What's new

Clones, Mother plants, How to "Clean" cuttings!

Ttystikk

Well-known member
Veteran
During the early reproductive stage of development (2–3.5 wk post floral induction), non-senescent inflorescences with green–white carpels were excised from apical and axillary shoots of several individual plants from each cultivar. Bracts and leaves were removed and explants (Fig. 1C) were surface-sterilized with a 1-min submersion in ethanol, washed in sterile water for 5 s and then again for 45 s, then submerged in a solution of 10% v/v commercial bleach for 10 min, followed by three rinses in sterile water for 5 min each. Explants were blotted dry on filter paper and temporarily placed in a sealed GA7 culture vessel to prevent desiccation.

Going to add a few of these cleaning clone examples, algae is a thing amazing how persistent it can be at times.
This is an extremely information dense thread and I thank you for posting it. It is rare that I find such a rich source of new (to me) knowledge on cannabis horticulture anymore and this is graduate level science kind of stuff. If I understand what's posted here, I can't help but up my propagation game!
 

gmanwho

Well-known member
Veteran
Here is my latest efforts in battling donor plants.

Few years back i attended a tissue culture class that made me wonder how to clean up the donor prior to cloning or taking explants. After multiple tc failures an some success, i ended up yet again with more questions then true answers an i changed my approach for non viral related issues.

Now im on a 2 part clean up.

1st, try to eliminate the pathogen prior to cloning or taking tissue samples! Or at the least reduce the bacteria or fungi load in the donor weeks before acquiring tissue samples. Or before taking clones.

This is a way that maybe easier then learning the tc process. Aseptic technique has quite the learning curve. An opens up alot of work preparing vessels an medium prior to taking any samples.

After trying my hand at tissue culture i found many of my failures had come from the internal pathogens that later bloomed once the tissue was invitro. These endophytes move out of the tissue an now begin to bloom on the agar. Some may show in a few days, some take weeks to show up.

We know both GOOD and BAD fungi an bacteria can reside within the tissue! These will all mostly bloom once invitro and begin to feed on the agar.

So how do we know whether these blooms are good or bad microbes? Outside lab testing, or educate yourself on learning how to read the growth characteristics of these pathogens that are now growing. Then experiment and learn what will interrupt and end the pathogens life cycle.

Also, what i have found is treating the ex-plants in-vitro is very tricky.

So many various chemicals used to treat the tissue sample are borderline toxic to very toxic to the ex-plant. Mixing your medium with a microgram over the threshold, the pathogen dies but so does the ex-plant. Or a specific chemical added a microgram under an the pathogen lives and the explant dies.

Or if your in tune, and find the correct or compatible chemical, the ex-plant lives and the pathogen dies. Its a long trial and error process pron to many many many variables that cause failures. All while needing money , time , space & equipment, materials ,education, discipline, and technique all absorbing a great amount of time an dedication.



I then thought, if we know that a specific plant has a bacteria or fungal infection, lets isolate the plant and treat it first. Now, this treated plant & medium will never go into flower. this plant in this medium will only be used as a tissue donor. An eventually (unless it hplvd or another virus) it potentially can be cleaned up.

By treating the donor plant first, we reduce the fungal or bacteria load in the tissue sample. Which will make the clean up process easier. Whether its using a fungicide or bactericide, or combination. Then a lighter treatment can be used on the fragile ex plant or clone. Then additionally treating the rock wool during the cloning process, or adding the treatment to the aerocloner.

An this should be done with care as we dont want to poison the plant that will poison us, or put the waste into the environment. One fine line i am not certain on is when these treatments may alter the rna.

It is important to note we need to learn the half life of these chemicals we are using. So they will not be around forever in our plant. Learning the half life, then the fact the treated plant tissue later on will be 1000's of times divided. Therefore the chemical has been reduced 1000's of times. An if we did our job right, the tissue has no residual chemical left in it and now can go into flower.

( it takes on average 100+days from a clone to veg to flower, dried cured and bagged. So the question is, is that chemical u used still around in 100days??????)

Also once the reproduction plant has been treated, cleared, now producing healthy clones, we can then inoculate that donor plant with beneficial microbes again. Now this plant that has gone thru the process it can deliver healthy clones again.

Bring it further and verify your work. place newly taken explants onto the agar an see if we get pathogens growing again.
 
Last edited:

acespicoli

Well-known member
Mentor
Here is my latest efforts in battling donor plants.
Bring it further and verify your work. place newly taken explants onto the agar an see if we get pathogens growing again.

Volume 10 - 2019 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.01120
This article is part of the Research TopicCannabis Genomics, Breeding and ProductionView all 17 articles

Pathogens and Molds Affecting Production and Quality of Cannabis sativa L.​


1739841924573.png

Figure 2 Root-infecting pathogens on Cannabis sativa. (A) Symptoms of brown discoloration on the root system of indoor hydroponically grown plants. (B) Colonies of Fusarium oxysporum isolated from diseased roots in (A) growing on potato dextrose agar. (C) Colony of Pythium catenulatum isolated from diseased roots growing on potato dextrose agar. (D) Symptoms of natural crown infection on a field-grown cannabis plant caused by a combination of F. oxysporum, Fusarium brachygibbosum, and Pythium aphanidermatum. (E) The crown area of the infected plant shown in (D) is sunken, and there is visible mycelial growth on the surface. (F) Colony of Fusarium brachygibbosum isolated from diseased roots growing on potato dextrose agar. (G) Symptoms of plant collapse as a result of infection by P. aphanidermatum under a greenhouse environment. (H) Comparison of a noninoculated plant (left) with a plant wound-inoculated with spores of F. oxysporum (right) and grown in coco fiber substrate. Photo was taken 4 weeks after inoculation and shows stunting and yellowing of leaves. (I) Symptom of internal discoloration of the pith tissue in the upper 10 cm of the crown region of a plant grown indoors in coco fiber as a substrate and infected by F. oxysporum. Figures 2A, D, E, G reproduced from Can. J. Plant Pathol. 40(4) by permission.
1739841962822.png

Figure 3 (A) Mycelial growth and sporulation of Fusarium species on cannabis stems. (B) Schematic diagram showing the potential for spread of spores of Fusarium from stem tissues to leaves and flower buds of the same and adjacent plants. As well, spread can occur to adjoining plants by water. (C) Colonies of Fusarium oxysporum detected in hydroponic nutrient solution following plating of samples onto potato dextrose agar + streptomycin sulfate. (D) Damping-off on cuttings of cannabis in rockwool blocks resulting from spread of F. oxysporum and infection of the cut ends of the stem. (E) Colonies of F. oxysporum isolated from roots and stems of infected cuttings shown in (D). Figure 3A reproduced from Can. J. Plant Pathol. 40(4) by permission.
1739841996493.png

Figure 4 Botrytis bud rot development, caused by Botrytis cinerea, in a greenhouse production facility. (A) Early infection on developing inflorescence, showing browning and decay of leaves and bracts. (B, C) Advanced stages of bud rot, where the entire inflorescence has been destroyed. (D) Close-up of diseased harvested inflorescences, showing development of mycelium within the bud and decay. (E) Colony of B. cinerea recovered from diseased tissues showing prolific sporulation on the edge of the colony and sclerotial development in the center. (F, G) Scanning electron micrographs of conidiophores and conidia of B. cinerea from culture. The points of spore attachment to the conidiophore head can be seen. (H, I) Lesions on cannabis leaves resulting from spore deposition of B. cinerea from infected inflorescences to cause individual spots that enlarged into necrotic lesions.

***
I only posted 3 example figures of the 14 figures in the White paper so many more to review if you follow that link up there.
Fairly common stuff right ?

I think most of us are familiar with the cold and flu running a fever and the fever kills the viral infection, come to find out this works with plants as well
Its referred to as "Thermo Therapy" and may figure in to your vigorous clones,
1739842624351.png

used to use a incubator oven in the lab, or sterilization oven for our purposes, can be had for a couple hundred on ebay...
Think the premise is you run it for 30 minutes at 140F it kills the virus and spares the host
Well for all we spend on growing 200$ USD is a small drop in the bucket 🤷‍♂️ right?

In vitro thermotherapy-based methods for plant virus eradication. Plant Methods 14, 87 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13007-018-0355-y
@gmanwho I can tell you have spent alot of time on this post above and tissue culture, thanks for taking the time to share :huggg:
Always enjoy your posts!


This is what the viral loads are costing us in potency quality and yield
Single infection caused yield losses of 40–60%
  • #26 Zerotol 2.0
    Cutting dip0.5 fl. oz./gallon. 45–60 seconds, air dry
Prior to sticking cuttings in the greenhouse, there are several important tasks in propagation that should be completed to achieve successful rooting: Ensure walkin coolers and refrigerators function correctly before receiving cuttings. Properly seal greenhouses to minimize pest and weed seed entrance. Maintain excellent sanitation practices in propagation production. Propagation trays and tools should be washed using a quaternary ammonium compoundsuch as MicroBloc® mold treatment spray, Greenshield® disinfectant or Physan 20™ disinfectant. Keep floors devoid of debris. Glazing and bench surfaces should be sterilized. Eliminate algae. Algae are a food source for shore flies and fungus gnats. ZeroTol® algaecide/fungicide at a 1:100 dilution or STRIPIT™ greenhouse cleaner at 4 oz/gal can be used as sprays on benches and floors for algae control.

 
Last edited:

acespicoli

Well-known member
Mentor
Table 1. In vitro clonal propagation of Cannabis sativa via direct organogenesis *.
Explant​
Explant/Decontamination​
Steps and Culture Medium​
Experimental Outcome​
Pros​
Cons​
References​
Seeds​
Seeds: sterilised in 75% (v/v) EtOH for 1 min, rinsed in 5% (v/v) active NaCl for 15 min​
Culture initiation
PGR-free MS medium​
Best explant response (59–70%) and highest number of shoots per explant recorded for shoot tip explants cultured on medium supplemented with TDZ​
Did not utilise PGRs with cytokinin activity, which minimised the risk of soma clonal variation​
Regeneration was low, 74% of nodal segments and 82% of shoot tips not growing​
[61]​
In vitro shoot tips and nodal segments with one axillary bud without leaves (seedlings)​
Shoot induction
MS medium + BAP (0.5–2.0 mg/L), TDZ (0.1–0.5 mg/L), mT (0.1–1.0 mg/L)​
Best regeneration rate obtained from TDZ at 0.2 mg/L. Nodal segments less responsive and growth of only one shoot per explant regardless of the tested PGR​
Shorter micropropagation duration time. Does not require elongation step​
TDZ use related to phenotypic vitrification, leaf rolling, leaf narrowing and supressed growth of shoots. High BAP and mT concentrations also related to phenotypic changes in regenerated plants​
[61]​
In vitro plantlets​
Rooting
½ MS medium + IAA (0.25–0.75 mg/L) and or IBA (0.25–0.75 mg/L)​
No significant difference observed in tested auxins in terms of rooting rates​
It can be used for germplasm conservation and breeding. Rooting limited to 21 days due to rapid growth of shoots in culture. Plantlets obtained within 66–70 days​
Number of plantlets from single explant was low. Protocol thus not suitable for industrial application​
[61]​
Seeds​
Seeds: surface sterilised in 75% (v/v) ethanol for 2 min and 30 s, soaked in NaClO for 25 min​
Culture initiation
½ MS medium​
Hypocotyl was significantly better than cotyledon leaves in terms of shoot organogenic potential​
This is the first report of direct in vitro regeneration of plants from hypocotyls​
Leaves displayed a poor ability to promote shoot organogenesis​
[47]​
In vitro cotyledons, hypocotyls and true leaves​
Shoot induction
Medium + TDZ (0.4–1.0 mg/L), NAA (0.02–0.2 mg/L), BAP (0.5–2.0 mg/L), IBA (0.5 mg/L), 2,4-D (0.1 mg/L), ZEARIB (1.0–2.0 mg/L), BAPRIB (1.0 mg/L), 4-CPPU (1.0 mg/L)​
Medium containing (TDZ 0.4 mg/L + NAA 0.2 mg/L) was the best, achieving the highest shoot induction rate of 22.32%​
None​
Medium without PGRs and ZEARIB 1 mg/L + NAA 0.02 mg/L were the worst treatments, without any explant showing response in terms of shoot organogenesis​
[47]​
Seeds​
Seeds: surface sterilised by washing under running water with a few drops of detergent, 0.2% mercury chloride for 13 min​
Culture initiation
MS medium​
Plantlets were grown from seeds​
None​
None​
[63]​
In vitro shoot tips​
Shoot induction
MS medium + BAP (0.4 mg/L)/TDZ (0.1 mg/L)/mT (0.5 mg/L) + NAA (0.1 mg/L)/IAA (0.1 mg/L)/GA3 (2.3 mg/L)​
In both varieties, the highest stem was observed when cultured on medium supplemented with TDZ and GA3, and the shortest stem recorded on medium supplemented with TDZ and NAA​
None​
The presence of NAA strongly influenced callus formation and general shoot architecture.
Difficult to tell which extent longer stems are a genotypic trait​
[63]​
In vitro plantlets​
Rooting
MS medium + IBA (0.5 mg/L) + activated charcoal​
The most vital plantlets of both genotypes with the highest number of roots were observed on medium where phytohormones were not present or on medium supplemented with mT (0.5 mg/L)​
Culture media supplemented with mT without any phytohormones produced the best overall appearance of plantlets​
None​
[63]​
Seeds​
Seeds: soaked with H2SO4 for 20 s, sterilised in 75% ethanol for 2 min, 3% (v/v) NaClO for 20 min​
Culture initiation
MS medium​
Seeds grew up to seedlings and cotyledons were excised as explants to induce in vitro shoots​
None​
None​
[52]​
Cotyledons excised from seedlings
(aseptic seedlings obtained from sterilised seeds)​
Shoot induction
MS medium + TDZ (0.1–0.4 mg/L), BA (4–8 mg/L), ZT (0.5–1.5 mg/L) with or without NAA (0.1–0.6 mg/L)​
Cotyledon cultured in medium containing TDZ with or without the addition of NAA were capable of inducing formation of a nodular callus. Induction rate lower when using only TDZ. Peak of 51.7% induction frequency in MS medium + TDZ (0.4 mg/L) + NAA (0.2 mg/L)​
