Absolem
Active member
Why can't your people put that down on paper for people review? Simple, It's not made for the medical field. It's made for people like you who have a hard time reading medical research and latch on easily to misinformation.
-
As of today ICMag has his own Discord server. In this Discord server you can chat, talk with eachother, listen to music, share stories and pictures...and much more. Join now and let's grow together! Join ICMag Discord here! More details in this thread here: here.
Covid 19 mrna Vaccines...Yes/No?
- Thread starter gaiusmarius
- Start date
Why can't your people put that down on paper for people review? Simple, It's not made for the medical field. It's made for people like you who have a hard time reading medical research and latch on easily to misinformation.
Budz Lightyear
Member
Lmao
It IS the medical paper, being reviewed and simplified by a highly trained and qualified medical proffessional. Its already on paper, they site the sorces in the video. They are litterally going through the paper/report info and data and saying what it means. Why do you need me to write it out here? The reports and all info are cited, so if you think your more qualified (are you an Md or phd, I cant remember), why dont you review the papers they are citing?("write it out here or it doesnt count!" Lol, get real
)
Absolem
Active member
Lmao
("write it out here or it doesnt count!" Lol, get real
Maybe you need a third party to explain medical knowledge to you. But some of us here like to see the actual research. Should be simple to post. Yet you don't. Think it's because you have been corrected several times on the "studies" you have tried passing off here.
Is there data that vaccinated people won’t get myocarditis with a breakthrough case?
Budz Lightyear
Member
Lmao
Ok, so you think you can interpret the data better than these medical professionals (phd, isnt he??) ok, SO GO TAKE A PEN, AND A NOTEBOOK, WATCH THE VIDEO, WRITE DOWN ALL THE SOURCES AND THEN READ THEM YOURSELF.If you need to be explained that very simple process then I definitely dont think you should be reviewing anything
Or is it that you expect me to do that for you and post the links?? Get real!!
Notebook. Pen. Go.
Absolem
Active member
Lmao
If you need to be explained that very simple process then I definitely dont think you should be reviewing anything
Or is it that you expect me to do that for ypu and pist the links here?? Get real!!
Notebook. Pen. Go.
Data speaks for itself. Medical data doesn't come from YouTube video's champ. People like you can't even tell the diff between a PhD and MD. The struggle is real for some. So why would I watch a third hand/rate video by someone like you?
You should learn how the "Scientific Method" works. Your video's don't meet the standard. It's that simple. Who the hell has the time to write everything down from a video to then look it up later. That's what makes paper so nice. Read then copy and look up as needed. it' why scientific community prefers paper to video.
Budz Lightyear
Member
Its not my video, its a medical professionals. He's a phd. Can you not understand,.. Lool
Youve been told where to get the data to review yourself. Talk about clutching at straws now. Are you gonna put your fingers in your ears next, and say"lalalalala"You know what, you're right, I was wrong. You should get your jabs man. (Please!!
) When is your next booster? Please be sure to get it 
Absolem
Active member
Its not my video, its a medical professionals. He's a phd. Can you not understand,.. Lool
You know what, you're right, I was wrong. You should get your jabs man. (Please!!
The Karen's of the world salute your posts.
Budz Lightyear
Member
(Karens are always jabbed. You're the Karen
)What are your medical qualifications please? I'm just interested, you must have good credentials seeing as you think you can interpret the data better than Dr John Campbell (phd). What are your qualifications?
Thanks
Absolem
Active member
(Karens are always jabbed. You're the Karen
What are your medical qualifications please? I'm just interested, you must have good credentials seeing as you think you can interpret the data better than Dr John Campbell (phd). What are your qualifications?
Thanks
Keep clinging to your 3 videos that agree with you and continue to disregarded the people who actually have medical degrees. Finding people with MD's might be a good starting point for you.
The Ivermectin prohibition scam
Budz Lightyear
Member
So do you have an MD? You still havent answered the question
What are you're qualifications please?
Budz Lightyear
Member
You guys trying to convince them that their GOV isn't trying to poison them using a vaccine ain't gonna happen. It makes more sense to them that it's true. You will have more luck getting a noodle to stick to a wall 
Three Berries
Active member
6 Millon dead yet no excess deaths and no flu deaths.......
I don't know, my point is that 30 in 1000000 is statistically safe, if it wasn't I would be buying alot more lottery tickets.
Budz Lightyear this will be my last reply as I have ended up doing the exact opposite of what my post intended. I watched the first YouTube video you linked to. Its full of confirmation bias and confusing correlation with causation, even from my lay person perspective it is clear that the subject is completely over the head of the speaker at best and completely non sensical at times.
The video about the vaccine changing DNA in the liver demonstrates a complete lack of understanding of the subject. Despite being based on good science. A change in molecules bind and protein structure doesn't equate to changed DNA. To put it into simple terms the effects on dna in the liver caused by the vaccine is less damaging and similar to eating 1 bacon sandwich. Is that the impression the video gives?
The vaccine doesn't need to be and isn't 100% safe. It needs to be safer than getting the virus, it is, it has saved countless life's. I'm happy to role the dice to protect the vulnerable and people like yourself who aren't. That's the compassion I was talking about.
I don't put to much stock in titles myself, I've met many clueless doctors who can't see past there own arrogance. Same with PhD, that are almost always out of field. I have a PhD that concerns neurology, I don't comment past the basics on epidemiology, my title (which I don't use) doesn't equate knowledge or intelligence.
In your original reply to me you used a crying from laughter
about the idea that people like myself had been duped into something you consider harmful. Is that who you are? Someone who takes pleasure and amusement from your perceived misfortune of others. Have you always been that person?
