Pfizer stock has risen 47.4%.
For Modera, the newest entrant to commercializing any product in the space, its stockholders have seen their investment rise up to 25x in the last three years. That gain has since been pared to about 10x.
Moderna’s ttm revenue has gone up about 95x over the last three years, rising to about $11.8 billion as of the last twelve months.
Pfizer’s revenue has also shown a massive upswing - especially for a large drugmaker with a huge portfolio of products. The company’s ttm revenue has more than doubled off its lows made right after the pandemic started in early 2020.
One November 2021 analysis estimated that “Pfizer, BioNTech and Moderna will make pre-tax profits of $34 billion this year between them, which works out as over a thousand dollars a second, $65,000 a minute or $93.5 million a day.”
In 2008, the housing market was a lie. Today, the vaccine propaganda that we were fed has also turned out to be a lie. Remember when we were told vaccines would end the pandemic? Meanwhile, today, we’re having conservations about never-ending booster shots and witnessing millions of vaccinated people acquiring and transmitting Covid.
Remember when Rachel Maddow said in March 2021 that "Now we know that the vaccines work well enough that the virus stops with every vaccinated person."?
"A vaccinated person gets exposed to the virus, the virus does not infect them, the virus cannot then use that person to go anywhere else. It cannot use a vaccinated person as a host to go get more people," Maddow said.
In July 2021, President Biden said: "You’re not going to get COVID if you have these vaccinations," and "If you’re vaccinated, you’re not going to be hospitalized, you’re not going to be in the ICU unit, and you’re not going to die."
Shorting the vaccine narrative was an idea I first toyed with in a piece I wrote called “100 "Fringe" Predictions For 2022”, where I laid out 100 "for fun" predictions for 2022.
The vaccine lies are why it isn’t crazy for me to think that all of the companies who benefited from vaccine revenues may turn out to be their own “big shorts” over the next couple of years - especially if interest rates have to rise and the government backs out of its job as vaccine salesmen.
The one piece of the “sales” equation for these vaccine companies that the government can’t create out of nowhere, despite its relentless propaganda campaign, is people’s willingness to accept vaccines and literally go and get them.
Now, with the omicron variant out and about, I think people are going to be less likely to buy into the vaccine narrative and those who have already received vaccines are less likely to get boosters.
Vaccination rates have already started tumbling in the U.S., with the NY Times stating in late 2021 that the U.S. vaccine curve has leveled off dramatically.
Chart: NY TimesAfter an initial surge, vaccine administration from Moderna and Pfizer has become far more inconsistent and wonky.
Chart: NY TimesOf recent, we have also found out that omicron has found a way to elude vaccines, something that vaccine specialists like Dr. Geert Vanden Bossche had predicted months ago on various interviews, including this one that I enjoyed from Peak Prosperity.
WebMD wrote yesterday:
Naturally, these results will discourage people from getting booster shots.
In addition to that, we’ve also found out the very interesting information that omicron may actually wind up working as somewhat of a vaccine itself.
Professor Ian Jones, a virologist at the University of Reading, told The Sun at the end of 2021 that omicron could wind up as a “natural vaccine”.
Variants to come "may be even more mild", Jones said. He followed up by saying the only people who may need vaccines from this point on could be the elderly, ahead of winter.
Jones continued: "If Omicron is an attenuated strain already on its way to endemicity then later versions may be even more mild and the need for vaccination for an otherwise fit adult might recede.”
“You have to remember that making you very sick is no good to the virus at all, all it 'wants' is to transmit, so virus evolution will tend towards a less severe strain which you will pass around as you will struggle on with work etc much as we do for common colds,” he continued.
"Whatever version you were infected with your immunity would be boosted. That mild bit suits us because it means we can get immunity without, or with much less, risk."
In other words, nature giveth to the pharmaceutical giants - and nature may taketh away.
Finally, in conjunction with this, a long suppressed narrative about natural immunity is starting to make its way out into the mainstream.
“Having SARS-CoV-2 once confers much greater immunity than a vaccine,” one headline from Science.org last summer starts by saying, before obligatorily recommending vaccination yet again.
“The natural immune protection that develops after a SARS-CoV-2 infection offers considerably more of a shield against the Delta variant of the pandemic coronavirus than two doses of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine, according to a large Israeli study…,” the article says, before turning into an obligatory diatribe about the benefits of vaccinations.
Natural immunity is an interesting topic that people like Dr. Fauci have danced around, but can’t avoid forever. My guess is that this narrative “breaks through” to the mainstream media in 2022 and also causes further doubt about vaccinations.
In the words of Senator Rand Paul from Fall 2021:
“Hey, this guy [Fauci] has an opinion on baseball, hockey, tinder, and Christmas, but he was asked the other day about natural immunity that you acquire after the disease [COVID-19], he is like, "Oh, that is really interesting thought, I never thought about that. I don’t have an opinion because I haven’t thought about naturally acquired immunity."
He has and he is lying to you.
The reason he won’t bring up natural immunity is because it foils his plans to get everybody possible vaccinated. He thinks it might slow down vaccination.