Rapid shoot regeneration. No limitation of cultural season due to the use of cotyledons​
This regeneration protocol is genotype dependent​
[52]​
In vitro shoots​
Rooting
½ MS Medium with IBA (0.2–2 mg/L)​
IBA (0.5–2 mg/L) had 80% root induction​
None​
None​
[52]​
Seeds​
Seeds: washed for 20 min with 0.1% antiseptic APSA80 liquid detergent, sterilised in 75% (v/v) ethanol for 30 s and 0.1% mercuric chloride for 10–15 min​
Culture initiation
½ MS medium with 10 g/L sucrose and 5.5 g/L agar​
Shoot tips were harvested from 20-day-old sterile plantlets​
None​
None​
[51]​
Shoot tips harvested from 20-day-old sterile plantlets
(aseptic seedlings obtained from sterilised seeds)​
Regeneration
MS medium + BA (1–5 mg/L), KT (1–5 mg/L), TDZ (1–5 mg/L) with or without NAA (1–5 mg/L)​
TDZ (0.2 mg/L) provided the best bud induction, producing an average of 3.22 buds. 0.1 mg/L NAA was optimal concentration for auxiliary bud induction​
CKs stimulated shoot formation and stem enlargement in each explant​
Type of CK affected plantlet morphology​
[51]​
In vitro plantlets​
Rooting
MS medium + IBA (0.1–0.5 mg/L) + NAA (0.05–0.25 mg/L), IAA (0.05–0.25 mg/L)​
85% rooting response in IBA (0.1 mg/L) and NAA (0.05 mg/L) explants​
None​
None​
[51]​
Axillary buds​
Axillary buds: surface disinfected by maintaining them under stirred tap water for 1 h; 30 min immersion in 15% (v/v) bleach, stirred solution​
Culture initiation and shoot induction
MS medium with or without vitamins/Formula βH/Formula βA + 0.48 mg/L mT or 0.37 mg/L NAA + 0.41 mg/L IBA with or without MS basal salts, Formula βH basal salts, Formula βA basal salts, with or without MS vitamins​
100% survival of axillary buds was observed for all cultivars at least under one studied media. Most of the varieties survived and reacted better without the addition of MS vitamins. Use of PGRs was variety dependent: some cultivars responded better to the addition of mT instead to NAA+IBA​
This study confirmed that the success of in vitro introduction of C. sativa is cultivar dependent​
Different cultivars of the same species have a completely different response to the same medium​
[60]​
Nodal segments with axillary buds​
Nodal segments containing young axillary buds: sterilised in 2% NaOCl, 0.1% (v/v) Tween 20 for 5 min​
Culture initiation
MS medium + activated charcoal​
None​
None​
None​
[65]​
In vitro explants​
Shoot induction
MS medium + 0.1 mg/L NAA + 0.4 mg/L kinetin​
None​
None​
None​
[65]​
In vitro plantlets​
Rooting
MS medium + 0.1 mg/L NAA + 0.4 mg/L kinetin + 1.0 mg/L IBA​
None​
None​
None​
[65]​
Disinfected axillary buds​
Oryzalin treatments
Shoot induction medium + 17.32, 34.62, 51.95 mg/L oryzalin or MS medium + 6.93, 13.85, 20.78 mg/L oryzalin​
62.5% to 87.5% survival rate for explants treated with 6.92 mg/L oryzalin​
The treatment of axillary buds with oryzalin is an effective method for chromosome doubling​
Poor survival rate of explants treated with high oryzalin concentrations with 0% of explants surviving the 51.95 mg/L​
[65]​
Shoot tips​
In vitro shoot tip cuttings​
Maintenance of stock plants in ventilated glass jars
¼ Rockwool block placed onto glass preservation jars (3 shoot tip cuttings for each block)​
The self-built preservation jars were more suited for the culture of Cannabis as they provided more head space​
The stock cultures could be maintained for at least 6 months. Excellent-quality plantlets​
Wilting plants (blocks too dry/humidity too low). Deterioration of plants due to the blocks being too wet​
[56]​
In vitro shoot tip cuttings​
Maintenance of stock plants using RITA® system
Nutrient solution (20 mL), Canna Aqua Vega Fertiliser. RITA container with 3 rockwool blocks each (2 shoot tip cuttings in each block), nutrient solution (75 mL), jars connected via tubing to a 1 bar pressure pump​
The RITA® system was more practicable in terms of handling because of the wide opening​
Relies on industry-based fertiliser, rockwool blocks and forced ventilation. No requirement of growth regulators. No sugar or vitamins required​
Stunted plants or yellow leaves (nutrient deficiency)​
[56]​
In vitro shoot tips​
Rooting
Glass vessel, 2 rockwool blocks, nutrient solution (20 mL)​
97.5% of in vitro shoot tip cuttings were rooted and acclimatised within 3 weeks inside the growth chamber​
None​
None​
[56]​
Shoots​
Shoots from immature and mature inflorescences: surface sterilised in ethanol for 1 min, followed by 10% v/v bleach for 10 min, washed in sterile water for 50 s​
