gaiusmarius....
I agree with you to a certain degree regarding what happened on 9/11. Some significant weird and unexpected shit happened that day, and there are historical accounts of "false flag" operations that attest to the possibility that what happened on 9/11 is not what has been reported in the main stream media. I'm not as convinced as you are, but I have an open mind to challenging the government's version of events.
But, I have a question for you. I've only seen you posting on one "conspiracy theory" (9/11) so far in this thread. How do you feel generally about the whole "conspiracy theory" field...there are literally hundreds of 'em out there. Do you think all of these are legit? My guess would be that you don't, and if not, how do you separate the legit theories from the unsupportable theories?
I see many people in this thread basically defending just about any conspiracy theory out there, and making statements that are much more likely based in paranoia than evidence. I mean, even "evidence" itself is being questioned. If you can't agree on what solid evidence is, well then where the hell are we now? Crazy land is my guess.
you're guessing while we provide evidence contrary to your beliefs and you say 'they must be crazy'.
how to separate the legit theories from unsupportable? due diligence my friend. we don't just come along singing cumbiyah this or that is true without trusting our intellect. that would be short sighted.
yet you have no evidence to disprove anything presented other than your 'opinion', period.
you think you are right? present something to convince us. simple as that.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jHm0XhtDyZA
[youtubeif]jHm0XhtDyZA[/youtubeif]
uh, please refrain from saying anyone that disagrees (with you) is mentally off or 'crazy' that makes it difficult for people interested to participate.
mmmmmmk?
experts evidence.
[youtubeif]yswMOB8_IAM[/youtubeif]
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yswMOB8_IAM
Last edited: