saw that, sad story in there
yup alot of sighting in upstate my uncle friend had sighting last year out on a walk behind his property scared him so much was the first year he didnt go hunting in his 45 yrs of it said the thing was digging through old log looking for grubs. whitehall in the late 70s had good sightings check this vid out got good old clips from down in hudson valley area
well didnt say eating kinda a guess but why else would it be ripping through old dead decaying logs them things are filled with big white grubs packed with protein.
his name was Harry Truman, if I recall rightly
bingo he was the last holdout on spirit lake the first of the 57 to perish
all i ask for is some proofI think people just need to open thier minds a little..... I thought weed helped with that..... what do I know eh?
But to counter a few comments I glossed thru in this thread.
1) Dietary needs of the sasquatch would be too great for a beast like it to survive..... the question I ask to counter that is..... if there isn't enough calories on the land to sustain a sasquatch..... how do bears survive? Assuming a 6 to 9 foot tall humanoid with a muscle mass and conditioning of a wild animal would weigh somewhere in the realms of a medium to large blackbear and probably have a very similar dietary intake being both are no doubt Omnivorous creatures. I think the land could very easily support not only a small number of Sasquatches but probably thousands given the vastness of unpopulated landscape across north america and especially Canada where I live.
2) No signs of dead sasquatches in the forest ie: skeletal remains of a deceased sasquatch from natural causes or other causes. Here is my counter to that..... Across North america range millions of bears, deer, elk and moose and every year thousands of them die by natural causes and while thier carcasses do get found while people are out recreating on the land..... most do not, they are consumed by nature surprisingly fast. On top of that, those millions of elk, moose and deer (all species) have one thing in common that is important to note. They all shed thier antlers every year and grow new ones every spring. So there should be antlers accumulating in the forest at a rate that would make them common discoveries by regular folks out recreating in the wilderness. Again some get found in fact some folks dedicate a lot of time and energy "shed hunting". By and large though these antlers are consumed by nature faster than they can accumulate on the land.
So assuming sasquatch numbers are by far lower than deer/moose/elk numbers and even bears , not finding skeletal remains doesn't surprise me one bit.
I do feel the same..... desiring real scientific proof.
there's a number of view points out there, I'm looking at these sightings as paranormal
I worked as a park Interpreter at Sasquatch Provincial Park, in the Harrison Lake area I did a program on sasquatch, it only made sense. The Ruby Creek encounter 1941 was very famous in it's time. I did an interview with a fellow named John Green who had amassed an incredible database concerning sasquatch.
i appreciate you sharing your story man