Culture initiation
MS medium + TDZ (0–2.2 mg/L)​
TDZ was shown to be among the most effective PGRs for shoot proliferation and de novo regeneration​
First known report of shoot regeneration from floral tissues​
None​
[48]​
In vitro explants with regenerating shoots​
Shoot regeneration/rooting
MS medium + KIN (0.40 mg/L) + NAA (0.10 mg/L) + activated charcoal​
Regeneration was occurring from existing meristematic tissue, but this was not specifically determined​
First report of shoot regeneration or plant propagation at reproductive phase​
Further work needed to refine the protocol​
[48]​
Nodal segments with axillary buds​
Nodal segments containing axiliary buds: disinfected with 0.5% NaOCl for 20 min​
Shoot induction
MS medium + TDZ (0.01–1.10 mg/L) + 500 mg/L activated charcoal​
In TDZ, of the different concentrations tested, the highest average number of shoots was obtained in MS + 0.5 µM TDZ​
One step protocol for promoting shoot formation and root induction in the same medium​
None​
[54]​
In vitro explants with regenerating shoots​
Shoot formation/Rooting
½ MS medium + IBA (0.01–1.01 mg/L), mT (0.01–1.21 mg/L)​
100% of explants exposed to with 0.48 mg/L mT produced shoots. Shoot number and shoot length was higher when using mT compared to TDZ. The best concentration for rooting was 0.05 mg/L mT​
High shoot proliferation rate. Proof of the safety of mT for large-scale production. 96% of regenerated shoots were able to develop roots​
mT concentrations higher than 0.97 mg/L were inhibitory to rooting​
[54]​
Nodal segments with axillary buds​
Nodal segments containing auxiliary buds: sterilised using 0.5% NaOCl for 20 min​
Shoot induction
MS medium + BA (0.01–2.03 mg/L), KN (0.01–1.94 mg/L), TDZ (0.01–1.98 mg/L) with or without GA3 (2.42 mg/L)​
TDZ was the most effective PGR for shoot proliferation.
100% culture response when using TDZ (0.11 mg/L), with an average of 13 shoots per explant​
Regeneration of many plants in a short period of time. GA3 can act as a replacement for auxins in shoot induction​
TDZ concentrations higher than 1.1 mg/L supressed shoot formation​
[50]​
In vitro shoots​
Rooting
MS medium + IAA (0.44–0.88 mg/L), IBA (0.51–1.02 mg/L), NAA (0.47–0.93 mg/L) with or without 500 mg/L activated charcoal​
94% response of cultures in IBA (0.51 mg/L) with an average of 4.8 roots per explant​
Addition of activated charcoal was effective in root induction​
Profuse callus formation was observed when using IAA and IBA​
[50]​
Nodal segments with axillary buds​
Apical nodal segments containing axillary bud: sterilised using 0.5% NaOCl for 20 min​
Shoot initiation
MS medium + BA, KN, TDZ (concentrations not mentioned)​
Quality and quantity of shoot regenerants in cultures were best with 0.11 mg/L TDZ​
None​
None​
[64]​
Apical nodal segments containing axillary bud: sterilised using 0.5% NaOCl for 20 min​
Rooting
½ MS medium + activated charcoal + IAA + IBA + NAA (concentrations not mentioned)​
Highest percentage of rooting achieved in ½ MS with 500 mg/dm3 activated charcoal supplemented with 0.51 mg/L IBA​
None​
None​
[64]​
Nodal segments with axillary buds​
Nodal segments containing axillary buds: sterilised using 1.67% (C(O)NCl)₂ + Tween 20 for 8 min​
Shoot initiation:
MS + TDZ (0.011– 1.76 mg/L), mT (0.012–1.93 mg/L), BAP (1–5 mg/L), IAA (0.1 mg/L)​
MS medium +
0.1 mg/L TDZ resulted in
the highest regeneration of shoots.
Tissue culture responsiveness was genotype dependent​
None​
Results demonstrated the recalcitrance of Cannabis in tissue culture and its poor multiplication rate​
[66]​
Apical shoot tip​
Apical shoot tip+ node​
Shoot initiation:
DKW medium without PGRs​
The highest number of
harvested shoot tips was found in the 46 µmol/m2/s in non-vented vessels​
Unlike traditional micropropagation, this method re-uses the same rooted basal stem section of the initial explant over several apical tip removal cycles, resulting in a higher number of shoot tips​
None​
[67]​
Abbreviations: BA/BAP—6-benzylaminopurine, H2SO4—sulphuric acid, IAA—indole-3-acetic acid, IBA—indole-3-butyric acid, KIN—kinetin, MS—Murashige and Skoog, mT—meta-Topolin, NAA—1-naphthaleneacetic acid, NaCl—sodium chloride, NaOCl—sodium hypochlorite, PGR—plant growth regulator, RITA—temporary immersion system for tissue culture, TDZ—thidiazuron, ZEA—zeatin, and 4-CPPU—forchlorfenuron. * The list in this table may not be completely exhaustive.
 

