I'll be interested to see how it works out for you. I've had excellent luck with the RO - it suits my water very well.
I think that there is a bit of a compromise at the end due to the one-part nature of V+B. Since there is no way to reduce the N, you can either leave a little growth on the table by starting the flush a little earlier than you otherwise could, or not have it flushed the way you like as a result of keeping the feed rate up longer in order to optimize the growth. For me, there isn't enough difference to worry about so I take the route of possibly losing a little weight. There are always ramifications from our choices, but for me the convenience of V+B outweighs the potential gain from being able to tailor various levels within the nutrient mix along the way.
you guys.... up the pH at the end of flower
N becomes less available at a higher ph, in coco i am doing 6.3-6.5pH for the last 2-3 weeks. at the begining of flower i am down around 5.8-6.
Exactly!
In the wild N is not reduced in flowering. The plant gets what it needs naturally right? Just a thought.
TR
you guys.... up the pH at the end of flower
N becomes less available at a higher ph, in coco i am doing 6.3-6.5pH for the last 2-3 weeks. at the begining of flower i am down around 5.8-6.
i run 3/3rd V+B for first 4 weeks - pH 5.8-6.0
then 2/3rd V+B & 1/3rd MOAB - week 5 - ph 6.3
then 1/3rd V+B and 2/3rd MOAB - week 6 - ph 6.5
then 3/3rd MOAB - week 7 -
week 8,9,10 tap water at 6.5 pH
not a lot at all, my heaviest feeding indica doms never get more than 1.4EC
who didnt grow anything that could be considered fast flowering
none of them 'yellow out' from a day of plain water(to me this says the solution is 'more complete' in proper feeding ratios)