AgentPothead
Just this guy, ya know?
Regardless of how the virus turns out, some of you are bat shit insane and need mental health evaluations stat.
TOTAL CASES BY NATION: 3-26-2020.
USA — 82.179
China — 81,285
Italy — 80,589
Spain — 56,347
Germany — 43,646
TOTAL DEATHS BY NATION:
Italy — 8,215
Spain — 6,832
China — 3,287
Iran — 2,234
France — 1,696
USA — 1,177
https://www.google.com/amp/s/kutv.com/amp/news/coronavirus/us-now-leads-world-in-confirmed-covid-19-cases
From the horses mouth
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qUWZA43UblM
Union Locates Massive Supply of N95 Masks
https://www.seiu-uhw.org/press/union-locates-massive-supply-of-n95-masks/
Is Imperial’s Neil Ferguson, whose modelling gave us the 250,000 deaths projection and led to lockdown, now saying UK deaths 'could be substantially lower' than 20,000 -- and two thirds would have died in the next 6 months anyway?
“Italy got hit very badly because they had a large number of importations from China by Chinese tourists." - Dr. Fauci
With some masks, social distancing, regular and proper hand washing and perhaps body temp checks before entering a place of business their is no reason we can't get back to work and play in the very near future.
We have received the following response from the lead researcher in this report, Neil Ferguson:
I think it would be helpful if I cleared up some confusion that has emerged in recent days. Some have interpreted my evidence to a UK parliamentary committee as indicating we have substantially revised our assessments of the potential mortality impact of COVID-19. This is not the case. Indeed, if anything, our latest estimates suggest that the virus is more transmissible than previously thought. Our lethality estimates remain unchanged. My evidence to Parliament referred to the numbers of deaths we assess might occur in the UK in the presence of the very intensive social distancing and other public health interventions now in place. Without those interventions, our assessment remains that the UK would see the scale of deaths reported in our study (namely, up to approximately 500 thousand).
[Update, March 26 2020, 4:25 PM Eastern Time] On March 26 2020, the Daily Wire’s Amanda Prestigiacomo published a piece headlined, “Epidemiologist Behind Highly-Cited Coronavirus Model Drastically Revises Model,” which claimed that the primary researcher on Imperial College London’s influential COVID-19 paper was “wrong” and that he had “offered a massive revision” to the globally referenced research.
That claim is patently false.
(On March 24 2020, Prestigiacomo described the report as a “doomsday novel” in a separate effort to downplay its data.)
In “Epidemiologist Behind Highly-Cited Coronavirus Model Drastically Revises Model,” Prestigiacomo cited reporting published by David Adam at NewScientist, as well as several tweets also predicated on Adam’s reporting:
Epidemiologist Neil Ferguson, who created the highly-cited Imperial College London coronavirus model, which has been cited by organizations like The New York Times and has been instrumental in governmental policy decision-making, offered a massive revision to his model on [March 25 2020] … However, after just one day of ordered lockdowns in the U.K., Ferguson is presenting drastically downgraded estimates, revealing that far more people likely have the virus than his team figured.
We clicked through to Adam’s March 25 2020 article, titled “UK has enough intensive care units for coronavirus, expert predicts.” Adam did not seem to report what Prestigiacomo claimed he did:
Neil Ferguson at Imperial College London gave evidence today to the UK’s parliamentary select committee on science and technology as part of an inquiry into the nation’s response to the coronavirus outbreak.
He said that expected increases in National Health Service capacity and ongoing restrictions to people’s movements make him “reasonably confident” the health service can cope when the predicted peak of the epidemic arrives in two or three weeks. UK deaths from the disease are now unlikely to exceed 20,000, he said, and could be much lower.
In fact, Adam’s reporting seemed to indicate factors cited in the influential Imperial College London report were revised upwards, specifically COVID-19’s rate of reproduction. Moreover, Adam reported that Ferguson — who purportedly “backtracked” on his team’s findings — in fact indicated there was “more evidence to support the more intensive social distancing measures”:
New data from the rest of Europe suggests that the outbreak is running faster than expected, said Ferguson. As a result, epidemiologists have revised their estimate of the reproduction number (R0) of the virus. This measure of how many other people a carrier usually infects is now believed to be just over three, he said, up from 2.5. “That adds more evidence to support the more intensive social distancing measures,” he said.
We contacted Adam to ask whether Prestigiacomo’s piece accurately represented his March 25 2020 article, and he responded quickly. Adam described the Daily Wire’s claims as “dangerous nonsense,” explaining:
[It is] fair to say that the article you linked to and the tweets DO NOT accurately represent my article or indeed Prof Ferguson’s position. To be clear, the revised estimates are because the UK has changed its approach and because it has introduced such stringent social distancing measures. If we hadn’t, then the much higher estimates of deaths would still apply. Essentially, person-to-person transmission SHOULD have massively reduced since the measures were introduced. And because it takes 2-3 week for the worst cases to reach hospital after infection, he’s now saying that the anticipated peak in demand for hospital care will come in 2-3 weeks, and that because the UK is rapidly putting in extra capacity, there should be enough ICU beds.
Other experts on Twitter addressed the harmful inaccuracies in the rapidly spreading “Epidemiologist Behind Highly-Cited Coronavirus Model Drastically Revises Model,” calling it “quite literally fake news”:
Magical thinking doesnt solve anything.So the orchestrated event is failing,,, media's attempt at mind-meld in full swing,,, don't believe the hype
Magical thinking doesnt solve anything.
PS: 5G isn't suing anyone
They are the ones who will be sued, if our nation remains a Republic
Until what? Until they shut down the planet because of the worldwide lyme disease pandemic?I used to think Lyme disease wasn't real or really pertinent to me either until ...........
Funny that nobody knows anyone who is seriously ill or who has died from this super contagious highly fatal virus. The world has been shut down for a week now and still, nobody here actually knows anyone who has died and nobody has posted a video or picture of the chaos that is supposedly happening. All I've seen is a few pictures of hospital waiting rooms looking like an average day in any big city. Also, apparently people the world over have suddenly stopped dying of anything except for the Corona virus, which has magically become the sole cause of death for everybody everywhere.