acespicoli

Well-known member
Mentor
Table 2. In vitro clonal propagation of Cannabis sativa via indirect organogenesis *.
Explant​
Explant/Decontamination​
Steps and Culture Medium​
Experimental Outcome​
Pros​
Cons​
References​
Seeds​
Seeds: Sterilised in 5% Ca (ClO)2 for 6, 8 and 15 min​
Culture initiation
MS medium​
Best sterilisation time was achieved after 15 min (5% hypochlorite solution)​
None​
Hemp seeds were highly contaminated​
[68]​
In vitro young leaves, petioles, internodes and axillary buds​
Callus induction/indirect regeneration
MS medium + KN (1–4 mg/L), NAA (0.5–2 mg/L), 2,4-D (2–4 mg/L), DIC (2–3 mg/L)​
Callus was obtained from all explant types. Petiole explants with 2–3 mg/L DIC had the highest frequency of callus formation with 82.7% of explants​
Explants derived from plants growing in pots​
Low frequency of callus from internodes and axillary buds. Efficiency of plant regeneration is low​
[68]​
In vitro regenerated plantlets​
Rooting
MS medium + IAA (1 mg/L) and NAA (1.0 mg/L)​
69.95% of the plantlets formed roots​
None​
Further experiments needed to develop an efficient plant regeneration system​
[68]​
Seeds​
Seeds: sterilised in 70% ethanol for 10 s and in 1% NaClO for 20 min​
Culture initiation
DARIA medium​
Explants of cotyledons, stems, and roots were excised from plantlets​
None​
None​
[69]​
In vitro cotyledons, stems, roots​
Callus induction
DARIA medium + KN (1 mg/L) + NAA (0.05 mg/L)​
Callus was obtained from all explant types​
The highest efficiency of morphogenic callus induction was noticed from cotyledon explants​
Callus formed at root explants was incapable of morphogenesis and plant regeneration​
[69]​
In vitro explants​
Indirect regeneration
DARIA medium + BA (0.2 mg/L) + NAA (0.03 mg/L)​
Stem explants showed the highest regeneration rate percentage and cotyledon explants showed the highest efficiency in callus induction​
The use of three media, DARIA ind+, DARIA pro +, and DARIA root +, supplemented with PGRs, enabled regeneration of plants with relatively high efficiency​
None​
[69]​
In vitro explants​
Rooting
DARIA medium + IAA (2 mg/L)​
Rooted plants were transferred to soil​
None​
None​
[69]​
Seeds​
Seeds: sterilised with 70% ethanol for 30 s, 2% NaOCl for 20 min and 0.05% HgCl2 for 5 min​
Culture initiation
MS medium​
Seeds produced seedlings for obtaining explants​
None​
None​
[70]​
In vitro cotyledon and epicotyl​
Callus induction
MS medium + BA (0.1–3 mg/L), TDZ (0.1–3 mg/L) with or without IBA 0.5 mg/L​
Cotyledon explant showed better response compared to epicotyl explants in terms of the mass and size of the calli produced in various hormonal combination​
The first response of explant to callus formation was observed after 11 days. The addition of IBA in various concentrations of BA had positive influence on callus induction​
None​
[70]​
In vitro calli​
Shoot induction
MS medium + BA (0.1–3 mg/L), TDZ (0.1–3 mg/L) with or without IBA 0.5 mg/L​
Epicotyl explants showed better regeneration rate compared to cotyledon. Epicotyl explant callus treated with 2 mg/L BA and 0.5 mg/L IBA showed high shoot regeneration rate​
None​
None​
[70]​
In vitro regenerated shoots​
Rooting
MS medium + NAA (0.1–1 mg/L), IBA (0.1–1 mg/L)​
IBA (0.1 mg/L) showed highest rooting rate​
None​
Burning was observed in the shoots cultured in media supplemented with NAA hormone​
[70]​
Young leaves​
Young leaves: sterilised using 0.5% NaOCl, 15% (v/v) bleach​
Culture initiation/callus induction
MS medium + IAA (0.09–0.35 mg/L), IBA (0.1–0.41 mg/L), NAA (0.09–0.37 mg/L), 2,4-D (0.11–0.44 mg/L) with 0.22 mg/LTDZ​
Optimum callus growth in 0.09 mg/L NAA + 0.22 mg/L μM TDZ​
Rapid protocol for producing plantlets from young leaf tissue​
The formation and growth of the callus was affected by the type of PGR and concentration applied​
[71]​
In vitro calli​
Shoot induction
MS medium + BAP (0.11–2.25 mg/L), KN (0.12–2.15 mg/L), TDZ (0.11–2.2 mg/L)​
Highest shoot induction and proliferation was observed in 0.11 mg/L TDZ​
None​
None​
[71]​
In vitro regenerated shoots​
Rooting
½ MS medium + IAA (0.09–1.75 mg/L), IBA (0.10–2.03 mg/L), NAA (0.09–1.86 mg/L)​
Shoots rooted best in ½ MS medium with 0.51 mg/L IBA. The presence of IBA resulted in significantly higher rooting percentage (80–96%) than IAA or NAA​
None​
None​
[71]​
Leaves, flowers, 4-day-old seedlings​
Leaves, flowers, and 4-day-old seedlings: washing with detergent, 70% EtOH for 3 min, sterilised distilled water for 10 min, 2% NaClO soak for 20 min​
Culture initiation/callus induction
MS medium + mesoinositol (100 mg/L), thiamine diHCl (10 mg/L), pyridoxine HCl (1 mg/L), nicotinic acid (1 mg/L), 2,4-D (1 mg/L), sucrose (30 g/L) and agar (10 g/L)​
Flowers gave more callus while the leaves had less callus production​
Callus was easily induced in standard medium​
Cannabinoids were not produced in Cannabis cell cultures​
[73]​
In vitro calli​
Suspension cultures
Liquid MS medium after 2 weeks: one part was maintained in the MS medium while the other was maintained in B5 medium (B5 components, 2,4-D 2.0 mg/L, IAA 0.5 mg/L, NAA 0.5 mg/L, K 0.2 mg/L and sucrose 30 g/L)​
Shoots from seedlings produced more callus than the stems and no callus was formed on the roots​
None​
None​
[73,76]​
Immature embryo
hypocotyls, true leaves,
cotyledons and
hypocotyls​
Immature embryo
hypocotyls, true leaves,
cotyledons and
hypocotyls: sterilised using 2% (v/v) NaClO for 25 min followed by 75% (v/v) EtOH for 5 min​
Culture initiation:
MS+ nicotinic acid (1 mg/L) + pyridoxine-HCl (1 mg/L) +
thiamine-HCl (10 mg/L) +
myo-inositol (0.1 g/L) + 3%
sucrose + phytagel (2.5 g/L) + 2,4-D (1 mg/L) + KIN (0.25 mg/L) + casein (100 mg/L)
Hydrolysate regeneration:
1/2 strength MS + 1.5% sucrose + phytagel (3.5 g/L)
+ TDZ (0.5 mg/L) + 6-BA (0.3 mg/L) + NAA (0.2 mg/L) + IAA (0.2 mg/L)
Rooting:
1/2 strength MS + NAA (0.2 mg/L) + IBA (0.5 mg/L) + ZeaRIB (0.01 mg/L)​
Over 20% of the
immature embryo hypocotyls developed embryogenic calli within 5 days. Hypocotyls collected 15 days after anthesis produced more calli than those collected earlier or later​
None​
Genotype dependence of Cannabis​
[83]​
Leaf​
Leaf material from in vitro shoots: no sterilisation mentioned​
Culture initiation/callus induction
MS + TDZ (1.0 μM)
Shoot induction
MS + TDZ (0.5 μM)​
Callus was effectively induced in all 10 genotypes, yet the subsequent transfer of calli to shoot induction medium failed to initiate shoot organogenesis in any of the tested genotypes.
Regeneration of Cannabis from somatic tissues is highly genotype specific​
None​
This method is not suitable for inducing de novo regeneration across different genotypes​
[45]​
BA/BAP—6-benzylaminopurine, EtOH—ethanol, HCl—hydrochloric acid, H2SO4—sulphuric acid, IAA—indole-3-acetic acid, IBA—indole-3-butyric acid, KIN—kinetin, MS—Murashige and Skoog, mT—meta-Topolin, NAA—1-naphthaleneacetic acid, NaCl—sodium chloride, NaOCl—sodium hypochlorite, PGR—plant growth regulator, TDZ—thidiazuron, ZEA—zeatin, and 2,4-D—2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid. * The list in this table may not be completely exhaustive
 