And I’m for people getting vaccinated particularly people at risk, but the thing is, if you ignore naturally acquired immunity then you’re saying we don’t have enough people, you have to force it on younger people.”
This paints a picture, to me, of a dying vaccine narrative.
It also brings into question whether or not the success that companies like Pfizer and Moderna have found from a combination of over-promising things to, and scaring the living shit out, of the American public (and probably the government, too) will stick around much longer.
The populace is already on its way to roundly rejecting lockdowns and mandates, which I have predicted will eventually crumble by the end of 2022. I believe the idea of mass mandatory vaccinations will be next - and that isn’t good for Pfizer or Moderna’s business.
A loss of confidence in vaccination will have a profound impact on sales for both of these names. In other words, the “gravy train” may have already made its last stop as more and more people wake up to the reality, not only of how the omicron variant works, but how natural immunity is superior to the vaccine.
by Tyler Durden
Thursday, Jan 20, 2022 - 05:00 AM
Submitted by QTR's Fringe Finance
The “Big Short” of 2008, the housing market, got its name because it looked too big to be a possible idea to short. The idea that the housing market would collapse was literally laughed off the air on financial media and there was nary a mainstream anchor or news contributor who admitted the housing market was in a precarious position.
This is what made putting the position on - shorting this market - such a bold and movie-worthy story. It defied expectations and was beyond belief.
When comes to the idea of Covid vaccines, few things look more steadfast as a certainty right now. Literally everyone is trying to convince you to get vaccinated, and the incessant campaign to remind you to do so is backed by limitless government resources and every “intellectual” that every mainstream media networks can find two minutes for to roll out onto the air and say their piece.
Those who have been reading my blog and listening to my podcast for months know that I am already immensely skeptical of the Soviet-style propaganda campaign being rolled out across our country to push vaccines.
For example, I wrote an article days ago called “Capitalism and Common Sense Will End Vaccine Mandates In 2022” that laid out my initial argument as to why vaccine mandates may wind up falling by the wayside during the upcoming year.
But there’s been little doubt the relentless vaccine campaign, for the time being, has acted like a free sales and marketing department for major pharmaceutical companies like Pfizer (PFE) and Moderna (MRNA). In fact, Pfizer announced just last week that, despite an incredible year in 2021, it would be reducing its sales staff.
The last line of the Reuters article announcing the job cuts says it all:
“The vaccine and Paxlovid are being sold directly to governments in the near-term.”
In other words, they don’t need a sales staff when the government is rolling out their drugs for them. Elsewhere, this would be considered socialist state planning in the pharmaceutical industry - but we won’t go there today.However, make no mistake: these companies have benefitted hugely from the rollout of their respective Covid vaccines.
Over the last year, Moderna (MRNA) stock was up 43.9% while Pfizer stock has risen 47.4%.
For Modera, the newest entrant to commercializing any product in the space, its stockholders have seen their investment rise up to 25x in the last three years. That gain has since been pared to about 10x.
Moderna’s ttm revenue has gone up about 95x over the last three years, rising to about $11.8 billion as of the last twelve months.
Pfizer’s revenue has also shown a massive upswing - especially for a large drugmaker with a huge portfolio of products. The company’s ttm revenue has more than doubled off its lows made right after the pandemic started in early 2020.
One November 2021 analysis estimated that “Pfizer, BioNTech and Moderna will make pre-tax profits of $34 billion this year between them, which works out as over a thousand dollars a second, $65,000 a minute or $93.5 million a day.”
In 2008, the housing market was a lie. Today, the vaccine propaganda that we were fed has also turned out to be a lie. Remember when we were told vaccines would end the pandemic? Meanwhile, today, we’re having conservations about never-ending booster shots and witnessing millions of vaccinated people acquiring and transmitting Covid.
Remember when Rachel Maddow said in March 2021 that "Now we know that the vaccines work well enough that the virus stops with every vaccinated person."?
"A vaccinated person gets exposed to the virus, the virus does not infect them, the virus cannot then use that person to go anywhere else. It cannot use a vaccinated person as a host to go get more people," Maddow said.
In July 2021, President Biden said: "You’re not going to get COVID if you have these vaccinations," and "If you’re vaccinated, you’re not going to be hospitalized, you’re not going to be in the ICU unit, and you’re not going to die."
Shorting the vaccine narrative was an idea I first toyed with in a piece I wrote called “100 "Fringe" Predictions For 2022”, where I laid out 100 "for fun" predictions for 2022.
The vaccine lies are why it isn’t crazy for me to think that all of the companies who benefited from vaccine revenues may turn out to be their own “big shorts” over the next couple of years - especially if interest rates have to rise and the government backs out of its job as vaccine salesmen.
The one piece of the “sales” equation for these vaccine companies that the government can’t create out of nowhere, despite its relentless propaganda campaign, is people’s willingness to accept vaccines and literally go and get them.
Now, with the omicron variant out and about, I think people are going to be less likely to buy into the vaccine narrative and those who have already received vaccines are less likely to get boosters.
Vaccination rates have already started tumbling in the U.S., with the NY Times stating in late 2021 that the U.S. vaccine curve has leveled off dramatically.
Chart: NY TimesAfter an initial surge, vaccine administration from Moderna and Pfizer has become far more inconsistent and wonky.
Chart: NY TimesOf recent, we have also found out that omicron has found a way to elude vaccines, something that vaccine specialists like Dr. Geert Vanden Bossche had predicted months ago on various interviews, including this one that I enjoyed from Peak Prosperity.
WebMD wrote yesterday:
“A fourth shot of the COVID-19 vaccine boosts antibodies but doesn’t provide enough protection to prevent infections from the Omicron variant, according to new research at an Israeli hospital.
In a clinical trial, 274 medical workers at Sheba Medical Center near Tel Aviv received a fourth vaccine dose in December -- 154 got the Pfizer vaccine and 120 got the Moderna vaccine -- after previously getting three Pfizer shots.
Both groups received a boost in antibodies that was “slightly higher” than after the third shot, Regev-Yochay said. But when compared to a control group that didn’t receive the fourth dose, the extra boost didn’t prevent the spread of Omicron.”
Gili Regev-Yochay, MD, who headed up the study, said: “Despite increased antibody levels, the fourth vaccine only offers a partial defense against the virus. The vaccines, which were more effective against previous variants, offer less protection versus Omicron.”In a clinical trial, 274 medical workers at Sheba Medical Center near Tel Aviv received a fourth vaccine dose in December -- 154 got the Pfizer vaccine and 120 got the Moderna vaccine -- after previously getting three Pfizer shots.
Both groups received a boost in antibodies that was “slightly higher” than after the third shot, Regev-Yochay said. But when compared to a control group that didn’t receive the fourth dose, the extra boost didn’t prevent the spread of Omicron.”
Naturally, these results will discourage people from getting booster shots.
In addition to that, we’ve also found out the very interesting information that omicron may actually wind up working as somewhat of a vaccine itself.
Professor Ian Jones, a virologist at the University of Reading, told The Sun at the end of 2021 that omicron could wind up as a “natural vaccine”.
Variants to come "may be even more mild", Jones said. He followed up by saying the only people who may need vaccines from this point on could be the elderly, ahead of winter.
Jones continued: "If Omicron is an attenuated strain already on its way to endemicity then later versions may be even more mild and the need for vaccination for an otherwise fit adult might recede.”
“You have to remember that making you very sick is no good to the virus at all, all it 'wants' is to transmit, so virus evolution will tend towards a less severe strain which you will pass around as you will struggle on with work etc much as we do for common colds,” he continued.
"Whatever version you were infected with your immunity would be boosted. That mild bit suits us because it means we can get immunity without, or with much less, risk."
In other words, nature giveth to the pharmaceutical giants - and nature may taketh away.
Finally, in conjunction with this, a long suppressed narrative about natural immunity is starting to make its way out into the mainstream.
“Having SARS-CoV-2 once confers much greater immunity than a vaccine,” one headline from Science.org last summer starts by saying, before obligatorily recommending vaccination yet again.
“The natural immune protection that develops after a SARS-CoV-2 infection offers considerably more of a shield against the Delta variant of the pandemic coronavirus than two doses of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine, according to a large Israeli study…,” the article says, before turning into an obligatory diatribe about the benefits of vaccinations.
Natural immunity is an interesting topic that people like Dr. Fauci have danced around, but can’t avoid forever. My guess is that this narrative “breaks through” to the mainstream media in 2022 and also causes further doubt about vaccinations.
In the words of Senator Rand Paul from Fall 2021:
“Hey, this guy [Fauci] has an opinion on baseball, hockey, tinder, and Christmas, but he was asked the other day about natural immunity that you acquire after the disease [COVID-19], he is like, "Oh, that is really interesting thought, I never thought about that. I don’t have an opinion because I haven’t thought about naturally acquired immunity."
He has and he is lying to you.
The reason he won’t bring up natural immunity is because it foils his plans to get everybody possible vaccinated. He thinks it might slow down vaccination.
And I’m for people getting vaccinated particularly people at risk, but the thing is, if you ignore naturally acquired immunity then you’re saying we don’t have enough people, you have to force it on younger people.”
This paints a picture, to me, of a dying vaccine narrative.
It also brings into question whether or not the success that companies like Pfizer and Moderna have found from a combination of over-promising things to, and scaring the living shit out, of the American public (and probably the government, too) will stick around much longer.
The populace is already on its way to roundly rejecting lockdowns and mandates, which I have predicted will eventually crumble by the end of 2022. I believe the idea of mass mandatory vaccinations will be next - and that isn’t good for Pfizer or Moderna’s business.
A loss of confidence in vaccination will have a profound impact on sales for both of these names. In other words, the “gravy train” may have already made its last stop as more and more people wake up to the reality, not only of how the omicron variant works, but how natural immunity is superior to the vaccine.
