What's new
  • As of today ICMag has his own Discord server. In this Discord server you can chat, talk with eachother, listen to music, share stories and pictures...and much more. Join now and let's grow together! Join ICMag Discord here! More details in this thread here: here.

Covid 19 mrna Vaccines...Yes/No?

Covid 19 mrna Vaccines...Yes/No?

  • yes, gimme

    Votes: 29 31.9%
  • not yet

    Votes: 15 16.5%
  • no way

    Votes: 47 51.6%

  • Total voters
    91
  • Poll closed .

Switcher56

Comfortably numb!
interesting developments, the man behind the curtain is having a hard time to stay hidden, typical idealogical misinformation journalism...

Fauci Accused Of Overseeing Experiments On Beagles AND Monkeys, WaPo Runs DEFENSE



Innocent? You do like stirring the pot and see was spills over.
 

gaiusmarius

me
Veteran
quite funny how the point made by Greenwald, is here by proven even here. apparently animal rights are now also about perceived political sides.
 

mexcurandero420

See the world through a puff of smoke
Veteran
Latest statistics on England mortality data suggest systematic mis-categorisation of vaccine status and uncertain effectiveness of Covid-19 vaccination

The risk/benefit of Covid vaccines is arguably most accurately measured by an all-cause mortality rate comparison of vaccinated against unvaccinated, since it not only avoids most confounders relating to case definition but also fulfils the WHO/CDC definition of "vaccine effectiveness" for mortality. We examine the latest UK ONS vaccine mortality surveillance report which provides the necessary information to monitor this crucial comparison over time. At first glance the ONS data suggest that, in each of the older age groups, all-cause mortality is lower in the vaccinated than the unvaccinated. Despite this apparent evidence to support vaccine effectiveness-at least for the older age groups-on closer inspection of this data, this conclusion is cast into doubt because of a range of fundamental inconsistencies and anomalies in the data. Whatever the explanations for the observed data, it is clear that it is both unreliable and misleading. While socio-demographical and behavioural differences between vaccinated and unvaccinated have been proposed as possible explanations, there is no evidence to support any of these. By Occam's razor we believe the most likely explanations are systemic miscategorisation of deaths between the different categories of unvaccinated and vaccinated; delayed or non-reporting of vaccinations; systemic underestimation of the proportion of unvaccinated; and/or incorrect population selection for Covid deaths.

https://www.researchgate.net/public...certain_effectiveness_of_Covid-19_vaccination
 

Microbeman

The Logical Gardener
ICMag Donor
Veteran
Yes, it was a joke. Here comes the next one: I love my dog. That's why I trained him to attack rangers and not cops.

True story. My great Dane cross bit a cop (fed) in the ass while searching my house and the cop immediately forgave him despite the hole in his pants (and I assume a good bruise).
 

armedoldhippy

Well-known member
Veteran
True story. My great Dane cross bit a cop (fed) in the ass while searching my house and the cop immediately forgave him despite the hole in his pants (and I assume a good bruise).

more evidence that not all cops are trigger-happy sociopaths waiting to squeeze the trigger . news makes that hard to believe sometimes...
 

h.h.

Active member
Veteran
While the ranger may have shot my little under 3 pound chipoo and charged me federally, he simply confiscated my weed.
 

gaiusmarius

me
Veteran
Covid fraudsters steal billions from UK government

https://www.rt.com/uk/542083-fraudst...-covid-scheme/

3 Dec, 2021

The UK’s National Audit Office (NAO) has found that the government’s failure to implement anti-fraud measures allowed fraudsters to steal £4.9 billion ($6.51 billion) of taxpayers’ money from the Covid Bounce Back Loan scheme.

Established during the pandemic, the scheme offered loans of up to £50,000 ($66,378) to small and medium-sized businesses to help them cope with and recover from the pandemic. Having now closed, it handed out 1.5 million loans to a quarter of UK businesses, totaling around £47 billion ($62.39 billion).
An investigation by the NAO has discovered that “high levels of estimated fraud” was carried out by criminals after anti-fraud measures were “implemented too slowly.”
Out of the loans handed out, 11% have been deemed to be fraudulent, as of March, costing the UK government nearly £4.9 billion.
“The true level of fraud will become clearer over time,” Gareth Davies, the head of the NAO, stated, adding “it is clear government needs to improve on its identification, quantification and recovery of fraudulent loans within the scheme.”

The NAO’s assessment warns the UK government that more than a third of the loans, valued at £17 billion ($22.57 billion), might never be repaid due to both a combination of criminals fraudulently claiming money and businesses defaulting on their debt.

Among the criticisms levelled at the scheme, the NAO accused the government of establishing it with “limited verification and no credit checks on borrowers,” making it “vulnerable to fraud and losses.”

The report confirmed a warning issued shortly after the scheme began. In May 2020, the British Business Bank claimed the loan scheme was susceptible to a “very high risk of fraud.” Similarly, a BBC investigation found that criminals had established fake firms to steal tens of thousands of pounds.

Responding to the report’s findings, a UK government spokesperson said that officials will “not tolerate” any attempts to defraud taxpayers by falsely claiming money from Covid support schemes, arguing that it has robust anti-fraud measures in place.

6 billion fucking dollars!!!!
just in 1 nation fs!
 
Top