acespicoli

Well-known member
Mentor
Table 3. Ex vitro rooting and acclimatisation of Cannabis sativa *.
Plantlet Growth Stage​
Growth Conditions​
Experimental Outcome​
References​
Direct Organogenesis​
Plantlet (21 days old)​
-Pots with sterilised soil
-Under a plastic cover
-25 ± 1° C (18/6 photoperiod, 60 µmol m−2 s−1)
-Hardened for 2 weeks before transferring to the field​
95% survival rate in the growing chamber
90% survival rate in field conditions
Plantlets maintained ability to synthesise cannabinoids​
[61]​
Spontaneously rooted plantlets​
-Pots (2 L) with fertilised commercial substrate (black peat, granulated peat moss and perlite)
- Regenerants received foliar pulverisation with water
-Small plants were covered with plastic vessels and were progressively exposed to the environmental humidity
- 22 ± 1 °C
- 60% ± 1% relative humidity​
After 1 week of progressive exposition of regenerants to the environmental humidity, the process of acclimatisation ended, and hypocotyl-derived plants displayed a vigorous growth
Hypocotyl derived plants showed sexual functionality 8 weeks after in vitro explant inoculation​
[47]​
Plantlet (age not defined)​
-Kept under controlled environmental conditions in an indoor cultivation facility
-Well rooted plants washed with tap water to remove all traces of medium
-Plants pre-incubated in coco natural growth medium for 10 days before transferring in sterile potting mix-fertilome in large pots
-25–30 °C
-Light, ∼700 µmol m−2 s−1 with 16 h photoperiod
-60% relative humidity​
Plants propagated with mT rooted better when transferred to soil than the shoots produced with TDZ
100% survival rate in acclimatised plants​
[54]​
Plantlet (age not defined)​
-Kept in a greenhouse
-Plantlets with well-developed roots removed from tissue culture vessel and washed under running water
-Propagated in plastic cups containing sterilised organic manure, clay soil and sand (1:1:1)
-22 °C
-Cool white, fluorescent lights (16/8 h photoperiod, 36 µmol m−2 s−1)​
75% of rooted shoots survived after acclimation​
[52]​
Rooted shoots (age not defined)​
-Kept in controlled environmental conditions grown in an indoor cultivation facility
-Rooted shoots were carefully taken out of the medium and washed thoroughly running tap water
-Plantlets were pre-incubated in coco natural growth medium thermocol cups for 10 days
-Cups were covered with polythene bags to maintain humidity and later acclimatised in sterile potting mix-fertilome
-A hot air suction fan was attached with approximately 1 m distance between plants
-16 h photoperiod
-25–30 °C
-60% humidity​
95% survival of rooted plantlets transferred to soil
New growth observed after 2 weeks
Plants reached 14–16 cm in height within 6 weeks of transfer
Plants showed normal development and no gross morphological variation​
[50]​
Plantlets​
-Rooted shoots were carefully taken out of the medium and washed thoroughly in running tap water followed by washings with 0.2% (w/v) Bavistin1 and tap water
-Washed plantlets were transferred to root trainers consisting of 20 cells, each of 200 cm3, filled with perlite and 10 mL water
-Plantlets were transferred to plastic pots filled with vermiculite and plant ash, grown in a shade-house
-After an acclimation period of 2 weeks, the plantlets were able to be transplanted to the field​
95% plants acclimatised
99% plantlet survival for 3 months after field transfer​
[51]​
Plantlets​
-Rooted plantlets were placed in Grodan Gro-Smart Tray Insert (Indoor Growing Canada, Montreal, Canada) in the standard tray with transparent dome (Mondi, BC, Canada) with vents.
-The plants were fertilised using SF vegetative fertiliser solution.
-Rooted plants received photoperiod and
light intensity conditions (150 μmol m−2 s
−1 and 18/6 h light/dark).​
Survival rate above 90%
Up to 2260 rooted plantlets were produced per 10 m2​
[78]​
Indirect Organogenesis
Rooted shoots​
-Cultivated in pots containing equal ratio of perlite and pit moss
-To avoid evaporation, the pots were covered with a transparent cover and placed in growth chambers
-25 °C
-Covers removed after two weeks and plants were transferred into the greenhouse​
70% of the seedlings produced in tissue culture conditions survived and showed normal growth​
[70]​
Plantlets​
-Rooted shoots were carefully taken out of the medium and washed thoroughly in running tap water
-Plantlets were pre-incubated in coco natural growth medium thermocol cups for 10 days
-Growth cups were covered with polythene bags to maintain humidity, kept in a grow room, and later acclimatised in sterile potting mix (fertilome) in large pots
-25 °C​
95% survival rate in indoor grow room​
[71]​
mT—meta-Topolin and TDZ—thidiazuron. * The list in this table may not be completely exhaustive.
 

