i have to keep my 400 3-5ft up, or else the plants cant handle it. and when i say ''cant handle it'', not that it fries them from being too hot, rather they leaves completely fold downward, as if retreating from the source. i easily cover 4x4 area 400 and 7x7 with the 1000w.
BlindDate said:That is the dumbest thing I have ever read. 49 square feet and only 1000 watts???
I just remembered the digital ballast I have is 240v only, and my power meter is 120v only. So I can't test the power input and the light output between digital and coil until I get a 120v digital. I guess I can still test the light output, I may give that a shot sometime soon.
BlindDate said:Pirate...That type of test would not mean anything. A lower output bulb may in fact put out a more favorable spectrum (PAR). This is why I am waiting for a serious grower to do a side by side with a CMH bulb. Problem is, until they make a CMH in a 600 watt no serious grower is going to bother.
Could have been attributed to different things during my 400w grow days, but I'm pretty sold on the Hortilux Super HPS vs. a generic $20 HPS.Pirate said:Can anyone confirm.........from experience, that a high dollar EYE Hortilux lamp (lets say 600 watt HPS) is any better than a Cheapo budget 600 watt lamp?
ItsGrowTime said:Because of this thread I picked up a Super Sun 2 reflector for my new Galaxy 600w. Looks like a solid reflector. Thanks to all for their efforts on this thread.
To the above poster, there is absolutely no doubt in my mind that the more expensive horticulture bulbs (Hortilux, SolarMax, etc) are worth the extra cost. Ive seen the results on 600w digis and the difference is clear. Don't skimp on bulbs! The only cheaper bulb ($35) Im considering trying is the HidHut brand Super HPS. Ive heard good things about it and the spectrum seems very close to Hortilux but with a few more lumens.