acespicoli

Well-known member
Mentor
Table 1. In vitro clonal propagation of Cannabis sativa via direct organogenesis *.
If the organogenesis involves the process of cell differentiation directly from meristematic or adventitious (nonmeristematic) cells,
by which plant organs (viz., roots, shoots, bud flowers, stem, etc.) are formed, it is called direct organogenesis.

Table 2. In vitro clonal propagation of Cannabis sativa via indirect organogenesis
The process in which plant organs are derived from a calli mass (tissue formation occurring on a plant wound or at the site of a cut) in the explant is termed indirect organogenesis.

Table 3. Ex vitro rooting and acclimatisation of Cannabis sativa *.
Ex vitro refers to stages in micropropagation that do not take place in vitro

Plants
2021, 10(10), 2078; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10102078

Tables above 🤷‍♂️ make it easy right ?
 

acespicoli

Well-known member
Mentor
Topmost cuttings are generally considered the best for plant propagation because they contain the "apical dominant" growth point, which is the most actively growing part of the plant, leading to faster root development, larger leaves, and a more vigorous new plant compared to cuttings taken from lower sections of the stem; essentially, the top cutting continues growing in the same manner as the original plant did, while mid or bottom cuttings need to activate dormant buds, which takes more time and energy.
 

acespicoli

Well-known member
Mentor
PA short of Amber for a complete PAA is rather lackluster :(
TBC... To Be Continued


recipes
PAA +
PAAG+2

Using acrylamide hydrogel with amber enabled obtaining plant material in a shorter
period of time, accelerated the transition of plants from the juvenile to the reproductive
phase of development, and increased the intensity of growth and development of the main
shoot. The synthesized hydrogel could be used repeatedly after washing, in contrast to
agar.
4. Conclusions
A spatially cross-linked polyacrylamide hydrogel with immobilized amber was synthe-
sized. It was demonstrated that in terms of its physicochemical and rheological properties,
the obtained material is similar to agar-agar and can be used as its substitute for
in vitro
rooting of plants. It was biosafe after four washings. During each wash, all unreacted
toxic monomers and initiator residues were removed from the hydrogel structure; that is, it
was purified effectively. The biosafety of the new hydrogel was confirmed by experiments
performed using both biological objects, such as pea/chickpea seeds and D. magna, and
traditional UV spectroscopic methods. There was no mortality of both legume seeds and D.
magna after the application of water from the 4th washing. The use of the new hydrogel,
instead of agar, stimulated the growth of Cánnabis satíva. For example, the root and stem
weights increased by 167% and 67%, respectively.
The advantages of the developed composite substrate over agar are: (i) a significant
improvement in efficiency for rooting, (ii) the possibility of repeated use, (iii) the amber
particles immobilized in the structure of the hydrogel allow achieving the prolonged release
of bioactive compounds that stimulate plant growth, which is not possible when using an
agar substrate. Therefore, taking into account the above, the described material should be
considered as a novel effective substrate for
in vitro
plant rooting, which can accelerate
reproduction and allow obtaining a higher amount of plant material within a shorter period
of time in comparison with the agar
 
Last edited:

4maggio

Active member
I have twice, successfully, mailed cuttings from California to Florida. <still not legal to grow in FL
I use scissors (not buying 'sterile') to take the the cut, 4" - whatever will fit into a McDonalds straw (used to have the largest inside diameter) but any larger diameter straw will do. Trim the cut down to the just very top.
NO LEAVES. Wrap the cuts' end (not the top nub) with moist paper towel and stuff, paper towel end first, into the straw, seal both ends of the straw.. I used scotch tap.... the key is: Send it USPS, if your in the US, NEXT DAY AIR in bubble wrap envelope (any amount of straws that fit in the envelope). get it home and proceed with any successful cloning procedure one may use, dirt, water, media..
 
Last edited:

acespicoli

Well-known member
Mentor
I have twice, successfully, mailed cuttings from California to Florida. <still not legal to grow in FL
I use scissors (not buying 'sterile') to take the the cut, 4" - whatever will fit into a McDonalds straw (used to have the largest inside diameter) but any larger diameter straw will do. Trim the cut down to the just very top.
NO LEAVES. Wrap the cuts' end (not the top nub) with moist paper towel and stuff, paper towel end first, into the straw, seal both ends of the straw.. I used scotch tap.... the key is: Send it USPS, if your in the US, NEXT DAY AIR in bubble wrap envelope (any amount of straws that fit in the envelope). get it home and proceed with any successful cloning procedure one may use, dirt, water, media..
That's an interesting method, thanks for sharing :huggg:
 

Latest posts

Latest posts

Top